Commit graph

166 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
27d7c8599b Merge branch 'js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch'
Prepare tests not to be affected by the name of the default branch
"git init" creates.

* js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch: (28 commits)
  tests: drop prereq `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` where no longer needed
  t99*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  tests(git-p4): transition to the default branch name `main`
  t9[5-7]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t9[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t8*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t7[5-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t7[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t6[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t64*: preemptively adjust alignment to prepare for `master` -> `main`
  t6[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t5[6-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t55[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t55[23]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t551*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t550*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t5503: prepare aligned comment for replacing `master` with `main`
  t5[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  t5323: prepare centered comment for `master` -> `main`
  t4*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
  ...
2021-01-25 14:19:18 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
6dbbae17d9 Merge branch 'ew/decline-core-abbrev'
The configuration variable 'core.abbrev' can be set to 'no' to
force no abbreviation regardless of the hash algorithm.

* ew/decline-core-abbrev:
  core.abbrev=no disables abbreviations
2021-01-15 15:20:28 -08:00
Eric Wong
a9ecaa06a7 core.abbrev=no disables abbreviations
This allows users to write hash-agnostic scripts and configs by
disabling abbreviations.  Using "-c core.abbrev=40" will be
insufficient with SHA-256, and "-c core.abbrev=64" won't work with
SHA-1 repos today.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
[jc: tweaked implementation, added doc and a test]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-23 13:40:09 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
ec9779bcd8 t3200: finish transitioning to the initial branch name main
In 56300ff356 (t3200: prepare for `main` being shorter than `master`,
2020-10-23) and in 66713e84e7 (tests: prepare aligned mentions of the
default branch name, 2020-10-23), we started to prepare t3200 for a new
world where `git init` uses the branch name `main` for the initial
branch.

We do not even have to wait for that new world: we can easily ensure
that that branch name is used, independent of the exact name `git init`
will give the initial branch, so let's do that.

This also lets us remove the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq from three
test cases in that script.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-16 17:41:40 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
8b70966aa9 tests: drop prereq PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH where no longer needed
We introduced the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq for the sole purpose
of allowing us to perform the non-trivial adjustments regarding the
`master` -> `main` rename before the automatable ones.

Now that the transition is almost complete, we can stop using it in most
instances. The only two exceptions are t5526 and t9902: at the time of
writing, there are other patches in flight that touch these test
scripts, therefore their transition to `main` is postponed to a later
date.

This patch is the result of this command:

	sed -i 's/PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH[ ,]//' t/t[0-9]*.sh &&
	git checkout HEAD -- t/t5526\* t/t9902\*

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:18 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
d6c6b10817 t3[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
Carefully excluding t3040, which sees independent development elsewhere
at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the
default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via

	$ (cd t &&
	   sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
		-e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t3[0-3]*.sh t3206/* &&
	   git checkout HEAD -- t3040\*)

This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:18 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
334afbc76f tests: mark tests relying on the current default for init.defaultBranch
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.

To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in

- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,

- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
  initialize the default branch,

- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,

- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
  uses `master`)

This trick was performed by this command:

	$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
	GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
	export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
	' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
	t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh

After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:

	$ git checkout HEAD -- \
		t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
		t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
		t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
		t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
		t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
		t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
		t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
		t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
		t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
		t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
		t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
		t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
		t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
		t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
		t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
		t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
		t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
		t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
		t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh

We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:

	$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
	GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
	export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
	' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:17 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
66713e84e7 tests: prepare aligned mentions of the default branch name
In some tests, the default branch name is part of aligned output. As we
want to change the default branch name to `main`, which is two
characters shorter than the old default branch name, we will have to
adjust those tests.

Since we use the original default branch name until the entire test
suite has been adjusted accordingly, the touched test cases need to be
guarded by a prereq (that is so far disabled so that they are skipped
for now).

The test cases that depend on those test cases that are newly guarded by
that prereq naturally have to be guarded, too.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-23 08:57:42 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
56300ff356 t3200: prepare for main being shorter than master
In the test case adjusted by this patch, we want to cut just after the
longest shown ref name. Since `main` is shorter than `master`, we need
to decrease the number of characters. Since `topic` is shown, too, and
since that is only one character shorter than `master`, we decrement the
length by one instead of two.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-23 08:57:41 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
58138d3f26 Merge branch 'js/default-branch-name-part-2'
Update the tests to drop word 'master' from them.

* js/default-branch-name-part-2:
  t9902: avoid using the branch name `master`
  tests: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
  t3200: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
  fast-export: avoid using unnecessary language in a code comment
  t/test-terminal: avoid non-inclusive language
2020-10-05 14:01:50 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
26a3728bed Merge branch 'al/ref-filter-merged-and-no-merged'
"git for-each-ref" and friends that list refs used to allow only
one --merged or --no-merged to filter them; they learned to take
combination of both kind of filtering.

* al/ref-filter-merged-and-no-merged:
  Doc: prefer more specific file name
  ref-filter: make internal reachable-filter API more precise
  ref-filter: allow merged and no-merged filters
  Doc: cover multiple contains/no-contains filters
  t3201: test multiple branch filter combinations
2020-09-22 12:36:31 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
432f5e638d t3200: avoid variations of the master branch name
To avoid branch names with a loaded history, we already started to avoid
using the name "master" in a couple instances.

The `t3200-branch.sh` script uses variations of this name for branches
other than the default one. So let's change those names, as
"lowest-hanging fruits" in the effort to use more inclusive naming
throughout Git's source code. While at it, make those branch names
independent from the default branch name.

In this particular instance, this rename requires a couple of
non-trivial adjustments, as the aligned output depends on the maximum
length of the displayed branches (which we now changed), and also on the
alphabetical order (which we now changed, too).

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-21 15:19:28 -07:00
Aaron Lipman
21bf933928 ref-filter: allow merged and no-merged filters
Enable ref-filter to process multiple merged and no-merged filters, and
extend functionality to git branch, git tag and git for-each-ref. This
provides an easy way to check for branches that are "graduation
candidates:"

$ git branch --no-merged master --merged next

If passed more than one merged (or more than one no-merged) filter, refs
must be reachable from any one of the merged commits, and reachable from
none of the no-merged commits.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-16 12:38:10 -07:00
Aaron Lipman
e6d5a11fed t3200: clean side effect of git checkout --orphan
The "refuse --edit-description on unborn branch for now" test in t3200
switches to an orphan branch, causing subsequent git commands
referencing HEAD to fail. Avoid this side-effect by switching back to
master after the test finishes.

This has gone undetected, as the next affected test expects failure -
but it currently fails for the wrong reason.

Verbose output of the next test referencing HEAD,
"--merged is incompatible with --no-merged":

  fatal: malformed object name HEAD

Which this commit corrects to:

  error: option `no-merged' is incompatible with --merged

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-08 15:44:25 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
ae46588be0 Merge branch 'dl/branch-cleanup' into master
Last minute fix-up to tests for portability.

* dl/branch-cleanup:
  t3200: don't grep for `strerror()` string
2020-07-18 16:35:22 -07:00
Martin Ågren
d223e85407 t3200: don't grep for strerror() string
In 6b7093064a ("t3200: test for specific errors", 2020-06-15), we
learned to grep stderr to ensure that the failing `git branch`
invocations fail for the right reason. In two of these tests, we grep
for "File exists", expecting the string to show up there since config.c
calls `error_errno()`, which ends up including `strerror(errno)` in the
error message.

But as we saw in 4605a73073 ("t1091: don't grep for `strerror()`
string", 2020-03-08), there exists at least one implementation where
`strerror()` yields a slightly different string than the one we're
grepping for. In particular, these tests fail on the NonStop platform.

Similar to 4605a73073, grep for the beginning of the string instead to
avoid relying on `strerror()` behavior.

Reported-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-18 13:47:05 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
12210859da Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-part-2'
SHA-256 migration work continues.

* bc/sha-256-part-2: (44 commits)
  remote-testgit: adapt for object-format
  bundle: detect hash algorithm when reading refs
  t5300: pass --object-format to git index-pack
  t5704: send object-format capability with SHA-256
  t5703: use object-format serve option
  t5702: offer an object-format capability in the test
  t/helper: initialize the repository for test-sha1-array
  remote-curl: avoid truncating refs with ls-remote
  t1050: pass algorithm to index-pack when outside repo
  builtin/index-pack: add option to specify hash algorithm
  remote-curl: detect algorithm for dumb HTTP by size
  builtin/ls-remote: initialize repository based on fetch
  t5500: make hash independent
  serve: advertise object-format capability for protocol v2
  connect: parse v2 refs with correct hash algorithm
  connect: pass full packet reader when parsing v2 refs
  Documentation/technical: document object-format for protocol v2
  t1302: expect repo format version 1 for SHA-256
  builtin/show-index: provide options to determine hash algo
  t5302: modernize test formatting
  ...
2020-07-06 22:09:13 -07:00
Denton Liu
6b7093064a t3200: test for specific errors
In the "--set-upstream-to" and "--unset-upstream" tests, specific error
conditions are being tested. However, there is no way of ensuring that a
test case is failing because of some specific error.

Check stderr of failing commands to ensure that they are failing in the
expected way.

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17 11:12:32 -07:00
Denton Liu
6d504d5b0f t3200: rename "expected" to "expect"
Clean up style of test by changing some filenames from "expected" to
"expect", which follows typical test convention.

Also, change a space-indent into a tab-indent.

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17 11:12:31 -07:00
brian m. carlson
49c9a2ffe5 t3200: mark assertion with SHA1 prerequisite
One of the test assertions in this test checks that git branch -m works
even without a .git/config file.  However, if the repository requires
configuration extensions, such as because it uses a non-SHA-1 algorithm,
this assertion will fail.  Mark the assertion as requiring SHA-1.

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-27 10:07:06 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
99eea64583 Merge branch 'nb/branch-show-other-worktrees-head'
"git branch --list" learned to show branches that are checked out
in other worktrees connected to the same repository prefixed with
'+', similar to the way the currently checked out branch is shown
with '*' in front.

* nb/branch-show-other-worktrees-head:
  branch: add worktree info on verbose output
  branch: update output to include worktree info
  ref-filter: add worktreepath atom
2019-07-09 15:25:33 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
4ac8371a1c Merge branch 'dl/branch-from-3dot-merge-base'
"git branch new A...B" and "git checkout -b new A...B" have been
taught that in their contexts, the notation A...B means "the merge
base between these two commits", just like "git checkout A...B"
detaches HEAD at that commit.

* dl/branch-from-3dot-merge-base:
  branch: make create_branch accept a merge base rev
  t2018: cleanup in current test
2019-05-19 16:45:28 +09:00
Nickolai Belakovski
ab3138146f branch: update output to include worktree info
The output of git branch is modified to mark branches checked out in a
linked worktree with a "+" and color them in cyan (in contrast to the
current branch, which will still be denoted with a "*" and colored in green)

This is meant to communicate to the user that the branches that are
marked or colored will behave differently from other branches if the user
attempts to check them out or delete them, since branches checked out in
another worktree cannot be checked out or deleted.

Signed-off-by: Nickolai Belakovski <nbelakovski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-07 13:45:54 +09:00
Denton Liu
e3d6539d58 branch: make create_branch accept a merge base rev
When we ran something like

    $ git checkout -b test master...

it would fail with the message

    fatal: Not a valid object name: 'master...'.

This was caused by the call to `create_branch` where `start_name` is
expected to be a valid rev. However, git-checkout allows the branch to
be a valid _merge base_ rev (i.e. with a "...") so it was possible for
an invalid rev to be passed in.

Make `create_branch` accept a merge base rev so that this case does not
error out.

As a side-effect, teach git-branch how to handle merge base revs as
well.

Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-07 13:23:13 +09:00
Jonathan Tan
f3534c98e4 worktree: update is_bare heuristics
When "git branch -D <name>" is run, Git usually first checks if that
branch is currently checked out. But this check is not performed if the
Git directory of that repository is not at "<repo>/.git", which is the
case if that repository is a submodule that has its Git directory stored
as "super/.git/modules/<repo>", for example. This results in the branch
being deleted even though it is checked out.

This is because get_main_worktree() in worktree.c sets is_bare on a
worktree only using the heuristic that a repo is bare if the worktree's
path does not end in "/.git", and not bare otherwise. This is_bare code
was introduced in 92718b7438 ("worktree: add details to the worktree
struct", 2015-10-08), following a pre-core.bare heuristic. This patch
does 2 things:

 - Teach get_main_worktree() to use is_bare_repository() instead,
   introduced in 7d1864ce67 ("Introduce is_bare_repository() and
   core.bare configuration variable", 2007-01-07) and updated in
   e90fdc39b6 ("Clean up work-tree handling", 2007-08-01). This solves
   the "git branch -D <name>" problem described above. However...

 - If a repository has core.bare=1 but the "git" command is being run
   from one of its secondary worktrees, is_bare_repository() returns
   false (which is fine, since there is a worktree available). However,
   treating the main worktree as non-bare when it is bare causes issues:
   for example, failure to delete a branch from a secondary worktree
   that is referred to by a main worktree's HEAD, even if that main
   worktree is bare.

   In order to avoid that, also check core.bare when setting is_bare. If
   core.bare=1, trust it, and otherwise, use is_bare_repository().

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-21 13:58:55 +09:00
Matthew DeVore
dcbaa0b361 t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed arguments
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it
was easy to find with grep.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07 08:51:18 +09:00
Samuel Maftoul
560ae1c164 branch: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig
Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git branches. Command
line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
syntax.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Maftoul <samuel.maftoul@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-16 11:17:10 -07:00
Jeff King
7687f19e93 t: switch "branch -l" to "branch --create-reflog"
In preparation for deprecating "-l", let's make sure we're
using the recommended option ourselves.

This patch just mechanically converts "branch -l" to "branch
--create-reflog".  Note that with the exception of the
actual "--create-reflog" test, we could actually remove "-l"
entirely from most of these callers. That's because these
days core.logallrefupdates defaults to true in a non-bare
repository.

I've left them in place, though, since they serve to
document the expectation of the test, even if they are
technically noops.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 13:19:33 -07:00
Jeff King
6b15595151 t3200: unset core.logallrefupdates when testing reflog creation
This test checks that the "-l" option creates a reflog. But
in fact we'd create one even without it, since the default
in a non-bare repository is to do so. Let's unset the config
so we can be sure our "-l" option is kicking in.

Note that we can't do this with test_config, since that
would leave the variable unset after our test finishes,
confusing downstream tests (the helper is not not smart
enough to restore the previous value, and just always runs
test_unconfig).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-22 13:19:33 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
4229478639 Merge branch 'ks/branch-set-upstream'
A test title has been reworded to clarify it.

* ks/branch-set-upstream:
  t3200: clarify description of --set-upstream test
2018-06-18 11:23:23 -07:00
Kaartic Sivaraam
cf317877e3 t3200: clarify description of --set-upstream test
Support for the --set-upstream option was removed in 52668846ea
(builtin/branch: stop supporting the "--set-upstream" option,
2017-08-17). The change did not completely remove the command
due to an issue noted in the commit's log message.

So, a test was added to ensure that a command which uses the
'--set-upstream' option fails instead of silently acting as an alias
for the '--set-upstream-to' option due to option parsing features.

To avoid confusion, clarify that the option is disabled intentionally
in the corresponding test description.

The test is expected to be around as long as we intentionally fail
on seeing the '--set-upstream' option which in turn we expect to
do for a period of time after which we can be sure that existing
users of '--set-upstream' are aware that the option is no
longer supported.

Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18 08:54:40 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
d6e5484208 Merge branch 'cc/tests-without-assuming-ref-files-backend'
Quite a many tests assumed that newly created refs are made as
loose refs using the files backend, which have been updated to use
proper plumbing like rev-parse and update-ref, to avoid breakage
once we start using different ref backends.

* cc/tests-without-assuming-ref-files-backend:
  t990X: use '.git/objects' as 'deep inside .git' path
  t: make many tests depend less on the refs being files
2018-06-01 15:06:41 +09:00
David Turner
cbc5cf7ce5 t: make many tests depend less on the refs being files
Many tests are very focused on the file system representation of the
loose and packed refs code. As there are plans to implement other
ref storage systems, let's migrate these tests to a form that test
the intent of the refs storage system instead of it internals.

This will make clear to readers that these tests do not depend on
which ref backend is used.

The internals of the loose refs backend are still tested in
t1400-update-ref.sh, whereas the tests changed in this patch focus
on testing other aspects.

This patch just takes care of many low hanging fruits. It does not
try to completely solves the issue.

Helped-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-23 14:59:38 +09:00
brian m. carlson
8125a58b91 t: switch $_z40 to $ZERO_OID
Switch all uses of $_z40 to $ZERO_OID so that they work correctly with
larger hashes.  This commit was created by using the following sed
command to modify all files in the t directory except t/test-lib.sh:

  sed -i 's/\$_z40/$ZERO_OID/g'

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-14 11:02:00 +09:00
Eric Sunshine
1f537be3f2 t3200: verify "branch --list" sanity when rebasing from detached HEAD
"git branch --list" shows an in-progress rebase as:

  * (no branch, rebasing <branch>)
    master
    ...

However, if the rebase is started from a detached HEAD, then there is no
<branch>, and it would attempt to print a NULL pointer. The previous
commit fixed this problem, so add a test to verify that the output is
sane in this situation.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-05 16:05:09 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
564710379b Merge branch 'ks/t3200-typofix'
Test typofix.

* ks/t3200-typofix:
  t/t3200: fix a typo in a test description
2018-03-21 11:30:12 -07:00
Kaartic Sivaraam
40c17eb184 t/t3200: fix a typo in a test description
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-15 13:34:40 -07:00
Jeff King
a1c1d8170d refs_resolve_ref_unsafe: handle d/f conflicts for writes
If our call to refs_read_raw_ref() fails, we check errno to
see if the ref is simply missing, or if we encountered a
more serious error. If it's just missing, then in "write"
mode (i.e., when RESOLVE_REFS_READING is not set), this is
perfectly fine.

However, checking for ENOENT isn't sufficient to catch all
missing-ref cases. In the filesystem backend, we may also
see EISDIR when we try to resolve "a" and "a/b" exists.
Likewise, we may see ENOTDIR if we try to resolve "a/b" and
"a" exists. In both of those cases, we know that our
resolved ref doesn't exist, but we return an error (rather
than reporting the refname and returning a null sha1).

This has been broken for a long time, but nobody really
noticed because the next step after resolving without the
READING flag is usually to lock the ref and write it. But in
both of those cases, the write will fail with the same
errno due to the directory/file conflict.

There are two cases where we can notice this, though:

  1. If we try to write "a" and there's a leftover directory
     already at "a", even though there is no ref "a/b". The
     actual write is smart enough to move the empty "a" out
     of the way.

     This is reasonably rare, if only because the writing
     code has to do an independent resolution before trying
     its write (because the actual update_ref() code handles
     this case fine). The notes-merge code does this, and
     before the fix in the prior commit t3308 erroneously
     expected this case to fail.

  2. When resolving symbolic refs, we typically do not use
     the READING flag because we want to resolve even
     symrefs that point to unborn refs. Even if those unborn
     refs could not actually be written because of d/f
     conflicts with existing refs.

     You can see this by asking "git symbolic-ref" to report
     the target of a symref pointing past a d/f conflict.

We can fix the problem by recognizing the other "missing"
errnos and treating them like ENOENT. This should be safe to
do even for callers who are then going to actually write the
ref, because the actual writing process will fail if the d/f
conflict is a real one (and t1404 checks these cases).

Arguably this should be the responsibility of the
files-backend to normalize all "missing ref" errors into
ENOENT (since something like EISDIR may not be meaningful at
all to a database backend). However other callers of
refs_read_raw_ref() may actually care about the distinction;
putting this into resolve_ref() is the minimal fix for now.

The new tests in t1401 use git-symbolic-ref, which is the
most direct way to check the resolution by itself.
Interestingly we actually had a test that setup this case
already, but we only used it to verify that the funny state
could be overwritten, not that it could be resolved.

We also add a new test in t3200, as "branch -m" was the
original motivation for looking into this. What happens is
this:

  0. HEAD is pointing to branch "a"

  1. The user asks to rename "a" to "a/b".

  2. We create "a/b" and delete "a".

  3. We then try to update any worktree HEADs that point to
     the renamed ref (including the main repo HEAD). To do
     that, we have to resolve each HEAD. But now our HEAD is
     pointing at "a", and we get EISDIR due to the loose
     "a/b". As a result, we think there is no HEAD, and we
     do not update it. It now points to the bogus "a".

Interestingly this case used to work, but only accidentally.
Before 31824d180d (branch: fix branch renaming not updating
HEADs correctly, 2017-08-24), we'd update any HEAD which we
couldn't resolve. That was wrong, but it papered over the
fact that we were incorrectly failing to resolve HEAD.

So while the bug demonstrated by the git-symbolic-ref is
quite old, the regression to "branch -m" is recent.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-07 10:32:13 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
3b48045c6c Merge branch 'sd/branch-copy'
"git branch" learned "-c/-C" to create a new branch by copying an
existing one.

* sd/branch-copy:
  branch: fix "copy" to never touch HEAD
  branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m)
  branch: add test for -m renaming multiple config sections
  config: create a function to format section headers
2017-10-03 15:42:48 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
e5435ff1fc branch: fix "copy" to never touch HEAD
When creating a new branch B by copying the branch A that happens to
be the current branch, it also updates HEAD to point at the new
branch.  It probably was made this way because "git branch -c A B"
piggybacked its implementation on "git branch -m A B",

This does not match the usual expectation.  If I were sitting on a
blue chair, and somebody comes and repaints it to red, I would
accept ending up sitting on a chair that is now red (I am also OK to
stand, instead, as there no longer is my favourite blue chair).  But
if somebody creates a new red chair, modelling it after the blue
chair I am sitting on, I do not expect to be booted off of the blue
chair and ending up on sitting on the new red one.

Let's fix this before it hits 'next'.  Those who want to create a
new branch and switch to it can do "git checkout B" after doing a
"git branch -c B", and if that operation is so useful and deserves a
short-hand way to do so, perhaps extend "git checkout -b B" to copy
configurations while creating the new branch B.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-24 08:42:12 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
79553b94f9 Merge branch 'nd/worktree-kill-parse-ref'
"git branch -M a b" while on a branch that is completely unrelated
to either branch a or branch b misbehaved when multiple worktree
was in use.  This has been fixed.

* nd/worktree-kill-parse-ref:
  branch: fix branch renaming not updating HEADs correctly
2017-09-10 17:08:24 +09:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
31824d180d branch: fix branch renaming not updating HEADs correctly
There are two bugs that sort of work together and cause
problems. Let's start with one in replace_each_worktree_head_symref.

Before fa099d2322 (worktree.c: kill parse_ref() in favor of
refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() - 2017-04-24), this code looks like this:

    if (strcmp(oldref, worktrees[i]->head_ref))
            continue;
    set_worktree_head_symref(...);

After fa099d2322, it is possible that head_ref can be NULL. However,
the updated code takes the wrong exit. In the error case (NULL
head_ref), we should "continue;" to the next worktree. The updated
code makes us _skip_ "continue;" and update HEAD anyway.

The NULL head_ref is triggered by the second bug in add_head_info (in
the same commit). With the flag RESOLVE_REF_READING, resolve_ref_unsafe()
will abort if it cannot resolve the target ref. For orphan checkouts,
HEAD always points to an unborned branch, resolving target ref will
always fail. Now we have NULL head_ref. Now we always update HEAD.

Correct the logic in replace_ function so that we don't accidentally
update HEAD on error. As it turns out, correcting the logic bug above
breaks branch renaming completely, thanks to the second bug.

"git branch -[Mm]" does two steps (on a normal checkout, no orphan!):

 - rename the branch on disk (e.g. refs/heads/abc to refs/heads/def)
 - update HEAD if it points to the branch being renamed.

At the second step, since the branch pointed to by HEAD (e.g. "abc") no
longer exists on disk, we run into a temporary orphan checkout situation
that has been just corrected to _not_ update HEAD. But we need to update
HEAD since it's not actually an orphan checkout. We need to update HEAD
to move out of that orphan state.

Correct add_head_info(), remove RESOLVE_REF_READING flag. With the flag
gone, we should always return good "head_ref" in orphan checkouts (either
temporary or permanent). With good head_ref, things start to work again.

Noticed-by: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-24 14:15:18 -07:00
Kaartic Sivaraam
52668846ea builtin/branch: stop supporting the "--set-upstream" option
The '--set-upstream' option of branch was deprecated in b347d06b
("branch: deprecate --set-upstream and show help if we detect
possible mistaken use", 2012-08-30) and has been planned for removal
ever since.

In order to prevent "--set-upstream" on a command line from being taken as
an abbreviated form of "--set-upstream-to", explicitly catch "--set-upstream"
option and die, instead of just removing it from the list of options.

Before this change, an attempt to use "--set-upstream" resulted in:

    $ git branch
    * master

    $ git branch --set-upstream origin/master
    The --set-upstream flag is deprecated and will be removed. Consider using --track or --set-upstream-to
    Branch origin/master set up to track local branch master.

    $ echo $?
    0

    $ git branch
    * master
      origin/master

With this change, the behaviour becomes like this:

    $ git branch
    * master

    $ git branch --set-upstream origin/master
    fatal: the '--set-upstream' option is no longer supported. Please use '--track' or '--set-upstream-to' instead.

    $ echo $?
    128

    $ git branch
    * master

Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-17 13:33:20 -07:00
Kaartic Sivaraam
93a6b3f234 t3200: cleanup cruft of a test
Avoiding the clean up step of tests may help in some cases but in other
cases they cause the other unrelated tests to fail for unobvious reasons.
It's better to cleanup a few things to keep other tests from failing
as a result of it.

So, cleanup a cruft left behind by an old test in order for the changes that
are to be introduced to be independent of it.

Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-17 12:51:37 -07:00
Jeff King
d08565bf2d reflog-walk: stop using fake parents
The reflog-walk system works by putting a ref's tip into the
pending queue, and then "traversing" the reflog by
pretending that the parent of each commit is the previous
reflog entry.

This causes a number of user-visible oddities, as documented
in t1414 (and the commit message which introduced it). We
can fix all of them in one go by replacing the fake-reflog
system with a much simpler one: just keeping a list of
reflogs to show, and walking through them entry by entry.

The implementation is fairly straight-forward, but there are
a few items to note:

  1. We obviously must skip calling add_parents_to_list()
     when we are traversing reflogs, since we do not want to
     walk the original parents at all.  As a result, we must call
     try_to_simplify_commit() ourselves.

     There are other parts of add_parents_to_list() we skip,
     as well, but none of them should matter for a reflog
     traversal:

       -  We do not allow UNINTERESTING commits, nor
          symmetric ranges (and we bail when these are used
          with "-g").

       - Using --source makes no sense, since we aren't
         traversing. The reflog selector shows the same
         information with more detail.

       - Using --first-parent is still sensible, since you
         may want to see the first-parent diff for each
         entry. But since we're not traversing, we don't
         need to cull the parent list here.

  2. Since we now just walk the reflog entries themselves,
     rather than starting with the ref tip, we now look at
     the "new" field of each entry rather than the "old"
     (i.e., we are showing entries, not faking parents).
     This removes all of the tricky logic around skipping
     past root commits.

     But note that we have no way to show an entry with the
     null sha1 in its "new" field (because such a commit
     obviously does not exist). Normally this would not
     happen, since we delete reflogs along with refs, but
     there is one special case. When we rename the currently
     checked out branch, we write two reflog entries into
     the HEAD log: one where the commit goes away, and
     another where it comes back.

     Prior to this commit, we show both entries with
     identical reflog messages. After this commit, we show
     only the "comes back" entry. See the update in t3200
     which demonstrates this.

     Arguably either is fine, as the whole double-entry
     thing is a bit hacky in the first place. And until a
     recent fix, we truncated the traversal in such a case
     anyway, which was _definitely_ wrong.

  3. We show individual reflogs in order, but choose which
     reflog to show at each stage based on which has the
     most recent timestamp.  This interleaves the output
     from multiple reflogs based on date order, which is
     probably what you'd want with limiting like "-n 30".

     Note that the implementation aims for simplicity. It
     does a linear walk over the reflog queue for each
     commit it pulls, which may perform badly if you
     interleave an enormous number of reflogs. That seems
     like an unlikely use case; if we did want to handle it,
     we could probably keep a priority queue of reflogs,
     ordered by the timestamp of their current tip entry.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-07-09 10:00:48 -07:00
Jeff King
2272d3e542 reflog-walk: skip over double-null oid due to HEAD rename
Since 39ee4c6c2f (branch: record creation of renamed branch
in HEAD's log, 2017-02-20), a rename on the currently
checked out branch will create two entries in the HEAD
reflog: one where the branch goes away (switching to the
null oid), and one where it comes back (switching away from
the null oid).

This confuses the reflog-walk code. When walking backwards,
it first sees the null oid in the "old" field of the second
entry. Thanks to the "root commit" logic added by 71abeb753f
(reflog: continue walking the reflog past root commits,
2016-06-03), we keep looking for the next entry by scanning
the "new" field from the previous entry. But that field is
also null! We need to go just a tiny bit further, and look
at its "old" field. But with the current code, we decide the
reflog has nothing else to show and just give up. To the
user this looks like the reflog was truncated by the rename
operation, when in fact those entries are still there.

This patch does the absolute minimal fix, which is to look
back that one extra level and keep traversing.

The resulting behavior may not be the _best_ thing to do in
the long run (for example, we show both reflog entries each
with the same commit id), but it's a simple way to fix the
problem without risking further regressions.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-07-05 10:34:00 -07:00
Sahil Dua
52d59cc645 branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m)
Add the ability to --copy a branch and its reflog and configuration,
this uses the same underlying machinery as the --move (-m) option
except the reflog and configuration is copied instead of being moved.

This is useful for e.g. copying a topic branch to a new version,
e.g. work to work-2 after submitting the work topic to the list, while
preserving all the tracking info and other configuration that goes
with the branch, and unlike --move keeping the other already-submitted
branch around for reference.

Like --move, when the source branch is the currently checked out
branch the HEAD is moved to the destination branch. In the case of
--move we don't really have a choice (other than remaining on a
detached HEAD) and in order to keep the functionality consistent, we
are doing it in similar way for --copy too.

The most common usage of this feature is expected to be moving to a
new topic branch which is a copy of the current one, in that case
moving to the target branch is what the user wants, and doesn't
unexpectedly behave differently than --move would.

One outstanding caveat of this implementation is that:

    git checkout maint &&
    git checkout master &&
    git branch -c topic &&
    git checkout -

Will check out 'maint' instead of 'master'. This is because the @{-N}
feature (or its -1 shorthand "-") relies on HEAD reflogs created by
the checkout command, so in this case we'll checkout maint instead of
master, as the user might expect. What to do about that is left to a
future change.

Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 21:47:59 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
c8b2cec09e branch: add test for -m renaming multiple config sections
Add a test for how 'git branch -m' handles the renaming of multiple
config sections existing for one branch.

The config format we use is hybrid machine/human editable, and we do
our best to preserve the likes of comments and formatting when editing
the file with git-config.

This adds a test for the currently expected semantics in the face of
some rather obscure edge cases which are unlikely to occur in
practice.

Helped-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-18 21:47:56 -07:00
Sahil Dua
bb8efa1772 t3200: add test for single parameter passed to -m option
Add a test for the case when only one parameter is passed to '-m'
(move/rename) option.

For example - if 'git branch -m bbb' is run while checked out on aaa
branch, it should rename the currently checked out branch to bbb.
There was no test for this particular case with only one parameter
for -m option. However, there's one similar test case for -M option.

Add test for making sure HEAD points to the bbb (new branch name). Also
add a test for making sure the reflog that is moved to 'bbb' retains
entries created for the currently checked out branch. Note that since
the topmost entry on reflog for bbb will be about branch creation, we
compare bbb@{1} (instead of bbb@{0}) with aaa@{0} to make sure the
reflog for bbb retains entries from aaa.

Signed-off-by: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-13 08:04:16 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
e06b421cf0 Merge branch 'sd/t3200-typofix' into maint
Test fix.

* sd/t3200-typofix:
  branch test: fix invalid config key access
2017-06-05 09:03:22 +09:00