Commit graph

39 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
fb795323ce Merge branch 'wp/sha1-name-negative-match'
A new "<branch>^{/!-<pattern>}" notation can be used to name a
commit that is reachable from <branch> that does not match the
given <pattern>.

* wp/sha1-name-negative-match:
  object name: introduce '^{/!-<negative pattern>}' notation
  test for '!' handling in rev-parse's named commits
2016-02-10 14:20:10 -08:00
Will Palmer
0769854f3d object name: introduce '^{/!-<negative pattern>}' notation
To name a commit, you can now use the :/!-<negative pattern> regex
style, and consequentially, say

    $ git rev-parse HEAD^{/!-foo}

and it will return the hash of the first commit reachable from HEAD,
whose commit message does not contain "foo". This is the opposite of the
existing <rev>^{/<pattern>} syntax.

The specific use-case this is intended for is to perform an operation,
excluding the most-recent commits containing a particular marker. For
example, if you tend to make "work in progress" commits, with messages
beginning with "WIP", you work, then it could be useful to diff against
"the most recent commit which was not a WIP commit". That sort of thing
now possible, via commands such as:

    $ git diff @^{/!-^WIP}

The leader '/!-', rather than simply '/!', to denote a negative match,
is chosen to leave room for additional modifiers in the future.

Signed-off-by: Will Palmer <wmpalmer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith <ischis2@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-01 13:40:37 -08:00
Matthew Kraai
c200deb829 Documentation: remove unnecessary backslashes
asciidoctor does not remove backslashes used to escape curly brackets from
the HTML output if the contents of the curly brackets are empty or contain
at least a <, -, or space.  asciidoc does not require the backslashes in
these cases, so just remove them.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Kraai <matt.kraai@abbott.com>
Reported-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-01-20 16:15:14 -08:00
Jeff King
adfe5d0434 sha1_name: implement @{push} shorthand
In a triangular workflow, each branch may have two distinct
points of interest: the @{upstream} that you normally pull
from, and the destination that you normally push to. There
isn't a shorthand for the latter, but it's useful to have.

For instance, you may want to know which commits you haven't
pushed yet:

  git log @{push}..

Or as a more complicated example, imagine that you normally
pull changes from origin/master (which you set as your
@{upstream}), and push changes to your own personal fork
(e.g., as myfork/topic). You may push to your fork from
multiple machines, requiring you to integrate the changes
from the push destination, rather than upstream. With this
patch, you can just do:

  git rebase @{push}

rather than typing out the full name.

The heavy lifting is all done by branch_get_push; here we
just wire it up to the "@{push}" syntax.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22 09:33:08 -07:00
W. Trevor King
670a7297c2 Documentation: mention config sources for @{upstream}
The earlier documentation made vague references to "is set to build
on".  Flesh that out with references to the config settings, so folks
can use git-config(1) to get more detail on what @{upstream} means.
For example, @{upstream} does not care about remote.pushdefault or
branch.<name>.pushremote.

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-13 12:35:00 -07:00
Thomas Rast
75d6e552a8 Documentation: @{-N} can refer to a commit
The @{-N} syntax always referred to the N-th last thing checked out,
which can be either a branch or a commit (for detached HEAD cases).
However, the documentation only mentioned branches.

Edit in a "/commit" in the appropriate places.

Reported-by: Kevin <ikke@ikke.info>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-21 13:50:00 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
f406140baa Merge branch 'fc/at-head'
Instead of typing four capital letters "HEAD", you can say "@" now,
e.g. "git log @".

* fc/at-head:
  Add new @ shortcut for HEAD
  sha1-name: pass len argument to interpret_branch_name()
2013-09-20 12:38:10 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
638924fec2 Merge branch 'rh/peeling-tag-to-tag'
Make "foo^{tag}" to peel a tag to itself, i.e. no-op., and fail if
"foo" is not a tag.  "git rev-parse --verify v1.0^{tag}" would be a
more convenient way to say "test $(git cat-file -t v1.0) = tag".

* rh/peeling-tag-to-tag:
  peel_onion: do not assume length of x_type globals
  peel_onion(): add support for <rev>^{tag}
2013-09-20 12:27:18 -07:00
Felipe Contreras
9ba89f484e Add new @ shortcut for HEAD
Typing 'HEAD' is tedious, especially when we can use '@' instead.

The reason for choosing '@' is that it follows naturally from the
ref@op syntax (e.g. HEAD@{u}), except we have no ref, and no
operation, and when we don't have those, it makes sens to assume
'HEAD'.

So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness.

Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so
let's make it invalid. Probably very few people, if any, used this name.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-12 14:39:34 -07:00
Richard Hansen
abdb54a1d2 revisions.txt: fix and clarify <rev>^{<type>}
If possible, <rev> will be dereferenced even if it is not a tag type
(e.g., commit dereferenced to a tree).

Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-04 15:03:59 -07:00
Richard Hansen
75aa26d34c peel_onion(): add support for <rev>^{tag}
Complete the <rev>^{<type>} family of object descriptors by having
<rev>^{tag} dereference <rev> until a tag object is found (or fail if
unable).

At first glance this may not seem very useful, as commits, trees, and
blobs cannot be peeled to a tag, and a tag would just peel to itself.
However, this can be used to ensure that <rev> names a tag object:

    $ git rev-parse --verify v1.8.4^{tag}
    04f013dc38
    $ git rev-parse --verify master^{tag}
    error: master^{tag}: expected tag type, but the object dereferences to tree type
    fatal: Needed a single revision

Users can already ensure that <rev> is a tag object by checking the
output of 'git cat-file -t <rev>', but:
  * users may expect <rev>^{tag} to exist given that <rev>^{commit},
    <rev>^{tree}, and <rev>^{blob} all exist
  * this syntax is more convenient/natural in some circumstances

Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-03 13:09:17 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
2c2b6646c2 Revert "Add new @ shortcut for HEAD"
This reverts commit cdfd94837b, as it
does not just apply to "@" (and forms with modifiers like @{u}
applied to it), but also affects e.g. "refs/heads/@/foo", which it
shouldn't.

The basic idea of giving a short-hand might be good, and the topic
can be retried later, but let's revert to avoid affecting existing
use cases for now for the upcoming release.
2013-08-14 15:04:24 -07:00
Felipe Contreras
cdfd94837b Add new @ shortcut for HEAD
Typing 'HEAD' is tedious, especially when we can use '@' instead.

The reason for choosing '@' is that it follows naturally from the
ref@op syntax (e.g. HEAD@{u}), except we have no ref, and no
operation, and when we don't have those, it makes sens to assume
'HEAD'.

So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness.

Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so
let's make it invalid. Probably very few people, if any, used this name.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-08 12:13:12 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
2a407d7443 Merge branch 'rr/shortlog-doc'
Update documentation for "log" and "shortlog".

* rr/shortlog-doc:
  builtin/shortlog.c: make usage string consistent with log
  builtin/log.c: make usage string consistent with doc
  git-shortlog.txt: make SYNOPSIS match log, update OPTIONS
  git-log.txt: rewrite note on why "--" may be required
  git-log.txt: generalize <since>..<until>
  git-log.txt: order OPTIONS properly; move <since>..<until>
  revisions.txt: clarify the .. and ... syntax
  git-shortlog.txt: remove (-h|--help) from OPTIONS
2013-04-26 15:28:39 -07:00
Ramkumar Ramachandra
3a4dc48623 revisions.txt: clarify the .. and ... syntax
In <rev1>..<rev2> and <rev1>...<rev2>, if either <rev1> or <rev2> is
omitted, it defaults to 'HEAD'.  Add this detail to the document.

Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-21 23:10:09 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
ad77690fe4 Merge branch 'ta/glossary'
* ta/glossary:
  glossary: improve definitions of refspec and pathspec
  The name of the hash function is "SHA-1", not "SHA1"
  glossary: improve description of SHA-1 related topics
  glossary: remove outdated/misleading/irrelevant entries
2013-04-21 18:40:15 -07:00
Thomas Ackermann
d5fa1f1a69 The name of the hash function is "SHA-1", not "SHA1"
Use "SHA-1" instead of "SHA1" whenever we talk about the hash function.
When used as a programming symbol, we keep "SHA1".

Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-15 11:08:37 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
caa7d79f1f Sync with 'maint'
* maint:
  Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and tests
  kwset: fix spelling in comments
  precompose-utf8: fix spelling of "want" in error message
  compat/nedmalloc: fix spelling in comments
  compat/regex: fix spelling and grammar in comments
  obstack: fix spelling of similar
  contrib/subtree: fix spelling of accidentally
  git-remote-mediawiki: spelling fixes
  doc: various spelling fixes
  fast-export: fix argument name in error messages
  Documentation: distinguish between ref and offset deltas in pack-format
  i18n: make the translation of -u advice in one go
2013-04-12 13:54:01 -07:00
Stefano Lattarini
e1c3bf496f doc: various spelling fixes
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12 12:00:52 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
1b7b22bfd0 Merge branch 'jc/sha1-name-object-peeler'
There was no good way to ask "I have a random string that came from
outside world. I want to turn it into a 40-hex object name while
making sure such an object exists".  A new peeling suffix ^{object}
can be used for that purpose, together with "rev-parse --verify".

* jc/sha1-name-object-peeler:
  peel_onion(): teach $foo^{object} peeler
  peel_onion: disambiguate to favor tree-ish when we know we want a tree-ish
2013-04-03 09:34:54 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
a6a3f2cc07 peel_onion(): teach $foo^{object} peeler
A string that names an object can be suffixed with ^{type} peeler to
say "I have this object name; peel it until you get this type. If
you cannot do so, it is an error".  v1.8.2^{commit} asks for a commit
that is pointed at an annotated tag v1.8.2; v1.8.2^{tree} unwraps it
further to the top-level tree object.  A special suffix ^{} (i.e. no
type specified) means "I do not care what it unwraps to; just peel
annotated tag until you get something that is not a tag".

When you have a random user-supplied string, you can turn it to a
bare 40-hex object name, and cause it to error out if such an object
does not exist, with:

	git rev-parse --verify "$userstring^{}"

for most objects, but this does not yield the tag object name when
$userstring refers to an annotated tag.

Introduce a new suffix, ^{object}, that only makes sure the given
name refers to an existing object.  Then

	git rev-parse --verify "$userstring^{object}"

becomes a way to make sure $userstring refers to an existing object.

This is necessary because the plumbing "rev-parse --verify" is only
about "make sure the argument is something we can feed to get_sha1()
and turn it into a raw 20-byte object name SHA-1" and is not about
"make sure that 20-byte object name SHA-1 refers to an object that
exists in our object store".  When the given $userstring is already
a 40-hex, by definition "rev-parse --verify $userstring" can turn it
into a raw 20-byte object name.  With "$userstring^{object}", we can
make sure that the 40-hex string names an object that exists in our
object store before "--verify" kicks in.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-31 15:57:42 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
bb79a827a2 Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
  rev-parse: clarify documentation of $name@{upstream} syntax
  sha1_name: pass object name length to diagnose_invalid_sha1_path()
  Makefile: keep LIB_H entries together and sorted
2013-03-17 00:11:11 -07:00
Kacper Kornet
47e329ef7c rev-parse: clarify documentation of $name@{upstream} syntax
"git rev-parse" interprets string in string@{upstream} as a name of
a branch not a ref. For example, refs/heads/master@{upstream} looks
for an upstream branch that is merged by git-pull to ref
refs/heads/refs/heads/master not to refs/heads/master.

However the documentation could mislead a user to believe that the
string is interpreted as ref.

Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-17 00:10:59 -07:00
Thomas Ackermann
2de9b71138 Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git'
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-01 13:53:33 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
8023a42210 Merge branch 'nd/branch-v-alignment'
Output from "git branch -v" contains "(no branch)" that could be
localized, but the code to align it along with the names of branches
were counting in bytes, not in display columns.

* nd/branch-v-alignment:
  branch -v: align even when branch names are in UTF-8
2012-09-07 11:10:02 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
1452bd64f1 branch -v: align even when branch names are in UTF-8
Branch names are usually in ASCII so they are not the problem. The
problem most likely comes from "(no branch)" translation, which is
in UTF-8 and makes display-width calculation just wrong.  Clarify
this by renaming the field "len" in struct ref_item to "width", as
it stores the display-width and is used to compute the width of the
screen needed to show the names of all the branches, and compute the
display width using utf8_strwidth(), not byte-length with strlen().

Update document to mention the fact that we may want ref names in
UTF-8. Encodings that produce invalid UTF-8 are safe as utf8_strwidth()
falls back to strlen(). The ones that incidentally produce valid UTF-8
sequences will cause misalignment.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27 11:42:28 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
003c84f6d2 specifying ranges: we did not mean to make ".." an empty set
Either end of revision range operator can be omitted to default to HEAD,
as in "origin.." (what did I do since I forked) or "..origin" (what did
they do since I forked).  But the current parser interprets ".."  as an
empty range "HEAD..HEAD", and worse yet, because ".." does exist on the
filesystem, we get this annoying output:

  $ cd Documentation/howto
  $ git log .. ;# give me recent commits that touch Documentation/ area.
  fatal: ambiguous argument '..': both revision and filename
  Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions

Surely we could say "git log ../" or even "git log -- .." to disambiguate,
but we shouldn't have to.

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-23 14:37:49 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
ca5ee2d1fb Enumerate revision range specifiers in the documentation
It was a bit hard to learn how <rev>^@, <rev>^! and various other
forms of range specifiers are used, because they were discussed
mostly in the prose part of the documentation, unlike various forms
of extended SHA-1 expressions that are listed in an enumerated list.

Also add a few more examples showing use of <rev>, <rev>..<rev> and
<rev>^! forms, stolen from a patch by Max Horn.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-24 15:03:50 -07:00
Max Horn
89ce391b8e Make <refname> documentation more consistent.
Formerly, the documentation for <refname> would occasionally say
<name> instead of <refname>. Now it uniformly uses <refname>.

Signed-off-by: Max Horn <max@quendi.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-05 23:59:30 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
70eb130768 Documentation: do not assume that n > 1 in <rev>~$n
We explained <rev>~<n> as <n>th generation grand-parent, but a reader got
confused by the "grand-" part when <n> is 1.

Reword it with "ancestor"; with the "generation" and "following only the
first parents" around there, what we try to describe should be clear
enough now.

Noticed-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Helped-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-02 09:33:29 -08:00
Michael J Gruber
b62c769730 revisions.txt: language improvements
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-04 16:43:57 -07:00
Michael J Gruber
61e508d973 revisions.txt: structure with a labelled list
Currently, the reader has to parse a textual description in order to
find a specific syntax in the list.

Restructure as a labelled list with systematic labels as well as
concrete examples as a visual guide.

Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-01 15:08:32 -07:00
Michael J Gruber
83456b1352 revisions.txt: consistent use of quotes
Our use of quotes is inconsistent everywhere and within some files.
Before reworking the structure of revisions.txt, make the quotes
consistent:

`git command`

'some snippet or term'

The former gets typeset as code, the latter with some form of emphasis.
the man backend uses two types of emphasis.

Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-01 15:06:54 -07:00
Jay Soffian
d7e5c0cbfb Introduce CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
When a cherry-pick conflicts git advises:

 $ git commit -c <original commit id>

to preserve the original commit message and authorship. Instead, let's
record the original commit id in CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and advise:

  $ git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD

A later patch teaches git to handle the '-c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' part.
Note that we record CHERRY_PICK_HEAD even in the case where there
are no conflicts so that we may use it to communicate authorship to
commit; this will then allow us to remove set_author_ident_env from
revert.c. However, we do not record CHERRY_PICK_HEAD when --no-commit
is used, as presumably the user intends to further edit the commit
and possibly even cherry-pick additional commits on top.

Tests and documentation contributed by Jonathan Nieder.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-21 22:58:02 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
41cd7974b0 Merge branch 'nd/oneline-sha1-name-from-specific-ref'
* nd/oneline-sha1-name-from-specific-ref:
  get_sha1: handle special case $commit^{/}
  get_sha1: support $commit^{/regex} syntax
  get_sha1_oneline: make callers prepare the commit list to traverse
  get_sha1_oneline: fix lifespan rule of temp_commit_buffer variable
2010-12-21 14:30:19 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
32574b68c5 get_sha1: support $commit^{/regex} syntax
This works like ":/regex" syntax that finds a recently created commit
starting from all refs, but limits the discovery to those reachable from
the named commit.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-14 16:50:45 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
979f792951 get_sha1: support relative path ":path" syntax
Currently :path and ref:path can be used to refer to a specific object
in index or ref respectively. "path" component is absolute path. This
patch allows "path" to be written as "./path" or "../path", which is
relative to user's original cwd.

This does not work in commands for which startup_info is NULL
(i.e. non-builtin ones, it seems none of them needs this anyway).

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-07 14:25:46 -08:00
Matthieu Moy
95ad6d2de1 update comment and documentation for :/foo syntax
The documentation in revisions.txt did not match the implementation, and
the comment in sha1_name.c was incomplete.

Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27 10:54:52 -07:00
Michael J Gruber
5a8f311789 Documentation: split off rev doc into include file
Currently, the documentation for revisions and ranges sits in the
git-rev-parse man page, i.e. a plumbing man page, along with the
documentation of all rev-parse modes.

Split off the revisions and ranges section into an included file to
prepare for restructuring.

Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-05 13:38:10 -07:00