Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano 14677d25ab Merge branch 'ab/test-must-be-empty-for-master'
Test updates.

* ab/test-must-be-empty-for-master:
  tests: make use of the test_must_be_empty function
2018-08-20 11:33:48 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason d3c6751b18 tests: make use of the test_must_be_empty function
Change various tests that use an idiom of the form:

    >expect &&
    test_cmp expect actual

To instead use:

    test_must_be_empty actual

The test_must_be_empty() wrapper was introduced in ca8d148daf ("test:
test_must_be_empty helper", 2013-06-09). Many of these tests have been
added after that time. This was mostly found with, and manually pruned
from:

    git grep '^\s+>.*expect.* &&$' t

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-30 11:18:41 -07:00
Henning Schild 53fc999306 gpg-interface t: extend the existing GPG tests with GPGSM
Add test cases to cover the new X509/gpgsm support. Most of them
resemble existing ones. They just switch the format to x509 and set the
signingkey when creating signatures. Validation of signatures does not
need any configuration of git, it does need gpgsm to be configured to
trust the key(-chain).
Several of the testcases build on top of existing gpg testcases.
The commit ships a self-signed key for committer@example.com and
configures gpgsm to trust it.

Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-20 08:41:42 -07:00
SZEDER Gábor 2f3cbcd8c5 tests: make forging GPG signed commits and tags more robust
A couple of test scripts create forged GPG signed commits or tags to
check that such forgery can't fool various git commands' signature
verification.  All but one of those test scripts are prone to
occasional failures because the forgery creates a bogus GPG signature,
and git commands error out with an unexpected error message, e.g.
"Commit deadbeef does not have a GPG signature" instead of "...  has a
bad GPG signature".

't5573-pull-verify-signatures.sh', 't7510-signed-commit.sh' and
't7612-merge-verify-signatures.sh' create forged signed commits like
this:

  git commit -S -m "bad on side" &&
  git cat-file commit side-bad >raw &&
  sed -e "s/bad/forged bad/" raw >forged &&
  git hash-object -w -t commit forged >forged.commit

On rare occasions the given pattern occurs not only in the commit
message but in the GPG signature as well, and after it's replaced in
the signature the resulting signature becomes invalid, GPG will report
CRC error and that it couldn't find any signature, which will then
ultimately cause the test failure.

Since in all three cases the pattern to be replaced during the forgery
is the first word of the commit message's subject line, and since the
GPG signature in the commit object is indented by a space, let's just
anchor those patterns to the beginning of the line to prevent this
issue.

The test script 't7030-verify-tag.sh' creates a forged signed tag
object in a similar way by replacing the pattern "seventh", but the
GPG signature in tag objects is not indented by a space, so the above
solution is not applicable in this case.  However, in the tag object
in question the pattern "seventh" occurs not only in the tag message
but in the 'tag' header as well.  To create a forged tag object it's
sufficient to replace only one of the two occurences, so modify the
sed script to limit the pattern to the 'tag' header (i.e. a line
beginning with "tag ", which, because of the space character, can
never occur in the base64-encoded GPG signature).

Note that the forgery in 't7004-tag.sh' is not affected by this issue:
while 't7004' does create a forged signed tag kind of the same way,
it replaces "signed-tag" in the tag object, which, because of the '-'
character, can never occur in the base64-encoded GPG signarute.

Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-11 10:19:03 -07:00
Santiago Torres b42ca35e5c t7004, t7030: fix here-doc syntax errors
Jan Palus noticed that some here-doc are spelled incorrectly,
resulting the entire remainder of the test snippet being slurped
into the "expect" file as if it were data, e.g. in this sequence

	cat >expect <<EOF &&
	... expectation ...
	EOF
	git $cmd_being_tested >actual &&
	test_cmp expect actual

the last command of the test is "cat" that sends everything to
'expect' and succeeds.

Fixing these issues in t7004 and t7030 reveals that "git tag -v"
and "git verify-tag" with their --format option do not work as the
test was expecting originally.  Instead of showing both valid tags
and tags with incorrect signatures on their output, tags that do not
pass verification are omitted from the output.  Another breakage that
is uncovered is that these tests must be restricted to environment
where gpg is available.

Arguably, that is a safer behaviour, and because the format
specifiers like %(tag) do not have a way to show if the signature
verifies correctly, the command with the --format option cannot be
used to get a list of tags annotated with their signature validity
anyway.

For now, let's fix the here-doc syntax, update the expectation to
match the reality, and update the test prerequisite.

Maybe later when we extend the --format language available to "git
tag -v" and "git verify-tag" to include things like "%(gpg:status)",
we may want to change the behaviour so that piping a list of tag
names into

    xargs git verify-tag --format='%(gpg:status) %(tag)'

becomes a good way to produce such a list, but that is a separate
topic.

Noticed-by: Jan Palus <jan.palus@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 10:19:18 -07:00
Santiago Torres 02c5433e16 t/t7030-verify-tag: Add --format specifier tests
Verify-tag now provides --format specifiers to inspect and ensure the
contents of the tag are proper. We add two tests to ensure this
functionality works as expected: the return value should indicate if
verification passed, and the format specifiers must be respected.

Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-01-18 11:27:56 -08:00
Santiago Torres 3e1e7454cc t7030: test verifying multiple tags
The verify-tag command supports multiple tag names to verify, but
existing tests only test for invocation with a single tag.

Add a test invoking it with multiple tags.

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-18 13:06:15 -07:00
brian m. carlson e18443ece7 verify-tag: add option to print raw gpg status information
verify-tag by default displays human-readable output on standard error.
However, it can also be useful to get access to the raw gpg status
information, which is machine-readable, allowing automated
implementation of signing policy.  Add a --raw option to make verify-tag
produce the gpg status information on standard error instead of the
human-readable format.

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-22 14:20:47 -07:00
brian m. carlson d66aeff21e verify-tag: add tests
verify-tag was lacking tests.  Add some, mirroring those used for
verify-commit.

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-22 14:20:44 -07:00