Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Rast
d4cbaa12a7 Documentation: clarify 'ours' merge strategy
Make it clear in the docs that the merge takes the tree of HEAD and
ignores everything in the other branches.  This should hopefully clear
up confusion, usually caused by the user looking for a strategy that
resolves all conflict hunks in favour of HEAD (which is completely
different and currently not supported).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-15 12:26:08 -08:00
Wincent Colaiuta
4fa535a179 Grammar fixes to "merge" and "patch-id" docs
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-25 17:28:33 -07:00
Miklos Vajna
02b00e16bb Documentation/git-merge: document subtree strategy.
There was already some documentation about subtree under
Documentation/howto but it was missing from git-merge manpage.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-19 01:43:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
9688a882e1 Documentation: recursive is the default strategy these days.
We still said resolve was the default in handful places.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-12-08 14:04:33 -08:00
Jon Loeliger
bb73d73c08 Refactor merge strategies into separate includable file.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-06 10:31:48 -08:00