When given a pathspec that does not match any path in the current work
tree with an explicit "--":
git format-patch <commit> -- <path>
the command still complains that <path> does not exist in the current work
tree and the user needs to explicitly specify "--" and errors out. This
is because it incorrectly removes "--" from the command line arguments
that is later passed to setup_revisions().
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Once upon a time, format-patch would use its default stat
plus patch format only when no diff format was given on the
command line. This meant that "format-patch -p" would
suppress the stat and show just the patch.
Commit 68daa64 changed this to keep the stat format when we
had an "implicit" patch format, like "-U5". As a side
effect, this meant that an explicit patch format was now
ignored (because cmd_format_patch didn't know the reason
that the format was set way down in diff_opt_parse).
This patch unbreaks what 68daa64 did (while still preserving
what 68daa64 was trying to do), reinstating "-p" to suppress
the default behavior. We do this by parsing "-p" ourselves
in format-patch, and noting whether it was used explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit de435ac0 changed the behavior of --decorate from printing the
full ref (e.g., "refs/heads/master") to a shorter, more human-readable
version (e.g., just "master"). While this is nice for human readers,
external tools using the output from "git log" may prefer the full
version.
This patch introduces an extension to --decorate to allow the caller to
specify either the short or the full versions.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If your name is, say, Üwë, you want your cover letters to appear
correctly. Convince format-patch to mark it as 8-bit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When showing an annotated tag, "git show" will always
display the pointed-to object. However, it didn't separate
the two with whitespace, making it more difficult to notice
where the new object started. For example:
$ git tag -m 'my message' foo
$ git show foo
tag foo
Tagger: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri Jul 17 18:46:25 2009 -0400
my message
commit 41cabf8fed2694ba33e01d64f9094f2fc5e5805a
Author: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu Jul 16 17:31:34 2009 -0400
...
This patch respects and sets the rev.shown_one member to
prepend a blank line before showing a second item. We use
this member of rev_info instead of a local flag, because the
log_tree_commit we call into for showing commits already
respects and sets that flag. Meaning that everything will be
spaced properly if you intermix commits and tags, like:
$ git show v1.6.3 v1.6.2 HEAD
In that case, a single blank line will separate the first
tag, the commit it points to, the second tag, the commit
that one points to, and the final commit.
While we're at it, let's also support trees, so that even
something as crazy as
$ git show HEAD^{tree} HEAD~1^{tree} HEAD
will also be spaced in an easy-to-read way. However, we
intentionally do _not_ insert blank lines for blobs, so
that specifying multiple blobs gives a strict concatenation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When showing a tag, our header parsing finishes with the
offset pointing to the newline separating the tag header
from the tag body. This means that the printed body will
always start with a newline.
However, we also add an extra newline when printing the
tagger information. This leads to an ugly double-newline:
$ git show v1.6.3
tag v1.6.3
Tagger: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed May 6 18:16:47 2009 -0700
GIT 1.6.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
...
This patch removes the extra newline from the end of the
tagger headers. This is a better solution than suppressing
the separator newline, because it retains the behavior for
tags which have no tagger. E.g., "git show v0.99" will
continue to look like:
$ git show v0.99
tag v0.99
Test-release for wider distribution.
...
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/die_errno:
Use die_errno() instead of die() when checking syscalls
Convert existing die(..., strerror(errno)) to die_errno()
die_errno(): double % in strerror() output just in case
Introduce die_errno() that appends strerror(errno) to die()
Lots of die() calls did not actually report the kind of error, which
can leave the user confused as to the real problem. Use die_errno()
where we check a system/library call that sets errno on failure, or
one of the following that wrap such calls:
Function Passes on error from
-------- --------------------
odb_pack_keep open
read_ancestry fopen
read_in_full xread
strbuf_read xread
strbuf_read_file open or strbuf_read_file
strbuf_readlink readlink
write_in_full xwrite
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are a few remaining ones, but this fixes the trivial ones. It boils
down to two main issues that sparse complains about:
- warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Sparse doesn't like you using '0' instead of 'NULL'. For various good
reasons, not the least of which is just the visual confusion. A NULL
pointer is not an integer, and that whole "0 works as NULL" is a
historical accident and not very pretty.
A few of these remain: zlib is a total mess, and Z_NULL is just a 0.
I didn't touch those.
- warning: symbol 'xyz' was not declared. Should it be static?
Sparse wants to see declarations for any functions you export. A lack
of a declaration tends to mean that you should either add one, or you
should mark the function 'static' to show that it's in file scope.
A few of these remain: I only did the ones that should obviously just
be made static.
That 'wt_status_submodule_summary' one is debatable. It has a few related
flags (like 'wt_status_use_color') which _are_ declared, and are used by
builtin-commit.c. So maybe we'd like to export it at some point, but it's
not declared now, and not used outside of that file, so 'static' it is in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This resolves a semantic conflicts early to work with 5ae93df (t3900: use
ancient iconv names for backward compatibility, 2009-05-18).
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To give OPT_FILENAME the prefix, we pass the prefix to parse_options()
which passes the prefix to parse_options_start() which sets the prefix
member of parse_opts_ctx accordingly. If there isn't a prefix in the
calling context, passing NULL will suffice.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some ancient platforms (Solaris 7, IRIX 6.5) do not understand 'utf-8', but
all tested implementations understand 'UTF-8'.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Let a command-line --keep-subject (-k) override a config-specified
format.numbered (--numbered (-n)), rather than provoking the
"-n and -k are mutually exclusive" failure.
* t4021-format-patch-numbered.sh: Test for the above
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sb/format-patch-patchname:
format_sanitized_subject: Don't trim past initial length of strbuf
log-tree: fix patch filename computation in "git format-patch"
format-patch: --numbered-files and --stdout aren't mutually exclusive
format-patch: --attach/inline uses filename instead of SHA1
format-patch: move get_patch_filename() into log-tree
format-patch: pass a commit to reopen_stdout()
format-patch: construct patch filename in one function
pretty.c: add %f format specifier to format_commit_message()
If you regularly create patches which require a Signed-off: line you may
want to make it your default to add that line. It also helps you not to forget
to add the -s/--signoff switch.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch supports the format.headers configuration for adding
arbitrary email headers to the patches it outputs. This patch adds
support for an --add-header argument which makes the same feature
available from the command line. This is useful when the content of
custom email headers must change from branch to branch.
This patch has been sponsored by Grant Street Group
Signed-off-by: Michael Hendricks <michael@ndrix.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently when format-patch is used with --attach or --inline the patch
attachment has the SHA1 of the commit for its filename. This replaces
the SHA1 with the filename used by format-patch when outputting to
files.
Fix tests relying on the SHA1 output and add a test showing how the
--suffix option affects the attachment filename output.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We use the commit to generate the patch filename in reopen_stdout()
before we redirect stdout. The cover letter codepath creates a dummy
commit with the desired subject line 'cover letter'.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
reopen_stdout() usually takes the oneline subject of a commit,
appends the patch suffix, prepends the output directory (if any) and
then reopens stdout as the resulting file. Now the patch filename (the
oneline subject and the patch suffix) is created in
get_patch_filename() and passed to reopen_stdout() which prepends the
output directory and reopens stdout as that file.
The original function to get the oneline description,
get_oneline_for_filename(), has been renamed to get_patch_filename() to
reflect its new functionality.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For example:
git format-patch --numbered-files --stdout --attach HEAD~~
will create two messages with files 1 and 2 attached respectively.
Without --attach/--inline but with --stdout, --numbered-files option
can be simply ignored, because we are not creating any file ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hide the patch filename output from 'git format-patch' when --quiet
is used. The man pages suggested that this should have already worked.
Signed-off-by: Nate Case <ncase@xes-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/format-patch-thread:
format-patch: support deep threading
format-patch: thread as reply to cover letter even with in-reply-to
format-patch: track several references
format-patch: threading test reactivation
Conflicts:
builtin-log.c
For deep threading mode, i.e., the mode that gives a thread structured
like
+ [PATCH 0/n] Cover letter
`-+ [PATCH 1/n] First patch
`-+ [PATCH 2/n] Second patch
`-+ ...
we currently have to use 'git send-email --thread' (the default). On
the other hand, format-patch also has a --thread option which gives
shallow mode, i.e.,
+ [PATCH 0/n] Cover letter
|-+ [PATCH 1/n] First patch
|-+ [PATCH 2/n] Second patch
...
To reduce the confusion resulting from having two indentically named
features in different tools giving different results, let format-patch
take an optional argument '--thread=deep' that gives the same output
as 'send-mail --thread'. With no argument, or 'shallow', behave as
before. Also add a configuration variable format.thread with the same
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, format-patch --thread --cover-letter --in-reply-to $parent
makes all mails, including the cover letter, a reply to $parent.
However, we would want the reader to consider the cover letter above
all the patches.
This changes the semantics so that only the cover letter is a reply to
$parent, while all the patches are formatted as replies to the cover
letter.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, format-patch can only track a single reference (the
In-Reply-To:) for each mail. To ensure proper threading, we should
list all known references for every mail.
Change the rev_info.ref_message_id field to a string_list, so that we
can append references at will, and change the output formatting
routines to print all of them in the References: header. The last
entry in the list is implicitly assumed to be the In-Reply-To:, which
gives output consistent with RFC 2822:
The "References:" field will contain the contents of the parent's
"References:" field (if any) followed by the contents of the
parent's "Message-ID:" field (if any).
Note that this is just preparatory work; nothing uses it yet, so all
"References:" fields in the output are still only one deep.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without any explicit -o parameter, we correctly avoided putting the
resulting patch output to the toplevel. We should do the same when
the user gave a relative pathname to be consistent with this case.
Noticed by Cesar Eduardo Barros.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even without --root specified, if the range given on the command line
happens to include a root commit, we should include its patch text in the
output.
This fix deliberately ignores log.showroot configuration variable because
"format-patch" and "log -p" can and should behave differently in this
case, as the former is about exporting a part of your history in a form
that is replayable elsewhere and just giving the commit log message
without the patch text does not make any sense for that purpose.
Noticed and fix originally attempted by Nathan W. Panike; credit goes to
Alexander Potashev for injecting sanity to my initial (broken) fix that
used the value from log.showroot configuration, which was misguided.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
LF at the end of format strings given to die() is redundant because
die already adds one on its own.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Potashev <aspotashev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to extract the tagger information "by hand" in "git show <tag>",
but the function pp_user_info() already does that. Even better:
it respects the commit_format and date_format specified by the user.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The upstream branch <upstream> now defaults to the first tracked
remote branch, which is set by the configuration variables
branch.<name>.remote and branch.<name>.merge of the current branch.
Without such a remote branch, the command "git cherry [-v]" fails with
usage output as before and an additional message.
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
fast-import: close pack before unlinking it
pager: do not dup2 stderr if it is already redirected
git-show: do not segfault when showing a bad tag
When a tag points at a bad or nonexistent object, we should diagnose the
breakage and exit. An earlier commit 4f3dcc2 (Fix 'git show' on signed
tag of signed tag of commit, 2008-07-01) lost this check and made it
segfault instead; not good.
This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Right now for the diff porcelain and the log family, we
call:
init_revisions();
setup_revisions();
DIFF_OPT_SET(ALLOW_TEXTCONV);
However, that means textconv will _always_ be on, instead of
being a default that can be manipulated with
setup_revisions. Instead, we want:
init_revisions();
DIFF_OPT_SET(ALLOW_TEXTCONV);
setup_revisions();
which is what this patch does.
We'll go ahead and move the callsite in wt-status, also;
even though the user can't pass any options here, it is a
cleanup that will help avoid any surprise later if the
setup_revisions line is changed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* lt/decorate:
rev-list documentation: clarify the two parts of history simplification
Document "git log --simplify-by-decoration"
Document "git log --source"
revision traversal: '--simplify-by-decoration'
Make '--decorate' set an explicit 'show_decorations' flag
revision: make tree comparison functions take commits rather than trees
Add a 'source' decorator for commits
Conflicts:
Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
We will want to add decorations without necessarily showing them, so add
an explicit revisions info flag as to whether we're showing decorations
or not.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already support decorating commits by tags or branches that point to
them, but especially when we are looking at multiple branches together,
we sometimes want to see _how_ we reached a particular commit.
We can abuse the '->util' field in the commit to keep track of that as
we walk the commit lists, and get a reasonably useful view into which
branch or tag first reaches that commit.
Of course, if the commit is reachable through multiple sources (which is
common), our particular choice of "first" reachable is entirely random
and depends on the particular path we happened to follow.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
