When passing a list of pathspecs to, say, `git add`, we need to be
careful to use the original form, not the parsed form of the pathspecs.
This makes a difference e.g. when calling
git stash -- ':(glob)**/*.txt'
where the original form includes the `:(glob)` prefix while the parsed
form does not.
However, in the built-in `git stash`, we passed the parsed (i.e.
incorrect) form, and `git add` would fail with the error message:
fatal: pathspec '**/*.txt' did not match any files
at the stage where `git stash` drops the changes from the worktree, even
if `refs/stash` has been actually updated successfully.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/2037
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it
was easy to find with grep.
Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adjust the test so that it computes variables for blobs instead of using
hard-coded hashes.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When introducing the stash push feature, and thus allowing users to pass
in a pathspec to limit the files that would get stashed in
df6bba0937 ("stash: teach 'push' (and 'create_stash') to honor
pathspec", 2017-02-28), this developer missed one place where the
pathspec should be passed in.
Namely in the call to the 'untracked_files()' function in the
'no_changes()' function. This resulted in 'git stash push -u --
<non-existant>' creating an empty stash when there are untracked files
in the repository other that don't match the pathspec.
As 'git stash' never creates empty stashes, this behaviour is wrong and
confusing for users. Instead it should just show a message "No local
changes to save", and not create a stash.
Luckily the 'untracked_files()' function already correctly respects
pathspecs that are passed to it, so the fix is simply to pass the
pathspec along to the function.
Reported-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git stash push -u -- <pathspec>' prints the following errors if
<pathspec> only matches untracked files:
fatal: pathspec 'untracked' did not match any files
error: unrecognized input
This is because we first clean up the untracked files using 'git clean
<pathspec>', and then use a command chain involving 'git add -u
<pathspec>' and 'git apply' to clear the changes to files that are in
the index and were stashed.
As the <pathspec> only includes untracked files that were already
removed by 'git clean', the 'git add' call will barf, and so will 'git
apply', as there are no changes that need to be applied.
Fix this by avoiding the 'git clean' if a pathspec is given, and use the
pipeline that's used for pathspec mode to get rid of the untracked files
as well.
Reported-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If calling git stash -u on a repo that contains a file that is not
ignored any more due to a current modification of the gitignore file,
this file is stashed but not remove from the working tree.
This is due to git-stash first doing a reset --hard which clears the
.gitignore file modification and the call git clean, leaving the file
untouched.
This causes git stash pop to fail due to the file existing.
This patch simply switches the order between cleaning and resetting
and adds a test for this usecase.
Reported-by: Sam Partington <sam@whiteoctober.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <nicolas@morey-chaisemartin.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While working on a repository, it's often helpful to stash the changes
of a single or multiple files, and leave others alone. Unfortunately
git currently offers no such option. git stash -p can be used to work
around this, but it's often impractical when there are a lot of changes
over multiple files.
Allow 'git stash push' to take pathspec to specify which paths to stash.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When performing a plain "git stash" (without --patch), git-diff would fail
with "fatal: ambiguous argument 'HEAD': both revision and filename". The
output was piped into git-update-index, masking the failed exit status.
The output is now sent to a temporary file (which is cleaned up by
existing code), and the exit status is checked. The "HEAD" arg to the
git-diff invocation has been disambiguated too, of course.
In patch mode, "git stash -p" would fail harmlessly, leaving the working
dir untouched. Interactive adding is fine, but the resulting tree was
diffed with an ambiguous 'HEAD' argument.
Use >foo (no space) when redirecting output.
In t3904, checks and operations on each file are in the order they'll
appear when interactively staging.
In t3905, fix a bug in "stash save --include-untracked -q is quiet": The
redirected stdout file was considered untracked, and so was removed from
the working directory. Use test path helper functions where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Jonathon Mah <me@JonathonMah.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The two new stash options --include-untracked and --all do not remove the
untracked and/or ignored files that are stashed if those files reside in
a subdirectory. e.g. the following sequence fails:
mkdir untracked &&
echo hello >untracked/file.txt &&
git stash --include-untracked &&
test ! -f untracked/file.txt
Within the git-stash script, git-clean is used to remove the
untracked/ignored files, but since the -d option was not supplied, it does
not remove directories.
So, add -d to the git-clean arguments, and update the tests to test this
functionality.
Reported-by: Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is common practice in the git test suite to use the file names 'actual'
and 'expect' to hold the actual and expected output of commands. So change
the name 'output' to 'actual'.
Additionally, swap the order of arguments to test_cmp when comparing
expected output and actual output so that if diff output is produced, it
describes how the actual output differs from what was expected rather than
the other way around.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --include-untracked option acts like the normal "git stash save" but
also adds all untracked files in the working directory to the stash and then
calls "git clean --force --quiet" to restore the working directory to a
pristine state.
This is useful for projects that need to run release scripts. With this
option, the release scripts can be from the main working directory so one
does not have to maintain a "clean" directory in parallel just for
releasing. Basically the work-flow becomes:
$ git tag release-1.0
$ git stash --include-untracked
$ make release
$ git clean -f
$ git stash pop
"git stash" alone is not enough in this case--it leaves untracked files
lying around that might mess up a release process that expects everything to
be very clean or might let a release succeed that should actually fail (due
to a new source file being created that hasn't been committed yet).
Signed-off-by: David Caldwell <david@porkrind.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
