* 'maint' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Disable native platform text selection in "lists"
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Commit->Revert" format arguments
git-gui: Provide 'uninstall' Makefile target to undo an installation
git-gui: Font chooser to handle a large number of font families
git-gui: Make backporting changes from i18n version easier
git-gui: Don't delete send on Windows as it doesn't exist
git-gui: Trim trailing slashes from untracked submodule names
git-gui: Assume untracked directories are Git submodules
git-gui: handle "deleted symlink" diff marker
git-gui: show unstaged symlinks in diff viewer
git-gui: Avoid use of libdir in Makefile
git-gui: Disable Tk send in all git-gui sessions
git-gui: lib/index.tcl: handle files with % in the filename properly
git-gui: Properly set the state of "Stage/Unstage Hunk" action
git-gui: Fix detaching current branch during checkout
git-gui: Correct starting of git-remote to handle -w option
This teaches "git-gc --auto" to consolidate many packs into one
without losing unreachable objects in them by using "repack -A"
when there are too many packfiles that are not marked with *.keep
in the repository. gc.autopacklimit configuration can be used
to set the maximum number of packs a repository is allowed to
have before this mechanism kicks in.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to build the command line to run repack outside of
need_to_gc() but with the next patch we would want to tweak the
command line depending on the nature of need.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Deciding to run "repack -d -l" when there are too many
loose objects would backfire when there are too many loose
objects that are unreachable, because repacking that way would
never improve the situation. Detect that case by checking the
number of loose objects again after automatic garbage collection
runs, and issue an warning to run "prune" manually.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier code took Unix time and appended a few random digits.
If you are firing off many messages within a second, you could
issue the same id to different messages, which is a no-no. If
you send out 31 messages within a single second, with random
integer taken out of rand(4200), you have about 10% chance of
producing the same message ID.
This fixes the problem by uses a prefix string which is
constant-per-invocation (time and pid), with a serial number for
each message generated by the process appended at the end.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This new option is meant to be used in conjunction with the
options "git repack -a -d" usually invokes the underlying
pack-objects with. When this option is given, objects unreachable
from the refs in packs named with --unpacked= option are added
to the resulting pack, in addition to the reachable objects that
are not in packs marked with *.keep files.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-apply: fix whitespace stripping
apply --index-info: fall back to current index for mode changes
core-tutorial: minor cleanup
documentation: replace Discussion section by link to user-manual chapter
user-manual: todo updates and cleanup
user-manual: fix introduction to packfiles
user-manual: move packfile and dangling object discussion
user-manual: rewrite object database discussion
user-manual: reorder commit, blob, tree discussion
user-manual: rewrite index discussion
user-manual: create new "low-level git operations" chapter
user-manual: rename "git internals" to "git concepts"
user-manual: move object format details to hacking-git chapter
user-manual: adjust section levels in "git internals"
revision walker: --cherry-pick is a limited operation
git-sh-setup: typofix in comments
The algorithm isn't right here: it accumulates any set of 8 spaces into
tabs even if they're separated by tabs, so
<four spaces><tab><four spaces><tab>
is converted to
<tab><tab><tab>
when it should be just
<tab><tab>
So teach git-apply that a tab hides any group of less than 8 previous
spaces in a row.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sometimes we use a Tk text widget as though it were a listbox.
This happens typically when we want to show an icon to the left
of the text label or just when a text widget is generally a better
choice then the native listbox widget.
In these cases if we want the user to have control over the selection
we implement our own "in_sel" tag that shows the selected region
and we perform our own selection management in the background
via keybindings and mouse bindings. In such uses we don't want
the user to be able to activate the native platform selection by
dragging their mouse through the text widget. Doing so creates a
very confusing display and the user is left wondering what it may
mean to have two different types of selection in the same widget.
Tk doesn't allow us to delete the "sel" tag that it uses internally
to manage the native selection but it will allow us to make it
invisible by setting the tag to have the same display properties
as unselected text. So long as we don't actually use the "sel"
tag for anything in code its effectively invisible.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
"git diff" does not record index lines for pure mode changes (i.e. no
lines changed). Therefore, apply --index-info would call out a bogus
error.
Instead, fall back to reading the info from the current index.
Incidentally, this fixes an error where git-rebase would not rebase a
commit including a pure mode change, and changes requiring a threeway
merge.
Noticed and later tested by Chris Shoemaker.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Careful profiling shows that we spend more time guessing what pattern
allocation will have, whereas we can delay it only at the point where
add_rfc2047 will be used and don't allocate huge memory area for the many
cases where it's not.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Be more clever in how we search for "encoding ...\n": parse for real
instead of the sloppy strstr's.
* use strbuf_splice to do the substring replacements.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Now, those functions take an "out" strbuf argument, where they store their
result if any. In that case, it also returns 1, else it returns 0.
* those functions support "in place" editing, in the sense that it's OK to
call them this way:
convert_to_git(path, sb->buf, sb->len, sb);
When doable, conversions are done in place for real, else the strbuf
content is just replaced with the new one, transparentely for the caller.
If you want to create a new filter working this way, being the accumulation
of filter1, filter2, ... filtern, then your meta_filter would be:
int meta_filter(..., const char *src, size_t len, struct strbuf *sb)
{
int ret = 0;
ret |= filter1(...., src, len, sb);
if (ret) {
src = sb->buf;
len = sb->len;
}
ret |= filter2(...., src, len, sb);
if (ret) {
src = sb->buf;
len = sb->len;
}
....
return ret | filtern(..., src, len, sb);
}
That's why subfilters the convert_to_* functions called were also rewritten
to work this way.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* strbuf_splice replace a portion of the buffer with another.
* strbuf_attach replace a strbuf buffer with the given one, that should be
malloc'ed. Then it enforces strbuf's invariants. If alloc > len, then this
function has negligible cost, else it will perform a realloc, possibly
with a cost.
Also some style issues are fixed now.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'maint' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
core-tutorial: minor cleanup
documentation: replace Discussion section by link to user-manual chapter
user-manual: todo updates and cleanup
user-manual: fix introduction to packfiles
user-manual: move packfile and dangling object discussion
user-manual: rewrite object database discussion
user-manual: reorder commit, blob, tree discussion
user-manual: rewrite index discussion
user-manual: create new "low-level git operations" chapter
user-manual: rename "git internals" to "git concepts"
user-manual: move object format details to hacking-git chapter
user-manual: adjust section levels in "git internals"
Revise the introduction for concision, add pointers to the tutorial and
user manual as appropriate, delete cvsimport note from the end, as that
work's been done elsewhere already.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The "Discussion" section has a lot of useful information, but is a
little wordy, especially for an already-long man page, and is designed
for an audience more of potential git hackers than users, which probably
doesn't make as much sense as git matures. Also, I (perhaps foolishly)
forked a version in the user manual, which has been significantly
rewritten in an attempt to address some of the above problems.
So, remove this section and replace it by a (very terse) summary of the
original material--my attempt at the World's Shortest Git Overview--and
a reference to the appropriate chapter of the user manual. It's
unfortunate to remove something that's been in this place for a long
time, as some people may still depend on finding it there. But I think
we'll want to do this some day anyway.
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Actually I don't think we've previously mentioned .git/objects, so we
need a different introduction here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Rewrite the introduction. Rewrite each section completely to make them
work in the new order, to add some examples, and to move plumbing
commands (like git-commit-tree) to the following chapter.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The bottom-up blog, tree, commit order makes sense unless you want to
give explicit examples--it's easier to discover objects to examine if
you go in the other order....,
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Add an example using git-ls-files, standardize on the new "index"
terminology (as opposed to "cache"), attempt to clarify discussion and
make it a little shorter, avoid some unnecessary jargon ("write-back
cache").
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The low-level index operations aren't as important to regular users as
the rest of this "git concepts" chapter; so move it into a separate
chapter, and do some minor cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
"git internals" sounds like something only git developers must know
about, but this stuff should be of wider interest. Rename the chapter
and give it a slightly friendlier introduction.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The descriptions of the various object types should all be a subsection
of the "Object Database" section.
I cribbed most of this chapter from the README (now core-intro.txt and
git(7)), because there's stuff in there people need to know and I was
too lazy to rewrite it. The audience isn't quite right, though--the
chapter is a mixture of user- and developer- level documentation that
isn't as appropriate now as it was originally.
So, reserve this chapter for stuff users need to know, and move the
source code introduction into a new "git hacking" chapter where we'll
also move any hacker-only technical details.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
We used to rely on the fact that cherry-pick would trigger the code path
to set limited = 1 in handle_commit(), when an uninteresting commit was
encountered.
However, when cherry picking between two independent branches, i.e. when
there are no merge bases, and there is only linear development (which can
happen when you cvsimport a fork of a project), no uninteresting commit
will be encountered.
So set limited = 1 when --cherry-pick was asked for.
Noticed by Martin Bähr.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 8f48936391 changed mkpatchgo
to use diffcmd rather than constructing the diff command itself.
Unfortunately diffcmd returns the command with a "|" as the first
element (ready for use with open), but exec won't accept the "|".
Thus we need to remove the "|".
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
* jc/partial-remove:
Document ls-files --with-tree=<tree-ish>
git-commit: partial commit of paths only removed from the index
git-commit: Allow partial commit of file removal.
Because a partial commit is meant to be a way to ignore what are
staged in the index, "git rm --cached A && git commit A" should
just record what is in A on the filesystem. The previous patch
made the command sequence to barf, saying that A has not been
added yet. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we have a general-purpose way of taking some action when a
commit ID of interest is encountered, use that for triggering the
git diff-index process when we find the currently checked-out head,
rather than the special-purpose lookingforhead variable.
Also do the commitinterest processing in getcommitlines rather than
in showstuff.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
We weren't updating the rowfinal list in insertrow and removerow, so
it was getting out of sync with rowidlist, which resulted in Tcl errors.
This also optimizes the setting of rowfinal in layoutrows a bit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
* jc/grep-c:
Split grep arguments in a way that does not requires to add /dev/null.
Documentation/git-config.txt: AsciiDoc tweak to avoid leading dot
Add test to check recent fix to "git add -u"
Documentation/git-archive.txt: a couple of clarifications.
Fix the rename detection limit checking
diff --no-index: do not forget to run diff_setup_done()
In order to (almost) always show the name of the file without
relying on "-H" option of GNU grep, we used to add /dev/null to
the argument list unless we are doing -l or -L. This caused
"/dev/null:0" to show up when -c is given in the output.
It is not enough to add -c to the set of options we do not pass
/dev/null for. When we have too many files, we invoke grep
multiple times and we need to avoid giving a widow filename to
the last invocation -- otherwise we will not see the name.
This keeps two filenames when the argv[] buffer is about to
overflow and we have not finished iterating over the index, so
that the last round will always have at least two paths to work
with (and not require /dev/null).
An obvious and the only exception is when there is only 1 file
that is given to the underlying grep, and in that case we avoid
passing /dev/null and let the external "grep -c" report only the
number of matches.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
