Add a few tests to check that both the split-index file and the
shared-index file are created using the right permissions when
core.sharedrepository is set.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The experimental "split index" feature has gained a few
configuration variables to make it easier to use.
* cc/split-index-config: (22 commits)
Documentation/git-update-index: explain splitIndex.*
Documentation/config: add splitIndex.sharedIndexExpire
read-cache: use freshen_shared_index() in read_index_from()
read-cache: refactor read_index_from()
t1700: test shared index file expiration
read-cache: unlink old sharedindex files
config: add git_config_get_expiry() from gc.c
read-cache: touch shared index files when used
sha1_file: make check_and_freshen_file() non static
Documentation/config: add splitIndex.maxPercentChange
t1700: add tests for splitIndex.maxPercentChange
read-cache: regenerate shared index if necessary
config: add git_config_get_max_percent_split_change()
Documentation/git-update-index: talk about core.splitIndex config var
Documentation/config: add information for core.splitIndex
t1700: add tests for core.splitIndex
update-index: warn in case of split-index incoherency
read-cache: add and then use tweak_split_index()
split-index: add {add,remove}_split_index() functions
config: add git_config_get_split_index()
...
This way a share index file will not be garbage collected if
we still read from an index it is based from.
As we need to read the current index before creating a new
one, the tests have to be adjusted, so that we don't expect
an old shared index file to be deleted right away when we
create a new one.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing a new split-index and there is a big number of cache
entries in the split-index compared to the shared index, it is a
good idea to regenerate the shared index.
By default when the ratio reaches 20%, we will push back all
the entries from the split-index into a new shared index file
instead of just creating a new split-index file.
The threshold can be configured using the
"splitIndex.maxPercentChange" config variable.
We need to adjust the existing tests in t1700 by setting
"splitIndex.maxPercentChange" to 100 at the beginning of t1700,
as the existing tests are assuming that the shared index is
regenerated only when `git update-index --split-index` is used.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This improves test indentation by getting rid of the outdated
here document style.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to making git_path() aware of certain file names that need
to be handled differently e.g. when running in worktrees, the commit
557bd833bb (git_path(): be aware of file relocation in $GIT_DIR,
2014-11-30) also snuck in a new option for `git rev-parse`:
`--git-path`.
On the face of it, there is no obvious bug in that commit's diff: it
faithfully calls git_path() on the argument and prints it out, i.e. `git
rev-parse --git-path <filename>` has the same precise behavior as
calling `git_path("<filename>")` in C.
The problem lies deeper, much deeper. In hindsight (which is always
unfair), implementing the .git/ directory discovery in
`setup_git_directory()` by changing the working directory may have
allowed us to avoid passing around a struct that contains information
about the current repository, but it bought us many, many problems.
In this case, when being called in a subdirectory, `git rev-parse`
changes the working directory to the top-level directory before calling
`git_path()`. In the new working directory, the result is correct. But
in the working directory of the calling script, it is incorrect.
Example: when calling `git rev-parse --git-path HEAD` in, say, the
Documentation/ subdirectory of Git's own source code, the string
`.git/HEAD` is printed.
Side note: that bug is hidden when running in a subdirectory of a
worktree that was added by the `git worktree` command: in that case, the
(correct) absolute path of the `HEAD` file is printed.
In the interest of time, this patch does not go the "correct" route to
introduce a struct with repository information (and removing global
state in the process), instead this patch chooses to detect when the
command was called in a subdirectory and forces the result to be an
absolute path.
While at it, we are also fixing the output of --git-common-dir and
--shared-index-path.
Lastly, please note that we reuse the same strbuf for all of the
relative_path() calls; this avoids frequent allocation (and duplicated
code), and it does not risk memory leaks, for two reasons: 1) the
cmd_rev_parse() function does not return anywhere between the use of
the new strbuf instance and its final release, and 2) git-rev-parse is
one of these "one-shot" programs in Git, i.e. it exits after running
for a very short time, meaning that all allocated memory is released
with the exit() call anyway.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t2027-worktree-list has an incorrect expectation for --git-common-dir
which has been adjusted and marked to expect failure.
Some of the tests added have been marked to expect failure. These
demonstrate a problem with the way that some options to git rev-parse
behave when executed from a subdirectory of the main worktree.
[jes: fixed incorrect assumption that objects/ lives in the
worktree-specific git-dir (it lives in the common dir instead). Also
adjusted t1700 so that the test case does not *need* to be the last
one in that script.]
Signed-off-by: Michael Rappazzo <rappazzo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar to $EMPTY_TREE this makes it easier to recognize this special
SHA-1 and change hash later.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}"
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
People often forget to chain the commands in their test together
with &&, leaving a failure from an earlier command in the test go
unnoticed. The new GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT mechanism allows you to
catch such a mistake more easily.
* jk/test-chain-lint: (36 commits)
t9001: drop save_confirm helper
t0020: use test_* helpers instead of hand-rolled messages
t: simplify loop exit-code status variables
t: fix some trivial cases of ignored exit codes in loops
t7701: fix ignored exit code inside loop
t3305: fix ignored exit code inside loop
t0020: fix ignored exit code inside loops
perf-lib: fix ignored exit code inside loop
t6039: fix broken && chain
t9158, t9161: fix broken &&-chain in git-svn tests
t9104: fix test for following larger parents
t4104: drop hand-rolled error reporting
t0005: fix broken &&-chains
t7004: fix embedded single-quotes
t0050: appease --chain-lint
t9001: use test_when_finished
t4117: use modern test_* helpers
t6034: use modern test_* helpers
t1301: use modern test_* helpers
t0020: use modern test_* helpers
...
The different index versions have different sha-1 checksums. Those
checksums are checked in t1700, which makes it fail when the test suite
is run with TEST_GIT_INDEX_VERSION=4. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain,
in a location which causes a significant portion of the test
to be missed (e.g., the test effectively does nothing, or
consists of a long string of actions and output comparisons,
and we throw away the exit code of at least one part of the
string).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
