Git tools all consistently encourage users to avoid whitespaces at
the end of line by giving them features like "git diff --check" and
"git am --whitespace=fix". Make sure that the advice messages we
give users avoid trailing whitespaces. We shouldn't be wasting
vertical screen real estate by adding blank lines in advice messages
that are supposed to be concise hints, but as long as we write such
blank line in our "hints", we should do it right.
A test that expects the current behaviour of leaving trailing
whitespaces has been adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git refuses to create a branch because the proposed branch
name is not a valid refname, an advice message is given to refer
the user to exact naming rules.
* kh/branch-ref-syntax-advice:
branch: advise about ref syntax rules
advice: use double quotes for regular quoting
advice: use backticks for verbatim
advice: make all entries stylistically consistent
t3200: improve test style
git-branch(1) will error out if you give it a bad ref name. But the user
might not understand why or what part of the name is illegal.
The user might know that there are some limitations based on the *loose
ref* format (filenames), but there are also further rules for
easier integration with shell-based tools, pathname expansion, and
playing well with reference name expressions.
The man page for git-check-ref-format(1) contains these rules. Let’s
advise about it since that is not a command that you just happen
upon. Also make this advise configurable since you might not want to be
reminded every time you make a little typo.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some tests use a preliminary heredoc for `expect` or have setup and
teardown commands before and after, respectively. It is however
preferred to keep all the logic in the test itself. Let’s move these
into the tests.
Also:
• Remove a now-irrelevant comment about test placement and switch back
to `main` post-test
• Prefer indented literal heredocs (`-\EOF`) except for a block which
says that this is intentional
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We still have a bunch of tests scattered across our test suites that
exercise on-disk files of the "files" backend directly:
- t1301 exercises permissions of reflog files when the config
"core.sharedRepository" is set.
- t1400 exercises whether empty directories in the ref store are
handled correctly.
- t3200 exercises what happens when there are symlinks in the ref
store.
- t3400 also exercises what happens when ".git/logs" is a symlink.
All of these are inherently low-level tests specific to the "files"
backend. Move them into "t0600-reffiles-backend.sh" to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A limited number of tests require repositories to have the default
repository format or otherwise they would fail to run, e.g. because they
fail to detect the correct hash function. While the hash function is the
only extension right now that creates problems like this, we are about
to add a second extension for the ref format.
Introduce a new DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT prereq that can easily be amended
whenever we add new format extensions. Next to making any such changes
easier on us, the prerequisite's name should also help to clarify the
intent better.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git for-each-ref --no-sort" still sorted the refs alphabetically
which paid non-trivial cost. It has been redefined to show output
in an unspecified order, to allow certain optimizations to take
advantage of.
* vd/for-each-ref-unsorted-optimization:
t/perf: add perf tests for for-each-ref
ref-filter.c: use peeled tag for '*' format fields
for-each-ref: clean up documentation of --format
ref-filter.c: filter & format refs in the same callback
ref-filter.c: refactor to create common helper functions
ref-filter.c: rename 'ref_filter_handler()' to 'filter_one()'
ref-filter.h: add functions for filter/format & format-only
ref-filter.h: move contains caches into filter
ref-filter.h: add max_count and omit_empty to ref_format
ref-filter.c: really don't sort when using --no-sort
Update ref-related tests.
* ps/ref-tests-update:
t: mark several tests that assume the files backend with REFFILES
t7900: assert the absence of refs via git-for-each-ref(1)
t7300: assert exact states of repo
t4207: delete replace references via git-update-ref(1)
t1450: convert tests to remove worktrees via git-worktree(1)
t: convert tests to not access reflog via the filesystem
t: convert tests to not access symrefs via the filesystem
t: convert tests to not write references via the filesystem
t: allow skipping expected object ID in `ref-store update-ref`
When '--no-sort' is passed to 'for-each-ref', 'tag', and 'branch', the
printed refs are still sorted by ascending refname. Change the handling of
sort options in these commands so that '--no-sort' to truly disables
sorting.
'--no-sort' does not disable sorting in these commands is because their
option parsing does not distinguish between "the absence of '--sort'"
(and/or values for tag.sort & branch.sort) and '--no-sort'. Both result in
an empty 'sorting_options' string list, which is parsed by
'ref_sorting_options()' to create the 'struct ref_sorting *' for the
command. If the string list is empty, 'ref_sorting_options()' interprets
that as "the absence of '--sort'" and returns the default ref sorting
structure (equivalent to "refname" sort).
To handle '--no-sort' properly while preserving the "refname" sort in the
"absence of --sort'" case, first explicitly add "refname" to the string list
*before* parsing options. This alone doesn't actually change any behavior,
since 'compare_refs()' already falls back on comparing refnames if two refs
are equal w.r.t all other sort keys.
Now that the string list is populated by default, '--no-sort' is the only
way to empty the 'sorting_options' string list. Update
'ref_sorting_options()' to return a NULL 'struct ref_sorting *' if the
string list is empty, and add a condition to 'ref_array_sort()' to skip the
sort altogether if the sort structure is NULL. Note that other functions
using 'struct ref_sorting *' do not need any changes because they already
ignore NULL values.
Finally, remove the condition around sorting in 'ls-remote', since it's no
longer necessary. Unlike 'for-each-ref' et. al., it does *not* do any
sorting by default. This default is preserved by simply leaving its sort key
string list empty before parsing options; if no additional sort keys are
set, 'struct ref_sorting *' is NULL and sorting is skipped.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Another step to deprecate test_i18ngrep.
* jc/test-i18ngrep:
tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grep
test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep
Teach "git show-ref" a mode to check the existence of a ref.
* ps/show-ref:
t: use git-show-ref(1) to check for ref existence
builtin/show-ref: add new mode to check for reference existence
builtin/show-ref: explicitly spell out different modes in synopsis
builtin/show-ref: ensure mutual exclusiveness of subcommands
builtin/show-ref: refactor options for patterns subcommand
builtin/show-ref: stop using global vars for `show_one()`
builtin/show-ref: stop using global variable to count matches
builtin/show-ref: refactor `--exclude-existing` options
builtin/show-ref: fix dead code when passing patterns
builtin/show-ref: fix leaking string buffer
builtin/show-ref: split up different subcommands
builtin/show-ref: convert pattern to a local variable
Add the REFFILES prerequisite to several tests that assume we're using
the files backend. There are various reasons why we cannot easily
convert those tests to be backend-independent, where the most common
one is that we have no way to write corrupt references into the refdb
via our tooling. We may at a later point in time grow the tooling to
make this possible, but for now we just mark these tests as requiring
the files backend.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some of our tests reach directly into the filesystem in order to both
read or modify the reflog, which will break once we have a second
reference backend in our codebase that stores reflogs differently.
Refactor these tests to either use git-reflog(1) or the ref-store test
helper. Note that the refactoring to use git-reflog(1) also requires us
to adapt our expectations in some cases where we previously verified the
exact on-disk log entries. This seems like an acceptable tradeoff though
to ensure that different backends have the same user-visible behaviour
as any user would typically use git-reflog(1) anyway to access the logs.
Any backend-specific verification of the written on-disk format should
be implemented in a separate, backend-specific test.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some of our tests access symbolic references via the filesystem
directly. While this works with the current files reference backend, it
this will break once we have a second reference backend in our codebase.
Refactor these tests to instead use git-symbolic-ref(1) or our
`ref-store` test tool. The latter is required in some cases where safety
checks of git-symbolic-ref(1) would otherwise reject writing a symbolic
reference.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ps/show-ref:
t: use git-show-ref(1) to check for ref existence
builtin/show-ref: add new mode to check for reference existence
builtin/show-ref: explicitly spell out different modes in synopsis
builtin/show-ref: ensure mutual exclusiveness of subcommands
builtin/show-ref: refactor options for patterns subcommand
builtin/show-ref: stop using global vars for `show_one()`
builtin/show-ref: stop using global variable to count matches
builtin/show-ref: refactor `--exclude-existing` options
builtin/show-ref: fix dead code when passing patterns
builtin/show-ref: fix leaking string buffer
builtin/show-ref: split up different subcommands
builtin/show-ref: convert pattern to a local variable
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the
only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to
test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are
callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to
other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep.
This patch was produced more or less with
git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' |
xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /'
and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the
above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate
test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree
contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit.
You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected,
in addition to the manual reproduction.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Convert tests that use `test_path_is_file` and `test_path_is_missing` to
instead use a set of helpers `test_ref_exists` and `test_ref_missing`.
These helpers are implemented via the newly introduced `git show-ref
--exists` command. Thus, we can avoid intimate knowledge of how the ref
backend stores references on disk.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As per the CodingGuidelines document, it is recommended that error messages
such as die(), error() and warning(), should start with a lowercase letter
and should not end with a period.
This patch adjusts tests to match updated messages.
Signed-off-by: Isoken June Ibizugbe <isokenjune@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Let's update the error message we show when the user tries to delete a
branch which is being used in another worktree, following the guideline
reasoned in 4970bedef2 (branch: update the message to refuse touching a
branch in-use, 2023-07-21).
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests listed below, since previous commits, no longer trigger any
leak.
+ t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
+ t1508-at-combinations.sh
+ t1514-rev-parse-push.sh
+ t2027-checkout-track.sh
+ t3200-branch.sh
+ t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh
+ t5404-tracking-branches.sh
+ t5517-push-mirror.sh
+ t5525-fetch-tagopt.sh
+ t6040-tracking-info.sh
+ t7508-status.sh
Let's mark them with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to notice and fix
promptly any new leak that may be introduced and triggered by them in
the future.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Error messages given when working on an unborn branch that is
checked out in another worktree have been improved.
* rj/branch-unborn-in-other-worktrees:
branch: avoid unnecessary worktrees traversals
branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree
branch: description for orphan branch errors
branch: use get_worktrees() in copy_or_rename_branch()
branch: test for failures while renaming branches
In cfaff3aac (branch -m: allow renaming a yet-unborn branch, 2020-12-13)
we added support for renaming an orphan branch when that branch is
checked out in the current worktree.
Let's also allow renaming an orphan branch checked out in a worktree
different than the current one.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we introduced replace_each_worktree_head_symref() in 70999e9cec
(branch -m: update all per-worktree HEADs, 2016-03-27), we implemented a
best effort approach.
If we are asked to rename a branch that is simultaneously checked out in
multiple worktrees, we try to update all of those worktrees. If we fail
updating any of them, we die() as a signal that something has gone
wrong. However, at this point, the branch ref has already been renamed
and also updated the HEADs of the successfully updated worktrees.
Despite returning an error, we do not try to rollback those changes.
Let's add a test to notice if we change this behavior in the future.
In next commits we will change replace_each_worktree_head_symref() to
work more closely with its only caller, copy_or_rename_branch(). Let's
move the former closer to its caller, to facilitate those changes.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rewrite tests that ran "git" inside command substitution and lost the
exit status of "git" so that we notice the failing "git".
Have them use modern patterns such as a "test_cmp" of the expected
outputs instead.
We'll fix more of these these in the subsequent commit, for now we're
only converting the cases where this loss of exit code was combined
with spawning a sub-shell.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When deleting a branch, "git branch -d" has a safety check that ensures
the branch is merged to its upstream (if any), or to HEAD. To do that,
naturally we try to resolve HEAD to a commit object. If we're on an
orphan branch (i.e., HEAD points to a branch that does not yet exist),
that will fail, and we'll bail with an error:
$ git branch -d to-delete
fatal: Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD
This usually isn't that big of a deal. The deletion would fail anyway,
since the branch isn't merged to HEAD, and you'd need to use "-D" (or
"-f"). And doing so skips the HEAD resolution, courtesy of 67affd5173
(git-branch -D: make it work even when on a yet-to-be-born branch,
2006-11-24).
But there are still two problems:
1. The error message isn't very helpful. We should give the usual "not
fully merged" message, which points the user at "branch -D". That
was a problem even back in 67affd5173.
2. Even without a HEAD, these days it's still possible for the
deletion to succeed. After 67affd5173, commit 99c419c915 (branch
-d: base the "already-merged" safety on the branch it merges with,
2009-12-29) made it OK to delete a branch if it is merged to its
upstream.
We can fix both by removing the die() in delete_branches() completely,
leaving head_rev NULL in this case. It's tempting to stop there, as it
appears at first glance that the rest of the code does the right thing
with a NULL. But sadly, it's not quite true.
We end up feeding the NULL to repo_is_descendant_of(). In the
traditional code path there, we call repo_in_merge_bases_many(). It
feeds the NULL to repo_parse_commit(), which is smart enough to return
an error, and we immediately return "no, it's not a descendant".
But there's an alternate code path: if we have a commit graph with
generation numbers, we end up in can_all_from_reach(), which does
eventually try to set a flag on the NULL commit and segfaults.
So instead, we'll teach the local branch_merged() helper to treat a NULL
as "not merged". This would be a little more elegant in in_merge_bases()
itself, but that function is called in a lot of places, and it's not
clear that quietly returning "not merged" is the right thing everywhere
(I'd expect in many cases, feeding a NULL is a sign of a bug).
There are four tests here:
a. The first one confirms that deletion succeeds with an orphaned HEAD
when the branch is merged to its upstream. This is case (2) above.
b. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Even if it is merged to
upstream, we still check head_rev so that we can say "deleting
because it's merged to upstream, even though it's not merged to
HEAD". Without the second hunk in branch_merged(), this test would
segfault in can_all_from_reach().
c. The third one confirms that we correctly say "not merged to HEAD"
when we can't resolve HEAD, and reject the deletion.
d. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Without the first hunk in
branch_merged(), this one would segfault.
Reported-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
"git branch --edit-description" can exit with status -1 which is
not a good practice; it learned to use 1 as everybody else instead.
* rj/branch-do-not-exit-with-minus-one-status:
branch: error code with --edit-description
Since c2d17ba3db (branch --edit-description: protect against mistyped
branch name, 2012-02-05) we return -1 on error editing the branch
description.
Let's change to 1, which follows the established convention and it is
better for portability reasons.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In c847f53712 (Detached HEAD (experimental), 2007-01-01) an error
condition was introduced in rename_branch() to prevent renaming, later
also copying, a detached HEAD.
The condition used was checking for NULL in oldname, the source branch
to rename/copy. That condition cannot be satisfied because if no source
branch is specified, HEAD is going to be used in the call.
The error issued instead is:
fatal: Invalid branch name: 'HEAD'
Let's remove the condition in copy_or_rename_branch() (the current
function name) and check for HEAD before calling it, dying with the
original intended error if we're in a detached HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description" resulted in failure,
which has been corrected.
* jc/branch-description-unset:
branch: do not fail a no-op --edit-desc
To prepare for the default value of `protocol.file.allow` to change to
"user", ensure tests that rely on local submodules can initialize them
over the file protocol.
Tests that only need to interact with submodules in a limited capacity
have individual Git commands annotated with the appropriate
configuration via `-c`. Tests that interact with submodules a handful of
times use `test_config_global` instead. Test scripts that rely on
submodules throughout use a `git config --global` during a setup test
towards the beginning of the script.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Imagine running "git branch --edit-description" while on a branch
without the branch description, and then exit the editor after
emptying the edit buffer, which is the way to tell the command that
you changed your mind and you do not want the description after all.
The command should just happily oblige, adding no branch description
for the current branch, and exit successfully. But it fails to do
so:
$ git init -b main
$ git commit --allow-empty -m commit
$ GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description
fatal: could not unset 'branch.main.description'
The end result is OK in that the configuration variable does not
exist in the resulting repository, but we should do better. If we
know we didn't have a description, and if we are asked not to have a
description by the editor, we can just return doing nothing.
This of course introduces TOCTOU. If you add a branch description
to the same branch from another window, while you had the editor
open to edit the description, and then exit the editor without
writing anything there, we'd end up not removing the description you
added in the other window. But you are fooling yourself in your own
repository at that point, and if it hurts, you'd be better off not
doing so ;-).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The CodingGuidelines says we should avoid \{m,n\} in BRE usage.
And their usages in our code base is limited, and subjectively
hard to read.
Replace them with ERE.
Except for "0\{40\}" which would be changed to "$ZERO_OID",
which is a better value for testing with:
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the default push.default option, "simple", beginners are
protected from accidentally pushing to the "wrong" branch in
centralized workflows: if the remote tracking branch they would push
to does not have the same name as the local branch, and they try to do
a "default push", they get an error and explanation with options.
There is a particular centralized workflow where this often happens:
a user branches to a new local topic branch from an existing
remote branch, eg with "checkout -b feature1 origin/master". With
the default branch.autosetupmerge configuration (value "true"), git
will automatically add origin/master as the upstream tracking branch.
When the user pushes with a default "git push", with the intention of
pushing their (new) topic branch to the remote, they get an error, and
(amongst other things) a suggestion to run "git push origin HEAD".
If they follow this suggestion the push succeeds, but on subsequent
default pushes they continue to get an error - so eventually they
figure out to add "-u" to change the tracking branch, or they spelunk
the push.default config doc as proposed and set it to "current", or
some GUI tooling does one or the other of these things for them.
When one of their coworkers later works on the same topic branch,
they don't get any of that "weirdness". They just "git checkout
feature1" and everything works exactly as they expect, with the shared
remote branch set up as remote tracking branch, and push and pull
working out of the box.
The "stable state" for this way of working is that local branches have
the same-name remote tracking branch (origin/feature1 in this
example), and multiple people can work on that remote feature branch
at the same time, trusting "git pull" to merge or rebase as required
for them to be able to push their interim changes to that same feature
branch on that same remote.
(merging from the upstream "master" branch, and merging back to it,
are separate more involved processes in this flow).
There is a problem in this flow/way of working, however, which is that
the first user, when they first branched from origin/master, ended up
with the "wrong" remote tracking branch (different from the stable
state). For a while, before they pushed (and maybe longer, if they
don't use -u/--set-upstream), their "git pull" wasn't getting other
users' changes to the feature branch - it was getting any changes from
the remote "master" branch instead (a completely different class of
changes!)
An experienced git user might say "well yeah, that's what it means to
have the remote tracking branch set to origin/master!" - but the
original user above didn't *ask* to have the remote master branch
added as remote tracking branch - that just happened automatically
when they branched their feature branch. They didn't necessarily even
notice or understand the meaning of the "set up to track 'origin/master'"
message when they created the branch - especially if they are using a
GUI.
Looking at how to fix this, you might think "OK, so disable auto setup
of remote tracking - set branch.autosetupmerge to false" - but that
will inconvenience the *second* user in this story - the one who just
wanted to start working on the topic branch. The first and second
users swap roles at different points in time of course - they should
both have a sane configuration that does the right thing in both
situations.
Make this "branches have the same name locally as on the remote"
workflow less painful / more obvious by introducing a new
branch.autosetupmerge option called "simple", to match the same-name
"push.default" option that makes similar assumptions.
This new option automatically sets up tracking in a *subset* of the
current default situations: when the original ref is a remote tracking
branch *and* has the same branch name on the remote (as the new local
branch name).
Update the error displayed when the 'push.default=simple' configuration
rejects a mismatching-upstream-name default push, to offer this new
branch.autosetupmerge option that will prevent this class of error.
With this new configuration, in the example situation above, the first
user does *not* get origin/master set up as the tracking branch for
the new local branch. If they "git pull" in their new local-only
branch, they get an error explaining there is no upstream branch -
which makes sense and is helpful. If they "git push", they get an
error explaining how to push *and* suggesting they specify
--set-upstream - which is exactly the right thing to do for them.
This new option is likely not appropriate for users intentionally
implementing a "triangular workflow" with a shared upstream tracking
branch, that they "git pull" in and a "private" feature branch that
they push/force-push to just for remote safe-keeping until they are
ready to push up to the shared branch explicitly/separately. Such
users are likely to prefer keeping the current default
merge.autosetupmerge=true behavior, and change their push.default to
"current".
Also extend the existing branch tests with three new cases testing
this option - the obvious matching-name and non-matching-name cases,
and also a non-matching-ref-type case. The matching-name case needs to
temporarily create an independent repo to fetch from, as the general
strategy of using the local repo as the remote in these tests
precludes locally branching with the same name as in the "remote".
Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The error "not tracking: ambiguous information for ref" is raised
when we are evaluating what tracking information to set on a branch,
and find that the ref to be added as tracking branch is mapped
under multiple remotes' fetch refspecs.
This can easily happen when a user copy-pastes a remote definition
in their git config, and forgets to change the tracking path.
Add advice in this situation, explicitly highlighting which remotes
are involved and suggesting how to correct the situation. Also
update a test to explicitly expect that advice.
Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch" learned the "--recurse-submodules" option.
* gc/branch-recurse-submodules:
branch.c: use 'goto cleanup' in setup_tracking() to fix memory leaks
branch: add --recurse-submodules option for branch creation
builtin/branch: consolidate action-picking logic in cmd_branch()
branch: add a dry_run parameter to create_branch()
branch: make create_branch() always create a branch
branch: move --set-upstream-to behavior to dwim_and_setup_tracking()
With the previous commit, there are no more invocations of
create_branch() that do not create a branch because:
* BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE is no longer passed
* clobber_head_ok = true and force = false is never passed
Assert these situations, delete dead code and ensure that we're handling
clobber_head_ok and force correctly by introducing tests for `git branch
--force`. As a result, create_branch() now always creates a branch.
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git -c branch.autosetupmerge=inherit branch new old" makes "new"
to have the same upstream as the "old" branch, instead of marking
"old" itself as its upstream.
* js/branch-track-inherit:
config: require lowercase for branch.*.autosetupmerge
branch: add flags and config to inherit tracking
branch: accept multiple upstream branches for tracking
It can be helpful when creating a new branch to use the existing
tracking configuration from the branch point. However, there is
currently not a method to automatically do so.
Teach git-{branch,checkout,switch} an "inherit" argument to the
"--track" option. When this is set, creating a new branch will cause the
tracking configuration to default to the configuration of the branch
point, if set.
For example, if branch "main" tracks "origin/main", and we run
`git checkout --track=inherit -b feature main`, then branch "feature"
will track "origin/main". Thus, `git status` will show us how far
ahead/behind we are from origin, and `git pull` will pull from origin.
This is particularly useful when creating branches across many
submodules, such as with `git submodule foreach ...` (or if running with
a patch such as [1], which we use at $job), as it avoids having to
manually set tracking info for each submodule.
Since we've added an argument to "--track", also add "--track=direct" as
another way to explicitly get the original "--track" behavior ("--track"
without an argument still works as well).
Finally, teach branch.autoSetupMerge a new "inherit" option. When this
is set, "--track=inherit" becomes the default behavior.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180927221603.148025-1-sbeller@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new static variant of install_branch_config() that accepts
multiple remote branch names for tracking. This will be used in an
upcoming commit that enables inheriting the tracking configuration from
a parent branch.
Currently, all callers of install_branch_config() pass only a single
remote. Make install_branch_config() a small wrapper around
install_branch_config_multiple_remotes() so that existing callers do not
need to be changed.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refuse to force-move a branch over the currently checked out branch of
any working tree, not just the current one.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/CodingGuidelines says “do not end error messages with a
full stop” and “do not capitalize the first word”. Clean up existing
messages, some of which we will be touching in later steps in the
series, that deviate from these rules in this file, as a preparation for
the main part of the topic.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Things like "git -c branch.sort=bogus branch new HEAD", i.e. the
operation modes of the "git branch" command that do not need the
sort key information, no longer errors out by seeing a bogus sort
key.
* jc/fix-ref-sorting-parse:
for-each-ref: delay parsing of --sort=<atom> options
