Make the replay_opts_release() function added in the preceding commit
non-static, and use it for freeing the "struct replay_opts"
constructed for "rebase" and "revert".
To safely call our new replay_opts_release() we'll need to stop
calling it in sequencer_remove_state(), and instead call it where we
allocate the "struct replay_opts" itself.
This is because in e.g. do_interactive_rebase() we construct a "struct
replay_opts" with "get_replay_opts()", and then call
"complete_action()". If we get far enough in that function without
encountering errors we'll call "pick_commits()" which (indirectly)
calls sequencer_remove_state() at the end.
But if we encounter errors anywhere along the way we'd punt out early,
and not free() the memory we allocated. Remembering whether we
previously called sequencer_remove_state() would be a hassle.
Using a FREE_AND_NULL() pattern would also work, as it would be safe
to call replay_opts_release() repeatedly. But let's fix this properly
instead, by having the owner of the data free() it.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This backend has been deprecated in favor of `git rebase
--rebase-merges`.
In preparation for dropping it, let's remove all the regression tests
that would need it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two related changes, with separate rationale for each:
Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because:
* 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used
for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used
in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones
given that we are making it the default.
* 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is.
* the directory where state is stored is not called
.git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge.
Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because:
* Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point.
* Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the
documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read
it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large
burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very
careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces
annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems.
* Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a
backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the
alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user
tries to explain to another what they are doing.
* While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am
is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools
for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too.
* The directory where state is stored has never been called
.git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply.
For all the reasons listed above:
* Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names
* Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names
to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere
(e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation)
* Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply
* Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new
backend names for us as well.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have many rebase tests in the testsuite, and often the same test is
repeated multiple times just testing different backends. For those
tests that were specifically trying to test the am backend, add the --am
flag.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ever since commit 3f213981e4 ("add tests for rebasing merged history",
2013-06-06), t3425 has had tests which included the rebasing of merged
history and whose order of applied commits was checked. Unfortunately,
the tests expected different behavior depending on which backend was in
use. Implementing these checks was the following four lines (including
the TODO message) which were repeated verbatim three times in t3425:
#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
test_run_rebase success 'e n o' ''
test_run_rebase success 'e n o' -m
test_run_rebase success 'n o e' -i
As part of the effort to reduce differences between the rebase backends
so that users get more uniform behavior, let's define the correct
behavior and modify the different backends so they all get the right
answer. It turns out that the difference in behavior here is entirely
due to topological sorting; since some backends require topological
sorting (particularly when --rebase-merges is specified), require it for
all modes. Modify the am and merge backends to implement this.
Performance Considerations:
I was unable to measure any appreciable performance difference with this
change. Trying to control the run-to-run variation was difficult; I
eventually found a headless beefy box that I could ssh into, which
seemed to help. Using git.git, I ran the following testcase:
$ git reset --hard v2.20.0-rc1~2
$ time git rebase --quiet v2.20.0-rc0~16
I first ran once to warm any disk caches, then ran five subsequent runs
and recorded the times of those five. I observed the following results
for the average time:
Before this change:
"real" timing: 1.340s (standard deviation: 0.040s)
"user" timing: 1.050s (standard deviation: 0.041s)
"sys" timing: 0.270s (standard deviation: 0.011s)
After this change:
"real" timing: 1.327s (standard deviation: 0.065s)
"user" timing: 1.031s (standard deviation: 0.061s)
"sys" timing: 0.280s (standard deviation: 0.014s)
Measurements aside, I would expect the timing for walking revisions to
be dwarfed by the work involved in creating and applying patches, so
this isn't too surprising. Further, while somewhat counter-intuitive,
it is possible that turning on topological sorting is actually a
performance improvement: by way of comparison, turning on --topo-order
made fast-export faster (see
https://public-inbox.org/git/20090211135640.GA19600@coredump.intra.peff.net/).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `--preserve-merges` mode of the `rebase` command is slated to be
deprecated soon, as the more powerful `--rebase-merges` mode is
available now, and the latter was designed with the express intent to
address the shortcomings of `--preserve-merges`' design (e.g. the
inability to reorder commits in an interactive rebase).
As such, we will eventually even remove the `--preserve-merges` support,
and along with it, its tests.
In preparation for this, and also to allow the Windows phase of our
automated tests to save some well-needed time when running the test
suite, this commit introduces a new prerequisite REBASE_P, which can be
forced to being unmet by setting the environment variable
`GIT_TEST_SKIP_REBASE_P` to any non-empty string.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain,
but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in
commands that build the test environment, but these are
typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good
to double-check that our test environment is what we
expect).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recently introduced tests used uppercase letters to denote
cherry-picks of commits having the corresponding lowercase letter names.
The helper functions also set up tags with the names of the commits.
But this constellation fails on case-insensitive file systems because
there cannot be distinct tags with names that differ only in case.
Use a less subtle convention for the names of cherry-picked commits.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
