Commit graph

382 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano 1fc83452c7 Merge branch 'rs/code-cleaning'
* rs/code-cleaning:
  fsck: simplify fsck_commit_buffer() by using commit_list_count()
  commit: use commit_list_append() instead of duplicating its code
  merge: simplify merge_trivial() by using commit_list_append()
  use strbuf_addch for adding single characters
  use strbuf_addbuf for adding strbufs
2014-07-16 11:33:09 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 788cef81d4 Merge branch 'nd/split-index'
An experiment to use two files (the base file and incremental
changes relative to it) to represent the index to reduce I/O cost
of rewriting a large index when only small part of the working tree
changes.

* nd/split-index: (32 commits)
  t1700: new tests for split-index mode
  t2104: make sure split index mode is off for the version test
  read-cache: force split index mode with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX
  read-tree: note about dropping split-index mode or index version
  read-tree: force split-index mode off on --index-output
  rev-parse: add --shared-index-path to get shared index path
  update-index --split-index: do not split if $GIT_DIR is read only
  update-index: new options to enable/disable split index mode
  split-index: strip pathname of on-disk replaced entries
  split-index: do not invalidate cache-tree at read time
  split-index: the reading part
  split-index: the writing part
  read-cache: mark updated entries for split index
  read-cache: save deleted entries in split index
  read-cache: mark new entries for split index
  read-cache: split-index mode
  read-cache: save index SHA-1 after reading
  entry.c: update cache_changed if refresh_cache is set in checkout_entry()
  cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on prime_cache_tree()
  cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on cache tree update
  ...
2014-07-16 11:25:40 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 5c18fde0d9 Merge branch 'jk/commit-buffer-length' into maint
A handful of code paths had to read the commit object more than
once when showing header fields that are usually not parsed.  The
internal data structure to keep track of the contents of the commit
object has been updated to reduce the need for this double-reading,
and to allow the caller find the length of the object.

* jk/commit-buffer-length:
  reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures
  commit: record buffer length in cache
  commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab
  commit-slab: provide a static initializer
  use get_commit_buffer everywhere
  convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer
  use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code
  use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate
  provide helpers to access the commit buffer
  provide a helper to set the commit buffer
  provide a helper to free commit buffer
  sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message
  logmsg_reencode: return const buffer
  do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc
  commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node
  alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report
  replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach
  commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
2014-07-16 11:16:38 -07:00
René Scharfe 294b2680cd use strbuf_addch for adding single characters
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-10 14:06:46 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 3b8e8af187 Merge branch 'jk/xstrfmt'
* jk/xstrfmt:
  setup_git_env(): introduce git_path_from_env() helper
  unique_path: fix unlikely heap overflow
  walker_fetch: fix minor memory leak
  merge: use argv_array when spawning merge strategy
  sequencer: use argv_array_pushf
  setup_git_env: use git_pathdup instead of xmalloc + sprintf
  use xstrfmt to replace xmalloc + strcpy/strcat
  use xstrfmt to replace xmalloc + sprintf
  use xstrdup instead of xmalloc + strcpy
  use xstrfmt in favor of manual size calculations
  strbuf: add xstrfmt helper
2014-07-09 11:34:05 -07:00
Junio C Hamano e91ae32a01 Merge branch 'jk/skip-prefix'
* jk/skip-prefix:
  http-push: refactor parsing of remote object names
  imap-send: use skip_prefix instead of using magic numbers
  use skip_prefix to avoid repeated calculations
  git: avoid magic number with skip_prefix
  fetch-pack: refactor parsing in get_ack
  fast-import: refactor parsing of spaces
  stat_opt: check extra strlen call
  daemon: use skip_prefix to avoid magic numbers
  fast-import: use skip_prefix for parsing input
  use skip_prefix to avoid repeating strings
  use skip_prefix to avoid magic numbers
  transport-helper: avoid reading past end-of-string
  fast-import: fix read of uninitialized argv memory
  apply: use skip_prefix instead of raw addition
  refactor skip_prefix to return a boolean
  avoid using skip_prefix as a boolean
  daemon: mark some strings as const
  parse_diff_color_slot: drop ofs parameter
2014-07-09 11:33:28 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 8061ae8b46 Merge branch 'jk/commit-buffer-length'
Move "commit->buffer" out of the in-core commit object and keep
track of their lengths.  Use this to optimize the code paths to
validate GPG signatures in commit objects.

* jk/commit-buffer-length:
  reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures
  commit: record buffer length in cache
  commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab
  commit-slab: provide a static initializer
  use get_commit_buffer everywhere
  convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer
  use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code
  use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate
  provide helpers to access the commit buffer
  provide a helper to set the commit buffer
  provide a helper to free commit buffer
  sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message
  logmsg_reencode: return const buffer
  do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc
  commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node
  alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report
  replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach
  commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
2014-07-02 12:53:02 -07:00
Jeff King 95b567c7c3 use skip_prefix to avoid repeating strings
It's a common idiom to match a prefix and then skip past it
with strlen, like:

  if (starts_with(foo, "bar"))
	  foo += strlen("bar");

This avoids magic numbers, but means we have to repeat the
string (and there is no compiler check that we didn't make a
typo in one of the strings).

We can use skip_prefix to handle this case without repeating
ourselves.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-20 10:44:45 -07:00
Jeff King 45bc131dd3 unique_path: fix unlikely heap overflow
When merge-recursive creates a unique filename, it uses a
template like:

  path~branch_%d

where the final "_%d" is filled by an incrementing counter
until we find a unique name. We allocate 8 characters for
the counter, but there is no logic to limit the size of the
integer.

Of course, this is extremely unlikely, as you would need a
hundred million collisions to trigger the problem.  Even if
an attacker constructed a specialized repo, it is unlikely
that the victim would have the patience to run the merge.

However, we can make it trivially correct (and hopefully
more readable) by using a strbuf.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-19 15:20:56 -07:00
Jeff King 283101869b use xstrfmt to replace xmalloc + sprintf
This is one line shorter, and makes sure the length in the
malloc and sprintf steps match.

These conversions are very straightforward; we can drop the
malloc entirely, and replace the sprintf with xstrfmt.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-19 15:20:54 -07:00
Jeff King 8597ea3afe commit: record buffer length in cache
Most callsites which use the commit buffer try to use the
cached version attached to the commit, rather than
re-reading from disk. Unfortunately, that interface provides
only a pointer to the NUL-terminated buffer, with no
indication of the original length.

For the most part, this doesn't matter. People do not put
NULs in their commit messages, and the log code is happy to
treat it all as a NUL-terminated string. However, some code
paths do care. For example, when checking signatures, we
want to be very careful that we verify all the bytes to
avoid malicious trickery.

This patch just adds an optional "size" out-pointer to
get_commit_buffer and friends. The existing callers all pass
NULL (there did not seem to be any obvious sites where we
could avoid an immediate strlen() call, though perhaps with
some further refactoring we could).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13 12:09:38 -07:00
Jeff King bc6b8fc130 use get_commit_buffer everywhere
Each of these sites assumes that commit->buffer is valid.
Since they would segfault if this was not the case, they are
likely to be correct in practice. However, we can
future-proof them by using get_commit_buffer.

And as a side effect, we abstract away the final bare uses
of commit->buffer.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13 12:08:17 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy d0cfc3e866 cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on cache tree update
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13 11:49:39 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 03b8664772 read-cache: new API write_locked_index instead of write_index/write_cache
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13 11:49:10 -07:00
Jeff King 10322a0aaf do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc
In both blame and merge-recursive, we sometimes create a
"fake" commit struct for convenience (e.g., to represent the
HEAD state as if we would commit it). By allocating
ourselves rather than using alloc_commit_node, we do not
properly set the "index" field of the commit. This can
produce subtle bugs if we then use commit-slab on the
resulting commit, as we will share the "0" index with
another commit.

We can fix this by using alloc_commit_node() to allocate.
Note that we cannot free the result, as it is part of our
commit allocator. However, both cases were already leaking
the allocated commit anyway, so there's nothing to fix up.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-12 10:29:42 -07:00
David Turner ae352c7f37 merge-recursive.c: fix case-changing merge bug
On a case-insensitive filesystem, when merging, a file would be
wrongly deleted from the working tree if an incoming commit had
renamed it changing only its case.  When merging a rename, the file
with the old name would be deleted -- but since the filesystem
considers the old name to be the same as the new name, the new
file would in fact be deleted.

We avoid this by not deleting files that have a case-clone in the
index at stage 0.

Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twitter.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-07 13:53:10 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 6d011b8e3f Merge branch 'bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive' into maint
"merge-recursive" was broken in 1.7.7 era and stopped working in an
empty (temporary) working tree, when there are renames involved.
This has been corrected.

* bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive:
  merge-recursive.c: tolerate missing files while refreshing index
  read-cache.c: extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options
  read-cache.c: refactor --ignore-missing implementation
  t3030-merge-recursive: test known breakage with empty work tree
2014-03-18 14:02:38 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 156d6ed922 Merge branch 'bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive'
Allow "merge-recursive" to work in an empty (temporary) working
tree again when there are renames involved, correcting an old
regression in 1.7.7 era.

* bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive:
  merge-recursive.c: tolerate missing files while refreshing index
  read-cache.c: extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options
  read-cache.c: refactor --ignore-missing implementation
  t3030-merge-recursive: test known breakage with empty work tree
2014-02-27 14:01:14 -08:00
Brad King 6e2068ae48 merge-recursive.c: tolerate missing files while refreshing index
Teach add_cacheinfo to tell make_cache_entry to skip refreshing stat
information when a file is missing from the work tree.  We do not want
the index to be stat-dirty after the merge but also do not want to fail
when a file happens to be missing.

This fixes the 'merge-recursive w/ empty work tree - ours has rename'
case in t3030-merge-recursive.

Suggested-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-24 14:31:30 -08:00
Brad King 257627268a read-cache.c: extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options
Convert the make_cache_entry boolean 'refresh' argument to a more
general 'refresh_options' argument.  Pass the value through to the
underlying refresh_cache_ent call.  Add option CE_MATCH_REFRESH to
enable stat refresh.  Update call sites to use the new signature.

Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-24 14:31:17 -08:00
Junio C Hamano d0956cfa8e Merge branch 'mh/safe-create-leading-directories'
Code clean-up and protection against concurrent write access to the
ref namespace.

* mh/safe-create-leading-directories:
  rename_tmp_log(): on SCLD_VANISHED, retry
  rename_tmp_log(): limit the number of remote_empty_directories() attempts
  rename_tmp_log(): handle a possible mkdir/rmdir race
  rename_ref(): extract function rename_tmp_log()
  remove_dir_recurse(): handle disappearing files and directories
  remove_dir_recurse(): tighten condition for removing unreadable dir
  lock_ref_sha1_basic(): if locking fails with ENOENT, retry
  lock_ref_sha1_basic(): on SCLD_VANISHED, retry
  safe_create_leading_directories(): add new error value SCLD_VANISHED
  cmd_init_db(): when creating directories, handle errors conservatively
  safe_create_leading_directories(): introduce enum for return values
  safe_create_leading_directories(): always restore slash at end of loop
  safe_create_leading_directories(): split on first of multiple slashes
  safe_create_leading_directories(): rename local variable
  safe_create_leading_directories(): add explicit "slash" pointer
  safe_create_leading_directories(): reduce scope of local variable
  safe_create_leading_directories(): fix format of "if" chaining
2014-01-27 10:45:33 -08:00
Michael Haggerty 0be0521b23 safe_create_leading_directories(): introduce enum for return values
Instead of returning magic integer values (which a couple of callers
go to the trouble of distinguishing), return values from an enum.  Add
a docstring.

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-06 09:34:21 -08:00
Christian Couder 5955654823 replace {pre,suf}fixcmp() with {starts,ends}_with()
Leaving only the function definitions and declarations so that any
new topic in flight can still make use of the old functions, replace
existing uses of the prefixcmp() and suffixcmp() with new API
functions.

The change can be recreated by mechanically applying this:

    $ git grep -l -e prefixcmp -e suffixcmp -- \*.c |
      grep -v strbuf\\.c |
      xargs perl -pi -e '
        s|!prefixcmp\(|starts_with\(|g;
        s|prefixcmp\(|!starts_with\(|g;
        s|!suffixcmp\(|ends_with\(|g;
        s|suffixcmp\(|!ends_with\(|g;
      '

on the result of preparatory changes in this series.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-05 14:13:21 -08:00
Junio C Hamano b28325d3ab Merge branch 'jk/diff-algo' into maint
"git merge-recursive" did not parse its "--diff-algorithm=" command
line option correctly.

* jk/diff-algo:
  merge-recursive: fix parsing of "diff-algorithm" option
2013-10-28 10:16:11 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder 92d2afd563 Merge branch 'jk/diff-algo'
* jk/diff-algo:
  merge-recursive: fix parsing of "diff-algorithm" option
2013-10-14 10:59:51 -07:00
John Keeping 6562928ae9 merge-recursive: fix parsing of "diff-algorithm" option
The "diff-algorithm" option to the recursive merge strategy takes the
name of the algorithm as an option, but it uses strcmp on the option
string to check if it starts with "diff-algorithm=", meaning that this
options cannot actually be used.

Fix this by switching to prefixcmp.  At the same time, clarify the
following line by using strlen instead of a hard-coded length, which
also makes it consistent with nearby code.

Reported-by: Luke Noel-Storr <luke.noel-storr@integrate.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-26 13:52:16 -07:00
Junio C Hamano b02f5aeda6 Merge branch 'jl/submodule-mv'
"git mv A B" when moving a submodule A does "the right thing",
inclusing relocating its working tree and adjusting the paths in
the .gitmodules file.

* jl/submodule-mv: (53 commits)
  rm: delete .gitmodules entry of submodules removed from the work tree
  mv: update the path entry in .gitmodules for moved submodules
  submodule.c: add .gitmodules staging helper functions
  mv: move submodules using a gitfile
  mv: move submodules together with their work trees
  rm: do not set a variable twice without intermediate reading.
  t6131 - skip tests if on case-insensitive file system
  parse_pathspec: accept :(icase)path syntax
  pathspec: support :(glob) syntax
  pathspec: make --literal-pathspecs disable pathspec magic
  pathspec: support :(literal) syntax for noglob pathspec
  kill limit_pathspec_to_literal() as it's only used by parse_pathspec()
  parse_pathspec: preserve prefix length via PATHSPEC_PREFIX_ORIGIN
  parse_pathspec: make sure the prefix part is wildcard-free
  rename field "raw" to "_raw" in struct pathspec
  tree-diff: remove the use of pathspec's raw[] in follow-rename codepath
  remove match_pathspec() in favor of match_pathspec_depth()
  remove init_pathspec() in favor of parse_pathspec()
  remove diff_tree_{setup,release}_paths
  convert common_prefix() to use struct pathspec
  ...
2013-09-09 14:36:15 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 9a08727443 remove init_pathspec() in favor of parse_pathspec()
While at there, move free_pathspec() to pathspec.c

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15 10:56:09 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 9c5e6c802c Convert "struct cache_entry *" to "const ..." wherever possible
I attempted to make index_state->cache[] a "const struct cache_entry **"
to find out how existing entries in index are modified and where. The
question I have is what do we do if we really need to keep track of on-disk
changes in the index. The result is

 - diff-lib.c: setting CE_UPTODATE

 - name-hash.c: setting CE_HASHED

 - preload-index.c, read-cache.c, unpack-trees.c and
   builtin/update-index: obvious

 - entry.c: write_entry() may refresh the checked out entry via
   fill_stat_cache_info(). This causes "non-const struct cache_entry
   *" in builtin/apply.c, builtin/checkout-index.c and
   builtin/checkout.c

 - builtin/ls-files.c: --with-tree changes stagemask and may set
   CE_UPDATE

Of these, write_entry() and its call sites are probably most
interesting because it modifies on-disk info. But this is stat info
and can be retrieved via refresh, at least for porcelain
commands. Other just uses ce_flags for local purposes.

So, keeping track of "dirty" entries is just a matter of setting a
flag in index modification functions exposed by read-cache.c. Except
unpack-trees, the rest of the code base does not do anything funny
behind read-cache's back.

The actual patch is less valueable than the summary above. But if
anyone wants to re-identify the above sites. Applying this patch, then
this:

    diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
    index 430d021..1692891 100644
    --- a/cache.h
    +++ b/cache.h
    @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static inline unsigned int canon_mode(unsigned int mode)
     #define cache_entry_size(len) (offsetof(struct cache_entry,name) + (len) + 1)

     struct index_state {
    -	struct cache_entry **cache;
    +	const struct cache_entry **cache;
     	unsigned int version;
     	unsigned int cache_nr, cache_alloc, cache_changed;
     	struct string_list *resolve_undo;

will help quickly identify them without bogus warnings.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-09 09:12:48 -07:00
Michal Privoznik 07924d4d50 diff: Introduce --diff-algorithm command line option
Since command line options have higher priority than config file
variables and taking previous commit into account, we need a way
how to specify myers algorithm on command line. However,
inventing `--myers` is not the right answer. We need far more
general option, and that is `--diff-algorithm`.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-16 09:41:18 -08:00
Junio C Hamano fa2364ec34 Which merge_file() function do you mean?
There are two different static functions and one global function,
all of them called "merge_file()", with different signatures and
purposes.  Rename them all to reduce confusion in "git grep" output:

 * Rename the static one in merge-index to "merge_one_path(const char
   *path)" as that function is about asking an external command to
   resolve conflicts in one path.

 * Rename the global one in merge-file.c that is only used by
   merge-tree to "merge_blobs()", as the function takes three blobs and
   returns the merged result only in-core, without doing anything to
   the filesystem.

 * Rename the one in merge-recursive to "merge_one_file()", just to be
   fair.

Also rename merge-file.[ch] to merge-blobs.[ch].

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-09 23:05:27 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 8c11b25de4 Merge branch 'rj/path-cleanup'
* rj/path-cleanup:
  Call mkpathdup() rather than xstrdup(mkpath(...))
  Call git_pathdup() rather than xstrdup(git_path("..."))
  path.c: Use vsnpath() in the implementation of git_path()
  path.c: Don't discard the return value of vsnpath()
  path.c: Remove the 'git_' prefix from a file scope function
2012-09-14 11:53:53 -07:00
Ramsay Jones 4e2d094dde Call mkpathdup() rather than xstrdup(mkpath(...))
In addition to updating the xstrdup(mkpath(...)) call sites with
mkpathdup(), we also fix a memory leak (in merge_3way()) caused by
neglecting to free the memory allocated to the 'base_name' variable.

Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-04 13:34:46 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 9cd33bbc52 Merge branch 'tr/void-diff-setup-done'
Remove unnecessary code.

* tr/void-diff-setup-done:
  diff_setup_done(): return void
2012-08-22 11:52:27 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 8d35c11457 Merge branch 'tr/merge-recursive-flush'
Remove unnecessary code.

* tr/merge-recursive-flush:
  merge-recursive: eliminate flush_buffer() in favor of write_in_full()
2012-08-22 11:52:19 -07:00
Ralf Thielow e0453cd8f0 merge-recursive: separate message for common ancestors
The function "merge_recursive" prints the count of common ancestors
as "found %u common ancestor(s):".  We should use a singular and a
plural form of this message to help translators.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-05 12:34:57 -07:00
Thomas Rast f633ea2c73 merge-recursive: eliminate flush_buffer() in favor of write_in_full()
flush_buffer() is a thin wrapper around write_in_full() with two very
confusing properties:

* It runs a loop to handle short reads, ensuring that we write
  everything.  But that is precisely what write_in_full() does!

* It checks for a return value of 0 from write_in_full(), which cannot
  happen: it returns this value only if count=0, but flush_buffer()
  will never call write_in_full() in this case.

Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-03 12:13:43 -07:00
Thomas Rast 28452655af diff_setup_done(): return void
diff_setup_done() has historically returned an error code, but lost
the last nonzero return in 943d5b7 (allow diff.renamelimit to be set
regardless of -M/-C, 2006-08-09).  The callers were in a pretty
confused state: some actually checked for the return code, and some
did not.

Let it return void, and patch all callers to take this into account.
This conveniently also gets rid of a handful of different(!) error
messages that could never be triggered anyway.

Note that the function can still die().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-03 12:11:07 -07:00
Jiang Xin 55653a689e i18n: merge-recursive: mark strings for translation
Mark strings in merge-recursive for translation.

Some tests would start to fail with GETTEXT_POISON turned on after
this update.  Use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep where appropriate
to mark strings that should only be checked in the C locale output
to avoid such issues.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-26 22:34:15 -07:00
Junio C Hamano c0599f6993 Merge branch 'jk/diff-no-rename-empty'
Forbids rename detection logic from matching two empty files as renames
during merge-recursive to prevent mismerges.

By Jeff King
* jk/diff-no-rename-empty:
  merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty files
  teach diffcore-rename to optionally ignore empty content
  make is_empty_blob_sha1 available everywhere
  drop casts from users EMPTY_TREE_SHA1_BIN
2012-04-16 12:41:49 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 86c340e082 Merge branch 'jc/diff-algo-cleanup'
Resurrects the preparatory clean-up patches from another topic that was
discarded, as this would give a saner foundation to build on diff.algo
configuration option series.

* jc/diff-algo-cleanup:
  xdiff: PATIENCE/HISTOGRAM are not independent option bits
  xdiff: remove XDL_PATCH_* macros
2012-04-15 22:51:15 -07:00
Jeff King 4f7cb99ada merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty files
Merge-recursive detects renames so that if one side modifies
"foo" and the other side moves it to "bar", the modification
is applied to "bar". However, our rename detection is based
on content analysis, it can be wrong (i.e., two files were
not intended as a rename, but just happen to have the same
or similar content).

This is quite rare if the files actually contain content,
since two unrelated files are unlikely to have exactly the
same content.  However, empty files present a problem, in
that there is nothing to analyze. An uninteresting
placeholder file with zero bytes may or may not be related
to a placeholder file with another name.

The result is that adding content to an empty file may cause
confusion if the other side of a merge removed it; your
content may end up in another random placeholder file that
was added.

Let's err on the side of caution and not consider empty
files as renames. This will cause a modify/delete conflict
on the merge, which will let the user sort it out
themselves.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-23 13:52:51 -07:00
Jeff King cba595bd21 drop casts from users EMPTY_TREE_SHA1_BIN
This macro already evaluates to the correct type, as it
casts the string literal to "unsigned char *" itself
(and callers who want the literal can use the _LITERAL
form).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-23 13:52:05 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 307ab20b33 xdiff: PATIENCE/HISTOGRAM are not independent option bits
Because the default Myers, patience and histogram algorithms cannot be in
effect at the same time, XDL_PATIENCE_DIFF and XDL_HISTOGRAM_DIFF are not
independent bits.  Instead of wasting one bit per algorithm, define a few
macros to access the few bits they occupy and update the code that access
them.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-19 15:36:55 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy e859c69b26 cache-tree: update API to take abitrary flags
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-07 16:35:43 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 33e7fefef6 Merge branch 'tr/cache-tree'
* tr/cache-tree:
  reset: update cache-tree data when appropriate
  commit: write cache-tree data when writing index anyway
  Refactor cache_tree_update idiom from commit
  Test the current state of the cache-tree optimization
  Add test-scrap-cache-tree
2011-12-19 16:05:20 -08:00
Thomas Rast 996277c520 Refactor cache_tree_update idiom from commit
We'll need to safely create or update the cache-tree data of the_index
from other places.  While at it, give it an argument that lets us
silence the messages produced by unmerged entries (which prevent it
from working).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-06 14:57:36 -08:00
Junio C Hamano ae8e4c9ce1 merge: make usage of commit->util more extensible
The merge-recursive code uses the commit->util field directly to annotate
the commit objects given from the command line, i.e. the remote heads to
be merged, with a single string to be used to describe it in its trace
messages and conflict markers.

Correct this short-signtedness by redefining the field to be a pointer to
a structure "struct merge_remote_desc" that later enhancements can add
more information. Store the original objects we were told to merge in a
field "obj" in this struct, so that we can recover the tag we were told to
merge.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-08 10:36:53 -08:00
Brad King 80988783c8 submodule: Search for merges only at end of recursive merge
The submodule merge search is not useful during virtual merges because
the results cannot be used automatically.  Furthermore any suggestions
made by the search may apply to commits different than HEAD:sub and
MERGE_HEAD:sub, thus confusing the user.  Skip searching for submodule
merges during a virtual merge such as that between B and C while merging
the heads of:

    B---BC
   / \ /
  A   X
   \ / \
    C---CB

Run the search only when the recursion level is zero (!o->call_depth).
This fixes known breakage tested in t7405-submodule-merge.

Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-13 10:18:16 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 9a33b691aa Merge branch 'cn/eradicate-working-copy'
* cn/eradicate-working-copy:
  Remove 'working copy' from the documentation and C code
2011-10-05 12:36:26 -07:00
Junio C Hamano d45b7f40b3 merge-recursive: Do not look at working tree during a virtual ancestor merge
Fix another instance of a recursive merge incorrectly paying attention to
the working tree file during a virtual ancestor merge, that resulted in
spurious and useless "addinfo_cache failed" error message.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-23 15:21:01 -07:00
Carlos Martín Nieto f7d650c06e Remove 'working copy' from the documentation and C code
The git term is 'working tree', so replace the most public references
to 'working copy'.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-21 14:26:38 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 96b7c4deb8 Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive-2'
* en/merge-recursive-2: (57 commits)
  merge-recursive: Don't re-sort a list whose order we depend upon
  merge-recursive: Fix virtual merge base for rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest
  t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest + simple modify
  merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewrites
  t6022: Additional tests checking for unnecessary updates of files
  merge-recursive: Fix spurious 'refusing to lose untracked file...' messages
  t6022: Add testcase for spurious "refusing to lose untracked" messages
  t3030: fix accidental success in symlink rename
  merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add
  merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest
  merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code
  merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable
  merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts
  merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers
  merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames
  merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry
  merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2
  merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base
  merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function
  merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case
  ...
2011-09-02 10:00:18 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 7abd8fb36d Merge branch 'jn/plug-empty-tree-leak'
* jn/plug-empty-tree-leak:
  merge-recursive: take advantage of hardcoded empty tree
  revert: plug memory leak in "cherry-pick root commit" codepath
2011-08-25 16:00:29 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder 03f622c81f merge-recursive: take advantage of hardcoded empty tree
When this code was first written (v1.4.3-rc1~174^2~4, merge-recur: if
there is no common ancestor, fake empty one, 2006-08-09), everyone
needing a fake empty tree had to make her own, but ever since
v1.5.5-rc0~180^2~1 (2008-02-13), the object lookup machinery provides
a ready-made one.  Use it.

This is just a simplification, though it also fixes a small leak
(since the tree in the virtual common ancestor commit is never freed).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-16 13:06:13 -07:00
Elijah Newren f701aae077 merge-recursive: Don't re-sort a list whose order we depend upon
In record_df_conflict_files() we would resort the entries list using
df_name_compare to get a convenient ordering.  Unfortunately, this broke
assumptions of the get_renames() code (via string_list_lookup() calls)
which needed the list to be in the standard ordering.  When those lookups
would fail, duplicate stage_data entries could be inserted, causing the
process_renames and process_entry code to fail (in particular, a path that
that process_renames had marked as processed would still be processed
anyway in process_entry due to the duplicate entry).

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:27:48 -07:00
Elijah Newren 6d63070cac merge-recursive: Fix virtual merge base for rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest
Earlier in this series, the patch "merge-recursive: add handling for
rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest" added code to handle the rename on each
side of history also being involved in a rename/add conflict, but only
did so in the non-recursive case.  Add code for the recursive case,
ensuring that the "added" files are not simply deleted.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:40 -07:00
Elijah Newren 35a74abff3 merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewrites
Often times, a potential conflict at a path is resolved by merge-recursive
by using the content that was already present at that location.  In such
cases, we do not want to overwrite the content that is already present, as
that could trigger unnecessary recompilations.  One of the patches earlier
in this series ("merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update,
actually skip it") fixed the cases that involved content merges, but there
were a few other cases as well.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:40 -07:00
Elijah Newren f53d39778c merge-recursive: Fix spurious 'refusing to lose untracked file...' messages
Calling update_stages() before update_file() can sometimes result in git
thinking the file being updated is untracked (whenever update_stages
moves it to stage 3).  Reverse the call order, and add a big comment to
update_stages to hopefully prevent others from making the same mistake.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:40 -07:00
Elijah Newren 3672c97148 merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add
If either side of a rename/rename(1to2) conflict is itself also involved
in a rename/add-dest conflict, then we need to make sure both the rename
and the added file appear in the working copy.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:39 -07:00
Elijah Newren 1ac91b32b5 merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest
Each side of the rename in rename/rename(1to2) could potentially also be
involved in a rename/add conflict.  Ensure stages for such conflicts are
also recorded.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:39 -07:00
Elijah Newren e03acb8bc1 merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:39 -07:00
Elijah Newren b70332520d merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable
modify/delete and rename/delete share a lot of similarities; we'd like all
the criss-cross and D/F conflict handling specializations to be shared
between the two.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:39 -07:00
Elijah Newren 434b8525e7 merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts
Our previous conflict resolution for renaming two different files to the
same name ignored the fact that each of those files may have modifications
from both sides of history to consider.  We need to do a three-way merge
for each of those files, and then handle the conflict of both sets of
merged contents trying to be recorded with the same name.

It is important to note that this changes our strategy in the recursive
case.  After doing a three-way content merge of each of the files
involved, we still are faced with the fact that we are trying to put both
of the results (including conflict markers) into the same path.  We could
do another two-way merge, but I think that becomes confusing.  Also,
taking a hint from the modify/delete and rename/delete cases we handled
earlier, a more useful "common ground" would be to keep the three-way
content merge but record it with the original filename.  The renames can
still be detected, we just allow it to be done in the o->call_depth=0
case.  This seems to result in simpler & easier to understand merge
conflicts as well, as evidenced by some of the changes needed in our
testsuite in t6036.  (However, it should be noted that this change will
cause problems those renames also occur along with a file being added
whose name matches the source of the rename.  Since git currently cannot
detect rename/add-source situations, though, this codepath is not
currently used for those cases anyway.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:39 -07:00
Elijah Newren dac4741554 merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers
We want to be able to reuse the code to do a three-way file content merge
and have the conflict markers use both branchname and filename.  Split it
out into a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren 232c635f7e merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames
When two different files are renamed to one, we need to be able to do
three-way merges for both of those files.  To do that, we need to record
the sha1sum of the (possibly modified) file on the unrenamed side.  Modify
setup_rename_conflict_info() to take this extra information and record it
when the rename_type is RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren 461f504117 merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry
This puts the code for the different types of double rename conflicts
closer together (fewer lines of other code separating the two paths) and
increases similarity between how they are handled.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren a99b7f2256 merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren c52ff85d97 merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base
When renaming one file to two files, we really should be doing a content
merge.  Also, in the recursive case, undoing the renames and recording the
merged file in the index with the source of the rename (while deleting
both destinations) allows the renames to be re-detected in the
non-recursive merge and will result in fewer spurious conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren 6bdaead1e5 merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function
merge_file previously required diff_filespec arguments, but all callers
only had sha1s and modes.  Rename merge_file to merge_file_1 and introduce
a new merge_file convenience function which takes the sha1s and modes and
creates the temporary diff_filespec variables needed to call merge_file_1.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren ec61d14963 merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case
When o->call_depth>0 and we have conflicts, we try to find "middle ground"
when creating the virtual merge base.  In the case of content conflicts,
this can be done by doing a three-way content merge and using the result.
In all parts where the three-way content merge is clean, it is the correct
middle ground, and in parts where it conflicts there is no middle ground
but the conflict markers provide a good compromise since they are unlikely
to accidentally match any further changes.

In the case of a modify/delete conflict, we cannot do the same thing.
Accepting either endpoint as the resolution for the virtual merge base
runs the risk that when handling the non-recursive case we will silently
accept one person's resolution over another without flagging a conflict.
In this case, the closest "middle ground" we have is actually the merge
base of the candidate merge bases.  (We could alternatively attempt a
three way content merge using an empty file in place of the deleted file,
but that seems to be more work than necessary.)

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:38 -07:00
Elijah Newren 5b448b8530 merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it
In 882fd11 (merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames 2010-09-20),
there was code that checked for whether we could skip updating a file in
the working directory, based on whether the merged version matched the
current working copy.  Due to the desire to handle directory/file conflicts
that were resolvable, that commit deferred content merging by first
updating the index with the unmerged entries and then moving the actual
merging (along with the skip-the-content-update check) to another function
that ran later in the merge process.  As part moving the content merging
code, a bug was introduced such that although the message about skipping
the update would be printed (whenever GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY was sufficiently
high), the file would be unconditionally updated in the working copy
anyway.

When we detect that the file does not need to be updated in the working
copy, update the index appropriately and then return early before updating
the working copy.

Note that there was a similar change in b2c8c0a (merge-recursive: When we
detect we can skip an update, actually skip it 2011-02-28), but it was
reverted by 6db4105 (Revert "Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'"
2011-05-19) since it did not fix both of the relevant types of unnecessary
update breakages and, worse, it made use of some band-aids that caused
other problems.  The reason this change works is due to the changes earlier
in this series to (a) record_df_conflict_files instead of just unlinking
them early, (b) allowing make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries,
(c) the splitting of update_stages_and_entry() to have its functionality
called at different points, and (d) making the pathnames of the files
involved in the merge available to merge_content().

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren 3c217c077a merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames
Whenever there are merge conflicts in file contents, we would mark the
different sides of the conflict with the two branches being merged.
However, when there is a rename involved as well, the branchname is not
sufficient to specify where the conflicting content came from.  In such
cases, mark the two sides of the conflict with branchname:filename rather
than just branchname.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren 4f66dade81 merge-recursive: Cleanup and consolidation of rename_conflict_info
The consolidation of process_entry() and process_df_entry() allows us to
consolidate more code paths concerning rename conflicts, and to do
a few additional related cleanups.  It also means we are using
rename_df_conflict_info in some cases where there is no D/F conflict;
rename it to rename_conflict_info.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren edd2faf52e merge-recursive: Consolidate process_entry() and process_df_entry()
The whole point of adding process_df_entry() was to ensure that files of
D/F conflicts were processed after paths under the corresponding
directory.  However, given that the entries are in sorted order, all we
need to do is iterate through them in reverse order to achieve the same
effect.  That lets us remove some duplicated code, and lets us keep
track of one less thing as we read the code ("do we need to make sure
this is processed before process_df_entry() or do we need to defer it
until then?").

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren 51931bf08e merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory addition
When dealing with file merging and renames and D/F conflicts and possible
criss-cross merges (how's that for a corner case?), we did not do a
thorough job ensuring the index and working directory had the correct
contents.   Fix the logic in merge_content() to handle this.  Also,
correct some erroneous tests in t6022 that were expecting the wrong number
of unmerged index entries.  These changes fix one of the tests in t6042
(and almost fix another one from t6042 as well).

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren 7769a75e96 merge-recursive: Add comments about handling rename/add-source cases
There are a couple of places where changes are needed to for situations
involving rename/add-source issues.  Add comments about the needed changes
(and existing bugs) until git has been enabled to detect such cases.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren 0a6b87126e merge-recursive: Make dead code for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts undead
The code for rename_rename_2to1 conflicts (two files both being renamed to
the same filename) was dead since the rename/add path was always being
independently triggered for each of the renames instead.  Further,
reviving the dead code showed that it was inherently buggy and would
always segfault -- among a few other bugs.

Move the else-if branch for the rename/rename block before the rename/add
block to make sure it is checked first, and fix up the rename/rename(2to1)
code segments to make it handle most cases.  Work is still needed to
handle higher dimensional corner cases such as rename/rename/modify/modify
issues.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:37 -07:00
Elijah Newren 531357a4cc merge-recursive: Fix deletion of untracked file in rename/delete conflicts
In the recursive case (o->call_depth > 0), we do not modify the working
directory.  However, when o->call_depth==0, file renames can mean we need
to delete the old filename from the working copy.  Since there have been
lots of changes and mistakes here, let's go through the details.  Let's
start with a simple explanation of what we are trying to achieve:

  Original goal: If a file is renamed on the side of history being merged
  into head, the filename serving as the source of that rename needs to be
  removed from the working directory.

The path to getting the above statement implemented in merge-recursive took
several steps.  The relevant bits of code may be instructive to keep in
mind for the explanation, especially since an English-only description
involves double negatives that are hard to follow.  These bits of code are:
  int remove_file(..., const char *path, int no_wd)
  {
    ...
    int update_working_directory = !o->call_depth && !no_wd;
and
  remove_file(o, 1, ren1_src, <expression>);
Where the choice for <expression> has morphed over time:

65ac6e9 (merge-recursive: adjust to loosened "working file clobbered"
check 2006-10-27), introduced the "no_wd" parameter to remove_file() and
used "1" for <expression>.  This meant ren1_src was never deleted, leaving
it around in the working copy.

In 8371234 (Remove uncontested renamed files during merge. 2006-12-13),
<expression> was changed to "index_only" (where index_only ==
!!o->call_depth; see b7fa51da).   This was equivalent to using "0" for
<expression> (due to the early logic in remove_file), and is orthogonal to
the condition we actually want to check at this point; it resulted in the
source file being removed except when index_only was false.  This was
problematic because the file could have been renamed on the side of history
including head, in which case ren1_src could correspond to an untracked
file that should not be deleted.

In 183d797 (Keep untracked files not involved in a merge. 2007-02-04),
<expression> was changed to "index_only || stage == 3".  While this gives
correct behavior, the "index_only ||" portion of <expression> is
unnecessary and makes the code slightly harder to follow.

There were also two further changes to this expression, though without
any change in behavior.  First in b7fa51d (merge-recursive: get rid of the
index_only global variable 2008-09-02), it was changed to "o->call_depth
|| stage == 3".  (index_only == !!o->call_depth).  Later, in 41d70bd6
(merge-recursive: Small code clarification -- variable name and comments),
this was changed to "o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2" (where stage was
renamed to other_stage and renamed_stage == other_stage ^ 1).

So we ended with <expression> being "o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2".
But the "o->call_depth ||" piece was unnecessary.  We can remove it,
leaving us with <expression> being "renamed_stage == 2".  This doesn't
change behavior at all, but it makes the code clearer.  Which is good,
because it's about to get uglier.

  Corrected goal: If a file is renamed on the side of history being merged
  into head, the filename serving as the source of that rename needs to be
  removed from the working directory *IF* that file is tracked in head AND
  the file tracked in head is related to the original file.

Note that the only difference between the original goal and the corrected
goal is the two extra conditions added at the end.  The first condition is
relevant in a rename/delete conflict.  If the file was deleted on the
HEAD side of the merge and an untracked file of the same name was added to
the working copy, then without that extra condition the untracked file
will be erroneously deleted.  This changes <expression> to "renamed_stage
== 2 || !was_tracked(ren1_src)".

The second additional condition is relevant in two cases.

The first case the second condition can occur is when a file is deleted
and a completely different file is added with the same name.  To my
knowledge, merge-recursive has no mechanism for detecting deleted-and-
replaced-by-different-file cases, so I am simply punting on this
possibility.

The second case for the second condition to occur is when there is a
rename/rename/add-source conflict.  That is, when the original file was
renamed on both sides of history AND the original filename is being
re-used by some unrelated (but tracked) content.  This case also presents
some additional difficulties for us since we cannot currently detect these
rename/rename/add-source conflicts; as long as the rename detection logic
"optimizes" by ignoring filenames that are present at both ends of the
diff, these conflicts will go unnoticed.  However, rename/rename conflicts
are handled by an entirely separate codepath not being discussed here, so
this case is not relevant for the line of code under consideration.

In summary:
  Change <expression> from "o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2" to
  "renamed_stage == 2 || !was_tracked(ren1_src)", in order to remove
  unnecessary code and avoid deleting untracked files.

96 lines of explanation in the changelog to describe a one-line fix...

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:36 -07:00
Elijah Newren b8ddf16424 merge-recursive: Split update_stages_and_entry; only update stages at end
Instead of having the process_renames logic update the stages in the index
for the rename destination, have the index updated after process_entry or
process_df_entry.  This will also allow us to have process_entry determine
whether a file was tracked and existed in the working copy before the
merge started.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:36 -07:00
Elijah Newren ed0148a520 merge-recursive: Allow make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries
If there were several files conflicting below a directory corresponding
to a D/F conflict, and the file of that D/F conflict is in the way, we
want it to be removed.  Since files of D/F conflicts are handled last,
they can be reinstated later and possibly with a new unique name.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:36 -07:00
Elijah Newren aacb82de3f merge-recursive: Split was_tracked() out of would_lose_untracked()
Checking whether a filename was part of stage 0 or stage 2 is code that we
would like to be able to call from a few other places without also
lstat()-ing the file to see if it exists in the working copy.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:35 -07:00
Elijah Newren 70cc3d36eb merge-recursive: Save D/F conflict filenames instead of unlinking them
Rename make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() to
record_df_conflict_files() to reflect the change in functionality.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:35 -07:00
Elijah Newren f2507b4e0e merge-recursive: Fix code checking for D/F conflicts still being present
Previously, we were using lstat() to determine if a directory was still
present after a merge (and thus in the way of adding a file).  We should
have been using lstat() only to determine if untracked directories were in
the way (and then only when necessary to check for untracked directories);
we should instead using the index to determine if there is a tracked
directory in the way.  Create a new function to do this and use it to
replace the existing checks for directories being in the way.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:35 -07:00
Elijah Newren f0fd4d05e8 merge-recursive: Fix sorting order and directory change assumptions
We cannot assume that directory/file conflicts will appear in sorted
order; for example, 'letters.txt' comes between 'letters' and
'letters/file'.

Thanks to Johannes for a pointer about qsort stability issues with
Windows and suggested code change.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren 7b1c610f84 merge-recursive: Fix recursive case with D/F conflict via add/add conflict
When a D/F conflict is introduced via an add/add conflict, when
o->call_depth > 0 we need to ensure that the higher stage entry from the
base stage is removed.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren 0b30e81251 merge-recursive: Avoid working directory changes during recursive case
make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() is about making sure necessary
working directory changes can succeed.  When o->call_depth > 0 (i.e. the
recursive case), we do not want to make any working directory changes so
this function should be skipped.

Note that make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() is broken as has
been pointed out by Junio; it should NOT be unlinking files.  What it
should do is keep track of files that could be unlinked if a directory
later needs to be written in their place.  However, that work also is only
relevant in the non-recursive case, so this change is helpful either way.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren 3d6b8e884c merge-recursive: Remember to free generated unique path names
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren 650467cf89 merge-recursive: Consolidate different update_stages functions
We are only calling update_stages_options() one way really, so we can
consolidate the slightly different variants into one and remove some
parameters whose values are always the same.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren 0c05942087 merge-recursive: Mark some diff_filespec struct arguments const
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren abafc88e76 merge-recursive: Correct a comment
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Elijah Newren c43ba42e8d merge-recursive: Make BUG message more legible by adding a newline
Hopefully no one ever hits this error except when making large changes to
merge-recursive.c and debugging...

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14 14:19:34 -07:00
Tay Ray Chuan 8c912eea94 teach --histogram to diff
Port JGit's HistogramDiff algorithm over to C. Rough numbers (TODO) show
that it is faster than its --patience cousin, as well as the default
Meyers algorithm.

The implementation has been reworked to use structs and pointers,
instead of bitmasks, thus doing away with JGit's 2^28 line limit.

We also use xdiff's default hash table implementation (xdl_hash_bits()
with XDL_HASHLONG()) for convenience.

Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-07-12 09:29:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano b3c89315a3 Merge branch 'jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c' into maint
* jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c:
  diffcore-rename: fall back to -C when -C -C busts the rename limit
  diffcore-rename: record filepair for rename src
  diffcore-rename: refactor "too many candidates" logic
  builtin/diff.c: remove duplicated call to diff_result_code()
2011-05-31 12:00:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 6db41050a3 Revert "Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'"
As the band-aid to merge-recursive seems to regress complex merges in an
unpleasant way.  The merge-recursive implementation needs to be rewritten
in such a way that it resolves renames and D/F conflicts entirely in-core
and not to touch working tree at all while doing so. But in the meantime,
this reverts commit ac9666f84 that merged the topic in its entirety.
2011-05-19 20:33:38 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 2f80de956f Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
  add, merge, diff: do not use strcasecmp to compare config variable names
2011-05-14 20:44:09 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder 8c2be75fe1 add, merge, diff: do not use strcasecmp to compare config variable names
The config machinery already makes section and variable names
lowercase when parsing them, so using strcasecmp for comparison just
feels wasteful.  No noticeable change intended.

Noticed-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-14 18:53:39 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 1273738f05 Merge branch 'nd/struct-pathspec'
* nd/struct-pathspec:
  pathspec: rename per-item field has_wildcard to use_wildcard
  Improve tree_entry_interesting() handling code
  Convert read_tree{,_recursive} to support struct pathspec
  Reimplement read_tree_recursive() using tree_entry_interesting()
2011-05-06 10:50:06 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 76a89d6d82 Merge branch 'jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c'
* jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c:
  diffcore-rename: fall back to -C when -C -C busts the rename limit
  diffcore-rename: record filepair for rename src
  diffcore-rename: refactor "too many candidates" logic
  builtin/diff.c: remove duplicated call to diff_result_code()
2011-04-28 14:11:43 -07:00
Junio C Hamano ac9666f84a Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'
* en/merge-recursive:
  merge-recursive: tweak magic band-aid
  merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it
  t6022: New test checking for unnecessary updates of files in D/F conflicts
  t6022: New test checking for unnecessary updates of renamed+modified files
2011-04-28 14:11:35 -07:00