"git symbolic-ref symref non..sen..se" is now diagnosed as an error.
* lt/symbolic-ref-sanity:
symbolic-ref: refuse to set syntactically invalid target
Some tests assumed that core.fsyncMethod=batch is supported
everywhere, which broke FreeBSD.
* js/t5351-freebsd-fix:
t5351: avoid using `test_cmp` for binary data
t5351: avoid relying on `core.fsyncMethod = batch` to be supported
Operating modes like "--batch" of "git cat-file" command learned to
take NUL-terminated input, instead of one-item-per-line.
* tb/cat-file-z:
builtin/cat-file.c: support NUL-delimited input with `-z`
t1006: extract --batch-command inputs to variables
When "git merge" finds that it cannot perform a merge, it should
restore the working tree to the state before the command was
initiated, but in some corner cases it didn't.
* en/merge-restore-to-pristine:
merge: do not exit restore_state() prematurely
merge: ensure we can actually restore pre-merge state
merge: make restore_state() restore staged state too
merge: fix save_state() to work when there are stat-dirty files
merge: do not abort early if one strategy fails to handle the merge
merge: abort if index does not match HEAD for trivial merges
merge-resolve: abort if index does not match HEAD
merge-ort-wrappers: make printed message match the one from recursive
Make our mergesort implementation type-safe.
* rs/mergesort:
mergesort: remove llist_mergesort()
packfile: use DEFINE_LIST_SORT
fetch-pack: use DEFINE_LIST_SORT
commit: use DEFINE_LIST_SORT
blame: use DEFINE_LIST_SORT
test-mergesort: use DEFINE_LIST_SORT
test-mergesort: use DEFINE_LIST_SORT_DEBUG
mergesort: add macros for typed sort of linked lists
mergesort: tighten merge loop
mergesort: unify ranks loops
"git cat-file" learned an option to use the mailmap when showing
commit and tag objects.
* sa/cat-file-mailmap:
cat-file: add mailmap support
ident: rename commit_rewrite_person() to apply_mailmap_to_header()
ident: move commit_rewrite_person() to ident.c
revision: improve commit_rewrite_person()
There was a bug in the codepath to upgrade generation information
in commit-graph from v1 to v2 format, which has been corrected.
* tb/commit-graph-genv2-upgrade-fix:
commit-graph: fix corrupt upgrade from generation v1 to v2
commit-graph: introduce `repo_find_commit_pos_in_graph()`
t5318: demonstrate commit-graph generation v2 corruption
Fix for a bug that makes write-tree to fail to write out a
non-existent index as a tree, introduced in 2.37.
* tk/untracked-cache-with-uall:
read-cache: make `do_read_index()` always set up `istate->repo`
You can feed absolute garbage to symbolic-ref as a target like:
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/foo..bar
While this doesn't technically break the repo entirely (our "is it a git
directory" detector looks only for "refs/" at the start), we would never
resolve such a ref, as the ".." is invalid within a refname.
Let's flag these as invalid at creation time to help the caller realize
that what they're asking for is bogus.
A few notes:
- We use REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL here, which lets:
git update-ref refs/heads/foo FETCH_HEAD
continue to work. It's unclear whether anybody wants to do something
so odd, but it does work now, so this is erring on the conservative
side. There's a test to make sure we didn't accidentally break this,
but don't take that test as an endorsement that it's a good idea, or
something we might not change in the future.
- The test in t4202-log.sh checks how we handle such an invalid ref on
the reading side, so it has to be updated to touch the HEAD file
directly.
- We need to keep our HEAD-specific check for "does it start with
refs/". The ALLOW_ONELEVEL flag means we won't be enforcing that for
other refs, but HEAD is special here because of the checks in
validate_headref().
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git checkout" miscounted the paths it updated, which has been
corrected.
source: <cover.1657799213.git.matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
* mt/checkout-count-fix:
checkout: fix two bugs on the final count of updated entries
checkout: show bug about failed entries being included in final report
checkout: document bug where delayed checkout counts entries twice
"git rebase -i" learns to update branches whose tip appear in the
rebased range with "--update-refs" option.
source: <pull.1247.v5.git.1658255624.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
* ds/rebase-update-ref:
sequencer: notify user of --update-refs activity
sequencer: ignore HEAD ref under --update-refs
rebase: add rebase.updateRefs config option
sequencer: rewrite update-refs as user edits todo list
rebase: update refs from 'update-ref' commands
rebase: add --update-refs option
sequencer: add update-ref command
sequencer: define array with enum values
rebase-interactive: update 'merge' description
branch: consider refs under 'update-refs'
t2407: test branches currently using apply backend
t2407: test bisect and rebase as black-boxes
The `test_cmp` function is meant to provide nicer output than `cmp` when
expected and actual output of Git commands disagree. The implicit
assumption is that the output is line-based and human readable.
However, aaf81223f4 (unpack-objects: use stream_loose_object() to
unpack large objects, 2022-06-11) introduced a call that compares the
contents of pack files, which are distinctly not line-based nor human
readable.
This causes problems because on Windows, we hand off to the Bash
function `mingw_test_cmp` that compares the lines while ignoring line
ending differences. And this Bash function spends an insane amount of
cycles trying to read in that binary pack file, so that it is almost
indistinguishable from an infinite loop.
For example, t5351 took 1486 seconds in the CI run at
https://github.com/git/git/runs/7398490747?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:171,
to complete. And yes, that is almost half an hour.
Since Git's tests already use `cmp` consistently when comparing pack
files, let's change this instance to use `cmp` instead of `test_cmp`,
too, and fix that performance problem.
Now t5351 takes all of 22 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On FreeBSD, this mode is not supported. But since 3a251bac0d (trace2:
only include "fsync" events if we git_fsync(), 2022-07-18) t5351 will
fail if this mode is unsupported.
Let's address this in the minimal fashion, by detecting that that mode
is unsupported and expecting a different count of hardware flushes in
that case.
This fixes the CI/PR builds on FreeBSD again.
Note: A better way would be to test only what is relevant in t5351.6
"unpack big object in stream (core.fsyncmethod=batch)" again instead of
blindly comparing the output against some exact text. But that would
pretty much revert the idea of above-mentioned commit, and that commit
was _just_ accepted into Git's main branch so one must assume that it
was intentional.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fixes for tests when the source directory has unusual characters in
its path, e.g. whitespaces, double-quotes, etc.
source: <cover-v2-0.3-00000000000-20220630T101646Z-avarab@gmail.com>
* ab/test-quoting-fix:
config tests: fix harmless but broken "rm -r" cleanup
test-lib.sh: fix prepend_var() quoting issue
tests: add missing double quotes to included library paths
In a non-bare repository, the behavior of Git when the
core.worktree configuration variable points at a directory that has
a repository as its subdirectory, regressed in Git 2.27 days.
source: <20220616234433.225-1-gg.oss@outlook.com>
source: <20220616231956.154-1-gg.oss@outlook.com>
* gg/worktree-from-the-above:
dir: minor refactoring / clean-up
dir: traverse into repository
Fixes a long-standing corner case bug around directory renames in
the merge-ort strategy.
source: <pull.1268.v4.git.1656984823.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
* en/merge-dual-dir-renames-fix:
merge-ort: fix issue with dual rename and add/add conflict
merge-ort: shuffle the computation and cleanup of potential collisions
merge-ort: make a separate function for freeing struct collisions
merge-ort: small cleanups of check_for_directory_rename
t6423: add tests of dual directory rename plus add/add conflict
A fix for a regression in test framework.
source: <pull.1288.git.1657789234416.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
* js/ci-github-workflow-markup:
tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code
Add missing documentation for "include" and "includeIf" features in
"git config" file format, which incidentally teaches the command
line completion to include them in its offerings.
* mb/config-document-include:
config.txt: document include, includeIf
Omit fsync-related trace2 entries when their values are all zero.
* ab/squelch-empty-fsync-traces:
trace2: only include "fsync" events if we git_fsync()
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries
informations in a custom format, taking inspiration
from the option with the same name in the `git ls-tree`
command.
"--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t",
" --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol".
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, if the user:
* Had no local changes before starting the merge
* A merge strategy makes changes to the working tree/index but returns
with exit status 2
Then we'd call restore_state() to clean up the changes and either let
the next merge strategy run (if there is one), or exit telling the user
that no merge strategy could handle the merge. Unfortunately,
restore_state() did not clean up the changes as expected; that function
was a no-op if the stash was a null, and the stash would be null if
there were no local changes before starting the merge. So, instead of
"Rewinding the tree to pristine..." as the code claimed, restore_state()
would leave garbage around in the index and working tree (possibly
including conflicts) for either the next merge strategy or for the user
after aborting the merge. And in the case of aborting the merge, the
user would be unable to run "git merge --abort" to get rid of the
unintended leftover conflicts, because the merge control files were not
written as it was presumed that we had restored to a clean state
already.
Fix the main problem by making sure that restore_state() only skips the
stash application if the stash is null rather than skipping the whole
function.
However, there is a secondary problem -- since merge.c forks
subprocesses to do the cleanup, the in-memory index is left out-of-sync.
While there was a refresh_cache(REFRESH_QUIET) call that attempted to
correct that, that function would not handle cases where the previous
merge strategy added conflicted entries. We need to drop the index and
re-read it to handle such cases.
(Alternatively, we could stop forking subprocesses and instead call some
appropriate function to do the work which would update the in-memory
index automatically. For now, just do the simple fix.)
Also, add a testcase checking this, one for which the octopus strategy
fails on the first commit it attempts to merge, and thus which it
cannot handle at all and must completely bail on (as per the "exit 2"
code path of commit 98efc8f3d8 ("octopus: allow manual resolve on the
last round.", 2006-01-13)).
Reported-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are multiple issues at play here:
1) If `git merge` is invoked with staged changes, it should abort
without doing any merging, and the user's working tree and index
should be the same as before merge was invoked.
2) Merge strategies are responsible for enforcing the index == HEAD
requirement. (See 9822175d2b ("Ensure index matches head before
invoking merge machinery, round N", 2019-08-17) for some history
around this.)
3) Merge strategies can bail saying they are not an appropriate
handler for the merge in question (possibly allowing other
strategies to be used instead).
4) Merge strategies can make changes to the index and working tree,
and have no expectation to clean up after themselves, *even* if
they bail out and say they are not an appropriate handler for
the merge in question. (The `octopus` merge strategy does this,
for example.)
5) Because of (3) and (4), builtin/merge.c stashes state before
trying merge strategies and restores it afterward.
Unfortunately, if users had staged changes before calling `git merge`,
builtin/merge.c could do the following:
* stash the changes, in order to clean up after the strategies
* try all the merge strategies in turn, each of which report they
cannot function due to the index not matching HEAD
* restore the changes via "git stash apply"
But that last step would have the net effect of unstaging the user's
changes. Fix this by adding the "--index" option to "git stash apply".
While at it, also squelch the stash apply output; we already report
"Rewinding the tree to pristine..." and don't need a detailed `git
status` report afterwards. Also while at it, switch to using strvec
so folks don't have to count the arguments to ensure we avoided an
off-by-one error, and so it's easier to add additional arguments to
the command.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there are stat-dirty files, but no files are modified,
`git stash create` exits with unsuccessful status. This causes merge
to fail. Copy some code from sequencer.c's create_autostash to refresh
the index first to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin/merge is setup to allow multiple strategies to be specified,
and it will find the "best" result and use it. This is defeated if
some of the merge strategies abort early when they cannot handle the
merge. Fix the logic that calls recursive and ort to not do such an
early abort, but instead return "2" or "unhandled" so that the next
strategy can try to handle the merge.
Coming up with a testcase for this is somewhat difficult, since
recursive and ort both handle nearly any two-headed merge (there is
a separate code path that checks for non-two-headed merges and
already returns "2" for them). So use a somewhat synthetic testcase
of having the index not match HEAD before the merge starts, since all
merge strategies will abort for that.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As noted in the last commit and the links therein (especially commit
9822175d2b ("Ensure index matches head before invoking merge machinery,
round N", 2019-08-17), we have had a very long history of problems with
failing to enforce the requirement that index matches HEAD when starting
a merge.
The "trivial merge" logic in builtin/merge.c is yet another such case
we previously missed. Add a check for it to ensure it aborts if the
index does not match HEAD, and add a testcase where this fix is needed.
Note that the fix here would also incidentally be an alternative fix
for the testcase added in the last patch, but the fix in the last patch
is still needed when multiple merge strategies are in use, so tweak the
testcase from the previous commit so that it continues to exercise the
codepath added in the last commit.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As noted in commit 9822175d2b ("Ensure index matches head before
invoking merge machinery, round N", 2019-08-17), we have had a very
long history of problems with failing to enforce the requirement that
index matches HEAD when starting a merge. One of the commits
referenced in the long tale of issues arising from lax enforcement of
this requirement was commit 55f39cf755 ("merge: fix misleading
pre-merge check documentation", 2018-06-30), which tried to document
the requirement and noted there were some exceptions. As mentioned in
that commit message, the `resolve` strategy was the one strategy that
did not have an explicit index matching HEAD check, and the reason it
didn't was that I wasn't able to discover any cases where the
implementation would fail to catch the problem and abort, and didn't
want to introduce unnecessary performance overhead of adding another
check.
Well, today I discovered a testcase where the implementation does not
catch the problem and so an explicit check is needed. Add a testcase
that previously would have failed, and update git-merge-resolve.sh to
have an explicit check. Note that the code is copied from 3ec62ad9ff
("merge-octopus: abort if index does not match HEAD", 2016-04-09), so
that we reuse the same message and avoid making translators need to
translate some new message.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When callers are using `cat-file` via one of the stdin-driven `--batch`
modes, all input is newline-delimited. This presents a problem when
callers wish to ask about, e.g. tree-entries that have a newline
character present in their filename.
To support this niche scenario, introduce a new `-z` mode to the
`--batch`, `--batch-check`, and `--batch-command` suite of options that
instructs `cat-file` to treat its input as NUL-delimited, allowing the
individual commands themselves to have newlines present.
The refactoring here is slightly unfortunate, since we turn loops like:
while (strbuf_getline(&buf, stdin) != EOF)
into:
while (1) {
int ret;
if (opt->nul_terminated)
ret = strbuf_getline_nul(&input, stdin);
else
ret = strbuf_getline(&input, stdin);
if (ret == EOF)
break;
}
It's tempting to think that we could use `strbuf_getwholeline()` and
specify either `\n` or `\0` as the terminating character. But for input
on platforms that include a CR character preceeding the LF, this
wouldn't quite be the same, since `strbuf_getline(...)` will trim any
trailing CR, while `strbuf_getwholeline(&buf, stdin, '\n')` will not.
In the future, we could clean this up further by introducing a variant
of `strbuf_getwholeline()` that addresses the aforementioned gap, but
that approach felt too heavy-handed for this pair of uses.
Some tests are added in t1006 to ensure that `cat-file` produces the
same output in `--batch`, `--batch-check`, and `--batch-command` modes
with and without the new `-z` option.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A future commit will want to ensure that various `--batch`-related
options produce the same output whether their input is newline
terminated, or NUL terminated (and a to-be-implemented `-z` option
exists).
To prepare for this, extract the given input(s) into separate variables
to that their LF characters can easily be converted into NUL bytes when
testing the new `-z` mode.
This is consistent with other tests in t1006 (which these days is no
longer a shining example of our CodingGuidelines).
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If there is no index file, e.g., because the repository has just been
created, we return zero early (unless `must_exist` makes us die
instead.)
This early return means we do not set up `istate->repo`. With
`core.untrackedCache=true`, the recent e6a653554b ("untracked-cache:
support '--untracked-files=all' if configured", 2022-03-31) will
eventually pass down `istate->repo` as a null pointer to
`repo_config_get_string()`, causing a segmentation fault.
If we do hit this early return, set up `istate->repo` similar to when we
actually read the index.
Reported-by: Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name>
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, HTTP transport clients learned to tell the server side
what locale they are in by sending Accept-Language HTTP header, but
this was done only for some requests but not others.
* ll/curl-accept-language:
remote-curl: send Accept-Language header to server
"git clone" from a repository with some ref whose HEAD is unborn
did not set the HEAD in the resulting repository correctly, which
has been corrected.
* jk/clone-unborn-confusion:
clone: move unborn head creation to update_head()
clone: use remote branch if it matches default HEAD
clone: propagate empty remote HEAD even with other branches
clone: drop extra newline from warning message
A corner case bug where lazily fetching objects from a promisor
remote resulted in infinite recursion has been corrected.
* hx/lookup-commit-in-graph-fix:
t5330: remove run_with_limited_processses()
commit-graph.c: no lazy fetch in lookup_commit_in_graph()
The resolve-undo information in the index was not protected against
GC, which has been corrected.
* jc/resolve-undo:
fsck: do not dereference NULL while checking resolve-undo data
revision: mark blobs needed for resolve-undo as reachable
When the user runs 'git rebase -i --update-refs', the end message still
says only
Successfully rebased and updated <HEAD-ref>.
Update the sequencer to collect the successful (and unsuccessful) ref
updates due to the --update-refs option, so the end message now says
Successfully rebased and updated <HEAD-ref>.
Updated the following refs with --update-refs:
refs/heads/first
refs/heads/third
Failed to update the following refs with --update-refs:
refs/heads/second
To test this output, we need to be very careful to format the expected
error to drop the leading tab characters. Also, we need to be aware that
the verbose output from 'git rebase' is writing progress lines which
don't use traditional newlines but clear the line after every progress
item is complete. When opening the error file in an editor, these lines
are visible, but when looking at the diff in a terminal those lines
disappear because of the characters that delete the previous characters.
Use 'sed' to clear those progress lines and clear the tabs so we can get
an exact match on our expected output.
Reported-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous change added the --update-refs command-line option. For
users who always want this mode, create the rebase.updateRefs config
option which behaves the same way as rebase.autoSquash does with the
--autosquash option.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An interactive rebase provides opportunities for the user to edit the
todo list. The --update-refs option initializes the list with some
'update-ref <ref>' steps, but the user could add these manually.
Further, the user could add or remove these steps during pauses in the
interactive rebase.
Add a new method, todo_list_filter_update_refs(), that scans a todo_list
and compares it to the stored update-refs file. There are two actions
that can happen at this point:
1. If a '<ref>/<before>/<after>' triple in the update-refs file does not
have a matching 'update-ref <ref>' command in the todo-list _and_ the
<after> value is the null OID, then remove that triple. Here, the
user removed the 'update-ref <ref>' command before it was executed,
since if it was executed then the <after> value would store the
commit at that position.
2. If a 'update-ref <ref>' command in the todo-list does not have a
matching '<ref>/<before>/<after>' triple in the update-refs file,
then insert a new one. Store the <before> value to be the current
OID pointed at by <ref>. This is handled inside of the
init_update_ref_record() helper method.
We can test that this works by rewriting the todo-list several times in
the course of a rebase. Check that each ref is locked or unlocked for
updates after each todo-list update. We can also verify that the ref
update fails if a concurrent process updates one of the refs after the
rebase process records the "locked" ref location.
To help these tests, add a new 'set_replace_editor' helper that will
replace the todo-list with an exact file.
Reported-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous change introduced the 'git rebase --update-refs' option
which added 'update-ref <ref>' commands to the todo list of an
interactive rebase.
Teach Git to record the HEAD position when reaching these 'update-ref'
commands. The ref/before/after triple is stored in the
$GIT_DIR/rebase-merge/update-refs file. A previous change parsed this
file to avoid having other processes updating the refs in that file
while the rebase is in progress.
Not only do we update the file when the sequencer reaches these
'update-ref' commands, we then update the refs themselves at the end of
the rebase sequence. If the rebase is aborted before this final step,
then the refs are not updated. The 'before' value is used to ensure that
we do not accidentally obliterate a ref that was updated concurrently
(say, by an older version of Git or a third-party tool).
Now that the 'git rebase --update-refs' command is implemented to write
to the update-refs file, we can remove the fake construction of the
update-refs file from a test in t2407-worktree-heads.sh.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When working on a large feature, it can be helpful to break that feature
into multiple smaller parts that become reviewed in sequence. During
development or during review, a change to one part of the feature could
affect multiple of these parts. An interactive rebase can help adjust
the multi-part "story" of the branch.
However, if there are branches tracking the different parts of the
feature, then rebasing the entire list of commits can create commits not
reachable from those "sub branches". It can take a manual step to update
those branches.
Add a new --update-refs option to 'git rebase -i' that adds 'update-ref
<ref>' steps to the todo file whenever a commit that is being rebased is
decorated with that <ref>. At the very end, the rebase process updates
all of the listed refs to the values stored during the rebase operation.
Be sure to iterate after any squashing or fixups are placed. Update the
branch only after those squashes and fixups are complete. This allows a
--fixup commit at the tip of the feature to apply correctly to the sub
branch, even if it is fixing up the most-recent commit in that part.
This change update the documentation and builtin to accept the
--update-refs option as well as updating the todo file with the
'update-ref' commands. Tests are added to ensure that these todo
commands are added in the correct locations.
This change does _not_ include the actual behavior of tracking the
updated refs and writing the new ref values at the end of the rebase
process. That is deferred to a later change.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The branch_checked_out() helper helps commands like 'git branch' and
'git fetch' from overwriting refs that are currently checked out in
other worktrees.
A future update to 'git rebase' will introduce a new '--update-refs'
option which will update the local refs that point to commits that are
being rebased. To avoid collisions as the rebase completes, we want to
make the future data store for these refs to be considered by
branch_checked_out().
The data store is a plaintext file inside the 'rebase-merge' directory
for that worktree. The file lists refnames followed by two OIDs, each on
separate lines. The OIDs will be used to store the original values of
the refs and the to-be-written values as the rebase progresses, but can
be ignored at the moment.
Create a new sequencer_get_update_refs_state() method that parses this
file and populates a struct string_list with the ref-OID pairs. We can
then use this list to add to the current_checked_out_branches strmap
used by branch_checked_out().
To properly navigate to the rebase directory for a given worktree,
extract the static strbuf_worktree_gitdir() method to a public API
method.
We can test that this works without having Git write this file by
artificially creating one in our test script, at least until 'git rebase
--update-refs' is implemented and we can use it directly.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests in t2407 that verify the branch_checked_out() helper in the
case of bisects and rebases were added by 9347303db89 (branch: check for
bisects and rebases, 2022-06-08). However, that commit failed to check
for rebases that are using the 'apply' backend.
Add a test that checks the apply backend. The implementation was already
correct here, but it is good to have regression tests before modifying
the implementation further.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests added by d2ba271aad (branch: check for bisects and rebases,
2022-06-14) modified hidden state to verify the branch_checked_out()
helper. While this indeed checks that the method implementation is _as
designed_, it doesn't show that it is _correct_. Specifically, if 'git
bisect' or 'git rebase' change their back-end for preserving refs, then
these tests do not demonstrate that drift as a bug in
branch_checked_out().
Modify the tests in t2407 to actually rely on a paused bisect or rebase.
This requires adding the !SANITIZE_LEAK prereq for tests using those
builtins. The logic is still tested for leaks in the final test which
does set up that back-end directly for an error state that should not be
possible using Git commands.
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The word "whitelist" has cultural implications that are not inclusive.
Thankfully, it is not difficult to reword and avoid its use.
Focus on changes in the test scripts, since most of the changes are in
comments and test names. The renamed test_allow_var helper is only used
once inside the widely-used test_proto helper.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
