The tests listed below, since previous commits, no longer trigger any
leak.
+ t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
+ t1508-at-combinations.sh
+ t1514-rev-parse-push.sh
+ t2027-checkout-track.sh
+ t3200-branch.sh
+ t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh
+ t5404-tracking-branches.sh
+ t5517-push-mirror.sh
+ t5525-fetch-tagopt.sh
+ t6040-tracking-info.sh
+ t7508-status.sh
Let's mark them with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to notice and fix
promptly any new leak that may be introduced and triggered by them in
the future.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 52d59cc645 (branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move
(-m), 2017-06-18) we can copy a branch to make a new branch with the
'-c' (copy) option or to overwrite an existing branch using the '-C'
(force copy) option. A no-op possibility is considered when we are
asked to copy a branch to itself, to follow the same no-op introduced
for the rename (-M) operation in 3f59481e33 (branch: allow a no-op
"branch -M <current-branch> HEAD", 2011-11-25). To check for this, in
52d59cc645 we compared the branch names provided by the user, source
(HEAD if omitted) and destination, and a match is considered as this
no-op.
Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout: implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th
last branch, 2009-01-17) a branch can be specified using shortcuts like
@{-1}. This allows this usage:
$ git checkout -b test
$ git checkout -
$ git branch -C test test # no-op
$ git branch -C test @{-1} # oops
$ git branch -C @{-1} test # oops
As we are using the branch name provided by the user to do the
comparison, if one of the branches is provided using a shortcut we are
not going to have a match and a call to git_config_copy_section() will
happen. This will make a duplicate of the configuration for that
branch, and with this progression the second call will produce four
copies of the configuration, and so on.
Let's use the interpreted branch name instead for this comparison.
The rename operation is not affected.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
branch command with options "edit-description", "set-upstream-to" and
"unset-upstream" expects a branch name. Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout:
implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th last branch, 2009-01-17) a
branch can be specified using shortcuts like @{-1}. Those shortcuts
need to be resolved when considering the arguments.
We can modify the description of the previously checked out branch with:
$ git branch --edit--description @{-1}
We can modify the upstream of the previously checked out branch with:
$ git branch --set-upstream-to upstream @{-1}
$ git branch --unset-upstream @{-1}
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Carefully excluding t3040, which sees independent development elsewhere
at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the
default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via
$ (cd t &&
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
-e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t3[0-3]*.sh t3206/* &&
git checkout HEAD -- t3040\*)
This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.
To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in
- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,
- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
initialize the default branch,
- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,
- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
uses `master`)
This trick was performed by this command:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh
After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:
$ git checkout HEAD -- \
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh
We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we parse "git checkout $NAME", we try to interpret
$NAME as a local branch-name. If it is, then we point HEAD
to that branch. Otherwise, we detach the HEAD at whatever
commit $NAME points to.
We do the interpretation by calling strbuf_branchname(), and
then blindly sticking "refs/heads/" on the front. This leads
to nonsense results when expansions like "@{upstream}" or
"@" point to something besides a local branch. We end up
with a local branch name like "refs/heads/origin/master" or
"refs/heads/HEAD".
Normally this has no user-visible effect because those
branches don't exist, and so we fallback to feeding the
result to get_sha1(), which resolves them correctly.
But as the new test in t3204 shows, there are corner cases
where the effect is observable, and we check out the wrong
local branch rather than detaching to the correct one.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function asks strbuf_branchname() to expand any @-marks
in the branchname, and then we blindly stick refs/heads/ in
front of the result. This is obviously nonsense if the
expansion is "HEAD" or a ref in refs/remotes/.
The most obvious end-user effect is that creating or
renaming a branch with an expansion may have confusing
results (e.g., creating refs/heads/origin/master from
"@{upstream}" when the operation should be disallowed).
We can fix this by telling strbuf_branchname() that we are
only interested in local expansions. Any unexpanded bits are
then fed to check_ref_format(), which either disallows them
(in the case of "@{upstream}") or lets them through
("refs/heads/@" is technically valid, if a bit silly).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We use strbuf_branchname() to expand the branch name from
the command line, so you can delete the branch given by
@{-1}, for example. However, we allow other nonsense like
"@", and we do not respect our "-r" flag (so we may end up
deleting an oddly-named local ref instead of a remote one).
We can fix this by passing the appropriate "allowed" flag to
strbuf_branchname().
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-branch feeds the branch names from the command line to
strbuf_branchname(), but we do not yet tell that function
which kinds of expansions should be allowed. Let's create a
set of tests that cover both the allowed and disallowed
cases.
That shows off some breakages where we currently create or
delete the wrong ref (and will make sure that we do not
break any cases that _should_ be working when we do add more
restrictions).
Note that we check branch creation and deletion, but do not
bother with renames. Those follow the same code path as
creation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
