Dirty the test worktree's root directory, as the test expects.
When testing the untracked-cache, we previously assumed that checking
out master would be sufficient to mark the mtime of the worktree's
root directory as racily-dirty. But sometimes, the checkout would
happen at 12345.999 seconds and the status at 12346.001 seconds,
meaning that the worktree's root directory would not be racily-dirty.
And since it was not truly dirty, occasionally the test would fail.
By making the root truly dirty, the test will always succeed.
Tested by running a few hundred times.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
First, the current code in untracked_cache_invalidate_path() is wrong
because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" because
lookup_untracked() only looks for entries directly under the given
directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in
directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a
subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not
invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.
The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded
directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the
comment block for detail.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But
lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and
including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So
lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for
'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause
untracked cache corruption.
Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent
directory, so that only the last path component is passed to
lookup_untracked.
Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When in the middle of t7063, we are sure untracked cache is supported,
so we can use --force-untracked-cache to skip the support detection
phase and save a few seconds. It's also good that --force-untracked-cache
is exercised in the test suite.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove a check that would disable the untracked cache for sparse
checkouts. Add tests that ensure that the untracked cache works with
sparse checkouts -- specifically considering the case that a file
foo/bar is checked out, but foo/.gitignore is not.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When t7063 starts, it runs "update-index --untracked-cache"
to see if we support the untracked cache. Its output goes
straight to stderr, even if the test is not run with "-v".
Let's wrap it in a prereq that will hide the output by
default, but show it with "-v".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
