When the prompt command mode was introduced in 1bfc51ac81 (Allow
__git_ps1 to be used in PROMPT_COMMAND, 2012-10-10), the assumption was
that it was necessary in order to properly add colors to PS1 in bash,
but this wasn't true.
It's true that the \[ \] markers add the information needed to properly
calculate the width of the prompt, and they have to be added directly to
PS1, a function returning them doesn't work.
But that is because bash coverts the \[ \] markers in PS1 to \001 \002,
which is what readline ultimately needs in order to calculate the width.
We don't need bash to do this conversion, we can use \001 \002
ourselves, and then the prompt command mode is not necessary to display
colors.
This is what functions returning colors are supposed to do [1].
[1] http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/053
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently `git rev-parse --quiet @{u}` is not actually quiet when
upstream isn't configured:
fatal: no upstream configured for branch 'foo'
Make it so.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git-rebase invokes format-patch, it wants to make sure we use the
normal prefixes, and are not confused by diff.noprefix or similar. When
this was added in 5b220a6876 (Add --src/dst-prefix to git-formt-patch
in git-rebase.sh, 2010-09-09), we only had --src-prefix and --dst-prefix
to do so, which requires re-specifying the prefixes we expect to see.
These days we can say what we want more directly: just use the defaults.
This is a minor cleanup that should have no behavior change, but
hopefully the result expresses more clearly what the code is trying to
accomplish.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a bug introduced with the "--format" option in
ce74de93 (ls-files: introduce "--format" option, 2022-07-23),
where relative paths were computed using the output buffer,
which could lead to random garbage data in the output.
Signed-off-by: Adam Johnson <me@adamj.eu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When accepting a packfile in git-receive-pack(1), we feed that packfile
into git-index-pack(1) to generate the packfile index. As the packfile
would often only contain unreachable objects until the references have
been updated, concurrently running garbage collection might be tempted
to delete the packfile right away and thus cause corruption. To fix
this, we ask git-index-pack(1) to create a `.keep` file before moving
the packfile into place, which is getting deleted again once all of the
reference updates have been processed.
Now in production systems we have observed that those `.keep` files are
sometimes not getting deleted as expected, where the result is that
repositories tend to grow packfiles that are never deleted over time.
This seems to be caused by a race when git-receive-pack(1) is killed
after we have migrated the kept packfile from the quarantine directory
into the main object database. While this race window is typically small
it can be extended for example by installing a `proc-receive` hook.
Fix this race by registering the lockfile as a tempfile so that it will
automatically be removed at exit or when receiving a signal.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the list of files as input was implemented in 6508eedf67
(t/aggregate-results: accomodate systems with small max argument list
length, 2010-06-01), a much simpler solution wasn't considered.
Let's just pass the directory as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When an object is not found in a repository's object store, we sometimes
call reprepare_packed_git() to see if the object was temporarily moved
into a new pack-file (and its old pack-file or loose object was
deleted). This process does a scan of each pack directory within each
odb, but does not reevaluate if the odb list needs updating.
Extend reprepare_packed_git() to also reprepare the alternate odb list
by setting loaded_alternates to zero and calling prepare_alt_odb(). This
will add newly-discoverd odbs to the linked list, but will not duplicate
existing ones nor will it remove existing ones that are no longer listed
in the alternates file. Do this under the object read lock to avoid
readers from interacting with a potentially incomplete odb being added
to the odb list.
If the alternates file was edited to _remove_ some alternates during the
course of the Git process, Git will continue to see alternates that were
ever valid for that repository. ODBs are not removed from the list, the
same as the existing behavior before this change. Git already has
protections against an alternate directory disappearing from the
filesystem during the lifetime of a process, and those are still in
effect.
This change is specifically for concurrent changes to the repository, so
it is difficult to create a test that guarantees this behavior is
correct. I manually verified by introducing a reprepare_packed_git() call
into get_revision() and stepped into that call in a debugger with a
parent 'git log' process. Multiple runs of prepare_alt_odb() kept
the_repository->objects->odb as a single-item chain until I added a
.git/objects/info/alternates file in a different process. The next run
added the new odb to the chain and subsequent runs did not add to the
chain.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It seems a user would expect this option would work regardless
of whether it's fetching from a single remote, many remotes,
or recursing into submodules.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we generate a diff with --cached, unmerged entries have no oid for
their index entry:
$ git diff-index --abbrev --cached HEAD
:100644 000000 f719efd 0000000 U my-conflict
So when we are asked to produce a patch, since we only have one side, we
just emit a special message:
$ git diff-index --cached -p HEAD
* Unmerged path my-conflict
This confuses interactive-patch modes that look at cached diffs. For
example:
$ git reset -p
BUG: add-patch.c:498: diff starts with unexpected line:
* Unmerged path my-conflict
Making things even more confusing, you'll get that error only if the
unmerged entry is alphabetically the first changed file. Otherwise, we
simply stick the unrecognized line to the end of the previous hunk.
There it's mostly harmless, as it eventually gets fed back to "git
apply", which happily ignores it. But it's still shown to the user
attached to the hunk, which is wrong.
So let's handle these lines as a noop. There's not really anything
useful to do with a conflicted merge in this case, and that's what we do
for other cases like "add -p". There we get a "diff --cc" line, which we
accept as starting a new file, but we refuse to use any of its hunks
(their headers start with "@@@" and not "@@ ", so we silently ignore
them).
It seems like simply recognizing the line and continuing in our parsing
loop would work. But we actually need to run the rest of the loop body
to handle matching up our colored/filtered output. But that code assumes
that we have some active file_diff we're working on. So instead, we'll
just insert a dummy entry into our array. This ends up the same as if we
saw a "diff --cc" line (a file with no hunks).
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit dropped support for diff.noprefix in format-patch.
While this will do the right thing in most cases (where sending patches
without a prefix was an accidental side effect of the sender preferring
to see their local patches without prefixes), it left no good option for
a project or workflow where you really do want to send patches without
prefixes. You'd be stuck using "--no-prefix" for every invocation.
So let's add a config option specific to format-patch that enables this
behavior. That gives people who have such a workflow a way to get what
they want, but makes it hard to accidentally trigger it.
A more backwards-compatible way of doing the transition would be to have
format.noprefix default to diff.noprefix when it's not set. But that
doesn't really help the "accidental" problem; people would have to
manually set format.noprefix=false. And it's unlikely that anybody
really wants format.noprefix=true in the first place. I'm adding it here
mostly as an escape hatch, not because anybody has expressed any
interest in it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The output of format-patch respects diff.noprefix, but this usually ends
up being a hassle for people receiving the patch, as they have to
manually specify "-p0" in order to apply it.
I don't think there was any specific intention for it to behave this
way. The noprefix option is handled by git_diff_ui_config(), and
format-patch exists in a gray area between plumbing and porcelain.
People do look at the output, and we'd expect it to colorize things,
respect their choice of algorithm, and so on. But this particular option
creates problems for the receiver (in theory so does diff.mnemonicprefix,
but since we are always formatting commits, the mnemonic prefixes will
always be "a/" and "b/").
So let's disable it. The slight downsides are:
- people who have set diff.noprefix presumably like to see their
patches without prefixes. If they use format-patch to review their
series, they'll see prefixes. On the other hand, it is probably a
good idea for them to look at what will actually get sent out.
We could try to play games here with "is stdout a tty", as we do for
color. But that's not a completely reliable signal, and it's
probably not worth the trouble. If you want to see the patch with
the usual bells and whistles, then you are better off using "git
log" or "git show".
- if a project really does have a workflow that likes prefix-less
patches, and the receiver is prepared to use "-p0", then the sender
now has to manually say "--no-prefix" for each format-patch
invocation. That doesn't seem _too_ terrible given that the receiver
has to manually say "-p0" for each git-am invocation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can change the output of prefixes with diff.noprefix and
diff.mnemonicprefix, but there's no easy way to override them from the
command-line. We do have "--no-prefix", but there's no way to get back
to the default prefix. So let's add an option to do that.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't have any specific test coverage of diff's various prefix
options. We do incidentally invoke them in a few places, but it's worth
having a more thorough set of tests that covers all of the effects we
expect to see, and that the options kick in at the appropriate times.
This will be especially useful as the next patch adds more options.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We directly manipulate diffopt's a_prefix and b_prefix to set up either
the default "a/foo" prefix or the "--no-prefix" variant. Although this
is only a few lines, it's worth pulling these into their own functions.
That lets us avoid one repetition already in this patch, but will also
give us a cleaner interface for callers which want to tweak this
setting.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The split_cmdline() function introduced in [1] returns an "int". If
it's negative it signifies an error. The option parsing in [2] didn't
account for this, and assigned the value directly to the "size_t
xopts_nr". We'd then attempt to loop over all of these elements, and
access uninitialized memory.
There's a few things that use this for option parsing, but one way to
trigger it is with a bad value to "-X <strategy-option>", e.g:
git rebase -X"bad argument\""
In another context this might be a security issue, but in this case
someone who's already able to inject arguments directly to our
commands would be past other defenses, making this potential
escalation a moot point.
As the example above & test case shows the error reporting leaves
something to be desired. The function will loop over the
whitespace-split values, but when it encounters an error we'll only
report the first element, which is OK, not the second "argument\""
whose quote is unbalanced.
This is an inherent limitation of the current API, and the issue
affects other API users. Let's not attempt to fix that now. If and
when that happens these tests will need to be adjusted to assert the
new output.
1. 2b11e3170e (If you have a config containing something like this:,
2006-06-05)
2. ca6c6b45dd (sequencer (rebase -i): respect strategy/strategy_opts
settings, 2017-01-02)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user might not necessarily know why ff only was configured, maybe an
admin did it, or the installer (Git for Windows), or perhaps they just
followed some online advice.
This can happen not only on pull.ff=only, but merge.ff=only too.
Even worse if the user has configured pull.rebase=false and
merge.ff=only, because in those cases a diverging merge will constantly
keep failing. There's no trivial way to get out of this other than
`git merge --no-ff`.
Let's not assume our users are experts in git who completely understand
all their configurations.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since our fix_filename()'s only remaining special case is handling "-",
we can use the newly-minted helper function that handles this already.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When handling OPT_FILENAME(), we have to stick the "prefix" (if any) in
front of the filename to make up for the fact that Git has chdir()'d to
the top of the repository. We can do this with prefix_filename(), but
there are a few special cases we handle ourselves.
Unfortunately the memory allocation is inconsistent here; if we do make
it to prefix_filename(), we'll allocate a string which the caller must
free to avoid a leak. But if we hit our special cases, we'll return the
string as-is, and a caller which tries to free it will crash. So there's
no way to win.
Let's consistently allocate, so that callers can do the right thing.
There are now three cases to care about in the function (and hence a
three-armed if/else):
1. we got a NULL input (and should leave it as NULL, though arguably
this is the sign of a bug; let's keep the status quo for now and we
can pick at that scab later)
2. we hit a special case that means we leave the name intact; we
should duplicate the string. This includes our special "-"
matching. Prior to this patch, it also included empty prefixes and
absolute filenames. But we can observe that prefix_filename()
already handles these, so we don't need to detect them.
3. everything else goes to prefix_filename()
I've dropped the "const" from the "char **file" parameter to indicate
that we're allocating, though in practice it's not really important.
This is all being shuffled through a void pointer via opt->value before
it hits code which ever looks at the string. And it's even a bit weird,
because we are really taking _in_ a const string and using the same
out-parameter for a non-const string. A better function signature would
be:
static char *fix_filename(const char *prefix, const char *file);
but that would mean the caller dereferences the double-pointer (and the
NULL check is currently handled inside this function). So I took the
path of least-change here.
Note that we have to fix several callers in this commit, too, or we'll
break the leak-checking tests. These are "new" leaks in the sense that
they are now triggered by the test suite, but these spots have always
been leaky when Git is run in a subdirectory of the repository. I fixed
all of the cases that trigger with GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK. There
may be others in scripts that have other leaks, but we can fix them
later along with those other leaks (and again, you _couldn't_ fix them
before this patch, so this is the necessary first step).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A user can specify a filename to a command from the command line,
either as the value given to a command line option, or a command
line argument. When it is given as a relative filename, in the
user's mind, it is relative to the directory "git" was started from,
but by the time the filename is used, "git" would almost always have
chdir()'ed up to the root level of the working tree.
The given filename, if it is relative, needs to be prefixed with the
path to the current directory, and it typically is done by calling
prefix_filename() helper function. For commands that can also take
"-" to use the standard input or the standard output, however, this
needs to be done with care.
"git bundle create" uses the next word on the command line as the
output filename, and can take "-" to mean "write to the standard
output". It blindly called prefix_filename(), so running it in a
subdirectory did not quite work as expected.
Introduce a new helper, prefix_filename_except_for_dash(), and use
it to help "git bundle create" codepath.
Reported-by: Michael Henry
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have always allowed "bundle create -" to write to stdout, but it was
never documented. And a recent patch let reading operations like "bundle
list-heads -" read from stdin.
Let's document all of these cases.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For writing, "bundle create -" indicates that the bundle should be
written to stdout. But there's no matching handling of "-" for reading
operations. This is inconsistent, and a little inflexible (though one
can always use "/dev/stdin" on systems that support it).
However, it's easy to change. Once upon a time, the bundle-reading code
required a seekable descriptor, but that was fixed long ago in
e9ee84cf28 (bundle: allowing to read from an unseekable fd,
2011-10-13). So we just need to handle "-" explicitly when opening the
file.
We _could_ do this by handling "-" in read_bundle_header(), which the
reading functions all call already. But that is probably a bad idea.
It's also used by low-level code like the transport functions, and we
may want to be more careful there. We do not know that stdin is even
available to us, and certainly we would not want to get confused by a
configured URL that happens to point to "-".
So instead, let's add a helper to builtin/bundle.c. Since both the
bundle code and some of the callers refer to the bundle by name for
error messages, let's use the string "<stdin>" to make the output a bit
nicer to read.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 79862b6b77 (bundle-create: progress output control, 2019-11-10),
"bundle create" learned about the --all-progress and
--all-progress-implied options, which were copied from pack-objects.
I think these were a mistake.
In pack-objects, "all-progress-implied" is about switching the behavior
between a regular on-disk "git repack" and the use of pack-objects for
push/fetch (where a fetch does not want progress from the server during
the write stage; the client will print progress as it receives the
data). But there's no such distinction for bundles. Prior to
79862b6b77, we always printed the write stage. Afterwards, a vanilla:
git bundle create foo.bundle
omits the write progress, appearing to hang (especially if your
repository is large or your disk is slow). That seems like a regression.
It's possible that the flexibility to disable the write-phase progress
_could_ be useful for bundle. E.g., if you did something like:
ssh some-host git bundle create foo.bundle |
git bundle unbundle
But if you are running both in real-time, why are you using bundles in
the first place? You're better off doing a real fetch.
But even if we did want to support that, it should be the exception, and
vanilla "bundle create" should display the full progress. So we'd want
to name the option "--no-write-progress" or something.
The "--all-progress" option itself is even worse. It exists in
pack-objects only for historical reasons. It's a mistake because it
implies "--progress", and we added "--all-progress-implied" to fix that.
There is no reason to propagate that mistake to new commands.
Likewise, the documentation for these options was pulled from
pack-objects. But it doesn't make any sense in this context. It talks
about "--stdout", but that is not even an option that git-bundle
supports.
This patch flips the default for "--all-progress-implied" back to
"true", fixing the regression in 79862b6b77. This turns that option
into a noop, and means that "--all-progress" is really the same as
"--progress". We _could_ drop them completely, but since they've been
shipped with Git since v2.25.0, it's polite to continue accepting them.
I didn't implement any sort of "--no-write-progress" here. I'm not at
all convinced it's necessary, and the discussion from the original
thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20191110204126.30553-2-robbat2@gentoo.org/
shows that that the main focus was on getting --progress and --quiet
support, and not any kind of clever "real-time bundle over the network"
feature. But technically this patch is making it impossible to do
something that you _could_ do post-79862b6b77c.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When formatting an empty commit, it is surprising that a totally empty
file is generated. Set the flag to always print the header, matching
the behaviour of git-log.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We discourage the creation/update of single-level refs
because some upper-layer applications only work in specified
reference namespaces, such as "refs/heads/*" or "refs/tags/*",
these single-level refnames may not be recognized. However,
we still hope users can delete them which have been created
by mistake.
Therefore, when updating branches on the server with
"git receive-pack", by checking whether it is a branch deletion
operation, it will determine whether to allow the update of
a single-level refs. This avoids creating/updating such
single-level refs, but allows them to be deleted.
On the client side, "git push" also does not properly fill in
the old-oid of single-level refs, which causes the server-side
"git receive-pack" to think that the ref's old-oid has changed
when deleting single-level refs, this causes the push to be
rejected. So the solution is to fix the client to be able to
delete single-level refs by properly filling old-oid.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
