A failure to push due to non-ff while on an unborn branch
dereferenced a NULL pointer when showing an error message.
* ft/transport-report-segv:
push: fix segfault when HEAD points nowhere
Improve error and advice messages given locally when "git push"
refuses when it cannot compute fast-forwardness by separating these
cases from the normal "not a fast-forward; merge first and push
again" case.
* jc/push-reject-reasons:
push: finishing touches to explain REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS better
push: introduce REJECT_FETCH_FIRST and REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE
push: further simplify the logic to assign rejection reason
push: further clean up fields of "struct ref"
After a push of a branch other than the current branch fails in
a no-ff error and if you are still on an unborn branch, the code
recently added to report the failure dereferenced a null pointer
while checking the name of the current branch.
Signed-off-by: Fraser Tweedale <frase@frase.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we push to update an existing ref, if:
* the object at the tip of the remote is not a commit; or
* the object we are pushing is not a commit,
it won't be correct to suggest to fetch, integrate and push again,
as the old and new objects will not "merge". We should explain that
the push must be forced when there is a non-committish object is
involved in such a case.
If we do not have the current object at the tip of the remote, we do
not even know that object, when fetched, is something that can be
merged. In such a case, suggesting to pull first just like
non-fast-forward case may not be technically correct, but in
practice, most such failures are seen when you try to push your work
to a branch without knowing that somebody else already pushed to
update the same branch since you forked, so "pull first" would work
as a suggestion most of the time. And if the object at the tip is
not a commit, "pull first" will fail, without making any permanent
damage. As a side effect, it also makes the error message the user
will get during the next "push" attempt easier to understand, now
the user is aware that a non-commit object is involved.
In these cases, the current code already rejects such a push on the
client end, but we used the same error and advice messages as the
ones used when rejecting a non-fast-forward push, i.e. pull from
there and integrate before pushing again.
Introduce new rejection reasons and reword the messages
appropriately.
[jc: with help by Peff on message details]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "nonfastforward" and "update" fields are only used while
deciding what value to assign to the "status" locally in a single
function. Remove them from the "struct ref".
The "requires_force" field is not used to decide if the proposed
update requires a --force option to succeed, or to record such a
decision made elsewhere. It is used by status reporting code that
the particular update was "forced". Rename it to "forced_update",
and move the code to assign to it around to further clarify how it
is used and what it is used for.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add support for a pre-push hook which can be used to determine if the
set of refs to be pushed is suitable for the target repository. The
hook is run with two arguments specifying the name and location of the
destination repository.
Information about what is to be pushed is provided by sending lines of
the following form to the hook's standard input:
<local ref> SP <local sha1> SP <remote ref> SP <remote sha1> LF
If the hook exits with a non-zero status, the push will be aborted.
This will allow the script to determine if the push is acceptable based
on the target repository and branch(es), the commits which are to be
pushed, and even the source branches in some cases.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Schrab <aaron@schrab.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the
former is an ancestor of the latter. This behavior is oriented to
branches which are expected to move with commits. Tag references are
expected to be static in a repository, though, thus an update to
something under refs/tags/ should be rejected unless the update is
forced.
Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a flag for indicating an update to a reference requires force.
Currently the `nonfastforward` flag is used for this when generating the
status message. A separate flag insulates dependent logic from the
details of set_ref_status_for_push().
Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Advising the user to fetch and merge only makes sense if the rejected
reference is a branch. If none of the rejections are for branches, just
tell the user the reference already exists.
Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Pass all rejection reasons back from transport_push(). The logic is
simpler and more flexible with regard to providing useful feedback.
Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove any references that are available from the remote from the
sought list (rather than overwriting their names with NUL characters,
as previously). Mark matching entries by writing a non-NULL pointer
to string_list_item::util during the iteration, then use
filter_string_list() later to filter out the entries that have been
marked.
Document this aspect of fetch_pack() in a comment in the header file.
(More documentation is obviously still needed.)
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of juggling <nr_heads,heads> (sometimes called
<nr_match,match>), pass around the list of references to be sought in
a single string_list variable called "sought". Future commits will
make more use of string_list functionality.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git push --recurse-submodules" learns to optionally look into the
histories of submodules bound to the superproject and push them out.
By Heiko Voigt
* hv/submodule-recurse-push:
push: teach --recurse-submodules the on-demand option
Refactor submodule push check to use string list instead of integer
Teach revision walking machinery to walk multiple times sequencially
Break down the cases in which "git push" fails due to non-ff into
three categories, and give separate advise messages for each case.
By Christopher Tiwald (2) and Jeff King (1)
* ct/advise-push-default:
Fix httpd tests that broke when non-ff push advice changed
clean up struct ref's nonfastforward field
push: Provide situational hints for non-fast-forward errors
When using this option git will search for all submodules that
have changed in the revisions to be send. It will then try to
push the currently checked out branch of each submodule.
This helps when a user has finished working on a change which
involves submodules and just wants to push everything in one go.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows us to tell the user which submodules have not been pushed.
Additionally this is helpful when we want to automatically try to push
submodules that have not been pushed.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Pushing a non-fast-forward update to a remote repository will result in
an error, but the hint text doesn't provide the correct resolution in
every case. Give better resolution advice in three push scenarios:
1) If you push your current branch and it triggers a non-fast-forward
error, you should merge remote changes with 'git pull' before pushing
again.
2) If you push to a shared repository others push to, and your local
tracking branches are not kept up to date, the 'matching refs' default
will generate non-fast-forward errors on outdated branches. If this is
your workflow, the 'matching refs' default is not for you. Consider
setting the 'push.default' configuration variable to 'current' or
'upstream' to ensure only your current branch is pushed.
3) If you explicitly specify a ref that is not your current branch or
push matching branches with ':', you will generate a non-fast-forward
error if any pushed branch tip is out of date. You should checkout the
offending branch and merge remote changes before pushing again.
Teach transport.c to recognize these scenarios and configure push.c
to hint for them. If 'git push's default behavior changes or we
discover more scenarios, extension is easy. Standardize on the
advice API and add three new advice variables, 'pushNonFFCurrent',
'pushNonFFDefault', and 'pushNonFFMatching'. Setting any of these
to 'false' will disable their affiliated advice. Setting
'pushNonFastForward' to false will disable all three, thus preserving the
config option for users who already set it, but guaranteeing new
users won't disable push advice accidentally.
Based-on-patch-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Tiwald <christiwald@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* fc/push-prune:
push: add '--prune' option
remote: refactor code into alloc_delete_ref()
remote: reorganize check_pattern_match()
remote: use a local variable in match_push_refs()
Conflicts:
builtin/push.c
When pushing groups of refs to a remote, there is no simple way to remove
old refs that still exist at the remote that is no longer updated from us.
This will allow us to remove such refs from the remote.
With this change, running this command
$ git push --prune remote refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/laptop/*
removes refs/remotes/laptop/foo from the remote if we do not have branch
"foo" locally anymore.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By default, progress output is disabled if stderr is not a terminal.
The --progress option can be used to force progress output anyways.
Conversely, --no-progress does not force progress output. In particular,
if stderr is a terminal, progress output is enabled.
This is unintuitive. Change --no-progress to force output off.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/fetch-no-tail-match-refs:
connect.c: drop path_match function
fetch-pack: match refs exactly
t5500: give fully-qualified refs to fetch-pack
drop "match" parameter from get_remote_heads
Providing a single "-v" to "git push" currently does
nothing. Giving two flags ("git push -v -v") turns on the
first level of verbosity.
This is caused by a regression introduced in 8afd8dc (push:
support multiple levels of verbosity, 2010-02-24). Before
the series containing 8afd8dc, the verbosity handling for
fetching and pushing was completely separate. Commit bde873c
refactored the verbosity handling out of the fetch side, and
then 8afd8dc converted push to use the refactored code.
However, the fetch and push sides numbered and passed along
their verbosity levels differently. For both, a verbosity
level of "-1" meant "quiet", and "0" meant "default output".
But from there they differed.
For fetch, a verbosity level of "1" indicated to the "fetch"
program that it should make the status table slightly more
verbose, showing up-to-date entries. A verbosity level of
"2" meant that we should pass a verbose flag to the
transport; in the case of fetch-pack, this displays protocol
debugging information.
As a result, the refactored code in bde873c checks for
"verbosity >= 2", and only then passes it on to the
transport. From the transport code's perspective, a
verbosity of 0 or 1 both meant "0".
Push, on the other hand, does not show its own status table;
that is always handled by the transport layer or below
(originally send-pack itself, but these days it is done by
the transport code). So a verbosity level of 1 meant that we
should pass the verbose flag to send-pack, so that it knows
we want a verbose status table. However, once 8afd8dc
switched it to the refactored fetch code, a verbosity level
of 1 was now being ignored. Thus, you needed to
artificially bump the verbosity to 2 (via "-v -v") to have
any effect.
We can fix this by letting the transport code know about the
true verbosity level (i.e., let it distinguish level 0 or
1).
We then have to also make an adjustment to any transport
methods that assumed "verbose > 0" meant they could spew
lots of debugging information. Before, they could only get
"0" or "2", but now they will also receive "1". They need to
adjust their condition for turning on such spew from
"verbose > 0" to "verbose > 1".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The get_remote_heads function reads the list of remote refs
during git protocol session. It dates all the way back to
def88e9 (Commit first cut at "git-fetch-pack", 2005-07-04).
At that time, the idea was to come up with a list of refs we
were interested in, and then filter the list as we got it
from the remote side.
Later, 1baaae5 (Make maximal use of the remote refs,
2005-10-28) stopped filtering at the get_remote_heads layer,
letting us use the non-matching refs to find common history.
As a result, all callers now simply pass an empty match
list (and any future callers will want to do the same). So
let's drop these now-useless parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
resolve_ref() may return a pointer to a shared buffer and can be
overwritten by the next resolve_ref() calls. Callers need to
pay attention, not to keep the pointer when the next call happens.
Rename with "_unsafe" suffix to warn developers (or reviewers) before
introducing new call sites.
This patch is generated using the following command
git grep -l 'resolve_ref(' -- '*.[ch]'|xargs sed -i 's/resolve_ref(/resolve_ref_unsafe(/g'
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ph/transport-with-gitfile:
Fix is_gitfile() for files too small or larger than PATH_MAX to be a gitfile
Add test showing git-fetch groks gitfiles
Teach transport about the gitfile mechanism
Learn to handle gitfiles in enter_repo
enter_repo: do not modify input
Move most of the code from read_bundle_header() to parse_bundle_header()
that takes a file descriptor that is already opened for reading, and make
the former responsible only for opening the file and noticing errors.
As a logical consequence of this, is_bundle() helper function can be
implemented as a non-complaining variant of read_bundle_header() that
does not return an open file descriptor, and can be used to tighten
the check used to decide the use of bundle transport in transport_get()
function.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic to check whether a file is a gitfile used the heuristics that
a gitfile cannot be larger than PATH_MAX or smaller than 10 bytes (as
its contents is "gitdir: " followed by a path) and returned early.
But it returned with a wrong value. It should have said "this cannot
possibly be a gitfile" by returning 0, but it returned 1 instead. Our
test cases do not cover this, as the bundle files produced are smaller
than PATH_MAX, except on Windows.
While at it, fix the faulty logic that the path stored in a gitfile cannot
be larger than PATH_MAX-sizeof("gitdir: ").
Problem identified by running the test suite in msysGit, offending commit
identified by Jörg Rosenkranz.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mh/check-ref-format-3: (23 commits)
add_ref(): verify that the refname is formatted correctly
resolve_ref(): expand documentation
resolve_ref(): also treat a too-long SHA1 as invalid
resolve_ref(): emit warnings for improperly-formatted references
resolve_ref(): verify that the input refname has the right format
remote: avoid passing NULL to read_ref()
remote: use xstrdup() instead of strdup()
resolve_ref(): do not follow incorrectly-formatted symbolic refs
resolve_ref(): extract a function get_packed_ref()
resolve_ref(): turn buffer into a proper string as soon as possible
resolve_ref(): only follow a symlink that contains a valid, normalized refname
resolve_ref(): use prefixcmp()
resolve_ref(): explicitly fail if a symlink is not readable
Change check_refname_format() to reject unnormalized refnames
Inline function refname_format_print()
Make collapse_slashes() allocate memory for its result
Do not allow ".lock" at the end of any refname component
Refactor check_refname_format()
Change check_ref_format() to take a flags argument
Change bad_ref_char() to return a boolean value
...
Change check_ref_format() to take a flags argument that indicates what
is acceptable in the reference name (analogous to "git
check-ref-format"'s "--allow-onelevel" and "--refspec-pattern"). This
is more convenient for callers and also fixes a failure in the test
suite (and likely elsewhere in the code) by enabling "onelevel" and
"refspec-pattern" to be allowed independently of each other.
Also rename check_ref_format() to check_refname_format() to make it
obvious that it deals with refnames rather than references themselves.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The transport_get() function assumes that a regular file is a
bundle rather than a local git directory. Look inside the file
for the telltale "gitlink: " header to see if it is actually a
gitfile. If so, do not try to process it as a bundle, but
treat it as a local repository instead.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the usual "git" transport, a large-ish transfer with "git fetch" and
"git pull" give progress eye-candy to avoid boring users. However, not
when they are reading from a bundle. I.e.
$ git pull ../git-bundle.bndl master
This teaches bundle.c:unbundle() to give "-v" option to index-pack and
tell it to give progress bar when transport decides it is necessary.
The operation in the other direction, "git bundle create", could also
learn to honor --quiet but that is a separate issue.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Yes, there is a warning that says the function is only used by push in big
red letters in front of this function, but it didn't say a more important
thing it should have said: what the function is for and what it does.
Rename it and document it to avoid future confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit ffa69e61d3, reversing
changes made to 4a13c4d148.
Adding a new command line option to receive-pack and feed it from
send-pack is not an acceptable way to add features, as there is no
guarantee that your updated send-pack will be talking to updated
receive-pack. New features need to be added via the capability mechanism
negotiated over the protocol.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When working with submodules it is easy to forget to push a
submodule to the server but pushing a super-project that
contains a commit for that submodule. The result is that the
superproject points at a submodule commit that is not available
on the server.
This adds the option --recurse-submodules=check to push. When
using this option git will check that all submodule commits that
are about to be pushed are present on a remote of the submodule.
To be able to use a combined diff, disabling a diff callback has
been removed from combined-diff.c.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, git push --quiet produces some non-error output, e.g.:
$ git push --quiet
Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Add the --quiet option to send-pack/receive-pack and pass it to
unpack-objects in the receive-pack codepath and to receive-pack in
the push codepath.
This fixes a bug reported for the fedora git package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725593
Reported-by: Jesse Keating <jkeating@redhat.com>
Cc: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-submodule.sh: separate parens by a space to avoid confusing some shells
Documentation/technical/api-diff.txt: correct name of diff_unmerge()
read_gitfile_gently: use ssize_t to hold read result
remove tests of always-false condition
rerere.c: diagnose a corrupt MERGE_RR when hitting EOF between TAB and '\0'
* jm/maint-misc-fix:
read_gitfile_gently: use ssize_t to hold read result
remove tests of always-false condition
rerere.c: diagnose a corrupt MERGE_RR when hitting EOF between TAB and '\0'
* fsck.c (fsck_error_function): Don't test obj->sha1 == 0.
It can never be true, since that sha1 member is an array.
* transport.c (set_upstreams): Likewise for ref->new_sha1.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The foreach_alt_odb function triggers a callback for each
alternate object db we have, with room for a single void
pointer as data. Currently, we always call refs_from_alternate_cb
as the callback function, and then pass another callback (to
receive each ref individually) as the void pointer.
This has two problems:
1. C technically forbids stuffing a function pointer into
a "void *". In practice, this probably doesn't matter
on any architectures git runs on, but it never hurts to
follow the letter of the law.
2. There is no room for an extra data pointer. Indeed, the
alternate_ref_fn that refs_from_alternate_cb calls
takes a void* for data, but we always pass it NULL.
Instead, let's properly stuff our function pointer into a
data struct, which also leaves room for an extra
caller-supplied data pointer. And to keep things simple for
existing callers, let's make a for_each_alternate_ref
function that takes care of creating the extra struct.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
