Conflict markers carry an extra annotation of the form
REF-OR-COMMIT:FILENAME
to help distinguish where the content is coming from, with the :FILENAME
piece being left off if it is the same for both sides of history (thus
only renames with content conflicts carry that part of the annotation).
However, there were cases where the :FILENAME annotation was
accidentally left off, due to merge-recursive's
every-codepath-needs-a-copy-of-all-special-case-code format.
Update a few tests to have the correct :FILENAME extension on relevant
paths with the ort backend, while leaving the expectation for
merge-recursive the same to avoid destabilizing it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a file is renamed and has content conflicts, merge-recursive does
not have some stages for the old filename and some stages for the new
filename in the index; instead it copies all the stages corresponding to
the old filename over to the corresponding locations for the new
filename, so that there are three higher order stages all corresponding
to the new filename. Doing things this way makes it easier for the user
to access the different versions and to resolve the conflict (no need to
manually 'git rm' the old version as well as 'git add' the new one).
rename/deletes should be handled similarly -- there should be two stages
for the renamed file rather than just one. We do not want to
destabilize merge-recursive right now, so instead update relevant tests
to have different expectations depending on whether the "recursive" or
"ort" merge strategies are in use.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When files are renamed and modified, we need to do three-way content
merges to get the appropriate content in the right location. When we
have a rename/rename(1to2) conflict (both sides rename the same file,
but differently), that merged content should be placed in each of the
two resulting files. merge-recursive handled that fine when that was
all that was involved, but when one or more of the two resulting files
were ALSO involved in a directory/file conflict, it failed to propagate
the merged content to that file. Unfortunately, the one test in t6416
that touched on this combination of cases had been coded to not expect
the merged contents to be present.
Fix the test to check for the right behavior, and record how the
different merge backends will be expected to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive.c is built on the idea of running unpack_trees() and
then "doing minor touch-ups" to get the result. Unfortunately,
unpack_trees() was run in an update-as-it-goes mode, leading
merge-recursive.c to follow suit and end up with an immediate evaluation
and fix-it-up-as-you-go design. Some things like directory/file
conflicts are not well representable in the index data structure, and
required special extra code to handle. But then when it was discovered
that rename/delete conflicts could also be involved in directory/file
conflicts, the special directory/file conflict handling code had to be
copied to the rename/delete codepath. ...and then it had to be copied
for modify/delete, and for rename/rename(1to2) conflicts, ...and yet it
still missed some. Further, when it was discovered that there were also
file/submodule conflicts and submodule/directory conflicts, we needed to
copy the special submodule handling code to all the special cases
throughout the codebase.
And then it was discovered that our handling of directory/file conflicts
was suboptimal because it would create untracked files to store the
contents of the conflicting file, which would not be cleaned up if
someone were to run a 'git merge --abort' or 'git rebase --abort'. It
was also difficult or scary to try to add or remove the index entries
corresponding to these files given the directory/file conflict in the
index. But changing merge-recursive.c to handle these correctly was a
royal pain because there were so many sites in the code with similar but
not identical code for handling directory/file/submodule conflicts that
would all need to be updated.
I have worked hard to push all directory/file/submodule conflict
handling in merge-ort through a single codepath, and avoid creating
untracked files for storing tracked content (it does record things at
alternate paths, but makes sure they have higher-order stages in the
index).
Since updating merge-recursive is too much work and we don't want to
destabilize it, instead update the testsuite to have different
expectations for relevant directory/file/submodule conflict tests.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are a number of tests that the "recursive" backend does not handle
correctly but which the redesign in "ort" will. Add a new helper in
lib-merge.sh for selecting a different test expectation based on the
setting of GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM, and use it in various testcases to
document which ones we expect to fail under recursive but pass under
ort.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For the --committer-date-is-author-date option of git-am and git-rebase,
we format the committer ident, then re-parse it to find the name and
email, and then feed those back to fmt_ident().
We can simplify this by handling it all at the time of the fmt_ident()
call. We pass in the appropriate getenv() results, and if they're not
present, then our WANT_COMMITTER_IDENT flag tells fmt_ident() to fill in
the appropriate value from the config. Which is exactly what
git_committer_ident() was doing under the hood.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to the trivial search-and-replace, there are three
non-trivial adjustments necessary.
Mark the respective test cases with the transitional prereq and make
those non-trivial adjustments early, to make this change easier to
review.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some tests, the default branch name is part of aligned output. As we
want to change the default branch name to `main`, which is two
characters shorter than the old default branch name, we will have to
adjust those tests.
Since we use the original default branch name until the entire test
suite has been adjusted accordingly, the touched test cases need to be
guarded by a prereq (that is so far disabled so that they are skipped
for now).
The test cases that depend on those test cases that are newly guarded by
that prereq naturally have to be guarded, too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We need to adjust a test that uses a prefix of the default branch name,
to accommodate for `main` being used soon.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the test case adjusted by this patch, we want to cut just after the
longest shown ref name. Since `main` is shorter than `master`, we need
to decrease the number of characters. Since `topic` is shown, too, and
since that is only one character shorter than `master`, we decrement the
length by one instead of two.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We want to rename the default branch name used by `git init` in the near
future, using `main` as the new name.
In preparation for that, we adjust a test case that wants to rename the
default branch to a different name that however has the same length. We
use `none` as that name because it matches the length of `main`.
As this test case cannot possibly pass until the default branch name is
_actually_ changed, we temporarily guard it behind a special-purpose
prereq, until the test suite is fully converted to use that new default
branch name.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation to running t6200 with the default branch name set to
"main", let's adjust the only non-trivial aspect thereof. The rest will
be done via a trivial `sed` invocation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To allow for an incremental conversion to a new default main branch
name, let's introduce `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_MAIN_BRANCH_NAME`. This
environment variable can be set at the top of each converted test
script, overriding the default main branch name to use when initializing
new repositories (or cloning empty repositories).
Note: the `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_MAIN_BRANCH_NAME` is _not_ intended to be
used manually; many tests require a specific main branch name and cannot
simply work with another one. This `GIT_TEST_*` variable is meant purely
for the transitional period while the entire test suite is converted to
use `main` as the initial branch name by default.
We also introduce the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq that determines
whether the default main branch name is `main`, and adjust a couple of
test functions to use it. This prereq will be used to temporarily
disable a couple test cases to allow for adjusting the test script
incrementally. Once an entire test is adjusted, we will adjust the test
so that it is run with `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_MAIN_BRANCH_NAME=main`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Seeing as we want to use `main` as the new default branch name used by
`git init`, and that `main` is used as directory name in t9801, let's
tighten the rev-list arguments to make it explicit when we are referring
to a ref instead of a directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for changing the default branch name to `main`, let's
skip the suffix "into main" in merge commit messages, the same way that
"into master" has been skipped by default.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 7573cec52c (rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-date,
2020-08-17) copied the committer ident-parsing code from builtin/am.c.
And in doing so, it copied a bug in which we always set the email to an
empty string. We fixed the version in git-am in the previous commit;
this commit fixes the copied code.
Reported-by: VenomVendor <info@venomvendor.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit e8cbe2118a (am: stop exporting GIT_COMMITTER_DATE, 2020-08-17)
rewrote the code for setting the committer date to use fmt_ident(),
rather than setting an environment variable and letting commit_tree()
handle it. But it introduced two bugs:
- we use the author email string instead of the committer email
- when parsing the committer ident, we used the wrong variable to
compute the length of the email, resulting in it always being a
zero-length string
This commit fixes both, which causes our test of this option via the
rebase "apply" backend to now succeed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After running "rebase --committer-date-is-author-date", we confirm that
the committer date is the same as the author date. However, we don't
look at any other parts of the committer ident line to make sure we
didn't screw them up. And indeed, there are a few bugs here. Depending
on the rebase backend in use, we may accidentally use the author email
instead of the committer's, or even an empty string.
Let's teach our test_ctime_is_atime helper to check the committer name
and email, which reveals several failing tests.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
That way we can notice if there is a breakage/bug in the parts of
the test that prepare the expected outcome, which is how modern
tests are arranged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Modern practice is to avoid multiple commands per line,
and instead place each command on its own line.
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
According to Documentation/CodingGuidelines, redirect
operator is written with space before, but no space
after them.
Let's remove these whitespaces after redirect operators.
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Support POSIX, bashism and mixed function declarations, all four
compound command types, trailing comments and mixed whitespace.
Even though Bash allows locale-dependent characters in function names
<https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/245336/3645>, only detect function
names with characters allowed by POSIX.1-2017
<https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap03.html#tag_03_235>
for simplicity. This should cover the vast majority of use cases, and
produces system-agnostic results.
Since a word pattern has to be specified, but there is no easy way to
know the default word pattern, use the default `IFS` characters for a
starter. A later patch can improve this.
Signed-off-by: Victor Engmark <victor@engmark.name>
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We set "use warnings" in most of our perl code to catch problems. But as
the name implies, warnings just emit a message to stderr and don't
otherwise affect the program. So our tests are quite likely to miss that
warnings are being spewed, as most of them do not look at stderr.
We could ask perl to make all warnings fatal, but this is likely
annoying for non-developers, who would rather have a running program
with a warning than something that refuses to work at all.
So instead, let's teach the perl code to respect an environment variable
(GIT_PERL_FATAL_WARNINGS) to increase the severity of the warnings. This
can be set for day-to-day running if people want to be really pedantic,
but the primary use is to trigger it within the test suite.
We could also trigger that for every test run, but likewise even the
tests failing may be annoying to distro builders, etc (just as -Werror
would be for compiling C code). So we'll tie it to a special test-mode
variable (GIT_TEST_PERL_FATAL_WARNINGS) that can be set in the
environment or as a Makefile knob, and we'll automatically turn the knob
when DEVELOPER=1 is set. That should give developers and CI the more
careful view without disrupting normal users or packagers.
Note that the mapping from the GIT_TEST_* form to the GIT_* form in
test-lib.sh is necessary even if they had the same name: the perl
scripts need it to be normalized to a perl truth value, and we also have
to make sure it's exported (we might have gotten it from the
environment, but we might also have gotten it from GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
directly).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 0512eabd91 ("sequencer: stop abbreviating stopped-sha file",
2020-09-25), Git was taught both to write full object names to the
stopped-sha file and to require full object names when reading. However,
a user would experience a problem if they started an interactive rebase
using an old version of Git and then continued with a current version of
Git (for example, if the system version of Git was updated in the
meantime).
Teach Git to allow object names of any length when reading.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit 9ab33150a0 ("perl: create and switch variables for hash
constants", 2020-06-22) converted each instance of the variable
$sha1_short into $oid_short in the Subversion code, since git-svn now
understands SHA-256. However, one conversion was missed.
As a result, Perl complains about the use of this variable:
Use of uninitialized value $sha1_short in regexp compilation at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.30.3/Git/SVN/Log.pm line 301, <$fh>
line 6.
Because we're parsing raw diff output here, the likelihood is very low
that we'll actually misparse the data, since the only lines we're going
to get starting with colons are the ones we're expecting. Even if we
had a newline in a path, we'd end up with a quoted path. Our regex is
just less strict than we'd like it to be.
However, it's obviously undesirable that our code is emitting Perl
warnings, so let's convert it to use the proper variable name.
Reported-by: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The idea of the `SKIP_DASHED_BUILT_INS` option is to stop hard-linking
the built-in commands as separate executables. The patches to do that
specifically excluded the three commands `receive-pack`,
`upload-archive` and `upload-pack`, though: these commands are expected
to be present in the `PATH` in their dashed form on the server side of
any fetch/push.
However, due to an oversight by myself, even if those commands were
still hard-linked, they were not installed into `bin/`.
Noticed-by: Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 2b6ad0f4bc ("rebase --rebase-merges: add support for octopus
merges", 2017-12-21) introduced a case where rollback_lock_file() was
unconditionally called twice in a row with no intervening commands.
Remove the duplicate.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Modernize the test by replacing `test -e` instances with
`test_path_is_file` helper functions, and `! test -e` with
`test_path_is_missing`, for better readability and diagnostic messages.
Signed-off-by: Joey Salazar <jgsal@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A patch changing a symlink into a file is written with 2 sections (in
the code, represented as "struct patch"): firstly, the deletion of the
symlink, and secondly, the creation of the file. When applying that
patch with -R, the sections are reversed, so we get:
(1) creation of a symlink, then
(2) deletion of a file.
This causes an issue when the "deletion of a file" section is checked,
because Git observes that the so-called file is not a file but a
symlink, resulting in a "wrong type" error message.
What we want is:
(1) deletion of a file, then
(2) creation of a symlink.
In the code, this is reflected in the behavior of previous_patch() when
invoked from check_preimage() when the deletion is checked. Creation
then deletion means that when the deletion is checked, previous_patch()
returns the creation section, triggering a mode conflict resulting in
the "wrong type" error message. But deletion then creation means that
when the deletion is checked, previous_patch() returns NULL, so the
deletion mode is checked against lstat, which is what we want.
There are also other ways a patch can contain 2 sections referencing the
same file, for example, in 7a07841c0b ("git-apply: handle a patch that
touches the same path more than once better", 2008-06-27). "git apply
-R" fails in the same way, and this commit makes this case succeed.
Therefore, when building the list of sections, build them in reverse
order (by adding to the front of the list instead of the back) when -R
is passed.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was pretty tricky to verify that incomplete sideband messages are
handled correctly by the `recv_sideband()`/`demultiplex_sideband()`
code: they have to be flushed out at the end of the loop in
`recv_sideband()`, but the actual flushing is done by the
`demultiplex_sideband()` function (which therefore has to know somehow
that the loop will be done after it returns).
To catch future bugs where incomplete sideband messages might not be
shown by mistake, let's catch that condition and report a bug.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 2b695ecd74 (t5500: count objects through stderr, not trace,
2020-05-06) we tried to ensure that the "Total 3" message could be
grepped in Git's output, even if it sometimes got chopped up into
multiple lines in the trace machinery.
However, the first instance where this mattered now goes through the
sideband machinery, where it is _still_ possible for messages to get
chopped up: it *is* possible for the standard error stream to be sent
byte-for-byte and hence it can be easily interrupted. Meaning: it is
possible for the single line that we're looking for to be chopped up
into multiple sideband packets, with a primary packet being delivered
between them.
This seems to happen occasionally in the `vs-test` part of our CI
builds, i.e. with binaries built using Visual C, but not when building
with GCC or clang; The symptom is that t5500.43 fails to find a line
matching `remote: Total 3` in the `log` file, which ends in something
along these lines:
remote: Tota
remote: l 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
This should not happen, though: we have code in `demultiplex_sideband()`
_specifically_ to stitch back together lines that were delivered in
separate sideband packets.
However, this stitching was broken in a subtle way in fbd76cd450
(sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16): before that
change, incomplete sideband lines would not be flushed upon receiving a
primary packet, but after that patch, they would be.
The subtleness of this bug comes from the fact that it is easy to get
confused by the ambiguous meaning of the `break` keyword: after writing
the primary packet contents, the `break;` in the original version of
`recv_sideband()` does _not_ break out of the `while` loop, but instead
only ends the `switch` case:
while (!retval) {
[...]
switch (band) {
[...]
case 1:
/* Write the contents of the primary packet */
write_or_die(out, buf + 1, len);
/* Here, we do *not* break out of the loop, `retval` is unchanged */
break;
[...]
}
if (outbuf.len) {
/* Write any remaining sideband messages lacking a trailing LF */
strbuf_addch(&outbuf, '\n');
xwrite(2, outbuf.buf, outbuf.len);
}
In contrast, after fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on
pkt-line, 2019-01-16), the body of the `while` loop was extracted into
`demultiplex_sideband()`, crucially _including_ the logic to write
incomplete sideband messages:
switch (band) {
[...]
case 1:
*sideband_type = SIDEBAND_PRIMARY;
/* This does not break out of the loop: the loop is in the caller */
break;
[...]
}
cleanup:
[...]
/* This logic is now no longer _outside_ the loop but _inside_ */
if (scratch->len) {
strbuf_addch(scratch, '\n');
xwrite(2, scratch->buf, scratch->len);
}
The correct way to fix this is to return from `demultiplex_sideband()`
early. The caller will then write out the contents of the primary packet
and continue looping. The `scratch` buffer for incomplete sideband
messages is owned by that caller, and will continue to accumulate the
remainder(s) of those messages. The loop will only end once
`demultiplex_sideband()` returned non-zero _and_ did not indicate a
primary packet, which is the case only when we hit the `cleanup:` path,
in which we take care of flushing any unfinished sideband messages and
release the `scratch` buffer.
To ensure that this does not get broken again, we introduce a pair of
subcommands of the `pkt-line` test helper that specifically chop up the
sideband message and squeeze a primary packet into the middle.
Final note: The other test case touched by 2b695ecd74 (t5500: count
objects through stderr, not trace, 2020-05-06) is not affected by this
issue because the sideband machinery is not involved there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t7102 and t7201 still follow the old style of having blank
lines around test body, which is not consistence with our
current practice.
Let's remove those unnecessary blank lines.
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some tests in these scripts are formatted using a very old style:
test_expect_success \
'title' \
'body line 1 &&
body line 2'
Updating the formatting to the modern style:
test_expect_success 'title' '
body line 1 &&
body line 2
'
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new diff option that enables ignoring changes whose all lines
(changed, removed, and added) match a given regular expression. This is
similar to the -I/--ignore-matching-lines option in standalone diff
utilities and can be used e.g. to ignore changes which only affect code
comments or to look for unrelated changes in commits containing a large
number of automatically applied modifications (e.g. a tree-wide string
replacement). The difference between -G/-S and the new -I option is
that the latter filters output on a per-change basis.
Use the 'ignore' field of xdchange_t for marking a change as ignored or
not. Since the same field is used by --ignore-blank-lines, identical
hunk emitting rules apply for --ignore-blank-lines and -I. These two
options can also be used together in the same git invocation (they are
complementary to each other).
Rename xdl_mark_ignorable() to xdl_mark_ignorable_lines(), to indicate
that it is logically a "sibling" of xdl_mark_ignorable_regex() rather
than its "parent".
Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <michal@isc.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
xpparam_t structures are usually zero-initialized before their specific
fields are assigned to, but there are three locations in the tree where
that does not happen. Add the missing memset() calls in order to make
initialization of xpparam_t structures consistent tree-wide and to
prevent stack garbage from being used as field values.
Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <michal@isc.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Much of the benchmark code is redundant. This is
easier to understand and edit.
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Perf tests have not been linted for some time.
They've grown some seq instead of test_seq. This
runs the existing lints on the perf tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Results for the git-diff fsmonitor optimization
in patch in the parent-rev (using a 400k file repo to test)
As you can see here - git diff with fsmonitor running is
significantly better with this patch series (80% faster on my
workload)!
GIT_PERF_LARGE_REPO=~/src/server ./run v2.29.0-rc1 . -- p7519-fsmonitor.sh
Test v2.29.0-rc1 this tree
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7519.2: status (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.46(0.82+0.64) 1.47(0.83+0.62) +0.7%
7519.3: status -uno (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.16(0.12+0.04) 0.17(0.12+0.05) +6.3%
7519.4: status -uall (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.36(0.73+0.62) 1.37(0.76+0.60) +0.7%
7519.5: diff (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.85(0.22+0.63) 0.14(0.10+0.05) -83.5%
7519.6: diff -- 0_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.08+0.05) 0.13(0.11+0.02) +8.3%
7519.7: diff -- 10_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.08+0.04) 0.13(0.09+0.04) +8.3%
7519.8: diff -- 100_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.07+0.05) 0.13(0.07+0.06) +8.3%
7519.9: diff -- 1000_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.12(0.09+0.04) 0.13(0.08+0.05) +8.3%
7519.10: diff -- 10000_files (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.14(0.09+0.05) 0.13(0.10+0.03) -7.1%
7519.12: status (fsmonitor=) 1.67(0.93+1.49) 1.67(0.99+1.42) +0.0%
7519.13: status -uno (fsmonitor=) 0.37(0.30+0.82) 0.37(0.33+0.79) +0.0%
7519.14: status -uall (fsmonitor=) 1.58(0.97+1.35) 1.57(0.86+1.45) -0.6%
7519.15: diff (fsmonitor=) 0.34(0.28+0.83) 0.34(0.27+0.83) +0.0%
7519.16: diff -- 0_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.06+0.04) 0.09(0.08+0.02) +0.0%
7519.17: diff -- 10_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.07+0.03) 0.09(0.06+0.05) +0.0%
7519.18: diff -- 100_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.06+0.04) 0.09(0.06+0.04) +0.0%
7519.19: diff -- 1000_files (fsmonitor=) 0.09(0.06+0.04) 0.09(0.05+0.05) +0.0%
7519.20: diff -- 10000_files (fsmonitor=) 0.10(0.08+0.04) 0.10(0.06+0.05) +0.0%
I also added a benchmark for a tiny git diff workload w/ a pathspec.
I see an approximately .02 second overhead added w/ and w/o fsmonitor
From looking at these results, I suspected that refresh_fsmonitor
is already happening during git diff - independent of this patch
series' optimization. Confirmed that suspicion by breaking on
refresh_fsmonitor.
(gdb) bt [simplified]
0 refresh_fsmonitor at fsmonitor.c:176
1 ie_match_stat at read-cache.c:375
2 match_stat_with_submodule at diff-lib.c:237
4 builtin_diff_files at builtin/diff.c:260
5 cmd_diff at builtin/diff.c:541
6 run_builtin at git.c:450
7 handle_builtin at git.c:700
8 run_argv at git.c:767
9 cmd_main at git.c:898
10 main at common-main.c:52
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The first git status would be inflated due to warming of
filesystem cache. This makes the results comparable.
Before
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7519.2: status (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 2.52(1.59+1.56)
7519.3: status -uno (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.18(0.12+0.06)
7519.4: status -uall (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.36(0.73+0.62)
7519.7: status (fsmonitor=) 0.69(0.52+0.90)
7519.8: status -uno (fsmonitor=) 0.37(0.28+0.81)
7519.9: status -uall (fsmonitor=) 1.53(0.93+1.32)
After
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7519.2: status (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.39(0.33+0.06)
7519.3: status -uno (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 0.17(0.13+0.05)
7519.4: status -uall (fsmonitor=.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman) 1.34(0.77+0.56)
7519.7: status (fsmonitor=) 0.70(0.53+0.90)
7519.8: status -uno (fsmonitor=) 0.37(0.32+0.78)
7519.9: status -uall (fsmonitor=) 1.55(1.01+1.25)
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With fsmonitor enabled, the first call to match_stat_with_submodule
calls refresh_fsmonitor, incurring the overhead of reading the list of
updated files -- but run_diff_files does not respect the
CE_FSMONITOR_VALID flag.
Make use of the fsmonitor extension to skip lstat() calls on files
that fsmonitor judged as unmodified.
Notably, this change improves performance of the git shell prompt when
GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE is set.
Signed-off-by: Alex Vandiver <alexmv@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The name of the tool is 'git-filter-repo' not
'git-repo-filter'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit d572f52a64c6a69990f72ad6a09504b9b615d2e4; the
idea to detect that "test_cmp expect actual" was fed a misspelt
filename meant well, but when the version of Git tested exhibits a
bug, the reason why these two files do not match may be because one
of them did not get created as expected, in which case missing file
is not a sign of misspelt filename but is a genuine test failure.
Acked-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ted reported an old typo in the git-commit.txt and merge-options.txt.
Namely, the phrase "Signed-off-by line" was used without either a
definite nor indefinite article.
Upon examination, it seems that the documentation (including items in
Documentation/, but also option help strings) have been quite
inconsistent on usage when referring to `Signed-off-by`.
First, very few places used a definite or indefinite article with the
phrase "Signed-off-by line", but that was the initial typo that led
to this investigation. So, normalize using either an indefinite or
definite article consistently.
The original phrasing, in Commit 3f971fc425 (Documentation updates,
2005-08-14), is "Add Signed-off-by line". Commit 6f855371a5 (Add
--signoff, --check, and long option-names. 2005-12-09) switched to
using "Add `Signed-off-by:` line", but didn't normalize the former
commit to match. Later commits seem to have cut and pasted from one
or the other, which is likely how the usage became so inconsistent.
Junio stated on the git mailing list in
<xmqqy2k1dfoh.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> a preference to leave off
the colon. Thus, prefer `Signed-off-by` (with backticks) for the
documentation files and Signed-off-by (without backticks) for option
help strings.
Additionally, Junio argued that "trailer" is now the standard term to
refer to `Signed-off-by`, saying that "becomes plenty clear that we
are not talking about any random line in the log message". As such,
prefer "trailer" over "line" anywhere the former word fits.
However, leave alone those few places in documentation that use
Signed-off-by to refer to the process (rather than the specific
trailer), or in places where mail headers are generally discussed in
comparison with Signed-off-by.
Reported-by: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description on sign-off and DCO was written back in the days
where there was only a choice between "use sign-off and it means the
contributor agrees to the Linux-kernel style DCO" and "not using
sign-off at all will make your patch unusable". These days, we are
trying to clarify that the exact meaning of a sign-off varies
project to project.
Let's be more explicit when presenting what _our_ rules are. It is
of secondary importance that it originally came from the kernel
project, so move the description as a historical note at the end,
while cautioning that what a sign-off means to us may be different from
what it means to other projects contributors may have been used to.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
