Fix a memory leak that's been with us since this code was added in
ca02465b41 (push: use remote.$name.push as a refmap, 2013-12-03).
The "remote = remote_get(...)" added in the same commit would seem to
leak based only on the context here, but that function is a wrapper
for sticking the remotes we fetch into "the_repository->remote_state".
See fd3cb0501e (remote: move static variables into per-repository
struct, 2021-11-17) for the addition of code in repository.c that
free's the "remote" allocated here.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The set_refspecs() caller of refspec_append_mapped() (added in [1])
left open the question[2] of whether the "remote" we lazily fetch
might be NULL in the "[...]uniquely name our ref?" case, as
remote_get() can return NULL.
If we got past the "[...]uniquely name our ref?" case we'd have
already segfaulted if we tried to dereference it as
"remote->push.nr". In these cases the config mechanism & previous
remote validation will have bailed out earlier.
Let's refactor this code to clarify that, we'll now BUG() out if we
can't get a "remote", and will no longer retrieve it for these common
cases where we don't need it.
1. ca02465b41 (push: use remote.$name.push as a refmap, 2013-12-03)
2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/c0c07b89-7eaf-21cd-748e-e14ea57f09fd@web.de/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git learned pushing submodules without pushing the superproject by
the user specifying --recurse-submodules=only through 6c656c3fe4
("submodules: add RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ONLY value", 2016-12-20) and
225e8bf778 ("push: add option to push only submodules", 2016-12-20).
For users who use this feature regularly, it is desirable to have an
equivalent configuration.
It turns out that such a configuration (push.recurseSubmodules=only) is
already supported, even though it is neither documented nor mentioned
in the commit messages, due to the way the --recurse-submodules=only
feature was implemented (a function used to parse --recurse-submodules
was updated to support "only", but that same function is used to parse
push.recurseSubmodules too). What is left is to document it and test it,
which is what this commit does.
There is a possible point of confusion when recursing into a submodule
that itself has the push.recurseSubmodules=only configuration, because
if a repository has only its submodules pushed and not itself, its
superproject can never be pushed. Therefore, treat such configurations
as being "on-demand", and print a warning message.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
"upstream branches" is plural but "name" and "local branch" are
singular. Make them all singular. And because we're talking about a
hypothetical branch that doesn't exist yet, use the future tense.
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This was found during l10n process by Jiang Xin.
Reported-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangyi Zhou <me@fangyi.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some "simple" centralized workflows, users expect remote tracking
branch names to match local branch names. "git push" pushes to the
remote version/instance of the branch, and "git pull" pulls any changes
to the remote branch (changes made by the same user in another place, or
by other users).
This expectation is supported by the push.default default option "simple"
which refuses a default push for a mismatching tracking branch name, and
by the new branch.autosetupmerge option, "simple", which only sets up
remote tracking for same-name remote branches.
When a new branch has been created by the user and has not yet been
pushed (and push.default is not set to "current"), the user is prompted
with a "The current branch %s has no upstream branch" error, and
instructions on how to push and add tracking.
This error is helpful in that following the advice once per branch
"resolves" the issue for that branch forever, but inconvenient in that
for the "simple" centralized workflow, this is always the right thing to
do, so it would be better to just do it.
Support this workflow with a new config setting, push.autoSetupRemote,
which will cause a default push, when there is no remote tracking branch
configured, to push to the same-name on the remote and --set-upstream.
Also add a hint offering this new option when the "The current branch %s
has no upstream branch" error is encountered, and add corresponding tests.
Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the default push.default option, "simple", beginners are
protected from accidentally pushing to the "wrong" branch in
centralized workflows: if the remote tracking branch they would push
to does not have the same name as the local branch, and they try to do
a "default push", they get an error and explanation with options.
There is a particular centralized workflow where this often happens:
a user branches to a new local topic branch from an existing
remote branch, eg with "checkout -b feature1 origin/master". With
the default branch.autosetupmerge configuration (value "true"), git
will automatically add origin/master as the upstream tracking branch.
When the user pushes with a default "git push", with the intention of
pushing their (new) topic branch to the remote, they get an error, and
(amongst other things) a suggestion to run "git push origin HEAD".
If they follow this suggestion the push succeeds, but on subsequent
default pushes they continue to get an error - so eventually they
figure out to add "-u" to change the tracking branch, or they spelunk
the push.default config doc as proposed and set it to "current", or
some GUI tooling does one or the other of these things for them.
When one of their coworkers later works on the same topic branch,
they don't get any of that "weirdness". They just "git checkout
feature1" and everything works exactly as they expect, with the shared
remote branch set up as remote tracking branch, and push and pull
working out of the box.
The "stable state" for this way of working is that local branches have
the same-name remote tracking branch (origin/feature1 in this
example), and multiple people can work on that remote feature branch
at the same time, trusting "git pull" to merge or rebase as required
for them to be able to push their interim changes to that same feature
branch on that same remote.
(merging from the upstream "master" branch, and merging back to it,
are separate more involved processes in this flow).
There is a problem in this flow/way of working, however, which is that
the first user, when they first branched from origin/master, ended up
with the "wrong" remote tracking branch (different from the stable
state). For a while, before they pushed (and maybe longer, if they
don't use -u/--set-upstream), their "git pull" wasn't getting other
users' changes to the feature branch - it was getting any changes from
the remote "master" branch instead (a completely different class of
changes!)
An experienced git user might say "well yeah, that's what it means to
have the remote tracking branch set to origin/master!" - but the
original user above didn't *ask* to have the remote master branch
added as remote tracking branch - that just happened automatically
when they branched their feature branch. They didn't necessarily even
notice or understand the meaning of the "set up to track 'origin/master'"
message when they created the branch - especially if they are using a
GUI.
Looking at how to fix this, you might think "OK, so disable auto setup
of remote tracking - set branch.autosetupmerge to false" - but that
will inconvenience the *second* user in this story - the one who just
wanted to start working on the topic branch. The first and second
users swap roles at different points in time of course - they should
both have a sane configuration that does the right thing in both
situations.
Make this "branches have the same name locally as on the remote"
workflow less painful / more obvious by introducing a new
branch.autosetupmerge option called "simple", to match the same-name
"push.default" option that makes similar assumptions.
This new option automatically sets up tracking in a *subset* of the
current default situations: when the original ref is a remote tracking
branch *and* has the same branch name on the remote (as the new local
branch name).
Update the error displayed when the 'push.default=simple' configuration
rejects a mismatching-upstream-name default push, to offer this new
branch.autosetupmerge option that will prevent this class of error.
With this new configuration, in the example situation above, the first
user does *not* get origin/master set up as the tracking branch for
the new local branch. If they "git pull" in their new local-only
branch, they get an error explaining there is no upstream branch -
which makes sense and is helpful. If they "git push", they get an
error explaining how to push *and* suggesting they specify
--set-upstream - which is exactly the right thing to do for them.
This new option is likely not appropriate for users intentionally
implementing a "triangular workflow" with a shared upstream tracking
branch, that they "git pull" in and a "private" feature branch that
they push/force-push to just for remote safe-keeping until they are
ready to push up to the shared branch explicitly/separately. Such
users are likely to prefer keeping the current default
merge.autosetupmerge=true behavior, and change their push.default to
"current".
Also extend the existing branch tests with three new cases testing
this option - the obvious matching-name and non-matching-name cases,
and also a non-matching-ref-type case. The matching-name case needs to
temporarily create an independent repo to fetch from, as the general
strategy of using the local repo as the remote in these tests
precludes locally branching with the same name as in the "remote".
Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the same message when an invalid value is passed to a command line
option or a configuration variable.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In c4a09cc9cc (Merge branch 'hw/advise-ng', 2020-03-25), a new API for
accessing advice variables was introduced and deprecated `advice_config`
in favor of a new array, `advice_setting`.
This patch ports all but two uses which read the status of the global
`advice_` variables over to the new `advice_enabled` API. We'll deal
with advice_add_embedded_repo and advice_graft_file_deprecated
separately.
Signed-off-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All we need to know is that their names are the same.
Additionally this might be easier to parse for some since
remote_for_branch is more descriptive than remote_get(NULL).
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's a single line that is used in a single place, and the variable has
the same name as the function.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If fetch_remote is NULL (i.e. the branch remote is invalid), then it
can't possibly be same as remote, which can't be NULL.
The check is redundant, and so is the extra variable.
Also, fix the Yoda condition: we want to check if remote is the same as
the branch remote, not the other way around.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Only override dst on the odd case.
This allows a preemptive break on the `simple` case.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Their code is much simpler now and can move into the parent function.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All of the setup_push_* functions are appending a refspec. Do this only
once on the parent function.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
No need to do it in every single function.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We want all the cases that don't do anything with a branch first, and
then the rest. That way we will be able to get the branch and die if
there's a problem in the parent function, instead of inside the function
of each mode.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's no need to break when nothing else will be executed.
Will help next patches.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This code is duplicated among multiple functions.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's a safety check to make sure branch->refname isn't different
from branch->merge[0]->src, otherwise we die().
Therefore we always push to branch->refname.
Suggestions-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Simply move the code around and remove dead code. In particular the
'!same_remote' conditional is a no-op since that part of the code is the
same_remote leg of the conditional beforehand.
No functional changes.
Suggestions-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to avoid doing unnecessary things and simplify it in further
patches. In particular moving the additional name safety out of
setup_push_upstream() and into setup_push_simple() and thus making both
more straightforward.
The code is copied exactly as-is; no functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`simple` is the most important mode so move the relevant code to its own
function to make it easier to see what it's doing.
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The typical case is what git was designed for: distributed remotes.
It's only the atypical case--fetching and pushing to the same
remote--that we need to keep an eye on.
No functional changes.
Liked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git push $there --delete ''" should have been diagnosed as an
error, but instead turned into a matching push, which has been
corrected.
* jc/push-delete-nothing:
push: do not turn --delete '' into a matching push
When we added a syntax sugar "git push remote --delete <ref>" to
"git push" as a synonym to the canonical "git push remote :<ref>"
syntax at f517f1f2 (builtin-push: add --delete as syntactic sugar
for :foo, 2009-12-30), we weren't careful enough to make sure that
<ref> is not empty.
Blindly rewriting "--delete <ref>" to ":<ref>" means that an empty
string <ref> results in refspec ":", which is the syntax to ask for
"matching" push that does not delete anything.
Worse yet, if there were matching refs that can be fast-forwarded,
they would have been published prematurely, even if the user feels
that they are not ready yet to be pushed out, which would be a real
disaster.
Noticed-by: Tilman Vogel <tilman.vogel@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git push --force-with-lease[=<ref>]" can easily be misused to lose
commits unless the user takes good care of their own "git fetch".
A new option "--force-if-includes" attempts to ensure that what is
being force-pushed was created after examining the commit at the
tip of the remote ref that is about to be force-replaced.
* sk/force-if-includes:
t, doc: update tests, reference for "--force-if-includes"
push: parse and set flag for "--force-if-includes"
push: add reflog check for "--force-if-includes"
The previous commit added the necessary machinery to implement the
"--force-if-includes" protection, when "--force-with-lease" is used
without giving exact object the remote still ought to have. Surface
the feature by adding a command line option and a configuration
variable to enable it.
- Add a flag: "TRANSPORT_PUSH_FORCE_IF_INCLUDES" to indicate that the
new option was passed from the command line of via configuration
settings; update command line and configuration parsers to set the
new flag accordingly.
- Introduce a new configuration option "push.useForceIfIncludes", which
is equivalent to setting "--force-if-includes" in the command line.
- Update "remote-curl" to recognize and pass this option to "send-pack"
when enabled.
- Update "advise" to catch the reject reason "REJECT_REF_NEEDS_UPDATE",
set when the ref status is "REF_STATUS_REJECT_REMOTE_UPDATED" and
(optionally) print a help message when the push fails.
- The new option is a "no-op" in the following scenarios:
* When used without "--force-with-lease".
* When used with "--force-with-lease", and if the expected commit
on the remote side is specified as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We stopped using the "repo" argument in 8e4c8af058 (push: disallow --all
and refspecs when remote.<name>.mirror is set, 2019-09-02), which moved
the pushremote handling to its caller.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a function for building a refspec using printf-style formatting. It
frees callers from managing their own buffer. Use it throughout the
tree to shorten and simplify its callers.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
map_refspec() either returns the passed in ref string or a detached
strbuf. This makes it hard for callers to release the possibly
allocated memory, and set_refspecs() consequently leaks it.
Let map_refspec() append any refspecs directly and release its own
strbufs after use. Rename it to refspec_append_mapped() and don't
return anything to reflect its increased responsibility.
set_refspecs() also leaks its strbufs. Do the same here and directly
call refspec_append() in each if branch instead of holding onto a
detached strbuf, then dispose of the allocated memory after use. We
need to add an else branch for the final call because all the other
conditional branches already add their formatted refspec now.
setup_push_upstream() and setup_push_current() forgot to release their
strbufs as well; plug these leaks, too, while at it.
None of these leaks were likely to impact users, because the number
and sizes of refspecs are usually small and the allocations are only
done once per program run. Clean them up nevertheless, as another
step on the long road towards zero memory leaks.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Just like 47abd85ba0 (fetch: Strip usernames from url's before storing
them, 2009-04-17) and later 882d49ca5c (push: anonymize URL in status
output, 2016-07-13), and even later c1284b21f2 (curl: anonymize URLs
in error messages and warnings, 2019-03-04) this change anonymizes URLs
(read: strips them of user names and especially passwords) in
user-facing error messages and warnings.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the usage for `git push` is shown, it includes the following
lines
--recurse-submodules[=(check|on-demand|no)]
control recursive pushing of submodules
which seem to indicate that the argument for --recurse-submodules is
optional. However, we cannot actually run that optiion without an
argument:
$ git push --recurse-submodules
fatal: recurse-submodules missing parameter
Unset PARSE_OPT_OPTARG so that it is clear that this option requires an
argument. Since the parse-options machinery guarantees that an argument
is present now, assume that `arg` is set in the else of
option_parse_recurse_submodules().
Reported-by: Andrew White <andrew.white@audinate.com>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the codebase, there are many options which use OPTION_CALLBACK in a
plain ol' struct definition. However, we have the OPT_CALLBACK and
OPT_CALLBACK_F macros which are meant to abstract these plain struct
definitions away. These macros are useful as they semantically signal to
developers that these are just normal callback option with nothing fancy
happening.
Replace plain struct definitions of OPTION_CALLBACK with OPT_CALLBACK or
OPT_CALLBACK_F where applicable. The heavy lifting was done using the
following (disgusting) shell script:
#!/bin/sh
do_replacement () {
tr '\n' '\r' |
sed -e 's/{\s*OPTION_CALLBACK,\s*\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\s*0,\(\s*[^[:space:]}]*\)\s*}/OPT_CALLBACK(\1,\2,\3,\4,\5,\6)/g' |
sed -e 's/{\s*OPTION_CALLBACK,\s*\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\(\s*[^[:space:]}]*\)\s*}/OPT_CALLBACK_F(\1,\2,\3,\4,\5,\6,\7)/g' |
tr '\r' '\n'
}
for f in $(git ls-files \*.c)
do
do_replacement <"$f" >"$f.tmp"
mv "$f.tmp" "$f"
done
The result was manually inspected and then reformatted to match the
style of the surrounding code. Finally, using
`git grep OPTION_CALLBACK \*.c`, leftover results which were not handled
by the script were manually transformed.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Get rid of a magic number by using skip_prefix().
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
CI updates.
* js/azure-pipelines-msvc:
ci: also build and test with MS Visual Studio on Azure Pipelines
ci: really use shallow clones on Azure Pipelines
tests: let --immediate and --write-junit-xml play well together
test-tool run-command: learn to run (parts of) the testsuite
vcxproj: include more generated files
vcxproj: only copy `git-remote-http.exe` once it was built
msvc: work around a bug in GetEnvironmentVariable()
msvc: handle DEVELOPER=1
msvc: ignore some libraries when linking
compat/win32/path-utils.h: add #include guards
winansi: use FLEX_ARRAY to avoid compiler warning
msvc: avoid using minus operator on unsigned types
push: do not pretend to return `int` from `die_push_simple()`
This function is marked as `NORETURN`, and it indeed does not want to
return anything. So let's not declare it with the return type `int`.
This fixes the following warning when building with MSVC:
C4646: function declared with 'noreturn' has non-void return type
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add trace2 regions in transport.c and builtin/push.c to better track
time spent in various phases of pushing:
* Listing refs
* Checking submodules
* Pushing submodules
* Pushing refs
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix an earlier regression to "git push --all" which should have
been forbidden when the target remote repository is set to be a
mirror.
* tg/push-all-in-mirror-forbidden:
push: disallow --all and refspecs when remote.<name>.mirror is set
Pushes with --all, or refspecs are disallowed when --mirror is given
to 'git push', or when 'remote.<name>.mirror' is set in the config of
the repository, because they can have surprising
effects. 800a4ab399 ("push: check for errors earlier", 2018-05-16)
refactored this code to do that check earlier, so we can explicitly
check for the presence of flags, instead of their sideeffects.
However when 'remote.<name>.mirror' is set in the config, the
TRANSPORT_PUSH_MIRROR flag would only be set after we calling
'do_push()', so the checks would miss it entirely.
This leads to surprises for users [*1*].
Fix this by making sure we set the flag (if appropriate) before
checking for compatibility of the various options.
*1*: https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1163918701462249472
Reported-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@ml.filippo.io>
Helped-by: Saleem Rashid
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
