The PATH used in CI job may be too wide and let incompatible dlls
to be grabbed, which can cause the build&test to fail. Tighten it.
* js/windows-ci-path-fix:
ci(windows): ensure that we do not pick up random executables
The "--preserve-merges" option of "git rebase" has been removed.
* js/retire-preserve-merges:
sequencer: restrict scope of a formerly public function
rebase: remove a no-longer-used function
rebase: stop mentioning the -p option in comments
rebase: remove obsolete code comment
rebase: drop the internal `rebase--interactive` command
git-svn: drop support for `--preserve-merges`
rebase: drop support for `--preserve-merges`
pull: remove support for `--rebase=preserve`
tests: stop testing `git rebase --preserve-merges`
remote: warn about unhandled branch.<name>.rebase values
t5520: do not use `pull.rebase=preserve`
On the Windows build agents, a lot of programs are installed, and added
to the PATH automatically.
One such program is Git for Windows, and due to the way it is set up,
unfortunately its copy of `gpg.exe` is also reachable via the PATH.
This usually does not pose any problems. To the contrary, it even allows
us to test the GPG parts of Git's test suite even if `gpg.exe` is not
delivered as part of `git-sdk-64-minimal`, the minimal subset of Git for
Windows' SDK that we use in the CI builds to compile Git.
However, every once in a while we build a new MSYS2 runtime, which means
that there is a mismatch between the copy in `git-sdk-64-minimal` and
the copy in C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin. When that happens we hit the
dreaded problem where only one `msys-2.0.dll` is expected to be in the
PATH, and things start to fail.
Let's avoid all of this by restricting the PATH to the minimal set. This
is actually done by `git-sdk-64-minimal`'s `/etc/profile`, and we just
have to source this file manually (one would expect that it is sourced
automatically, but the Bash steps in Azure Pipelines/GitHub workflows
are explicitly run using `--noprofile`, hence the need for doing this
explicitly).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use upload-artifacts v1 (instead of v2) for 32-bit linux, as the
new version has a blocker bug for that architecture.
* cb/ci-use-upload-artifacts-v1:
ci: use upload-artifacts v1 for dockerized jobs
CI learns to run the leak sanitizer builds.
* ab/sanitize-leak-ci:
tests: add a test mode for SANITIZE=leak, run it in CI
Makefile: add SANITIZE=leak flag to GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
While git can be compiled with SANITIZE=leak, we have not run
regression tests under that mode. Memory leaks have only been fixed as
one-offs without structured regression testing.
This change adds CI testing for it. We'll now build and small set of
whitelisted t00*.sh tests under Linux with a new job called
"linux-leaks".
The CI target uses a new GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true test
mode. When running in that mode, we'll assert that we were compiled
with SANITIZE=leak. We'll then skip all tests, except those that we've
opted-in by setting "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
A test setting "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" setting can in turn
make use of the "SANITIZE_LEAK" prerequisite, should they wish to
selectively skip tests even under
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". In the preceding commit we
started doing this in "t0004-unwritable.sh" under SANITIZE=leak, now
it'll combine nicely with "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
This is how tests that don't set "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" will
be skipped under GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true:
$ GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true ./t0001-init.sh
1..0 # SKIP skip all tests in t0001 under SANITIZE=leak, TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK not set
The intent is to add more TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true annotations
as follow-up change, but let's start small to begin with.
In ci/run-build-and-tests.sh we make use of the default "*" case to
run "make test" without any GIT_TEST_* modes. SANITIZE=leak is known
to fail in combination with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=true in
t0016-oidmap.sh, and we're likely to have other such failures in
various GIT_TEST_* modes. Let's focus on getting the base tests
passing, we can expand coverage to GIT_TEST_* modes later.
It would also be possible to implement a more lightweight version of
this by only relying on setting "LSAN_OPTIONS". See
<YS9OT/pn5rRK9cGB@coredump.intra.peff.net>[1] and
<YS9ZIDpANfsh7N+S@coredump.intra.peff.net>[2] for a discussion of
that. I've opted for this approach of adding a GIT_TEST_* mode instead
because it's consistent with how we handle other special test modes.
Being able to add a "!SANITIZE_LEAK" prerequisite and calling
"test_done" early if it isn't satisfied also means that we can more
incrementally add regression tests without being forced to fix
widespread and hard-to-fix leaks at the same time.
We have tests that do simple checking of some tool we're interested
in, but later on in the script might be stressing trace2, or common
sources of leaks like "git log" in combination with the tool (e.g. the
commit-graph tests). To be clear having a prerequisite could also be
accomplished by using "LSAN_OPTIONS" directly.
On the topic of "LSAN_OPTIONS": It would be nice to have a mode to
aggregate all failures in our various scripts, see [2] for a start at
doing that which sets "log_path" in "LSAN_OPTIONS". I've punted on
that for now, it can be added later.
As of writing this we've got major regressions between master..seen,
i.e. the t000*.sh tests and more fixed since 31f9acf9ce (Merge branch
'ah/plugleaks', 2021-08-04) have regressed recently.
See the discussion at <87czsv2idy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>[3] about
the lack of this sort of test mode, and 0e5bba53af (add UNLEAK
annotation for reducing leak false positives, 2017-09-08) for the
initial addition of SANITIZE=leak.
See also 09595ab381 (Merge branch 'jk/leak-checkers', 2017-09-19),
7782066f67 (Merge branch 'jk/apache-lsan', 2019-05-19) and the recent
936e58851a (Merge branch 'ah/plugleaks', 2021-05-07) for some of the
past history of "one-off" SANITIZE=leak (and more) fixes.
As noted in [5] we can't support this on OSX yet until Clang 14 is
released, at that point we'll probably want to resurrect that
"osx-leaks" job.
1. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizer
2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YS9OT%2Fpn5rRK9cGB@coredump.intra.peff.net/
3. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87czsv2idy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
4. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YS9ZIDpANfsh7N+S@coredump.intra.peff.net/
5. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210916035603.76369-1-carenas@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The repository of git-l10n is a fork of "git/git" on GitHub, and uses
GitHub pull request for code review. A helper program "git-po-helper"
can be used to check typos in ".po" files, validate syntax, and check
commit messages. It would be convenient to integrate this helper program
to CI and add comments in pull request.
The new github-action workflow will be enabled for l10n related
operations, such as:
* Operations on a repository named as "git-po", such as a repository
forked from "git-l10n/git-po".
* Push to a branch that contains "l10n" in the name.
* Pull request from a remote branch which has "l10n" in the name, such
as: "l10n/fix-fuzzy-translations".
The new l10n workflow listens to two types of github events:
on: [push, pull_request_target]
The reason we use "pull_request_target" instead of "pull_request" is
that pull requests from forks receive a read-only GITHUB_TOKEN and
workflows cannot write comments back to pull requests for security
reasons. GitHub provides a "pull_request_target" event to resolve
security risks by checking out the base commit from the target
repository, and provide write permissions for the workflow.
By default, administrators can set strict permissions for workflows. The
following code is used to modify the permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN
and grant write permission in order to create comments in pull-requests.
permissions:
pull-requests: write
This workflow will scan commits one by one. If a commit does not look
like a l10n commit (no file in "po/" has been changed), the scan process
will stop immediately. For a "push" event, no error will be reported
because it is normal to push non-l10n commits merged from upstream. But
for the "pull_request_target" event, errors will be reported. For this
reason, additional option is provided for "git-po-helper".
git-po-helper check-commits \
--github-action-event="${{ github.event_name }}" -- \
<base>..<head>
The output messages of "git-po-helper" contain color codes not only for
console, but also for logfile. This is because "git-po-helper" uses a
package named "logrus" for logging, and I use an additional option
"ForceColor" to initialize "logrus" to print messages in a user-friendly
format in logfile output. These color codes help produce beautiful
output for the log of workflow, but they must be stripped off when
creating comments for pull requests. E.g.:
perl -pe 's/\e\[[0-9;]*m//g' git-po-helper.out
"git-po-helper" may generate two kinds of suggestions, errors and
warnings. All the errors and warnings will be reported in the log of the
l10n workflow. However, warnings in the log of the workflow for a
successfully running "git-po-helper" can easily be ignored by users.
For the "pull_request_target" event, this issue is resolved by creating
an additional comment in the pull request. A l10n contributor should try
to fix all the errors, and should pay attention to the warnings.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This backend has been deprecated in favor of `git rebase
--rebase-merges`.
In preparation for dropping it, let's remove all the regression tests
that would need it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
e9f79acb28 (ci: upgrade to using actions/{up,down}load-artifacts v2,
2021-06-23) changed all calls to that action from v1 to v2, but there
is still an open bug[1] that affects all nodejs actions and prevents
its use in 32-bit linux (as used by the Linux32 container)
move all dockerized jobs to use v1 that was built in C# and therefore
doesn't have this problem, which will otherwise manifest with confusing
messages like:
/usr/bin/docker exec 0285adacc4536b7cd962079c46f85fa05a71e66d7905b5e4b9b1a0e8b305722a sh -c "cat /etc/*release | grep ^ID"
OCI runtime exec failed: exec failed: container_linux.go:380: starting container process caused: no such file or directory: unknown
[1] https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/1011
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
similar to the recently added sparse task, it is nice to know as early
as possible.
add a dockerized build using fedora (that usually has the latest gcc)
to be ahead of the curve and avoid older ISO C issues at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
CI update.
* js/ci-check-whitespace-updates:
ci(check-whitespace): restrict to the intended commits
ci(check-whitespace): stop requiring a read/write token
The CI gained a new job to run "make sparse" check.
* js/ci-make-sparse:
ci/install-dependencies: handle "sparse" job package installs
ci: run "apt-get update" before "apt-get install"
ci: run `make sparse` as part of the GitHub workflow
This just matches the style/location of the package installation for
other jobs. There should be no functional change.
I did flip the order of the options and command-name ("-y update"
instead of "update -y") for consistency with other lines in the same
file.
Note also that we have to reorder the dependency install with the
"checkout" action, so that we actually have the "ci" scripts available.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "sparse" workflow runs "apt-get install" to pick up a few necessary
packages. But it needs to run "apt-get update" first, or it risks trying
to download an old package version that no longer exists. And in fact
this happens now, with output like:
2021-07-26T17:40:51.2551880Z E: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/c/curl/libcurl4-openssl-dev_7.68.0-1ubuntu2.5_amd64.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 52.147.219.192 80]
2021-07-26T17:40:51.2554304Z E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
Our other ci jobs don't suffer from this; they rely on scripts in ci/,
and ci/install-dependencies does the appropriate "apt-get update".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During a run of the `check-whitespace` we want to verify that the
commits introduced in the Pull Request have no whitespace issues. We
only want to look at those commits, not the upstream commits (because
the contributor cannot do anything about the latter).
However, by using the `-<count>` form in `git log --check`, we run the
risk of looking at the wrong commits. The reason is that the
`actions/checkout` step does _not_ check out the tip commit of the Pull
Request's branch: Instead, it checks out a merge commit that merges that
branch into the target branch. For that reason, we already adjust the
commit count by incrementing it, but that is not enough: if the upstream
branch has newer commits, they are traversed _first_. And obviously we
will then miss some of the commits that we _actually_ wanted to look at.
Therefore, let's be careful to stop assuming a linear, up to date commit
topology in the contributed commits, and instead specify the correct
commit range.
Unfortunately, this means that we no longer can rely on a shallow clone:
There is no way of knowing just how many commits the upstream branch
advanced after the commit from which the PR branch branched off. So
let's just go with a full clone instead, and be safe rather than sorry
(if we have "too shallow" a situation, a commit range `@{u}..` may very
well include a shallow commit itself, and the output of `git show
--check <shallow>` is _not_ pretty).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of some recent security tightening, GitHub introduced the
ability to configure GitHub workflows to be run with a read-only token.
This is much more secure, in particular when working in a public
repository: While the regular read/write token might be restricted to
writing to the current branch, it is not necessarily restricted to
access only the current Pull Request.
However, the `check-whitespace` workflow threw a wrench into this plan:
it _requires_ write access (because it wants to add a PR comment in case
of a whitespace issue).
Let's just skip that PR comment. The user can always click through to
the actual error, even if it is slightly less convenient.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Occasionally we receive reviews after patches were integrated, where
`sparse` (https://sparse.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/ has more information
on that project) identified problems such as file-local variables or
functions being declared as global.
By running `sparse` as part of our Continuous Integration, we can catch
such things much earlier. Even better: developers who activated GitHub
Actions on their forks can catch such issues before even sending their
patches to the Git mailing list.
This addresses https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/345
Note: Not even Ubuntu 20.04 ships with a new enough version of `sparse`
to accommodate Git's needs. The symptom looks like this:
add-interactive.c:537:51: error: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
To counter that, we download and install the custom-built `sparse`
package from the Azure Pipeline that we specifically created to address
this issue.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By upgrading from v1 to v2 of `actions/checkout`, we avoid fetching all
the tags and the complete history: v2 only fetches one revision by
default. This should make things a lot faster.
Note that `actions/checkout@v2` seems to be incompatible with running in
containers: https://github.com/actions/checkout/issues/151. Therefore,
we stick with v1 there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already build Git for Windows with `NO_GETTEXT` when compiling with
GCC. Let's do the same with Visual C, too.
Note that we do not technically _need_ to pass `NO_GETTEXT` explicitly
in that `make artifacts-tar` invocation because we do this while `MSVC`
is set (which will set `uname_S := Windows`, which in turn will set
`NO_GETTEXT = YesPlease`). But it is definitely nicer to be explicit
here.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Helped-by: Matthias Aßhauer <mha1993@live.de>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git's test suite is excruciatingly slow on Windows, mainly due to the
fact that it executes a lot of shell script code, and that's simply not
native to Windows.
To help with that, we established the pattern where the artifacts are
first built in one job, and then multiple test jobs run in parallel
using the artifacts built in the first job.
We take pains in transferring only the build outputs, and letting
`actions/checkout` fill in the rest of the files.
One major downside of that strategy is that the test jobs might fail to
check out the intended revision (e.g. because the branch has been
updated while the build was running, as is frequently the case with the
`seen` branch).
Let's transfer also the files tracked by Git, and skip the checkout step
in the test jobs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The GitHub Actions to upload/download workflow artifacts saw a major
upgrade since Git's GitHub workflow was established. Let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We use a `.bat` script to copy the DLLs in the `vs-build` job, and those
type of scripts are native to CMD, not to PowerShell.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In our continuous builds, Windows is the odd cookie that requires a
complete development environment to be downloaded because there is no
suitable one installed by default on Windows.
Side note: technically, there _is_ a development environment present in
GitHub Actions' build agents: MSYS2. But it differs from Git for
Windows' SDK in subtle points, unfortunately enough so to prevent Git's
test suite from running without failures.
Traditionally, we support downloading this environment (which we
nicknamed `git-sdk-64-minimal`) via a PowerShell scriptlet that accesses
the build artifacts of a dedicated Azure Pipeline (which packages a tiny
subset of the full Git for Windows SDK, containing just enough to build
Git and run its test suite).
This PowerShell script is unfortunately not very robust and sometimes
fails due to network issues.
Of course, we could add code to detect that situation, wait a little,
try again, if it fails again wait a little longer, lather, rinse and
repeat.
Instead of doing all of this in Git's own `.github/workflows/`, though,
let's offload this logic to the new GitHub Action at
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/setup-git-for-windows-sdk
This Action not only downloads and extracts git-sdk-64-minimal _outside_
the worktree (making it no longer necessary to meddle with
`.gitignore` or `.git/info/exclude`), it also adds the `bash.exe` to the
`PATH` and sets the environment variable `MSYSTEM` (an implementation
detail that Git's workflow should never have needed to know about).
This allows us to convert all those funny PowerShell tasks that wanted
to call git-sdk-64-minimal's `bash.exe`: they all are now regular `bash`
scriptlets.
This finally lets us get rid of the funny quoting and escaping where we
had to pay attention not only to quote and escape the Bash scriptlets
properly, but also to add a second level of escaping (with backslashes
for double quotes and backticks for dollar signs) to stop PowerShell
from doing unintended things.
Further, this Action uses a fast caching strategy native to GitHub
Actions that should accelerate the download across CI runs:
git-sdk-64-minimal is usually updated once per 24h, and needs to be
cached only once within that period. Caching it (unfortunately only on
a per-branch basis) speeds up the download step, and makes it much more
robust at the same time by virtue of accessing a cache location that is
closer in the network topology.
With this we can drop the home-rolled caching where we try to accelerate
the test phase by uploading git-sdk-64-minimal as a workflow artifact
after using it to build Git, and then download it as workflow artifact
in the test phase.
Even better: the `vs-test` job no longer needs to depend on the
`windows-build` job. The only reason it depended on it was to ensure
that the `git-sdk-64-minimal` workflow artifact was available.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our CMake configuration generates not only build definitions, but also
install definitions: After building Git using `msbuild git.sln`, the
built artifacts can be installed via `msbuild INSTALL.vcxproj`.
To specify _where_ the files should be installed, the
`-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<path>` option can be used when running CMake.
However, this process would really only install the files that were just
built. On Windows, we need more than that: We also need the `.dll` files
of the dependencies (such as libcurl). The `vcpkg` ecosystem, which we
use to obtain those dependencies, can be asked to install said `.dll`
files really easily, so let's do that.
This requires more than just the built `vcpkg` artifacts in the CI build
definition; We now clone the `vcpkg` repository so that the relevant
CMake scripts are available, in particular the ones related to defining
the toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The version of Ubuntu Linux used by default at GitHub Actions CI
has been updated to one that lack coccinelle; until it gets fixed,
work it around by sticking to the previous release (18.04).
* tb/ci-run-cocci-with-18.04:
.github/workflows/main.yml: run static-analysis on bionic
Get rid of "GETTEXT_POISON" support altogether, which may or may
not be controversial.
* ab/detox-gettext-tests:
tests: remove uses of GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=false
tests: remove support for GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON
ci: remove GETTEXT_POISON jobs
GitHub Actions is transitioning workflow steps that run on
'ubuntu-latest' from 18.04 to 20.04 [1].
This works fine in all steps except the static-analysis one, since
Coccinelle isn't available on Ubuntu focal (it is only available in the
universe suite).
Until Coccinelle can be installed from 20.04's main suite, pin the
static-analysis build to run on 18.04, where it can be installed by
default.
[1]: https://github.com/actions/virtual-environments/issues/1816
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The CI/PR GitHub Actions workflow uses the 'matrix' strategy for the
"windows-test", "vs-test", "regular" and "dockerized" jobs. The default
behaviour of GitHub Actions is to cancel all in-progress jobs in a
matrix if one of the job of the matrix fails [1].
This is not ideal as a failure early in a job, like during installation of
the build/test dependencies on a specific platform, leads to the
cancellation of all other jobs in the matrix.
Set the 'fail-fast' variable to 'false' for all four matrix jobs in the
workflow.
[1] https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstrategyfail-fast
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A subsequent commit will remove GETTEXT_POISON entirely, let's start
by removing the CI jobs that enable the option.
We cannot just remove the job because the CI is implicitly depending
on the "poison" job being a sort of "default" job in the sense that
it's the job that was otherwise run with the default compiler, no
other GIT_TEST_* options etc. So let's keep it under the name
"linux-gcc-default".
This means we can remove the initial "make test" from the "linux-gcc"
job (it does another one after setting a bunch of GIT_TEST_*
variables).
I'm not doing that because it would conflict with the in-flight
334afbc76f (tests: mark tests relying on the current default for
`init.defaultBranch`, 2020-11-18) (currently on the "seen" branch, so
the SHA-1 will almost definitely change). It's going to use that "make
test" again for different reasons, so let's preserve it for now.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Something changed in `vcpkg` (which we use in our Visual C++ build to
provide the dependencies such as libcurl) and our `vs-build` job started
failing in CI. The reason is that we had a work-around in place to help
CMake find iconv, and this work-around is neither needed nor does it
work anymore.
For the full discussion with the vcpkg project, see this comment:
https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/issues/14780#issuecomment-735368280
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 32c83afc2c (ci: github action - add check for whitespace errors,
2020-09-22), we introduced a GitHub workflow that automatically checks
Pull Requests for whitespace problems.
However, when affected lines contain one or more double quote
characters, this workflow failed to attach the informative comment
because the Javascript snippet incorrectly interpreted these quotes
instead of using the `git log` output as-is.
Let's fix that.
While at it, let's `await` the result of the `createComment()` function.
Finally, we enclose the log in the comment with ```...``` to avoid
having the diff marker be misinterpreted as an enumeration bullet.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GitHub Actions automated test improvement to skip tests on a tree
identical to what has already been tested.
* js/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests:
ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive
ci: work around old records of GitHub runs
In 7d78d5fc1a (ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested
commits/trees, 2020-10-08), we added a check that determines whether
there is already a workflow run for the given commit (or at least tree),
and if found, skips the current run.
We just worked around an issue with this check where older runs might
unexpectedly miss the `head_commit` attribute.
Let's be even more defensive by catching all kinds of exceptions,
logging them as warnings, and continue the run without skipping it
(after all, if the check fails, we _want_ to continue with the run).
This commit is best viewed with the diff option `-w` because it
increases the indentation level of the GitHub Action script by two
spaces, surrounding it by a `try ... catch` construct.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apparently older GitHub runs at least _sometimes_ lack information about
the `head_commit` (and therefore the `ci-config` check will fail with
"TypeError: Cannot read property 'tree_id' of null") in the check added
in 7d78d5fc1a (ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested
commits/trees, 2020-10-08).
Let's work around this by adding a defensive condition.
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not all developers are aware of `git diff --check` to warn
about whitespace issues. Running a check when a pull request is
opened or updated can save time for reviewers and the submitter.
A GitHub workflow will run when a pull request is created or the
contents are updated to check the patch series. A pull request
provides the necessary information (number of commits) to only
check the patch series.
To ensure the developer is aware of any issues, a comment will be
added to the pull request with the check errors.
Signed-off-by: Chris. Webster <chris@webstech.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic to skip testing on the tagged commit and the tag itself
was not quite consistent which led to failure of Windows test
tasks. It has been revamped to consistently skip revisions that
have already been tested, based on the tree object of the revision.
* js/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests:
ci: do not skip tagged revisions in GitHub workflows
ci: skip GitHub workflow runs for already-tested commits/trees
When pushing a commit that has already passed a CI or PR build
successfully, it makes sense to save some energy and time and skip the
new build.
Let's teach our GitHub workflow to do that.
For good measure, we also compare the tree ID, which is what we actually
test (the commit ID might have changed due to a reworded commit message,
which should not affect the outcome of the run).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is the custom to follow minor updates of GitHub Actions
automatically, by using the suffix `@v1`. Actions' maintainers will then
update that `v1` ref to point to the newest.
However, for `microsoft/setup-msbuild`, 889cacb689 (ci: configure
GitHub Actions for CI/PR, 2020-04-11) uses a very specific `@v1.0.0`
suffix.
In this instance, that is a problem: should `setup-msbuild` release a
new version that intends to fix a critical bug, we won't know it, and we
won't use it.
Such a scenario is not theoretical. It is happening right now:
https://github.blog/changelog/2020-10-01-github-actions-deprecating-set-env-and-add-path-commands
Let's simplify our setup, allowing us to benefit from automatically
using the newest v1.x.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the common case where users have _not_ pushed a `ci-config` branch to
configure which branches should be included in the GitHub workflow runs,
there is a big fat ugly annotation about a failure in the run's log:
X Check failure on line 1 in .github
@github-actions github-actions / ci-config
.github#L1
Process completed with exit code 128.
The reason is that the `ci-config` job tries to clone that `ci-config`
branch, and even if it is configured to continue on error, the
annotation is displayed, and it is distracting.
Let's just handle this on the shell script level, so that the job's step
is not marked as a failure.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The section added in e76eec3554 (ci: allow per-branch config for
GitHub Actions, 2020-05-07) contains a `&&`-chain that connects several
commands. The first command is actually so long that it stretches over
multiple lines, and as per usual, the continuation lines are indented one
more level than the first.
However, the subsequent commands in the `&&`-chain were also indented
one more level than the first command, which was almost certainly
unintended.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While YAML allows different indentation styles as long as each block
is consistent, it is rather unusual to mix different indentations in
a single file. Adjust to use two-space indentation everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Moennich <adrian@planetcoding.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
CMake support to build with MSVC for Windows bypassing the Makefile.
* ss/cmake-build:
ci: modification of main.yml to use cmake for vs-build job
cmake: support for building git on windows with msvc and clang.
cmake: support for building git on windows with mingw
cmake: support for testing git when building out of the source tree
cmake: support for testing git with ctest
cmake: installation support for git
cmake: generate the shell/perl/python scripts and templates, translations
Introduce CMake support for configuring Git
Teach .github/workflows/main.yml to use CMake for VS builds.
Modified the vs-test step to match windows-test step. This speeds
up the vs-test. Calling git-cmd from powershell and then calling git-bash
to perform the tests slows things down(factor of about 6). So git-bash
is directly called from powershell to perform the tests using prove.
NOTE: Since GitHub keeps the same directory for each job
(with respect to path) absolute paths are used in the bin-wrapper
scripts.
GitHub has switched to CMake 3.17.1 which changed the behaviour of
FindCURL module. An extra definition (-DCURL_NO_CURL_CMAKE=ON) has been
added to revert to the old behaviour.
In the configuration phase CMake looks for the required libraries for
building git (eg zlib,libiconv). So we extract the libraries before we
configure.
To check for ICONV_OMITS_BOM libiconv.dll needs to be in the working
directory of script or path. So we copy the dlls before we configure.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Siddharthan <sibisiddharthan.github@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While the MyFirstContribution guide exists and has received some use and
positive reviews, it is still not as discoverable as it could be. Add a
reference to it from the GitHub pull request template, where many
brand-new contributors may look. Also add a reference to it in
SubmittingPatches, which is the central source of guidance for patch
contribution.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of downloading Windows SDK for CI jobs for windows builds
from an external site (wingit.blob.core.windows.net), use the one
created in the windows-build job, to work around quota issues at
the external site.
* js/ci-sdk-download-fix:
ci: avoid pounding on the poor ci-artifacts container
When this developer tested how the git-sdk-64-minimal artifact could be
served to all the GitHub workflow runs that need it, Azure Blobs looked
like a pretty good choice: it is reliable, fast and we already use it in
Git for Windows to serve components like OpenSSL, cURL, etc
It came as an unpleasant surprise just _how many_ times this artifact
was downloaded. It exploded the bandwidth to a point where the free tier
would no longer be enough, threatening to block other, essential Git for
Windows services.
Let's switch back to using the Build Artifacts of our trusty Azure
Pipeline for the time being.
To avoid unnecessary hammering of the Azure Pipeline artifacts, we use
the GitHub Action `actions/upload-artifact` in the `windows-build` job
and the GitHub Action `actions/download-artifact` in the `windows-test`
and `vs-test` jobs (the latter now depends on `windows-build` for that
reason, too).
Helped-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Depending on the workflows of individual developers, it can either be
convenient or annoying that our GitHub Actions CI jobs are run on every
branch. As an example of annoying: if you carry many half-finished
work-in-progress branches and rebase them frequently against master,
you'd get tons of failure reports that aren't interesting (not to
mention the wasted CPU).
This commit adds a new job which checks a special branch within the
repository for CI config, and then runs a shell script it finds there to
decide whether to skip the rest of the tests. The default will continue
to run tests for all refs if that branch or script is missing.
There have been a few alternatives discussed:
One option is to carry information in the commit itself about whether it
should be tested, either in the tree itself (changing the workflow YAML
file) or in the commit message (a "[skip ci]" flag or similar). But
these are frustrating and error-prone to use:
- you have to manually apply them to each branch that you want to mark
- it's easy for them to leak into other workflows, like emailing patches
We could likewise try to get some information from the branch name. But
that leads to debates about whether the default should be "off" or "on",
and overriding still ends up somewhat awkward. If we default to "on",
you have to remember to name your branches appropriately to skip CI. And
if "off", you end up having to contort your branch names or duplicate
your pushes with an extra refspec.
By comparison, this commit's solution lets you specify your config once
and forget about it, and all of the data is off in its own ref, where it
can be changed by individual forks without touching the main tree.
There were a few design decisions that came out of on-list discussion.
I'll summarize here:
- we could use GitHub's API to retrieve the config ref, rather than a
real checkout (and then just operate on it via some javascript). We
still have to spin up a VM and contact GitHub over the network from
it either way, so it ends up not being much faster. I opted to go
with shell to keep things similar to our other tools (and really
could implement allow-refs in any language you want). This also makes
it easy to test your script locally, and to modify it within the
context of a normal git.git tree.
- we could keep the well-known refname out of refs/heads/ to avoid
cluttering the branch namespace. But that makes it awkward to
manipulate. By contrast, you can just "git checkout ci-config" to
make changes.
- we could assume the ci-config ref has nothing in it except config
(i.e., a branch unrelated to the rest of git.git). But dealing with
orphan branches is awkward. Instead, we'll do our best to efficiently
check out only the ci/config directory using a shallow partial clone,
which allows your ci-config branch to be just a normal branch, with
your config changes on top.
- we could provide a simpler interface, like a static list of ref
patterns. But we can't get out of spinning up a whole VM anyway, so
we might as well use that feature to make the config as flexible as
possible. If we add more config, we should be able to reuse our
partial-clone to set more outputs.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Arguably, CI builds' most important task is to not only identify
regressions, but to make it as easy as possible to investigate what went
wrong.
In that light, we will want to provide users with a way to inspect the
tests' output as well as the corresponding directories.
This commit adds build steps that are only executed when tests failed,
uploading the relevant information as build artifacts. These artifacts
can then be downloaded by interested parties to diagnose the failures
more efficiently.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch adds CI builds via GitHub Actions. While the underlying
technology is at least _very_ similar to that of Azure Pipelines, GitHub
Actions are much easier to set up than Azure Pipelines:
- no need to install a GitHub App,
- no need to set up an Azure DevOps account,
- all you need to do is push to your fork on GitHub.
Therefore, it makes a lot of sense for us to have a working GitHub
Actions setup.
While copy/editing `azure-pipelines.yml` into
`.github/workflows/main.yml`, we also use the opportunity to accelerate
the step that sets up a minimal subset of Git for Windows' SDK in the
Windows-build job:
- we now download a `.tar.xz` stored in Azure Blobs and extract it
simultaneously by calling `curl` and piping the result to `tar`,
- decompressing via `xz`,
- all three utilities are installed together with Git for Windows
At the same time, we also make use of the matrix build feature, which
reduces the amount of repeated text by quite a bit.
Also, we do away with the parts that try to mount a file share on which
`prove` can store data between runs. It is just too complicated to set
up, and most times the tree changes anyway, so there is little return on
investment there.
Initial-patch-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the contributing guide and PR template seen by people who open pull
requests on GitHub, we mention the submitGit tool, which gives an
alternative to figuring out the mailing list. These days we also have
the similar GitGitGadget tool, and we should make it clear that this
is also an option.
We could continue to mention _both_ tools, but it's probably better to
pick one in order to avoid overwhelming the user with choice. After all,
one of the purposes here is to reduce friction for first-time or
infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order
delivery.
2. Subjectively, GGG seems to be more commonly used on the list these
days, especially by list regulars.
3. GGG seems to be under more active development (likely related to
point 2).
So let's actually swap out submitGit for GGG. While we're there, let's
put another link to the GGG page in the PR template, because that's
where users who are learning about it for the first time will want to go
to read more.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many open source projects use github.com for their contribution process.
Although we mirror the Git core repository to github.com [1] we do not
use any other github.com service. This is unknown/unexpected to a
number of (potential) contributors and consequently they create Pull
Requests against our mirror with their contributions. These Pull
Requests become stale. This is frustrating to them as they think we
ignore them and it is also unsatisfactory for us as we miss potential
code improvements and/or new contributors.
GitHub contribution guidelines and a GitHub Pull Request template that
is visible to every Pull Request creator can be configured with special
files in a Git repository [2]. Let's make use of this!
[1] https://github.com/git/git
[2] https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-pull-request-template-for-your-repository/
Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
