Commit graph

116 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bryan Donlan
0e46e70462 Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts.
This form is not portable across all shells, so replace instances of:

  export FOO=bar

with:

  FOO=bar
  export FOO

Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-05 14:17:01 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
41ac414ea2 Sane use of test_expect_failure
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision.  Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:

    test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        what is to be tested
    '

And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests.  Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test.  The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.

This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:

    test_expect_success 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        ! this command should fail
    '

test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass.  So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:

    test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
        rm -f bar &&
        git foo &&
        test -f bar
    '

This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 20:49:34 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
3d5c418ff5 git-clone: aggressively optimize local clone behaviour.
This changes the behaviour of cloning from a repository on the
local machine, by defaulting to "-l" (use hardlinks to share
files under .git/objects) and making "-l" a no-op.  A new
option, --no-hardlinks, is also added to cause file-level copy
of files under .git/objects while still avoiding the normal
"pack to pipe, then receive and index pack" network transfer
overhead.  The old behaviour of local cloning without -l nor -s
is availble by specifying the source repository with the newly
introduced file:///path/to/repo.git/ syntax (i.e. "same as
network" cloning).

 * With --no-hardlinks (i.e. have all .git/objects/ copied via
   cpio) would not catch the source repository corruption, and
   also risks corrupted recipient repository if an
   alpha-particle hits memory cell while indexing and resolving
   deltas.  As long as the recipient is created uncorrupted, you
   have a good back-up.

 * same-as-network is expensive, but it would catch the breakage
   of the source repository.  It still risks corrupted recipient
   repository due to hardware failure.  As long as the recipient
   is created uncorrupted, you have a good back-up.

 * The new default on the same filesystem, as long as the source
   repository is healthy, it is very likely that the recipient
   would be, too.  Also it is very cheap.  You do not get any
   back-up benefit, though.

None of the method is resilient against the source repository
corruption, so let's discount that from the comparison.  Then
the difference with and without --no-hardlinks matters primarily
if you value the back-up benefit or not.  If you want to use the
cloned repository as a back-up, then it is cheaper to do a clone
with --no-hardlinks and two git-fsck (source before clone,
recipient after clone) than same-as-network clone, especially as
you are likely to do a git-fsck on the recipient if you are so
paranoid anyway.

Which leads me to believe that being able to use file:/// is
probably a good idea, if only for testability, but probably of
little practical value.  We default to hardlinked clone for
everyday use, and paranoids can use --no-hardlinks as a way to
make a back-up.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 23:42:36 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
5be60078c9 Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02 22:52:14 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
df391b192d git-fsck-objects is now synonym to git-fsck
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-28 16:33:58 -08:00
Tom Prince
e0d10e1c63 [PATCH] Rename git-repo-config to git-config.
Signed-off-by: Tom Prince <tom.prince@ualberta.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-28 16:16:53 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
e28714c527 Consolidate {receive,fetch}.unpackLimit
This allows transfer.unpackLimit to specify what these two
configuration variables want to set.

We would probably want to deprecate the two separate variables,
as I do not see much point in specifying them independently.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-24 18:08:02 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
af7cf268f0 fetch-pack: remove --keep-auto and make it the default.
This makes git-fetch over git native protocol to automatically
decide to keep the downloaded pack if the fetch results in more
than 100 objects, just like receive-pack invoked by git-push
does.  This logic is disabled when --keep is explicitly given
from the command line, so that a very small clone still keeps
the downloaded pack as before.

The 100 threshold can be adjusted with fetch.unpacklimit
configuration.  We might want to introduce transfer.unpacklimit
to consolidate the two unpacklimit variables, which will be a
topic for the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-24 18:08:02 -08:00
Nicolas Pitre
5c94f87e6b use 'init' instead of 'init-db' for shipped docs and tools
While 'init-db' still is and probably will always remain a valid git
command for obvious backward compatibility reasons, it would be a good
idea to move shipped tools and docs to using 'init' instead.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-12 13:36:16 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
37818d7db0 Merge branch 'master' into js/shallow
This is to adjust to:

  count-objects -v: show number of packs as well.

which will break a test in this series.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-27 02:43:46 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
16ad357910 add tests for shallow stuff
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-24 15:42:49 -08:00
Eric Wong
1010437d51 t5500-fetch-pack: remove local (bashism) usage.
None of the variables seem to conflict, so local was unnecessary.

Also replaced ${var:pos:len} with the sed equivalent.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-25 23:53:31 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
7f732c632f t5500: test fix
Relying on eye-candy progress bar was fragile to begin with.
Run fetch-pack with -k option, and count the objects that are in
the pack that were transferred from the other end.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-13 22:28:06 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
16139f9035 t5500: adjust to change in pack-object reporting behaviour.
Now pack-object is not as chatty when its stderr is not connected
to a terminal, so the test needs to be adjusted for that.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-02-11 23:08:23 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
1fdfd05db2 tests: make scripts executable
just for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-12-19 18:27:04 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
6b17c674aa Implement a test for git-fetch-pack/git-upload-pack
This test provides a minimal example of what went wrong with the old
git-fetch-pack (and now works beautifully).

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-28 22:56:58 -07:00