The component to respond to "git fetch" request is made more
configurable to selectively allow or reject object filtering
specification used for partial cloning.
* tb/upload-pack-filters:
t5616: use test_i18ngrep for upload-pack errors
upload-pack.c: introduce 'uploadpackfilter.tree.maxDepth'
upload-pack.c: allow banning certain object filter(s)
list_objects_filter_options: introduce 'list_object_filter_config_name'
Doc cleanup around "worktree".
* es/worktree-doc-cleanups:
git-worktree.txt: link to man pages when citing other Git commands
git-worktree.txt: make start of new sentence more obvious
git-worktree.txt: fix minor grammatical issues
git-worktree.txt: consistently use term "working tree"
git-worktree.txt: employ fixed-width typeface consistently
The final leg of SHA-256 transition.
* bc/sha-256-part-3: (39 commits)
t: remove test_oid_init in tests
docs: add documentation for extensions.objectFormat
ci: run tests with SHA-256
t: make SHA1 prerequisite depend on default hash
t: allow testing different hash algorithms via environment
t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithm
repository: enable SHA-256 support by default
setup: add support for reading extensions.objectformat
bundle: add new version for use with SHA-256
builtin/verify-pack: implement an --object-format option
http-fetch: set up git directory before parsing pack hashes
t0410: mark test with SHA1 prerequisite
t5308: make test work with SHA-256
t9700: make hash size independent
t9500: ensure that algorithm info is preserved in config
t9350: make hash size independent
t9301: make hash size independent
t9300: use $ZERO_OID instead of hard-coded object ID
t9300: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t8011: make hash size independent
...
--diff-merges=off is the only accepted form for now, a synonym for
--no-diff-merges.
This patch is a preparation for adding more values, as well as supporting
--diff-merges=<parent>, where <parent> is single parent number to output diff
against.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test added by e5256c82e5 (refs: fix interleaving hook calls with
reference-transaction hook, 2020-08-07) uses hard-coded sha1 object ids
in its expected output. This causes it to fail when run with
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256.
Let's make use of the oid variables we define earlier, as the rest of
the nearby tests do.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --batch-size=<size> option of 'git multi-pack-index repack' is
intended to limit the amount of work done by the repack. In the case of
a large repository, this command should repack a number of small
pack-files but leave the large pack-files alone. Most often, the
repository has one large pack-file from a 'git clone' operation and
number of smaller pack-files from incremental 'git fetch' operations.
The issue with '--batch-size' is that it also _prevents_ the repack from
happening if the expected size of the resulting pack-file is too small.
This was intended as a way to avoid frequent churn of small pack-files,
but it has mostly caused confusion when a repository is of "medium"
size. That is, not enormous like the Windows OS repository, but also not
so small that this incremental repack isn't valuable.
The solution presented here is to collect pack-files for repack if their
expected size is smaller than the batch-size parameter until either the
total expected size exceeds the batch-size or all pack-files are
considered. If there are at least two pack-files, then these are
combined to a new pack-file whose size should not be too much larger
than the batch-size.
This new strategy should succeed in keeping the number of pack-files
small in these "medium" size repositories. The concern about churn is
likely not interesting, as the real control over that is the frequency
in which the repack command is run.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2997178ee6 (upload-pack: split check_unreachable() in two, prep for
get_reachable_list(), 2016-06-12) moved most code of has_unreachable()
into the new function do_reachable_revlist(). The latter takes care to
ignore SIGPIPE during its operations, and restores the original signal
handler before returning.
However, a sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE) call remained in the error handling
code of has_unreachable(), which does nothing because the stack is
empty after do_reachable_revlist() cleaned up after itself. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t6425 was very picky about the exact output message produced by a
rename/delete conflict, in a way that just scratches the surface of the
mess that was built into merge-recursive. The idea was that it would
try to find the possible combinations of different conflict types, and
when more than one was present for one path, it would try to provide a
combined message that covered all the cases.
There's a lot to unravel here...
First, there's a basic conflict type known as modify/delete, which is a
content conflict. It occurs when one side deletes a file, but the other
modifies it.
There is also a path conflict known as a rename/delete. This occurs
when one side deletes a path, and the other renames it. This is not a
content conflict, it is a path conflict. It will often occur in
combination with a content conflict, though, namely a modify/delete. As
such, these two were often combined.
Another type of conflict that can exist is a directory/file conflict.
For example, one side adds a new file at some path, and the other side
of history adds a directory at the same path. The path that was "added"
could have been put there by a rename, though. Thus, we have the
possibility of a single path being affected by a modify/delete, a
rename/delete, and a directory/file conflict.
In part, this was a natural by-product of merge-recursive's design.
Since it was doing a four way merge with the contents of the working
tree being the fourth factor it had to consider, it had working tree
handling spread all over the code. It also had directory/file conflict
handling spread everywhere through all the other types of conflicts.
And our testsuite has a huge number of directory/file conflict tests
because trying to get them right required modifying so many different
codepaths. A natural outgrowth of this kind of structure is conflict
messages that combine all the different types that the current codepath
is considering.
However, if we want to make the different conflict types orthogonal and
avoid repeating ourselves and getting very brittle code, then we need to
split the messages from these different conflict types apart. Besides,
trying to determine all possible permutations is a _royal_ mess. The
code to handle the rename/delete/directory/file conflict output is
already somewhat hard to parse, and is somewhat brittle. But if we
really wanted to go that route, then we'd have to have special handling
for the following types of combinations:
* rename/add/delete:
on side of history that didn't rename the given file, remove the file
instead and place an unrelated file in the way of the rename
* rename/rename(2to1)/mode conflict/delete/delete:
two different files, one executable and the other not, are renamed
to the same location, each side deletes the source file that the
other side renames
* rename/rename(1to2)/add/add:
file renamed differently on each side of history, with each side
placing an unrelated file in the way of the other
* rename/rename(1to2)/content conflict/file location/(D/F)/(D/F)/:
both sides modify a file in conflicting way, both rename that file
but to different paths, one side renames the directory which the
other side had renamed that file into causing it to possibly need a
transitive rename, and each side puts a directory in the way of the
other's path.
Let's back away from this path of insanity, and allow the different
types of conflicts to be handled by separate pieces of non-repeated code
by allowing the conflict messages to be split into their separate types.
(If multiple conflict types affect a single path, the conflict messages
can be printed sequentially.) Start this path with a simple change:
modify this test to be more flexible and accept the output either merge
backend (recursive or the new ort) will produce.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Much like the last commit accepted 'add/add' and 'rename/add'
interchangably, we also want to do the same for 'add/add' and
'rename/rename'. This also allows us to avoid the ambiguity in meaning
with 'rename/rename' (is it two separate files renamed to the same
location, or one file renamed on both sides but differently)?
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive treats an add/add conflict where one of the adds came
from a rename as a separate 'rename/add' type of conflict. However, if
there is not content conflict after the content merge(s), then the file
is not considered to be conflicted. That suggests the conflict type is
really just add/add. Other merge engines might choose to print messages
to the console that just refer to these as add/add conflicts; accept
both types of output.
Note: it could help to notify users if the three-way content merge of
the rename had content conflicts, because when we then go to two-way
merge THAT with the conflicting add we can get nested conflict markers.
merge-recursive, unfortunately, doesn't do that, but other merge engines
could.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I had long since forgotten the idea behind this test and why it failed,
and took a little while to figure it out. To prevent others from having
to spend a similar time on it, add an explanation in the comments.
However, the reasoning in the explanation makes me question why I
considered it a failure at all. I'm not sure if I had a better reason
when I originally wrote it, but for now just add commentary about the
possible expectations and why it behaves the way it does right now.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test had multiple issues causing it to fail for the wrong
reason(s):
* rename/rename(1to2) conflicts have always left the original source
path present in the working directory and index (at stage 1). Thus,
the triple rename/rename(1to2) should result in 9 unstaged files,
not 6.
* It messed up the three-way content merge for checking the results of
merging for one of the renames, accidentally turning it into a
two-way merge.
* It got the contents of the base files it was using to compare
against wrong, due to an off-by-one error, and overwrite-redirection
('>') instead of append-redirection ('>>').
* It used slightly too-long conflict markers
* It didn't include filenames in the conflict marker hunks (granted,
that was a shortcoming of the merge-recursive backend for rename/add
and rename/rename(2to1) conflicts, but since it's
test_expect_failure anyway we might as well make it expect our
preferred behavior rather than some compromise that we can't yet
reach anyway).
Fix these issues so that a merge backend which correctly handles these
kinds of nested conflicts will pass the test.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit da1e295e00 ("t604[236]: do not run setup in separate tests",
2019-10-22) removed approximately half the tests (which were setup-only
tests) in t6043 by turning them into functions that the subsequent test
would call as their first step. This ensured that any test from this
file could be run entirely independently of all the other tests in the
file. Unfortunately, the call to the new setup function was missed in
two of the test_expect_failure cases. Add them in.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apparently I don't know how to count untracked files, and since the
tests in question were marked as test_expect_failure, no one ever
noticed it until now. Correct the count, as these tests clearly create
three untracked files ('out', 'err', and 'file_count').
(I believe this problem arose because earlier incarnations counted lines
via a pipe to 'wc -l'. Reviewers asked that it be replaced by writing
the output to a file and using test_line_count, but when the temporary
output was added to a separate file, the count of untracked files should
have increased.)
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The testcase only required that the merge complete without conflict,
without specifying what the correct resolution was. Since normalization
changed this from a modify/delete to a not-modified/delete, the correct
resolution is to have the file be removed at the end. Add a check for
this resolution.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests for the merge machinery are spread over several places.
Collect them into t64xx for simplicity. Some notes:
t60[234]*.sh:
Merge tests started in t602*, overgrew bisect and remote tracking
tests in t6030, t6040, and t6041, and nearly overtook replace tests
in t6050. This made picking out relevant tests that I wanted to run
in a tighter loop slightly more annoying for years.
t303*.sh:
These started out as tests for the 'merge-recursive' toplevel command,
but did not restrict to that and had lots of overlap with the
underlying merge machinery.
t7405, t7613:
submodule-specific merge logic started out in submodule.c but was
moved to merge-recursive.c in commit 18cfc08866 ("submodule.c: move
submodule merging to merge-recursive.c", 2018-05-15). Since these
tests are about the logic found in the merge machinery, moving these
tests to be with the merge tests makes sense.
t7607, t7609:
Having tests spread all over the place makes it more likely that
additional tests related to a certain piece of logic grow in all those
other places. Much like t303*.sh, these two tests were about the
underlying merge machinery rather than outer levels.
Tests that were NOT moved:
t76[01]*.sh:
Other than the four tests mentioned above, the remaining tests in
t76[01]*.sh are related to non-recursive merge strategies, parameter
parsing, and other stuff associated with the highlevel builtin/merge.c
rather than the recursive merge machinery.
t3[45]*.sh:
The rebase testcases in t34*.sh also test the merge logic pretty
heavily; sometimes changes I make only trigger failures in the rebase
tests. The rebase tests are already nicely coupled together, though,
and I didn't want to mess that up. Similar comments apply for the
cherry-pick tests in t35*.sh.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In `stop_progress()`, we're careful to check that `p_progress` is
non-NULL before we dereference it, but by then we have already
dereferenced it when calling `finish_if_sparse(*p_progress)`. And, for
what it's worth, we'll go on to blindly dereference it again inside
`stop_progress_msg()`.
We could return early if we get a NULL-pointer, but let's go one step
further and BUG instead. The progress API handles NULL just fine, but
that's the NULL-ness of `*p_progress`, e.g., when running with
`--no-progress`. If `p_progress` is NULL, chances are that's a mistake.
For symmetry, let's do the same check in `stop_progress_msg()`, too.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update "git help guides" documentation organization.
* pb/guide-docs:
git.txt: add list of guides
Documentation: don't hardcode command categories twice
help: drop usage of 'common' and 'useful' for guides
command-list.txt: add missing 'gitcredentials' and 'gitremote-helpers'
All "mergy" operations that internally use the merge-recursive
machinery should honor the merge.renormalize configuration, but
many of them didn't.
* en/eol-attrs-gotchas:
checkout: support renormalization with checkout -m <paths>
merge: make merge.renormalize work for all uses of merge machinery
t6038: remove problematic test
t6038: make tests fail for the right reason
Small fixes and workarounds.
* jk/compiler-fixes-and-workarounds:
revision: avoid leak when preparing bloom filter for "/"
revision: avoid out-of-bounds read/write on empty pathspec
config: work around gcc-10 -Wstringop-overflow warning
Adjust tests in contrib/ to the recent change to fmt-merge-msg.
* es/adjust-subtree-test-for-merge-msg-update:
Revert "contrib: subtree: adjust test to change in fmt-merge-msg"
Code cleanup around "worktree" API implementation.
* es/worktree-cleanup:
worktree: retire special-case normalization of main worktree path
worktree: drop bogus and unnecessary path munging
worktree: drop unused code from get_linked_worktree()
worktree: drop pointless strbuf_release()
The argv_array API is useful for not just managing argv but any
"vector" (NULL-terminated array) of strings, and has seen adoption
to a certain degree. It has been renamed to "strvec" to reduce the
barrier to adoption.
* jk/strvec:
strvec: rename struct fields
strvec: drop argv_array compatibility layer
strvec: update documention to avoid argv_array
strvec: fix indentation in renamed calls
strvec: convert remaining callers away from argv_array name
strvec: convert more callers away from argv_array name
strvec: convert builtin/ callers away from argv_array name
quote: rename sq_dequote_to_argv_array to mention strvec
strvec: rename files from argv-array to strvec
argv-array: rename to strvec
argv-array: use size_t for count and alloc
The purpose of "git init --separate-git-dir" is to separate the
repository from the worktree. This is true even when --separate-git-dir
is used on an existing worktree, in which case, it moves the .git/
subdirectory to a new location outside the worktree.
However, an outright bare repository (such as one created by "git init
--bare"), has no worktree, so using --separate-git-dir to separate it
from its non-existent worktree is nonsensical. Therefore, make it an
error to use --separate-git-dir on a bare repository.
Implementation note: "git init" considers a repository bare if told so
explicitly via --bare or if it guesses it to be so based upon
heuristics. In the explicit --bare case, a conflict with
--separate-git-dir is easy to detect early. In the guessed case,
however, the conflict can only be detected once "bareness" is guessed,
which happens after "git init" has begun creating the repository.
Technically, we can get by with a single late check which would cover
both cases, however, erroring out early, when possible, without leaving
detritus provides a better user experience.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Under normal circumstances, if a test author misspells a filename passed
to test_cmp(), the error is quickly discovered when the test fails
unexpectedly due to test_cmp() being unable to find the file. However,
if the test is expected to fail, as with test_expect_failure(), a
misspelled filename as argument to test_cmp() will go unnoticed since
the test will indeed fail, but for the wrong reason. Make it easier for
test authors to discover such problems early by sanity-checking the
arguments to test_cmp(). To avoid penalizing all clients of test_cmp()
in the general case, only check for missing files if the comparison
fails.
While at it, make test_cmp_bin() sanity-check its arguments, as well.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When creating "new file" diffs against i-t-a index entries, diff-lib
erroneously used the mode of the cache entry rather than the mode of the
file in the worktree. This changes run_diff_files() to correctly use the
mode of the worktree file in this case.
Signed-off-by: Raymond E. Pasco <ray@ameretat.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
apply --cached (as used by add -p) should accept creation and deletion
patches to intent-to-add paths in the index. apply --index, however,
should always fail because an intent-to-add path never matches the
worktree (by definition).
Based-on-patch-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Raymond E. Pasco <ray@ameretat.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By definition, an intent-to-add index entry can never match the
worktree, because worktrees have no concept of intent-to-add entries.
Therefore, "apply --index" should always fail on intent-to-add paths.
Because check_preimage() calls verify_index_match(), it already fails
for patches other than creation patches, which check_preimage() ignores.
This patch adds a check to check_preimage()'s rough equivalent for
creation patches, check_to_create().
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Raymond E. Pasco <ray@ameretat.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that find_bisection() accepts multiple boolean arguments, these may
be combined into a single unsigned integer in order to declutter some of
the code in bisect.c
Also, rename the existing "flags" bitfield to "commit_flags", to
explicitly differentiate it from the new "bisect_flags" bitfield.
Based-on-patch-by: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Upon seeing a merge commit when bisecting, this option may be used to
follow only the first parent.
In detecting regressions introduced through the merging of a branch, the
merge commit will be identified as introduction of the bug and its
ancestors will be ignored.
This option is particularly useful in avoiding false positives when a
merged branch contained broken or non-buildable commits, but the merge
itself was OK.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cmd_bisect__helper() is intended as a temporary shim layer serving as an
interface for git-bisect.sh. This function and git-bisect.sh should
eventually be replaced by a C implementation, cmd_bisect(), serving as
an entrypoint for all "git bisect ..." shell commands: cmd_bisect() will
only parse the first token following "git bisect", and dispatch the
remaining args to the appropriate function ["bisect_start()",
"bisect_next()", etc.].
Thus, cmd_bisect__helper() should not be responsible for parsing flags
like --no-checkout. Instead, let the --no-checkout flag remain in the
argv array, so it may be evaluated alongside the other options already
parsed by bisect_start().
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add first_parent_only parameter to find_bisection(), removing the
barrier that prevented combining the --bisect and --first-parent flags
when using git rev-list
Based-on-patch-by: Tiago Botelho <tiagonbotelho@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Enforce consistent styling for tests on "git bisect run":
- Use "write_script" to abstract away platform-specific details.
- Favor current whitespace conventions.
- While at it, change "introduced" to "added" in the comments to make
them read better.
Helped-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to not repeatedly search for the reference-transaction hook in
case it's getting called multiple times, we use a caching mechanism to
only call `find_hook()` once. What was missed though is that the return
value of `find_hook()` actually comes from a static strbuf, which means
it will get overwritten when calling `find_hook()` again. As a result,
we may call the wrong hook with parameters of the reference-transaction
hook.
This scenario was spotted in the wild when executing a git-push(1) with
multiple references, where there are interleaving calls to both the
update and the reference-transaction hook. While initial calls to the
reference-transaction hook work as expected, it will stop working after
the next invocation of the update hook. The result is that we now start
calling the update hook with parameters and stdin of the
reference-transaction hook.
This commit fixes the issue by storing a copy of `find_hook()`'s return
value in the cache.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A Git client may produce a "remote error:" message (along with whatever
error the other side sent us) in two places:
- when we see an ERR packet
- when we're using a sideband and see sideband 3
We can't reliably translate the message the other side sent us, but we
can do so for our own prefix. However, we translate only the ERR-packet
case but not the sideband-3 case. Let's make them consistent (by marking
both for translation).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there is no need to run a specific function on certain platforms,
we often #define an empty function to swallow its parameters and
make it into a no-op, e.g.
#define precompose_argv(c,v) /* no-op */
While this guarantees that no unneeded code is generated, it also
discards type and other checks on these parameters, e.g. a new code
written with the argv-array API (diff_args is of type "struct
argv_array" that has .argc and .argv members):
precompose_argv(diff_args.argc, diff_args.argv);
must be updated to use "struct strvec diff_args" with .nr and .v
members, like so:
precompose_argv(diff_args.nr, diff_args.v);
after the argv-array API has been updated to the strvec API.
However, the "no oop" C preprocessor macro is too aggressive to
discard what is unused, and did not catch such a call that was left
unconverted.
Using a "static inline" function whose body is a no-op should still
result in the same binary with decent compilers yet catch such a
reference to a missing field or passing a value of a wrong type.
While at it, I notice that precompute_str() has never been used
anywhere in the code, since it was introduced at 76759c7d (git on
Mac OS and precomposed unicode, 2012-07-08). Instead of turning it
into a static inline, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Drop whitespace in the value of `$test_description` and in a test body
and use `test_write_lines`.
Stop defining `$u` with a trailing space just so that we can tuck it in
like `git foo $u$more...` and get minimal whitespace in the command:
`git foo $u $more...` is more readable at the "cost" of an empty `$u`
yielding `git foo something...`.
Finally, avoid using single quotes within the test scripts to repeatedly
close and reopen the quotes that wrap the test scripts (see the previous
commit). This "unnecessary" quoting does mean that the verbose test
output shows the interpolated values, i.e., the shell code we're
running. But the downside is that the source of the script does *not*
show the shell code we're eventually executing, leaving the reader to
reason about what we really do and whether there are any quoting issues.
(There aren't.)
Where we run through loops to generate several "identical but different"
tests, the test message contains the interpolated variables we're
looping on, meaning one can always identify exactly which instance has
failed, even if the verbose test output shows the exact same test body
several times.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the test scripts, the recommended style is, e.g.:
test_expect_success 'name' '
do-something somehow &&
do-some-more testing
'
When using this style, any single quote in the multi-line test section
is actually closing the lone single quotes that surround it.
It can be a non-issue in practice:
test_expect_success 'sed a little' '
sed -e 's/hi/lo/' in >out # "ok": no whitespace in s/hi/lo/
'
Or it can be a bug in the test, e.g., because variable interpolation
happens before the test even begins executing:
v=abc
test_expect_success 'variable interpolation' '
v=def &&
echo '"$v"' # abc
'
Change several such in-test single quotes to use double quotes instead
or, in a few cases, drop them altogether. These were identified using
some crude grepping. We're not fixing any test bugs here, but we're
hopefully making these tests slightly easier to grok and to maintain.
There are legitimate use cases for closing a quote and opening a new
one, e.g., both '\'' and '"'"' can be used to produce a literal single
quote. I'm not touching any of those here.
In t9401, tuck the redirecting ">" to the filename while we're touching
those lines.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
blame/annotate have supported --first-parent since commit 95a4fb0eac
("blame: handle --first-parent"). This adds a blurb on that option to
the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Raymond E. Pasco <ray@ameretat.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
diff-files recently changed to treat changes to paths marked "intent to
add" in the index as new file diffs rather than diffs from the empty
blob. However, apply refuses to apply new file diffs on top of existing
index entries, except in the case of renames. This causes "git add -p",
which uses apply, to fail when attempting to stage hunks from a file
when intent to add has been recorded.
This changes the logic in check_to_create() which checks if an entry
already exists in an index in two ways: first, we only search for an
index entry at all if ok_if_exists is false; second, we check for the
CE_INTENT_TO_ADD flag on any index entries we find and allow the apply
to proceed if it is set.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Raymond E. Pasco <ray@ameretat.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
