Test names like "basic" are mentioned seven times in the code (ignoring
case): Twice when defining the input and result macros, thrice when
defining the test function, and twice again when calling it. Reduce
that to a single time by using compound literals to pass the input and
result arrays via TEST_INPUT to test_prio_queue().
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Avoid reading past the end of the "result" array, which could otherwise
happen if the prio-queue were to yield more items than were put into it
due to an implementation bug, or if the array has not enough entries due
to a test bug.
Also check at the end whether all "result" entries were consumed, which
would not be the case if the prio-queue forgot some entries or the test
definition contained too many.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we get an unexpected result, the prio-queue unit test reports it like
this:
# check "result[j++] == show(get)" failed at t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c:43
# left: 5
# right: 1
# failed at result[] index 0
That last line repeats "failed" and "result" from the first line.
Shorten it to resemble a similar one in t-ctype and also remove the
incrementation from the first line to avoid possible distractions from
the message of which comparison went wrong where:
# check "result[j] == show(get)" failed at t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c:43
# left: 5
# right: 1
# j: 0
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t/t0009-prio-queue.sh along with t/helper/test-prio-queue.c unit
tests Git's implementation of a priority queue. Migrate the
test over to the new unit testing framework to simplify debugging
and reduce test run-time. Refactor the required logic and add
a new test case in addition to porting over the original ones in
shell.
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
