Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
329351feeb Merge branch 'kb/merge-recursive-rename-threshold'
* kb/merge-recursive-rename-threshold:
  diff: add synonyms for -M, -C, -B
  merge-recursive: option to specify rename threshold

Conflicts:
	Documentation/diff-options.txt
	Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
2010-10-26 21:54:04 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
75b17fee72 Merge branch 'jf/merge-ignore-ws'
* jf/merge-ignore-ws:
  merge-recursive: options to ignore whitespace changes
  merge-recursive --patience
  ll-merge: replace flag argument with options struct
  merge-recursive: expose merge options for builtin merge
2010-10-26 21:40:54 -07:00
Štěpán Němec
62b4698e55 Use angles for placeholders consistently
Signed-off-by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-08 12:29:52 -07:00
Kevin Ballard
10ae7526be merge-recursive: option to specify rename threshold
The recursive merge strategy turns on rename detection but leaves the
rename threshold at the default. Add a strategy option to allow the user
to specify a rename threshold to use.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29 13:15:56 -07:00
Justin Frankel
4e5dd044c6 merge-recursive: options to ignore whitespace changes
Add support for merging with ignoring line endings (specifically
--ignore-space-at-eol) when using recursive merging.  This is
as a strategy-option, so that you can do:

	git merge --strategy-option=ignore-space-at-eol <branch>

and

	git rebase --strategy-option=ignore-space-at-eol <branch>

This can be useful for coping with line-ending damage (Xcode 3.1 has a
nasty habit of converting all CRLFs to LFs, and VC6 tends to just use
CRLFs for inserted lines).

The only option I need is ignore-space-at-eol, but while at it,
include the other xdiff whitespace options (ignore-space-change,
ignore-all-space), too.

[jn: with documentation]

Signed-off-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-27 10:08:50 -07:00
Justin Frankel
58a1ece478 merge-recursive --patience
Teach the merge-recursive strategy a --patience option to use the
"patience diff" algorithm, which tends to improve results when
cherry-picking a patch that reorders functions at the same time as
refactoring them.

To support this, struct merge_options and ll_merge_options gain an
xdl_opts member, so programs can use arbitrary xdiff flags (think
"XDF_IGNORE_WHITESPACE") in a git-aware merge.

git merge and git rebase can be passed the -Xpatience option to
use this.

[jn: split from --ignore-space patch; with documentation]

Signed-off-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-26 09:20:03 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder
7610fa57e6 merge-recursive --renormalize
Teach "git merge-recursive" a --renormalize option to enable the
merge.renormalize configuration.  The --no-renormalize option can
be used to override it in the negative.

So in the future, you might be able to, e.g.:

	git checkout -m -Xrenormalize otherbranch

or

	git revert -Xrenormalize otherpatch

or

	git pull --rebase -Xrenormalize

The bad part: merge.renormalize is still not honored for most
commands.  And it reveals lots of places that -X has not been plumbed
in (so we get "git merge -Xrenormalize" but not much else).

NEEDSWORK: tests

Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06 09:20:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
566c511195 Document that merge strategies can now take their own options
Also document the recently added -Xtheirs, -Xours and -Xsubtree[=path]
options to the merge-recursive strategy.

Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-17 22:46:28 -08:00
Thomas Rast
d4cbaa12a7 Documentation: clarify 'ours' merge strategy
Make it clear in the docs that the merge takes the tree of HEAD and
ignores everything in the other branches.  This should hopefully clear
up confusion, usually caused by the user looking for a strategy that
resolves all conflict hunks in favour of HEAD (which is completely
different and currently not supported).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-15 12:26:08 -08:00
Wincent Colaiuta
4fa535a179 Grammar fixes to "merge" and "patch-id" docs
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-25 17:28:33 -07:00
Miklos Vajna
02b00e16bb Documentation/git-merge: document subtree strategy.
There was already some documentation about subtree under
Documentation/howto but it was missing from git-merge manpage.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-19 01:43:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
9688a882e1 Documentation: recursive is the default strategy these days.
We still said resolve was the default in handful places.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-12-08 14:04:33 -08:00
Jon Loeliger
bb73d73c08 Refactor merge strategies into separate includable file.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-06 10:31:48 -08:00