Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Brian Gernhardt 6ecfd91df5 Avoid using non-portable echo -n in tests.
Expecting echo to recognise -n is a BSDism.  Using printf is far more
portable.

Discovered on OS X 10.5.5 in t4030-diff-textconv.sh and changed in all
the test scripts.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-31 21:38:48 -07:00
Nanako Shiraishi 3604e7c5c6 tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t3600 - t6999)
Converts tests between t3600-t6300.

Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-03 14:13:59 -07:00
Stephan Beyer d492b31caf t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".

This is useful to

 - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
   e.g. SIGSEGV, and

 - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13 13:21:26 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 41ac414ea2 Sane use of test_expect_failure
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision.  Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:

    test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        what is to be tested
    '

And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests.  Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test.  The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.

This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:

    test_expect_success 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        ! this command should fail
    '

test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass.  So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:

    test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
        rm -f bar &&
        git foo &&
        test -f bar
    '

This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 20:49:34 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 5be60078c9 Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02 22:52:14 -07:00
Alex Riesen 4848509a97 Fix permissions on test scripts
Make every test executable. Remove exec-attribute from included shell files,
they can't used standalone anyway.

Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-16 16:53:09 -07:00
Johannes Sixt 723024d696 Handle core.symlinks=false case in merge-recursive.
If the file system does not support symbolic links (core.symlinks=false),
merge-recursive must write the merged symbolic link text into a regular
file.

While we are here, fix a tiny memory leak in the if-branch that writes
real symbolic links.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-03 18:59:41 -08:00