Change the option parsing machinery so that e.g. "clone --recurs ..."
doesn't error out because "clone" understands both "--recursive" and
"--recurse-submodules" to mean the same thing.
Initially "clone" just understood --recursive until the
--recurses-submodules alias was added in ccdd3da652 ("clone: Add the
--recurse-submodules option as alias for --recursive",
2010-11-04). Since bb62e0a99f ("clone: teach --recurse-submodules to
optionally take a pathspec", 2017-03-17) the longer form has been
promoted to the default.
But due to the way the options parsing machinery works this resulted
in the rather absurd situation of:
$ git clone --recurs [...]
error: ambiguous option: recurs (could be --recursive or --recurse-submodules)
Add OPT_ALIAS() to express this link between two or more options and use
it in git-clone. Multiple aliases of an option could be written as
OPT_ALIAS(0, "alias1", "original-name"),
OPT_ALIAS(0, "alias2", "original-name"),
...
The current implementation is not exactly optimal in this case. But we
can optimize it when it becomes a problem. So far we don't even have two
aliases of any option.
A big chunk of code is actually from Junio C Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git's command-line parsers support uniquely abbreviated options, e.g.
`git init --ba` would automatically expand `--ba` to `--bare`.
This is a very convenient feature in every day life for Git users, in
particular when tab completion is not available.
However, it is not a good idea to rely on that in Git's test suite, as
something that is a unique abbreviation of a command line option today
might no longer be a unique abbreviation tomorrow.
For example, if a future contribution added a new mode
`git init --babyproofing` and a previously-introduced test case used the
fact that `git init --ba` expanded to `git init --bare`, that future
contribution would now have to touch seemingly unrelated tests just to
keep the test suite from failing.
So let's disallow abbreviated options in the test suite by default.
Note: for ease of implementation, this patch really only touches the
`parse-options` machinery: more and more hand-rolled option parsers are
converted to use that internal API, and more and more scripts are
converted to built-ins (naturally using the parse-options API, too), so
in practice this catches most issues, and is definitely the biggest bang
for the buck.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
More _("i18n") markings.
* nd/i18n:
fsck: mark strings for translation
fsck: reduce word legos to help i18n
parse-options.c: mark more strings for translation
parse-options.c: turn some die() to BUG()
parse-options: replace opterror() with optname()
repack: mark more strings for translation
remote.c: mark messages for translation
remote.c: turn some error() or die() to BUG()
reflog: mark strings for translation
read-cache.c: add missing colon separators
read-cache.c: mark more strings for translation
read-cache.c: turn die("internal error") to BUG()
attr.c: mark more string for translation
archive.c: mark more strings for translation
alias.c: mark split_cmdline_strerror() strings for translation
git.c: mark more strings for translation
One error is updated to start with lowercase to be consistent with the
rest.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are no users of OPT_DATE except for test-parse-options; its
only caller went away in 27ec394a97 (prune: introduce OPT_EXPIRY_DATE()
and use it, 2013-04-25).
It also has a bug: it does not specify PARSE_OPT_NONEG, but its callback
does not respect the "unset" flag, and will feed NULL to approxidate()
and segfault. Probably this should be marked with NONEG, or the callback
should set the timestamp to some sentinel value (e.g,. "0", or
"(time_t)-1").
But since there are no callers, deleting it means we don't even have to
think about what the right behavior should be.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than
>empty &&
test_cmp empty out
as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the
expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty',
and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used
for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty
files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500
lines later).
These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the
test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted
manually.
Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases
where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files:
- Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but
'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce
the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the
test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new
submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'.
- Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results
and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper
function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output.
- For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success'
block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'.
- Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update
(-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Usually, the usage should be shown only if the user does not know what
options are available. If the user specifies an invalid value, the user
is already aware of the available options. In this case, there is no
point in displaying the usage anymore.
This patch applies to "git tag --contains", "git branch --contains",
"git branch --points-at", "git for-each-ref --contains" and many more.
Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When commit 54e6dc7 added translation support to parse-options, an
fprintf was mistakenly replaced by a call to putchar(). Let's use fputc
instead.
Fixes t0040.11, t0040.12, t0040.33, and t1502.8.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the option spec contains no switches or only hidden switches,
parse_options will emit an extra blank line at the end of help output so
that the help text will end in two blank lines instead of one.
When parse_options produces internal help output after an error has
occurred it will emit blank lines within the usage string to stdout
instead of stderr.
Update t/helper/test-parse-options.c to have a description body in the
usage string to exercise this second bug and mark tests as failing in
t0040.
Add tests to t1502 to demonstrate both of these problems.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use "test-parse-options --expect" to rewrite the tests to avoid checking
the whole variable dump by just testing what is required.
This commit is a follow-up to 8ca65aebad ("t0040: convert a few
tests to use test-parse-options --expect", 2016-05-06).
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As a small example of using "test-parse-options --expect",
rewrite the "check" helper using it, instead of comparing
the whole variable dump.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
9a001381 (Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on parseopt, 2012-08-27)
introduced check_i18n, but the helper was never used from the
beginning.
The same commit also introduced check_unknown_i18n to replace the
helper check_unknown and changed all users of the latter to use the
former, but failed to remove check_unknown itself.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Existing tests in t0040 follow a rather verbose pattern:
cat >expect <<\EOF
boolean: 0
integer: 0
magnitude: 0
timestamp: 0
string: (not set)
abbrev: 7
verbose: 0
quiet: 3
dry run: no
file: (not set)
EOF
test_expect_success 'multiple quiet levels' '
test-parse-options -q -q -q >output 2>output.err &&
test_must_be_empty output.err &&
test_cmp expect output
'
But the only thing this test cares about is if "quiet: 3" is in the
output. We should be able to write the above 18 lines with just
four lines, like this:
test_expect_success 'multiple quiet levels' '
test-parse-options --expect="quiet: 3" -q -q -q
'
Teach the new --expect=<string> option to test-parse-options helper.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When test-parse-options detects an error on the command line, it
gives the usage string just like any parse-options API users do,
without showing any "variable dump". An exception is the callback
test, where a "variable dump" for the option is done before the
command line options are fully parsed.
Do not expose this implementation detail by separating the handling
of callback test into two phases, one to capture the fact that an
option was given during the option parsing phase, and the other to
show that fact as a part of normal "variable dump".
The effect of this fix is seen in the patch to t/t0040 where it
tried "test-parse-options --no-length" where "--length" is a callback
that does not take a negative form.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
OPT_COUNTUP() merely increments the counter upon --option, and resets it
to 0 upon --no-option, which means that there is no "unspecified" value
with which a client can initialize the counter to determine whether or
not --[no]-option was seen at all.
Make OPT_COUNTUP() treat any negative number as an "unspecified" value
to address this shortcoming. In particular, if a client initializes the
counter to -1, then if it is still -1 after parse_options(), then
neither --option nor --no-option was seen; if it is 0, then --no-option
was seen last, and if it is 1 or greater, than --option was seen last.
This change does not affect the behavior of existing clients because
they all use the initial value of 0 (or more).
Note that builtin/clean.c initializes the variable used with
OPT__FORCE (which uses OPT_COUNTUP()) to a negative value, but it is set
to either 0 or 1 by reading the configuration before the code calls
parse_options(), i.e. as far as parse_options() is concerned, the
initial value of the variable is not negative.
To test this behavior, in test-parse-options.c, "verbose" is set to
"unspecified" while quiet is set to 0 which will test the new behavior
with all sets of values.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Include tests to check for multiple levels of quiet and to check the
behavior of '--no-quiet'.
Include tests to check for multiple levels of verbose and to check the
behavior of '--no-verbose'.
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We would want to see how multiple --quiet options affect the value of
the underlying variable (we may want "--quiet --quiet" to still be 1, or
we may want to see the value incremented to 2). Show the value as
integer to allow us to inspect it.
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The unsigned long option parsing (including 'k'/'m'/'g' suffix
parsing) is more widely applicable. Add support for OPT_MAGNITUDE
to parse-options.h and change pack-objects.c use this support.
The error behavior on parse errors follows that of OPT_INTEGER. The
name of the option that failed to parse is reported with a brief
message describing the expect format for the option argument and
then the full usage message for the command invoked.
This differs from the previous behavior for OPT_ULONG used in
pack-objects for --max-pack-size and --window-memory which used to
display the value supplied in the error message and did not display
the full usage message.
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix the printf specification to treat 'integer' as the signed type
that it is and add a test that checks that we parse negative option
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes our output in the event of a failure slightly
nicer, and it means that we do not break the &&-chain.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are quite a lot places where an output file is expected to be
empty, and we fail the test when it is not. The output from running
the test script with -i -v can be helped if we showed the unexpected
contents at that point.
We could of course do
>expected.empty && test_cmp expected.empty actual
but this is commmon enough to be done with a dedicated helper.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for parseopt tests.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10.1-488-g54e6d:
54e6d i18n: parseopt: lookup help and argument translations when showing usage
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user specifies a long option but forgets to type the second
leading dash, we currently detect and report that fact if its first
letter is a valid short option. This is done for safety, to avoid
ambiguity between short options (and their arguments) and a long
option with a missing dash.
This diagnostic message is also helpful for long options whose first
letter is not a valid short option, however. Print it in that case,
too, as a courtesy.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Long options can be negated by adding no- right after the leading
two dashes. This is useful e.g. to override options set by aliases.
For options that are defined to start with no- already, this looks
a bit funny. Allow such options to also be negated by removing the
prefix.
The following thirteen options are affected:
apply --no-add
bisect--helper --no-checkout
checkout-index --no-create
clone --no-checkout --no-hardlinks
commit --no-verify --no-post-rewrite
format-patch --no-binary
hash-object --no-filters
read-tree --no-sparse-checkout
revert --no-commit
show-branch --no-name
update-ref --no-deref
The following five are NOT affected because they are defined with
PARSE_OPT_NONEG or the non-negated version is defined as well:
branch --no-merged
format-patch --no-stat --no-numbered
update-index --no-assume-unchanged --no-skip-worktree
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce OPT_BOOL() to test-parse-options and add some tests for
these "true" boolean options. Rename OPT_BOOLEAN to OPT_COUNTUP and
OPTION_BOOLEAN to OPTION_COUNTUP as well.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add OPT_NOOP_NOARG, a helper macro to define deprecated options in a
standard way. The help text is taken from the no-op option -r of
git revert.
The callback could be made to emit a (conditional?) warning later. And
we could also add OPT_NOOP (requiring an argument) etc. as needed.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This just adds repeated invocations of an option to a list
of strings. Using the "--no-<var>" form will reset the list
to empty.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
*.c part for matches with '<[A-Z]+>' (and affected test).
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When -h is used, print usage messages on stdout. If a command is invoked with
wrong arguments then print the usage messages on stderr.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivano@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
parse_long_opt always matches both --opt and --no-opt for any option
"opt", and only get_value checks whether --no-opt is actually valid.
Since the options for git branch contains both "no-merged" and "merged"
there are two matches for --no-merge, but no exact match. With this
patch the negation of a NONEG option is rejected earlier, but it changes
the error message from "option `no-opt' isn't available" to "unknown
option `no-opt'".
[jk: added test]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Commit dbd0f5c (Files given on the command line are relative to $cwd,
2008-08-06) introduced parse_options_fix_filename() as a minimal fix.
OPT_FILENAME is intended to be a more robust fix for the same issue.
OPT_FILENAME and its associated enum OPTION_FILENAME are used to
represent filename options within the parse options API.
This option is similar to OPTION_STRING. If --no is prefixed to the
option the filename is unset. If no argument is given and the default
value is set, the filename is set to the default value. The difference
is that the filename is prefixed with the prefix passed to
parse_options() (or parse_options_start()).
Update git-apply, git-commit, git-fmt-merge-msg, and git-tag to use
OPT_FILENAME with their filename options. Also, rename
parse_options_fix_filename() to fix_filename() as it is no longer
extern.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add support for options that don't start with a dash. Initially, they
don't accept arguments and can only be short options, i.e. consist of a
single character.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a way to recognize numerical options. The number is passed to
a callback function as a string.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add OPTION_NEGBIT and OPT_NEGBIT, mirroring OPTION_BIT and OPT_BIT.
OPT_NEGBIT can be used together with OPT_BIT to define two options
that cancel each other out.
Note: this patch removes the reminder from the test script because
it adds a test for --no-or4 and there already was one for --or4.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
OPT_INTEGER() works on an integer, not on an unsigned long. On a big
endian architecture with long larger than int, integer test gives bogus
results because of this bug.
Reported by H.Merijn Brand in HP-UX 64-bit environment.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
p->argc represent the number of arguments that have not been parsed yet,
_including_ the one we are currently parsing. If it is not greater than
one then there is no more argument.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Marin <dkr@freesurf.fr>
Acked-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch serves two purposes:
1. test-parse-option.c should be a more complete
example for the parse-options API, and
2. there have been no tests for OPT_CALLBACK,
OPT_DATE, OPT_BIT, OPT_SET_INT and OPT_SET_PTR
before.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the
results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not
know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the
cute hack of "git diff --no-index".
Rather use test_cmp for that purpose.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is meant to be used to keep --not and --all during revision parsing.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:
test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
what is to be tested
'
And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.
This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:
test_expect_success 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
! this command should fail
'
test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:
test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
rm -f bar &&
git foo &&
test -f bar
'
This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If options are aggregated, and that the whole token is an exact
prefix of a long option that is longer than 2 letters, reject
it. This is to prevent a common typo:
$ git commit -amend
to get interpreted as "commit all with message 'end'".
The typo check isn't performed if there is no aggregation,
because the stuck form is the recommended one. If we have `-o`
being a valid short option that takes an argument, and --option
a long one, then we _MUST_ accept -option as "'o' option with
argument 'ption'", which is our official recommended form.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When an option could be an ambiguous abbreviation of two options, the code
used to error out. Even if an exact match would have occured later.
Test and original patch by Pierre Habouzit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there is an option "--amend", the option parser now recognizes
"--am" for that option, provided that there is no other option beginning
with "--am".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
