Many codepaths did not diagnose write failures correctly when disks
go full, due to their misuse of write_in_full() helper function,
which have been corrected.
* jk/write-in-full-fix:
read_pack_header: handle signed/unsigned comparison in read result
config: flip return value of store_write_*()
notes-merge: use ssize_t for write_in_full() return value
pkt-line: check write_in_full() errors against "< 0"
convert less-trivial versions of "write_in_full() != len"
avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) != len" pattern
get-tar-commit-id: check write_in_full() return against 0
config: avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) < len" pattern
Unlike "git commit-tree < file", "git commit-tree -F file" did not
pass the contents of the file verbatim and instead completed an
incomplete line at the end, if exists. The latter has been updated
to match the behaviour of the former.
* rk/commit-tree-make-F-verbatim:
commit-tree: do not complete line in -F input
Many leaks of strbuf have been fixed.
* rs/strbuf-leakfix: (34 commits)
wt-status: release strbuf after use in wt_longstatus_print_tracking()
wt-status: release strbuf after use in read_rebase_todolist()
vcs-svn: release strbuf after use in end_revision()
utf8: release strbuf on error return in strbuf_utf8_replace()
userdiff: release strbuf after use in userdiff_get_textconv()
transport-helper: release strbuf after use in process_connect_service()
sequencer: release strbuf after use in save_head()
shortlog: release strbuf after use in insert_one_record()
sha1_file: release strbuf on error return in index_path()
send-pack: release strbuf on error return in send_pack()
remote: release strbuf after use in set_url()
remote: release strbuf after use in migrate_file()
remote: release strbuf after use in read_remote_branches()
refs: release strbuf on error return in write_pseudoref()
notes: release strbuf after use in notes_copy_from_stdin()
merge: release strbuf after use in write_merge_heads()
merge: release strbuf after use in save_state()
mailinfo: release strbuf on error return in handle_boundary()
mailinfo: release strbuf after use in handle_from()
help: release strbuf on error return in exec_woman_emacs()
...
As "git commit" to conclude a conflicted "git merge" honors the
commit-msg hook, "git merge" that recoreds a merge commit that
cleanly auto-merges should, but it didn't.
* sb/merge-commit-msg-hook:
builtin/merge: honor commit-msg hook for merges
Many of our programs consider that it is OK to release dynamic
storage that is used throughout the life of the program by simply
exiting, but this makes it harder to leak detection tools to avoid
reporting false positives. Plug many existing leaks and introduce
a mechanism for developers to mark that the region of memory
pointed by a pointer is not lost/leaking to help these tools.
* jk/leak-checkers:
add UNLEAK annotation for reducing leak false positives
set_git_dir: handle feeding gitdir to itself
repository: free fields before overwriting them
reset: free allocated tree buffers
reset: make tree counting less confusing
config: plug user_config leak
update-index: fix cache entry leak in add_one_file()
add: free leaked pathspec after add_files_to_cache()
test-lib: set LSAN_OPTIONS to abort by default
test-lib: --valgrind should not override --verbose-log
"git -c submodule.recurse=yes pull" did not work as if the
"--recurse-submodules" option was given from the command line.
This has been corrected.
* nm/pull-submodule-recurse-config:
pull: honor submodule.recurse config option
pull: fix cli and config option parsing order
Our hashmap implementation in hashmap.[ch] is not thread-safe when
adding a new item needs to expand the hashtable by rehashing; add
an API to disable the automatic rehashing to work it around.
* jh/hashmap-disable-counting:
hashmap: add API to disable item counting when threaded
The long-standing rule that an in-core lockfile instance, once it
is used, must not be freed, has been lifted and the lockfile and
tempfile APIs have been updated to reduce the chance of programming
errors.
* jk/incore-lockfile-removal:
stop leaking lock structs in some simple cases
ref_lock: stop leaking lock_files
lockfile: update lifetime requirements in documentation
tempfile: auto-allocate tempfiles on heap
tempfile: remove deactivated list entries
tempfile: use list.h for linked list
tempfile: release deactivated strbufs instead of resetting
tempfile: robustify cleanup handler
tempfile: factor out deactivation
tempfile: factor out activation
tempfile: replace die("BUG") with BUG()
tempfile: handle NULL tempfile pointers gracefully
tempfile: prefer is_tempfile_active to bare access
lockfile: do not rollback lock on failed close
tempfile: do not delete tempfile on failed close
always check return value of close_tempfile
verify_signed_buffer: prefer close_tempfile() to close()
setup_temporary_shallow: move tempfile struct into function
setup_temporary_shallow: avoid using inactive tempfile
write_index_as_tree: cleanup tempfile on error
The return value of write_in_full() is either "-1", or the
requested number of bytes[1]. If we make a partial write
before seeing an error, we still return -1, not a partial
value. This goes back to f6aa66cb95 (write_in_full: really
write in full or return error on disk full., 2007-01-11).
So checking anything except "was the return value negative"
is pointless. And there are a couple of reasons not to do
so:
1. It can do a funny signed/unsigned comparison. If your
"len" is signed (e.g., a size_t) then the compiler will
promote the "-1" to its unsigned variant.
This works out for "!= len" (unless you really were
trying to write the maximum size_t bytes), but is a
bug if you check "< len" (an example of which was fixed
recently in config.c).
We should avoid promoting the mental model that you
need to check the length at all, so that new sites are
not tempted to copy us.
2. Checking for a negative value is shorter to type,
especially when the length is an expression.
3. Linus says so. In d34cf19b89 (Clean up write_in_full()
users, 2007-01-11), right after the write_in_full()
semantics were changed, he wrote:
I really wish every "write_in_full()" user would just
check against "<0" now, but this fixes the nasty and
stupid ones.
Appeals to authority aside, this makes it clear that
writing it this way does not have an intentional
benefit. It's a historical curiosity that we never
bothered to clean up (and which was undoubtedly
cargo-culted into new sites).
So let's convert these obviously-correct cases (this
includes write_str_in_full(), which is just a wrapper for
write_in_full()).
[1] A careful reader may notice there is one way that
write_in_full() can return a different value. If we ask
write() to write N bytes and get a return value that is
_larger_ than N, we could return a larger total. But
besides the fact that this would imply a totally broken
version of write(), it would already invoke undefined
behavior. Our internal remaining counter is an unsigned
size_t, which means that subtracting too many byte will
wrap it around to a very large number. So we'll instantly
begin reading off the end of the buffer, trying to write
gigabytes (or petabytes) of data.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We ask to write 41 bytes and make sure that the return value
is at least 41. This is the same "dangerous" pattern that
was fixed in the prior commit (wherein a negative return
value is promoted to unsigned), though it is not dangerous
here because our "41" is a constant, not an unsigned
variable.
But we should convert it anyway to avoid modeling a
dangerous construct.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Message and doc updates.
* ma/up-to-date:
treewide: correct several "up-to-date" to "up to date"
Documentation/user-manual: update outdated example output
Killing "git merge --edit" before the editor returns control left
the repository in a state with MERGE_MSG but without MERGE_HEAD,
which incorrectly tells the subsequent "git commit" that there was
a squash merge in progress. This has been fixed.
* mg/killed-merge:
merge: save merge state earlier
merge: split write_merge_state in two
merge: clarify call chain
Documentation/git-merge: explain --continue
"git am -s" has been taught that some input may end with a trailer
block that is not Signed-off-by: and it should refrain from adding
an extra blank line before adding a new sign-off in such a case.
* pw/am-signoff:
am: fix signoff when other trailers are present
"git clone --recurse-submodules --quiet" did not pass the quiet
option down to submodules.
* bw/clone-recursive-quiet:
clone: teach recursive clones to respect -q
Commands like "git rebase" accepted the --rerere-autoupdate option
from the command line, but did not always use it. This has been
fixed.
* pw/sequence-rerere-autoupdate:
cherry-pick/revert: reject --rerere-autoupdate when continuing
cherry-pick/revert: remember --rerere-autoupdate
t3504: use test_commit
rebase -i: honor --rerere-autoupdate
rebase: honor --rerere-autoupdate
am: remember --rerere-autoupdate setting
"git push --recurse-submodules $there HEAD:$target" was not
propagated down to the submodules, but now it is.
* bw/push-options-recursively-to-submodules:
submodule--helper: teach push-check to handle HEAD
The "tag.pager" configuration variable was useless for those who
actually create tag objects, as it interfered with the use of an
editor. A new mechanism has been introduced for commands to enable
pager depending on what operation is being carried out to fix this,
and then "git tag -l" is made to run pager by default.
If this works out OK, I think there are low-hanging fruits in
other commands like "git branch" that outputs long list in one mode
while taking input in another.
* ma/pager-per-subcommand-action:
git.c: ignore pager.* when launching builtin as dashed external
tag: change default of `pager.tag` to "on"
tag: respect `pager.tag` in list-mode only
t7006: add tests for how git tag paginates
git.c: provide setup_auto_pager()
git.c: let builtins opt for handling `pager.foo` themselves
builtin.h: take over documentation from api-builtin.txt
"git log --tag=no-such-tag" showed log starting from HEAD, which
has been fixed---it now shows nothing.
* jk/rev-list-empty-input:
revision: do not fallback to default when rev_input_given is set
rev-list: don't show usage when we see empty ref patterns
revision: add rev_input_given flag
t6018: flesh out empty input/output rev-list tests
"git commit-tree -F <file>", unlike "cat <file> | git
commit-tree" (i.e. feeding the same contents from the standard
input), added a missing final newline when the input ended in an
incomplete line.
Correct this inconsistency by leaving the incomplete line as-is,
as erring on the side of not touching the input is preferrable
and expected for a plumbing command like "commit-tree".
Signed-off-by: Ross Kabus <rkabus@aerotech.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The original git-shortlog command parsed the output of
git-log, and the logic went something like this:
1. Read stdin looking for "author" lines.
2. Parse the identity into its name/email bits.
3. Apply mailmap to the name/email.
4. Reformat the identity into a single buffer that is our
"key" for grouping entries (either a name by default,
or "name <email>" if --email was given).
The first part happens in read_from_stdin(), and the other
three steps are part of insert_one_record().
When we do an internal traversal, we just swap out the stdin
read in step 1 for reading the commit objects ourselves.
Prior to 2db6b83d18 (shortlog: replace hand-parsing of
author with pretty-printer, 2016-01-18), that made sense; we
still had to parse the ident in the commit message.
But after that commit, we use pretty.c's "%an <%ae>" to get
the author ident (for simplicity). Which means that the
pretty printer is doing a parse/format under the hood, and
then we parse the result, apply the mailmap, and format the
result again.
Instead, we can just ask pretty.c to do all of those steps
for us (including the mailmap via "%aN <%aE>", and not
formatting the address when --email is missing).
And then we can push steps 2-4 into read_from_stdin(). This
speeds up "git shortlog -ns" on linux.git by about 3%, and
eliminates a leak in insert_one_record() of the namemailbuf
strbuf.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's a common pattern in git commands to allocate some
memory that should last for the lifetime of the program and
then not bother to free it, relying on the OS to throw it
away.
This keeps the code simple, and it's fast (we don't waste
time traversing structures or calling free at the end of the
program). But it also triggers warnings from memory-leak
checkers like valgrind or LSAN. They know that the memory
was still allocated at program exit, but they don't know
_when_ the leaked memory stopped being useful. If it was
early in the program, then it's probably a real and
important leak. But if it was used right up until program
exit, it's not an interesting leak and we'd like to suppress
it so that we can see the real leaks.
This patch introduces an UNLEAK() macro that lets us do so.
To understand its design, let's first look at some of the
alternatives.
Unfortunately the suppression systems offered by
leak-checking tools don't quite do what we want. A
leak-checker basically knows two things:
1. Which blocks were allocated via malloc, and the
callstack during the allocation.
2. Which blocks were left un-freed at the end of the
program (and which are unreachable, but more on that
later).
Their suppressions work by mentioning the function or
callstack of a particular allocation, and marking it as OK
to leak. So imagine you have code like this:
int cmd_foo(...)
{
/* this allocates some memory */
char *p = some_function();
printf("%s", p);
return 0;
}
You can say "ignore allocations from some_function(),
they're not leaks". But that's not right. That function may
be called elsewhere, too, and we would potentially want to
know about those leaks.
So you can say "ignore the callstack when main calls
some_function". That works, but your annotations are
brittle. In this case it's only two functions, but you can
imagine that the actual allocation is much deeper. If any of
the intermediate code changes, you have to update the
suppression.
What we _really_ want to say is that "the value assigned to
p at the end of the function is not a real leak". But
leak-checkers can't understand that; they don't know about
"p" in the first place.
However, we can do something a little bit tricky if we make
some assumptions about how leak-checkers work. They
generally don't just report all un-freed blocks. That would
report even globals which are still accessible when the
leak-check is run. Instead they take some set of memory
(like BSS) as a root and mark it as "reachable". Then they
scan the reachable blocks for anything that looks like a
pointer to a malloc'd block, and consider that block
reachable. And then they scan those blocks, and so on,
transitively marking anything reachable from a global as
"not leaked" (or at least leaked in a different category).
So we can mark the value of "p" as reachable by putting it
into a variable with program lifetime. One way to do that is
to just mark "p" as static. But that actually affects the
run-time behavior if the function is called twice (you
aren't likely to call main() twice, but some of our cmd_*()
functions are called from other commands).
Instead, we can trick the leak-checker by putting the value
into _any_ reachable bytes. This patch keeps a global
linked-list of bytes copied from "unleaked" variables. That
list is reachable even at program exit, which confers
recursive reachability on whatever values we unleak.
In other words, you can do:
int cmd_foo(...)
{
char *p = some_function();
printf("%s", p);
UNLEAK(p);
return 0;
}
to annotate "p" and suppress the leak report.
But wait, couldn't we just say "free(p)"? In this toy
example, yes. But UNLEAK()'s byte-copying strategy has
several advantages over actually freeing the memory:
1. It's recursive across structures. In many cases our "p"
is not just a pointer, but a complex struct whose
fields may have been allocated by a sub-function. And
in some cases (e.g., dir_struct) we don't even have a
function which knows how to free all of the struct
members.
By marking the struct itself as reachable, that confers
reachability on any pointers it contains (including those
found in embedded structs, or reachable by walking
heap blocks recursively.
2. It works on cases where we're not sure if the value is
allocated or not. For example:
char *p = argc > 1 ? argv[1] : some_function();
It's safe to use UNLEAK(p) here, because it's not
freeing any memory. In the case that we're pointing to
argv here, the reachability checker will just ignore
our bytes.
3. Likewise, it works even if the variable has _already_
been freed. We're just copying the pointer bytes. If
the block has been freed, the leak-checker will skip
over those bytes as uninteresting.
4. Because it's not actually freeing memory, you can
UNLEAK() before we are finished accessing the variable.
This is helpful in cases like this:
char *p = some_function();
return another_function(p);
Writing this with free() requires:
int ret;
char *p = some_function();
ret = another_function(p);
free(p);
return ret;
But with unleak we can just write:
char *p = some_function();
UNLEAK(p);
return another_function(p);
This patch adds the UNLEAK() macro and enables it
automatically when Git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. In
normal builds it's a noop, so we pay no runtime cost.
It also adds some UNLEAK() annotations to show off how the
feature works. On top of other recent leak fixes, these are
enough to get t0000 and t0001 to pass when compiled with
LSAN.
Note the case in commit.c which actually converts a
strbuf_release() into an UNLEAK. This code was already
non-leaky, but the free didn't do anything useful, since
we're exiting. Converting it to an annotation means that
non-leak-checking builds pay no runtime cost. The cost is
minimal enough that it's probably not worth going on a
crusade to convert these kinds of frees to UNLEAKS. I did it
here for consistency with the "sb" leak (though it would
have been equally correct to go the other way, and turn them
both into strbuf_release() calls).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar to 65969d43d1 (merge: honor prepare-commit-msg hook, 2011-02-14)
merge should also honor the commit-msg hook: When a merge is stopped due
to conflicts or --no-commit, the subsequent commit calls the commit-msg
hook. However, it is not called after a clean merge. Fix this
inconsistency by invoking the hook after clean merges as well.
This change is motivated by Gerrit's commit-msg hook to install a ChangeId
trailer into the commit message. Without such a ChangeId, Gerrit refuses
to accept any commit by default, such that the inconsistency of (not)
running the commit-msg hook between commit and merge leads to confusion
and might block people from getting their work done.
As the githooks man page is very vocal about the possibility of skipping
the commit-msg hook via the --no-verify option, implement the option
in merge, too.
'git merge --continue' is currently implemented as calling cmd_commit
with no further arguments. This works for most other merge related options,
such as demonstrated via the --allow-unrelated-histories flag in the
test. The --no-verify option however is not remembered across invocations
of git-merge. Originally the author assumed an alternative in which the
'git merge --continue' command accepts the --no-verify flag, but that
opens up the discussion which flags are allows to the continued merge
command and which must be given in the first invocation.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git pull" supports a --recurse-submodules option but does not parse the
submodule.recurse configuration item to set the default for that option.
Meanwhile "git fetch" does support submodule.recurse, producing
confusing behavior: when submodule.recurse is enabled, "git pull"
recursively fetches submodules but does not update them after fetch.
Handle submodule.recurse in "git pull" to fix this.
Reported-by: Magnus Homann <magnus@homann.se>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <nicolas@morey-chaisemartin.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pull parses first the cli options and then the config option.
The expected behavior is the other way around, so that config
options can not override the cli ones.
This patch changes the parsing order so config options are
parsed first.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <nicolas@morey-chaisemartin.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is to address concerns raised by ThreadSanitizer on the mailing list
about threaded unprotected R/W access to map.size with my previous "disallow
rehash" change (0607e10009).
See:
https://public-inbox.org/git/adb37b70139fd1e2bac18bfd22c8b96683ae18eb.1502780344.git.martin.agren@gmail.com/
Add API to hashmap to disable item counting and thus automatic rehashing.
Also include API to later re-enable them.
When item counting is disabled, the map.size field is invalid. So to
prevent accidents, the field has been renamed and an accessor function
hashmap_get_size() has been added. All direct references to this
field have been been updated. And the name of the field changed
to map.private_size to communicate this.
Here is the relevant output from ThreadSanitizer showing the problem:
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=10554)
Read of size 4 at 0x00000082d488 by thread T2 (mutexes: write M16):
#0 hashmap_add hashmap.c:209
#1 hash_dir_entry_with_parent_and_prefix name-hash.c:302
#2 handle_range_dir name-hash.c:347
#3 handle_range_1 name-hash.c:415
#4 lazy_dir_thread_proc name-hash.c:471
#5 <null> <null>
Previous write of size 4 at 0x00000082d488 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M31):
#0 hashmap_add hashmap.c:209
#1 hash_dir_entry_with_parent_and_prefix name-hash.c:302
#2 handle_range_dir name-hash.c:347
#3 handle_range_1 name-hash.c:415
#4 handle_range_dir name-hash.c:380
#5 handle_range_1 name-hash.c:415
#6 lazy_dir_thread_proc name-hash.c:471
#7 <null> <null>
Martin gives instructions for running TSan on test t3008 in this post:
https://public-inbox.org/git/CAN0heSoJDL9pWELD6ciLTmWf-a=oyxe4EXXOmCKvsG5MSuzxsA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't reset the strbufs l2 and l3 before use as if they were static, but
release them at the end instead.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using for_each_ref_in() with a full refname has always been
a questionable practice, but it became an error with
b9c8e7f2fb (prefix_ref_iterator: don't trim too much,
2017-05-22), making "git rev-parse --bisect" pretty reliably
show a BUG.
Commit 03df567fbf (for_each_bisect_ref(): don't trim
refnames, 2017-06-18) fixed this case for revision.c, but
rev-parse handles this option on its own. We can use the
same solution here (and piggy-back on its test).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We read the tree objects with fill_tree_descriptor(), but
never actually free the resulting buffers, causing a memory
leak. This isn't a huge deal because we call this code at
most twice per program invocation. But it does potentially
double our heap usage if you have large root trees. Let's
free the trees before returning.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
