Git learned pushing submodules without pushing the superproject by
the user specifying --recurse-submodules=only through 6c656c3fe4
("submodules: add RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ONLY value", 2016-12-20) and
225e8bf778 ("push: add option to push only submodules", 2016-12-20).
For users who use this feature regularly, it is desirable to have an
equivalent configuration.
It turns out that such a configuration (push.recurseSubmodules=only) is
already supported, even though it is neither documented nor mentioned
in the commit messages, due to the way the --recurse-submodules=only
feature was implemented (a function used to parse --recurse-submodules
was updated to support "only", but that same function is used to parse
push.recurseSubmodules too). What is left is to document it and test it,
which is what this commit does.
There is a possible point of confusion when recursing into a submodule
that itself has the push.recurseSubmodules=only configuration, because
if a repository has only its submodules pushed and not itself, its
superproject can never be pushed. Therefore, treat such configurations
as being "on-demand", and print a warning message.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reachability bitmaps are designed to speed up the "counting objects"
phase of generating a pack during a clone or fetch. They are not
optimized for Git clients sending a small topic branch via "git push".
In some cases (see [1]), using reachability bitmaps during "git push"
can cause significant performance regressions.
Add a new "push.useBitmaps" configuration variable to allow users to
tell "git push" not to use bitmaps. We already have "pack.bitmaps"
that controls the use of bitmaps, but a separate configuration variable
allows the reachability bitmaps to still be used in other areas,
such as "git upload-pack", while disabling it only for "git push".
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/87zhoz8b9o.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Kyle Zhao <kylezhao@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some "simple" centralized workflows, users expect remote tracking
branch names to match local branch names. "git push" pushes to the
remote version/instance of the branch, and "git pull" pulls any changes
to the remote branch (changes made by the same user in another place, or
by other users).
This expectation is supported by the push.default default option "simple"
which refuses a default push for a mismatching tracking branch name, and
by the new branch.autosetupmerge option, "simple", which only sets up
remote tracking for same-name remote branches.
When a new branch has been created by the user and has not yet been
pushed (and push.default is not set to "current"), the user is prompted
with a "The current branch %s has no upstream branch" error, and
instructions on how to push and add tracking.
This error is helpful in that following the advice once per branch
"resolves" the issue for that branch forever, but inconvenient in that
for the "simple" centralized workflow, this is always the right thing to
do, so it would be better to just do it.
Support this workflow with a new config setting, push.autoSetupRemote,
which will cause a default push, when there is no remote tracking branch
configured, to push to the same-name on the remote and --set-upstream.
Also add a hint offering this new option when the "The current branch %s
has no upstream branch" error is encountered, and add corresponding tests.
Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that the code has been simplified and it's clear what it's
actually doing, update the documentation to reflect that.
Namely; the simple mode only barfs when working on a centralized
workflow, and there's no configured upstream branch with the same name.
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update test cases for the new option, and document its usage
and update related references.
Update test cases for the new option, and document its usage
and update related references.
- t/t5533-push-cas.sh:
Update test cases for "compare-and-swap" when used along with
"--force-if-includes" helps mitigate overwrites when remote
refs are updated in the background; allows forced updates when
changes from remote are integrated locally.
- Documentation:
Add reference for the new option, configuration setting
("push.useForceIfIncludes") and advise messages.
Signed-off-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The default value also depends on the value of submodule.recurse.
Use this opportunity to correct some grammar mistakes in
Documentation/config/fetch.txt signaled by Robert P. J. Day.
Also mention `fetch.recurseSubmodules` in fetch-options.txt. In
git-push.txt, `push.recurseSubmodules` is implicitly mentioned (by
explaining how to disable it), so no need to add it there.
Lastly add a link to `git-fetch` in `git-pull.txt` to explain the
meaning of `--recurse-submodules` there.
Signed-off-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The example for the push.pushOption config tries to create a
preformatted section, but uses only two dashes in its "--" line. In
AsciiDoc this is an "open block", with no type; the lines end up jumbled
because they're formatted as paragraphs. We need four or more dashes to
make it a "listing block" that will respect the linebreaks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation for push.default mentions that it is used if no
refspec is "explicitly given". Let's drop the notion of "explicit" here,
since it's vague, and just mention that any refspec from anywhere is
sufficient to override this.
I've dropped the mention of "explicitly given" from the definition of
the "nothing" value right below, too. It's close enough to our
clarification that it should be obvious we mean the same type of "given"
here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
