An early version of the patch to add object_context used the
name object_resolve_context. This was later shortened to
just object_context, but the "orc" variable name stuck in a
few places. Let's use "oc", which is used elsewhere in the
code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The handle_revision_arg function is rather long, and a big
chunk of it is handling the range operators. Let's pull that
out to a separate helper. While we're doing so, we can clean
up a few of the rough edges that made the flow hard to
follow:
- instead of manually restoring *dotdot (that we overwrote
with a NUL), do the real work in a sub-helper, which
makes it clear that the munge/restore lines are a
matched pair
- eliminate a goto which wasn't actually used for control
flow, but only to avoid duplicating a few lines
(instead, those lines are pushed into another helper
function)
- use early returns instead of deep nesting
- consistently name all variables for the left-hand side
of the range as "a" (rather than "this" or "from") and
the right-hand side as "b" (rather than "next", or using
the unadorned "sha1" or "flags" from the main function).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 003c84f6d (specifying ranges: we did not mean to make
".." an empty set, 2011-05-02), we treat the argument ".."
specially. We detect it by noticing that both sides of the
range are empty, and that this is a non-symmetric two-dot
range.
While correct, this makes the code overly complicated. We
can just detect ".." up front before we try to do further
parsing. This avoids having to de-munge the NUL from dotdot,
and lets us eliminate an extra const array (which we needed
only to do direct pointer comparisons).
It also removes the one code path from the range-parsing
conditional that requires us to return -1. That will make it
simpler to pull the dotdot parsing out into its own
function.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The handle_revision_arg() function has a "dotdot" variable
that it uses to find a ".." or "..." in the argument. If we
don't find one, we look for other marks, like "^!". But we
just keep re-using the "dotdot" variable, which is
confusing.
Let's introduce a separate "mark" variable that can be used
for these other marks. They still reuse the same variable,
but at least the name is no longer actively misleading.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "dotdot" range parser avoids calling
lookup_commit_reference() if we are directly fed two
commits. But its casts are unnecessarily complex; that
function will just return a commit we pass into it.
Just calling the function all the time is much simpler, and
doesn't do any significant extra work (the object is already
parsed, and deref_tag() on a non-tag is a noop; we do incur
one extra lookup_object() call, but that's fairly trivial).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we are parsing a range like "a..b", we write a
temporary NUL over the first ".", so that we can access the
names "a" and "b" as C strings. But our restoration of the
original "." is done at inconsistent times, which can lead
to confusing results.
For most calls, we restore the "." after we resolve the
names, but before we call verify_non_filename(). This means
that when we later call add_pending_object(), the name for
the left-hand "a" has been re-expanded to "a..b". You can
see this with:
git log --source a...b
where "b" will be correctly marked with "b", but "a" will be
marked with "a...b". Likewise with "a..b" (though you need
to use --boundary to even see "a" at all in that case).
To top off the confusion, when the REVARG_CANNOT_BE_FILENAME
flag is set, we skip the non-filename check, and leave the
NUL in place.
That means we do report the correct name for "a" in the
pending array. But some code paths try to show the whole
"a...b" name in error messages, and these erroneously show
only "a" instead of "a...b". E.g.:
$ git cherry-pick HEAD:foo...HEAD:foo
error: object d95f3ad14d is a blob, not a commit
error: object d95f3ad14d is a blob, not a commit
fatal: Invalid symmetric difference expression HEAD:foo
(That last message should be "HEAD:foo...HEAD:foo"; I used
cherry-pick because it passes the CANNOT_BE_FILENAME flag).
As an interesting side note, cherry-pick actually looks at
and re-resolves the arguments from the pending->name fields.
So it would have been visibly broken by the first bug, but
the effect was canceled out by the second one.
This patch makes the whole function consistent by re-writing
the NUL immediately after calling verify_non_filename(), and
then restoring the "." as appropriate in some error-printing
and early-return code paths.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is an implicit assumption that a directory containing only
untracked and ignored paths should itself be considered untracked. This
makes sense in use cases where we're asking if a directory should be
added to the git database, but not when we're asking if a directory can
be safely removed from the working tree; as a result, clean -d would
assume that an "untracked" directory containing ignored paths could be
deleted, even though doing so would also remove the ignored paths.
To get around this, we teach clean -d to collect ignored paths and skip
an untracked directory if it contained an ignored path, instead just
removing the untracked contents thereof. To achieve this, cmd_clean()
has to collect all untracked contents of untracked directories, in
addition to all ignored paths, to determine which untracked dirs must be
skipped (because they contain ignored paths) and which ones should *not*
be skipped.
For this purpose, correct_untracked_entries() is introduced to prune a
given dir_struct of untracked entries containing ignored paths and those
untracked entries encompassed by the untracked entries which are not
pruned away.
A memory leak is also fixed in cmd_clean().
This also fixes the known breakage in t7300, since clean -d now skips
untracked directories containing ignored paths.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a duplicate mention of --contains in the SYNOPSIS to mention
--no-contains.
This fixes an error introduced in my commit ac3f5a3468 ("ref-filter:
add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref", 2017-03-24).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Taking git-compat-util.h's cue (which uses an inline function to back
is_dir_sep()), let's use an inline function to back also the Windows
version of is_dir_sep(). This avoids problems when calling the function
with arguments that do more than just provide a single character, e.g.
incrementing a pointer. Example:
is_dir_sep(*p++)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The manual for "git interpret-trailers" mentioned a non-existing
literal `overwrite` for its config option `trailer.ifexists`. The
correct name for that choice is `replace`.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description of the test was not enclosed in single quotes, which
broke the coloring scheme that I am used to. Upon closer inspection
the test is good, but the description is a bit vague. So extend the
description of the first test.
While at it align the description of the file to match what we actually
test in the file.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We want to use cmp_name() and check_contains() (which both compare
`struct dir_entry`s, the former in terms of the sort order, the latter
in terms of whether one lexically contains another) outside of dir.c,
so we have to (1) change their linkage and (2) rename them as
appropriate for the global namespace. The second is achieved by
renaming cmp_name() to cmp_dir_entry() and check_contains() to
check_dir_entry_contains().
Signed-off-by: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we taught read_directory_recursive() to recurse into untracked
directories in search of ignored files given DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO, that
had the side effect of teaching it to collect the untracked contents of
untracked directories. It doesn't always make sense to return these,
though (we do need them for `clean -d`), so we introduce a flag
(DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS) to control whether or not read_directory()
strips dir->entries of the untracked contents of untracked dirs.
We also introduce check_contains() to check if one dir_entry corresponds
to a path which contains the path corresponding to another dir_entry.
This also fixes known breakages in t7061, since status --ignored now
searches untracked directories for ignored files.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We consider directories containing only untracked and ignored files to
be themselves untracked, which in the usual case means we don't have to
search these directories. This is problematic when we want to collect
ignored files with DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO, though, so we teach
read_directory_recursive() to recurse into untracked directories to find
the ignored files they contain when DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO is set. This
has the side effect of also collecting all untracked files in untracked
directories as well.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Per eb8c5b87, `status --ignored` by design does not list ignored files
if they are in a directory which contains only ignored and untracked
files (which is itself considered to be untracked) without `-uall`. This
does not make sense for `--ignored`, which claims to "Show ignored files
as well."
Thus we revisit eb8c5b87 and decide that for such directories, `status
--ignored` will list the directory as untracked *and* list all ignored
files within said directory even without `-uall`.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If git sees a directory which contains only untracked and ignored
files, clean -d should not remove that directory. It was recently
discovered that this is *not* true of git clean -d, and it's possible
that this has never worked correctly; this test and its accompanying
patch series aims to fix that.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit d8193743e0 ("usage.c: add BUG() function", 12-05-2017) added the
BUG() functions and macros as a replacement for calls to die("BUG: ..").
The use of NORETURN on the declarations (in git-compat-util.h) and the
lack of NORETURN on the function definitions, however, leads sparse to
complain thus:
SP usage.c
usage.c:220:6: error: symbol 'BUG_fl' redeclared with different type
(originally declared at git-compat-util.h:1074) - different modifiers
In order to suppress the sparse error, add the NORETURN to the function
definitions.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update sha1dc from the latest version by the upstream
maintainer[1].
This version includes a commit of mine which allows for replacing the
local modifications done to the upstream files in git.git with macro
definitions to monkeypatch it in place.
It also brings in a change[2] upstream made for the breakage 2.13.0
introduced on SPARC and other platforms that forbid unaligned
access[3].
This means that the code customizations done since the initial import
in commit 28dc98e343 ("sha1dc: add collision-detecting sha1
implementation", 2017-03-16) can be done purely via Makefile
definitions and by including the content of our own sha1dc_git.[ch] in
sha1dc/sha1.c via a macro.
1. cc465543b3
2. 33a694a9ee
3. "Git 2.13.0 segfaults on Solaris SPARC due to DC_SHA1=YesPlease
being on by default"
(https://public-inbox.org/git/CACBZZX6nmKK8af0-UpjCKWV4R+hV-uk2xWXVA5U+_UQ3VXU03g@mail.gmail.com/)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Net::SMTP itself can do the necessary SSL and STARTTLS bits just fine
since version 1.28, and Net::SMTP::SSL is now deprecated. Since 1.28
isn't that old yet, keep the old code in place and use it when
necessary.
While we're in the area, mark some messages for translation that were
not yet marked as such.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When peeling a tag for prepare_revision_walk(), we do not
respect the ignore_missing_links flag. This can lead to a
bogus error when pack-objects walks the possibly-broken
unreachable-but-recent part of the object graph.
The other link-following all happens via traverse_commit_list(),
which explains why this case was missed. And our tests
covered only broken links from commits. Let's be more
comprehensive and cover broken tree entries (which do work)
and tags (which shows off this bug).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The configuration variable log.showSignature is mentioned in git-log's
manpage. Document it in git-config's manpage as well.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The message that's printed when auto-stashed changes are successfully
restored was missing '\n' at the end.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The shell version of rebase -i silences the status output from 'git
stash apply' when restoring the autostashed changes. The C version
does not.
Having the output from git stash apply on the screen is
distracting as it makes it difficult to find the message from git
rebase saying that the rebase succeeded. Also the status information
that git stash prints talks about looking in .git/rebase-merge/done to
see which commits have been applied. As .git/rebase-merge is removed
shortly after the message is printed before rebase -i exits this is
confusing.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rebase -i was converted to C a bug was introduced into the code
that creates the reflog message. Instead of saying
rebase -i (finish): <head-name> onto <onto>
it says
rebase -i (finish): <head-name> onto <orig-head><onto>
as the strbuf is not reset between reading the value of <orig-head>
and <onto>.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user asks to display (or sort by) the %(HEAD) atom,
ref-filter has to compare each refname to the value of HEAD.
We do so by resolving HEAD fresh when calling populate_value()
on each ref. If there are a large number of refs, this can
have a measurable impact on runtime.
Instead, let's resolve HEAD once when we realize we need the
%(HEAD) atom, allowing us to do a simple string comparison
for each ref. On a repository with 3000 branches (high, but
an actual example found in the wild) this drops the
best-of-five time to run "git branch >/dev/null" from 59ms
to 48ms (~20% savings).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a commit message is edited with the "verbose" option, the buffer
will have a cut line and diff after the log message, like so:
my subject
# ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
# Do not touch the line above.
# Everything below will be removed.
diff --git a/foo.txt b/foo.txt
index 5716ca5..7601807 100644
--- a/foo.txt
+++ b/foo.txt
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bar
+baz
"git interpret-trailers" is unaware of the cut line, and assumes the
trailer block would be at the end of the whole thing. This can easily
be seen with:
$ GIT_EDITOR='git interpret-trailers --in-place --trailer Acked-by:me' \
git commit --amend -v
Teach "git interpret-trailers" to notice the cut-line and ignore the
remainder of the input when looking for a place to add new trailer
block. This makes it consistent with how "git commit -v -s" inserts a
new Signed-off-by: line.
This can be done by the same logic as the existing helper function,
wt_status_truncate_message_at_cut_line(), uses, but it wants the caller
to pass a strbuf to it. Because the function ignore_non_trailer() used
by the command takes a <pointer, length> pair, not a strbuf, steal the
logic from wt_status_truncate_message_at_cut_line() to create a new
wt_status_locate_end() helper function that takes <pointer, length>
pair, and make ignore_non_trailer() call it to help "interpret-trailers".
Since there is only one caller of wt_status_truncate_message_at_cut_line()
in cmd_commit(), rewrite it to call wt_status_locate_end() helper instead
and remove the old helper that no longer has any caller.
Signed-off-by: Brian Malehorn <bmalehorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One test in t5400 examines the packet exchange between git-push and
git-receive-pack. The latter inherits the GIT_TRACE_PACKET environment
variable, so that both processes dump trace data into the same file
concurrently. This should not be a problem because the trace file is
opened with O_APPEND.
On Windows, however, O_APPEND is not atomic as it should be: it is
emulated as lseek(SEEK_END) followed by write(). For this reason, the
test is unreliable: it can happen that one process overwrites a line
that was just written by the other process. As a consequence, the test
sometimes does not find one or another line that is expected (and it is
also successful occasionally).
The test case is actually only interested in the output of git-push.
To ensure that only git-push writes to the trace file, override the
receive-pack command such that it does not even open the trace file.
Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In commit 438fc68462 ("push options: pass push options to the transport
helper", 08-02-2017), the test coverage was reduced to run no tests at all
if you lack a http server. Move the http initialization to the end,
such that only http tests are skipped when a http server is missing.
The test in between that tests submodule propagation is safe to run before
the http tests as it makes its own test directories `parent` and
`parent_upstream`.
Noticed-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because TAP output does not like to see the remainder of the test
getting skipped after running one or more tests, bf4b7219
("test-lib.sh: Add check for invalid use of 'skip_all' facility",
2012-09-01) made sure that test_done errors out when this happens.
Instead, loosen the check so that we only pretend that the rest of
the test script did not exist in such a case. We'd lose a bit of
information (i.e. TAP does not notice that we are skipping some
tests), but not very much (i.e. TAP wasn't told how many tests are
skipped anyway).
This will allow inclusion of lib-httpd.sh in the middle of a test,
which will skip the remainder of the test scripts when tests that
involve web server are declined with GIT_TEST_HTTPD=false, for
example.
Acked-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When introducing git stash push in f5727e26e4 ("stash: introduce push
verb", 2017-02-19), I forgot to add it to the completion code. Add it
now.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Repositories with less than 4000 entries are always handled using a
single thread, causing test-lazy-init-name-hash --multi to error out.
Don't abort the whole test script in that case, but simply skip the
multi-threaded performance check. We can still use it to compare the
single-threaded speed of different versions in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the single-threaded variant beats the multi-threaded one then we may
have a performance bug, but that doesn't justify aborting the test.
Drop that check; we can compare the results for --single and --multi
using the actual performance tests.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The perf test suite (more specifically: t/perf/aggregate.perl) requires
each test script to write test results into a file, otherwise it aborts
when aggregating. Add actual performance tests with test_perf to allow
p0004 to be run together with other perf scripts.
Calibrate the value for the parameter --count based on the size of the
test repository, in order to get meaningful results with smaller repos
yet still be able to finish the script against huge ones without having
to wait for hours.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The return code of commands on the producing end of a pipe is ignored.
Evaluate the outcome of test-lazy-init-name-hash by calling sort
separately.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test library puts helpers into $PATH, so we can simply call them
without specifying their location.
The suffix $X is also not necessary because .exe files on Windows can be
started without specifying their extension, and on other platforms it's
empty anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sven Strickroth <email@cs-ware.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The set_error_handle() function was introduced by 3b331e926
(vreportf: report to arbitrary filehandles, 2015-08-11) so
that run-command could send post-fork, pre-exec errors to
the parent's original stderr.
That use went away in 79319b194 (run-command: eliminate
calls to error handling functions in child, 2017-04-19),
which pushes all of the error reporting to the parent.
This leaves no callers of set_error_handle(). As we're not
likely to add any new ones, let's drop it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recent change that introduced autodecorating of refs accidentally
broke the ability of users to set log.decorate = false to override it.
When the git_log_config was traversed a second time with an option other
than log.decorate, the decoration style would be set to the automatic
style, even if the user had already overridden it. Instead of setting
the option in config parsing, set it in init_log_defaults instead.
Add a test for this case. The actual additional config option doesn't
matter, but it needs to be something not already set in the
configuration file.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--local" option instructs git-config to read or modify
the repository-level config. This doesn't make any sense if
you're not actually in a repository.
Older versions of Git would blindly try to read or write
".git/config". For reading, this would result in a quiet
failure, since there was no config to read (and thus no
matching config value). Writing would generally fail
noisily, since ".git" was unlikely to exist. But since
b1ef400ee (setup_git_env: avoid blind fall-back to ".git",
2016-10-20), we catch this in the call to git_pathdup() and
die with an assertion.
Dying is the right thing to do, but we should catch the
problem early and give a more human-friendly error message.
Note that even without --local, git-config will sometimes
default to using local repository config (e.g., when
writing). These cases are already protected by similar
checks, and covered by a test in t1308.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Converting to BUG() makes it easier to detect and debug
cases where we hit this assertion. Coupled with a new test
in t1300, this shows that the test suite can detect such
corner cases.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's a convention in Git's code base to write assertions
as:
if (...some_bad_thing...)
die("BUG: the terrible thing happened");
with the idea that users should never see a "BUG:" message
(but if they, it at least gives a clue what happened). We
use die() here because it's convenient, but there are a few
draw-backs:
1. Without parsing the messages, it's hard for callers to
distinguish BUG assertions from regular errors.
For instance, it would be nice if the test suite could
check that we don't hit any assertions, but
test_must_fail will pass BUG deaths as OK.
2. It would be useful to add more debugging features to
BUG assertions, like file/line numbers or dumping core.
3. The die() handler can be replaced, and might not
actually exit the whole program (e.g., it may just
pthread_exit()). This is convenient for normal errors,
but for an assertion failure (which is supposed to
never happen), we're probably better off taking down
the whole process as quickly and cleanly as possible.
We could address these by checking in die() whether the
error message starts with "BUG", and behaving appropriately.
But there's little advantage at that point to sharing the
die() code, and only downsides (e.g., we can't change the
BUG() interface independently). Moreover, converting all of
the existing BUG calls reveals that the test suite does
indeed trigger a few of them.
Instead, this patch introduces a new BUG() function, which
prints an error before dying via SIGABRT. This gives us test
suite checking and core dumps. The function is actually a
macro (when supported) so that we can show the file/line
number.
We can convert die("BUG") invocations to BUG() in further
patches, dealing with any test fallouts individually.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-filter-branch requires the specification of a branch by one way or
another. If no branch appears to have been specified, we know the user
got the usage wrong but we don't know what they were trying to do ---
e.g. maybe they specified the ref to rewrite but in the wrong place.
In this case, just state that the branch specification is missing.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git read-tree -m" requires a tree argument to name the tree to be
merged in. Git uses a cutesy error message to say so and why:
$ git read-tree -m
warning: read-tree: emptying the index with no arguments is
deprecated; use --empty
fatal: just how do you expect me to merge 0 trees?
$ git read-tree -m --empty
fatal: just how do you expect me to merge 0 trees?
When lucky, that could produce an ah-hah moment for the user, but it's
more likely to irritate and distract them.
Instead, tell the user plainly that the tree argument is
required. Also document this requirement in the git-read-tree(1)
manpage where there is room to explain it in a more straightforward way.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There has been a bug report by a corporate user that stated that
"spelling mistake of stash followed by a yes prints character 'y'
infinite times."
This analysis was false. When the spelling of a command contains
errors, the git program tries to help the user by providing candidates
which are close to the unexisting command. E.g Git prints the
following:
git: 'stahs' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
Did you mean this?
stash
and then exits.
The problem with this hint is that it is not formally indicated as an
hint and the user is in fact encouraged to reply to the question,
whereas the Git command is already finished.
The user was unlucky enough that it was the command he was looking
for, and replied "yes" on the command line, effectively launching the
`yes` program.
The initial error is that the Git programs, when launched in
command-line mode (without interaction) must not ask questions,
because these questions would normally require a user input as a reply
that they won't handle indeed. That's a source of confusion on UX
level.
To improve the general usability of the Git suite, the following rule
was applied:
if the sentence
* appears in a non-interactive session
* is printed last before exit
* is a question addressing the user ("you")
the sentence is turned into affirmative and proposes the option.
The basic rewording of the question sentences has been extended to
other spots found in the source.
Requested at https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/issues/999 by rpai1
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the include examples use "foo.inc", but some use
"foo". Since the string of examples are meant to show
variations and how they differ, it's a good idea to change
only one thing at a time. The filename differences are not
relevant to what we're trying to show.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using the word "expand" to refer to including the contents
of another config file isn't really accurate, since it's a
verbatim insertion. And it can cause confusion with the
expanding of the path itself via things like "~".
Let's clarify when we are referring to the contents versus
the filename, and use appropriate verbs in each case.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The changes in the previous commit hopefully clarify that
the evaluation of an include "path" variable is the same no
matter if it's in a conditional section or not. But since
this question came up on the list, let's add an example that
makes it obvious.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "includeIf" directives behave exactly like include ones,
except they only kick in when the conditional is true. That
was mentioned in the "conditional" section, but let's make
it more clear for the whole "includes" section, since people
don't necessarily read the documentation top to bottom.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a job to run Git tests with GETTEXT_POISON. In this job we don't run
the git-p4, git-svn, and HTTPD tests to save resources/time (those tests
are already executed in other jobs). Since we don't run these tests, we
can also skip the "before_install" step (which would install the
necessary dependencies) with an empty override.
Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
