The builtin/notes.c::copy() function is prepared to handle either
one or two arguments given from the command line; when one argument
is given, to-obj defaults to HEAD.
bbb1b8a3 ("notes: check number of parameters to "git notes copy"",
2010-06-28) tried to make sure "git notes copy" (with *no* other
argument) does not dereference NULL by checking the number of
parameters, but it incorrectly insisted that we need two arguments,
instead of either one or two. This disabled the defaulting to-obj
to HEAD.
Correct it.
Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit bbb1b8a35a ("notes: check number of parameters to "git notes
copy"", 2010-06-28) added a test for too many or too few of
parameters provided to `git notes copy'.
However, the test only ensures that the command will fail but it
doesn't really check if it fails because of number of parameters.
If we accidentally lifted the check inside our code base, the test
may still have failed because the provided parameter is not a valid
ref.
Correct it.
Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adjust the test so that it computes variables for object IDs instead of
using hard-coded hashes. Move some invocations of test_commit around so
that we can compute the object IDs for these commits.
Compute several object IDs in the tests instead of using hard-coded
values so that the test works with any hash algorithm. Since the actual
values are sorted by the object ID of the object being annotated, sort
the expected values accordingly as well.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 6956f858f6 (notes: implement helpers needed for note copying during
rewrite, 2010-03-12), we introduced a test case that verifies that the
config setting `notes.rewriteRef` can be overridden via the environment
variable `GIT_NOTES_REWRITE_REF`.
Back when it was introduced, it relied on a side effect of an earlier
test case that configured `core.noteRef` to point to `refs/notes/other`.
In 908a320363 (t3301: modernize style, 2014-11-12), this side effect was
removed.
The test case *still* passed, but for the wrong reason: we no longer
overrode the rewrite ref, but there simply was nothing to rewrite
anymore, as the overridden notes ref was "modernized" away.
Let's let that test case pass for the correct reason again.
To make sure of that, let's change the idea of the original test case:
it configured `notes.rewriteRef` to point to the actual notes ref,
forced that to be ignored and then verified that the notes were *not*
rewritten.
By turning that idea upside down (configure the `notes.rewriteRef` to
another notes ref, override it via the environment variable to force the
notes to be copied, and then verify that the notes *were* rewritten), we
make it much harder for that test case to pass for the wrong reason.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test fixes.
* sg/test-must-be-empty:
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>'
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp /dev/null <out>'
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test ! -s'
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of '! test -s'
Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than
>empty &&
test_cmp empty out
as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the
expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty',
and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used
for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty
files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500
lines later).
These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the
test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted
manually.
Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases
where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files:
- Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but
'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce
the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the
test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new
submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'.
- Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results
and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper
function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output.
- For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success'
block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'.
- Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update
(-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
init_notes() is the main point of entry to the notes API. It ensures
that the input can be used as ref, because it needs a ref to update to
store notes tree after modifying it.
There however are many use cases where notes tree is only read, e.g.
"git log --notes=...". Any notes-shaped treeish could be used for such
purpose, but it is not allowed due to existing restriction.
Allow treeish expressions to be used in the case the notes tree is going
to be used without write "permissions". Add a flag to distinguish
whether the notes tree is intended to be used read-only, or will be
updated.
With this change, operations that use notes read-only can be fed any
notes-shaped tree-ish can be used, e.g. git log --notes=notes@{1}.
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
expand_notes_ref is used by --ref from git-notes(1) and --notes from the
git log to find the full refname of a notes reference. Previously the
documentation of these options was not clear about what sorts of
expansions would be performed. Fix the documentation to clearly and
accurately describe the behavior of the expansions.
Add a test for this expansion when using git notes get-ref in order to
prevent future patches from changing this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 908a320363 introduced indentation
to here documents in t3301.sh. However in one place <<-EOF was missing
-, which broke this test when run with mksh-50d. This commit fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make this test script appear somewhat less old-fashioned:
- Use test helper functions:
- write_script
- test_commit
- test_write_lines
- test_line_count
- test_config
- test_unconfig
- test_path_is_missing
- Remove whitespace between redirection operators and their targets.
- Move preparation of "expect" files into tests.
- Rename "output" files to "actual".
- More consistent quoting, especially around commands that might
expand to nothing.
- More visibility of important whitespace with ${indent}.
- Combine pairs of tests that unnecessarily split setup and verification.
Improved-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Improved-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Improved-by: Michael Blume <blume.mike@gmail.com>
Improved-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user has gone through the trouble of explicitly adding an empty
note, then "git log" should not silently skip it (as if it didn't exist).
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Although the "git notes" man page advertises that we support binary-safe
notes addition (using the -C option), we currently do not support adding
the empty note (i.e. using the empty blob to annotate an object). Instead,
an empty note is always treated as an intent to remove the note
altogether.
Introduce the --allow-empty option to the add/append/edit subcommands,
to explicitly allow an empty note to be stored into the notes tree.
Also update the documentation, and add test cases for the new option.
Reported-by: James H. Fisher <jhf@trifork.com>
Improved-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Improved-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add test cases documenting the current behavior when trying to
add/append/edit empty notes. This is in preparation for adding
--allow-empty; to allow empty notes to be stored.
Improved-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Improved-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ordinarily, we would say "VAR=VAL command" to execute a tested
command with environment variable(s) set only for that command.
This however does not work if 'command' is a shell function (most
notably 'test_must_fail'); the result of the assignment is retained
and affects later commands.
To avoid this, we used to assign and export environment variables
and run such a test in a subshell, like so:
(
VAR=VAL && export VAR &&
test_must_fail git command to be tested
)
But with "env" utility, we should be able to say:
test_must_fail env VAR=VAL git command to be tested
which is much shorter and easier to read.
Signed-off-by: David Tran <unsignedzero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently "git notes add -C $object" will read the raw bytes from $object,
and then copy those bytes into the note object, which is hardcoded to be
of type blob. This means that if the given $object is a non-blob (e.g.
tree or commit), the raw bytes from that object is copied into a blob
object. This is probably not useful, and certainly not what any sane
user would expect. So disallow it, by erroring out if the $object passed
to the -C option is not a blob.
The fix also applies to the -c option (in which the user is prompted to
edit/verify the note contents in a text editor), and also when -c/-C is
passed to "git notes append" (which appends the $object contents to an
existing note object). In both cases, passing a non-blob $object does not
make sense.
Also add a couple of tests demonstrating expected behavior.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach the command to read object names to remove from the standard
input, in addition to the object names given from the command line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Depending on the application, it is not necessarily an error for an object
to lack a note, especially if the only thing the caller wants to make sure
is that notes are cleared for an object. By passing this option from the
command line, the "git notes remove" command considers it a success if the
object did not have any note to begin with.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While "xargs -n1 git notes rm" is certainly a possible way to remove notes
from many objects, this would create one notes "commit" per removal, which
is not quite suitable for seasonal housekeeping.
Allow taking more than one on the command line, and record their removal
as a single atomic event if everthing goes well.
Even though the old code insisted that "git notes rm" must be given only
one object (or zero, in which case it would default to HEAD), this
condition was not tested. Add tests to handle the new case where we feed
multiple objects, and also make sure if there is a bad input, no change
is recorded.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, "notes add" (without -f/--force) will abort when the given object
already has existing notes. This makes sense for the modes of "git notes add"
that would necessarily overwrite the old message (when using the -m/-F/-C/-c
options). However, when no options are given (meaning the notes are created
from scratch in the editor) it is not very user-friendly to abort on existing
notes, and forcing the user to run "git notes edit".
Instead, it is better to simply "redirect" to "git notes edit" automatically,
i.e. open the existing notes in the editor and let the user edit them.
This patch does just that.
This changes the behavior of "git notes add" without options when notes
already exist for the given object, but I doubt that many users really depend
on the previous failure from "git notes add" in this case.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With most command line options, later instances of an option
override earlier ones. With cumulative options like
"--notes", however, there is no way to say "forget the
--notes I gave you before".
Let's have --no-notes trigger this forgetting, so that:
git log --notes=foo --no-notes --notes=bar
will show only the "bar" notes.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already have --show-notes, but it has a few shortcomings:
1. Using --show-notes=<ref> implies that we should also
show the default notes. Which means you also need to
use --no-standard-notes if you want to suppress them.
2. It is negated by --no-notes, which doesn't match.
3. It's too long to type. :)
This patch introduces --notes, which behaves exactly like
--show-notes, except that using "--notes=<ref>" does not
imply showing the default notes.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On some shells (like /usr/xpg4/bin/sh on Solaris), unset will exit
non-zero when passed the name of a variable that has not been set. Use
sane_unset instead so that the return value of unset can be ignored while
the && linkage of the test script can be preserved.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jh/notes-merge: (23 commits)
Provide 'git merge --abort' as a synonym to 'git reset --merge'
cmd_merge(): Parse options before checking MERGE_HEAD
Provide 'git notes get-ref' to easily retrieve current notes ref
git notes merge: Add testcases for merging notes trees at different fanouts
git notes merge: Add another auto-resolving strategy: "cat_sort_uniq"
git notes merge: --commit should fail if underlying notes ref has moved
git notes merge: List conflicting notes in notes merge commit message
git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 2/2
git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 1/2
Documentation: Preliminary docs on 'git notes merge'
git notes merge: Add automatic conflict resolvers (ours, theirs, union)
git notes merge: Handle real, non-conflicting notes merges
builtin/notes.c: Refactor creation of notes commits.
git notes merge: Initial implementation handling trivial merges only
builtin/notes.c: Split notes ref DWIMmery into a separate function
notes.c: Use two newlines (instead of one) when concatenating notes
(trivial) t3303: Indent with tabs instead of spaces for consistency
notes.h/c: Propagate combine_notes_fn return value to add_note() and beyond
notes.h/c: Allow combine_notes functions to remove notes
notes.c: Reorder functions in preparation for next commit
...
Conflicts:
builtin.h
Script may use 'git notes get-ref' to easily retrieve the current notes ref.
Suggested-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using combine_notes_concatenate() to concatenate notes, it currently
ensures exactly one newline character between the given notes. However,
when using builtin/notes.c:create_note() to concatenate notes (e.g. by
'git notes append'), it adds a newline character to the trailing newline
of the preceding notes object, thus resulting in _two_ newlines (aka. a
blank line) separating contents of the two notes.
This patch brings combine_notes_concatenate() into consistency with
builtin/notes.c:create_note(), by ensuring exactly _two_ newline characters
between concatenated notes.
The patch also changes a few notes-related selftests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the test_expect_code helper instead of open-coding it.
The main behavior change is to print the command and actual exit
status when the test fails. More importantly, this would make it
easier to add commands before "git notes show" as part of the
same test assertion if needed.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of
some lines in the test suite.
Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last
batch if they look okay.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extend remove_note() in the notes API to return whether or not a note was
actually removed. Use this in 'git notes remove' to skip the creation of
a notes commit when no notes were actually removed.
Also add a test illustrating the change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test_must_fail will account for segfaults in git, so it should be used
instead of "! git"
This patch does not change any of the commands that use pipes.
Signed-off-by: Jared Hance <jaredhance@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise we may segfault with too few parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Tested-by: Bert Wesarg <Bert.Wesarg@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The notes code intends to write reflog entries, but currently they are
not written because log_ref_write() checks for the refname path
explicitly.
Add refs/notes to the list of allowed paths so that notes references are
treated just like branch heads, i.e. according to core.logAllRefUpdates
and core.bare.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test whether the notes code writes reflog entries. It intends to
(setting up the reflog messages) but currently does not.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/notes-display:
git-notes(1): add a section about the meaning of history
notes: track whether notes_trees were changed at all
notes: add shorthand --ref to override GIT_NOTES_REF
commit --amend: copy notes to the new commit
rebase: support automatic notes copying
notes: implement helpers needed for note copying during rewrite
notes: implement 'git notes copy --stdin'
rebase -i: invoke post-rewrite hook
rebase: invoke post-rewrite hook
commit --amend: invoke post-rewrite hook
Documentation: document post-rewrite hook
Support showing notes from more than one notes tree
test-lib: unset GIT_NOTES_REF to stop it from influencing tests
Conflicts:
git-am.sh
refs.c
* jh/notes: (33 commits)
Documentation: fix a few typos in git-notes.txt
notes: fix malformed tree entry
builtin-notes: Minor (mostly parse_options-related) fixes
builtin-notes: Add "copy" subcommand for copying notes between objects
builtin-notes: Misc. refactoring of argc and exit value handling
builtin-notes: Add -c/-C options for reusing notes
builtin-notes: Refactor handling of -F option to allow combining -m and -F
builtin-notes: Deprecate the -m/-F options for "git notes edit"
builtin-notes: Add "append" subcommand for appending to note objects
builtin-notes: Add "add" subcommand for adding notes to objects
builtin-notes: Add --message/--file aliases for -m/-F options
builtin-notes: Add "list" subcommand for listing note objects
Documentation: Generalize git-notes docs to 'objects' instead of 'commits'
builtin-notes: Add "prune" subcommand for removing notes for missing objects
Notes API: prune_notes(): Prune notes that belong to non-existing objects
t3305: Verify that removing notes triggers automatic fanout consolidation
builtin-notes: Add "remove" subcommand for removing existing notes
Teach builtin-notes to remove empty notes
Teach notes code to properly preserve non-notes in the notes tree
t3305: Verify that adding many notes with git-notes triggers increased fanout
...
Conflicts:
Makefile
Running 'git notes copy -h' is not very helfpul right now. It lists
the options for all the git notes subcommands and is rather confusing.
Fix this by splitting cmd_notes() into separate functions for each
subcommand (besides append and edit since they're very similar) and
only providing a usage message for the subcommand.
This has an added benefit of reducing the code complexity while making
it safer and easier to read. The downside is we get some code bloat
from similar setup and teardown needed for notes and options parsing.
We also get a bit stricter in options parsing by only allowing
the ref option to come before the subcommand.
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Cc: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement helper functions to load the rewriting config, and to
actually copy the notes. Also document the config.
Secondly, also implement an undocumented --for-rewrite=<cmd> option to
'git notes copy' which is used like --stdin, but also puts the
configuration for <cmd> into effect. It will be needed to support the
copying in git-rebase.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This implements a mass-copy command that takes a sequence of lines in
the format
<from-sha1> SP <to-sha1> [ SP <rest> ] LF
on stdin, and copies each <from-sha1>'s notes to the <to-sha1>. The
<rest> is ignored. The intent, of course, is that this can read the
same input that the 'post-rewrite' hook gets.
The copy_note() function is exposed for everyone's and in particular
the next commit's use.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With this patch, you can set notes.displayRef to a glob that points at
your favourite notes refs, e.g.,
[notes]
displayRef = refs/notes/*
Then git-log and friends will show notes from all trees.
Thanks to Junio C Hamano for lots of feedback, which greatly
influenced the design of the entire series and this commit in
particular.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is required on Windows because git-notes is now a built-in
rather than a shell script.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is useful for keeping notes to objects that are being rewritten by e.g.
'git commit --amend', 'git rebase', or 'git cherry-pick'.
"git notes copy <from> <to>" is in practice equivalent to
"git notes add -C $(git notes list <from>) <to>", although it is somewhat
more convenient for regular users.
"git notes copy" takes the same -f option as "git add", to overwrite existing
notes at the target (instead of aborting with an error message).
If the <from>-object has no notes, "git notes copy" will abort with an error
message.
The patch includes tests verifying correct behaviour of the new subcommand.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Inspired by the -c/-C options to "git commit", we teach these options to
"git notes add/append" to allow reuse of note objects.
With this patch in place, it is now easy to copy or move notes between
objects. For example, to copy object A's notes to object B:
git notes add [-f] -C $(git notes list A) B
To move instead of copying, you simply remove the notes from the source
object afterwards, e.g.:
git notes remove A
The patch includes tests verifying correct behaviour of the new functionality.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By moving the -F option handling into a separate function (parse_file_arg),
we can start allowing several -F options, and mixed usage of -m and -F
options. Each -m/-F given appends to the note message, in the order they are
given on the command-line.
The patch includes tests verifying correct behaviour of the new functionality.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git notes append" is equivalent to "git notes edit" except that instead
of editing existing notes contents, you can only append to it. This is
useful for quickly adding annotations like e.g.:
git notes append -m "Acked-by: A U Thor <author@example.com>"
"git notes append" takes the same -m/-F options as "git notes add".
If there is no existing note to append to, "git notes append" is identical
to "git notes add" (i.e. it adds a new note).
The patch includes tests verifying correct behaviour of the new subcommand.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>