Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
b2e5d75d17 tests: mark tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
When the "ab/various-leak-fixes" topic was merged in [1] only t6021
would fail if the tests were run in the
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=check" mode, i.e. to check whether we
marked all leak-free tests with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".

Since then we've had various tests starting to pass under
SANITIZE=leak. Let's mark those as passing, this is when they started
to pass, narrowed down with "git bisect":

- t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh: In
  faebba436e (list-objects-filter: plug pattern_list leak, 2022-12-01).

- t3210-pack-refs.sh, t5613-info-alternate.sh,
  t7403-submodule-sync.sh: In 189e97bc4b (diff: remove parseopts member
  from struct diff_options, 2022-12-01).

- t1408-packed-refs.sh: In ab91f6b7c4 (Merge branch
  'rs/diff-parseopts', 2022-12-19).

- t0023-crlf-am.sh, t4152-am-subjects.sh, t4254-am-corrupt.sh,
  t4256-am-format-flowed.sh, t4257-am-interactive.sh,
  t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh: In a658e881c1 (am: don't pass strvec to
  apply_parse_options(), 2022-12-13)

- t1301-shared-repo.sh, t1302-repo-version.sh: In b07a819c05 (reflog:
  clear leftovers in reflog_expiry_cleanup(), 2022-12-13).

- t1304-default-acl.sh, t1410-reflog.sh,
  t5330-no-lazy-fetch-with-commit-graph.sh, t5502-quickfetch.sh,
  t5604-clone-reference.sh, t6014-rev-list-all.sh,
  t7701-repack-unpack-unreachable.sh: In b0c61be320 (Merge branch
  'rs/reflog-expiry-cleanup', 2022-12-26)

- t3800-mktag.sh, t5302-pack-index.sh, t5306-pack-nobase.sh,
  t5573-pull-verify-signatures.sh, t7612-merge-verify-signatures.sh: In
  69bbbe484b (hash-object: use fsck for object checks, 2023-01-18).

- t1451-fsck-buffer.sh: In 8e4309038f (fsck: do not assume
  NUL-termination of buffers, 2023-01-19).

- t6501-freshen-objects.sh: In abf2bb895b (Merge branch
  'jk/hash-object-fsck', 2023-01-30)

1. 9ea1378d04 (Merge branch 'ab/various-leak-fixes', 2022-12-14)

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-06 15:34:36 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
06d531486e t[01]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
Carefully excluding t1309, which sees independent development elsewhere
at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the
default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via

	$ (cd t &&
	   sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
		-e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- t[01]*.sh &&
	   git checkout HEAD -- t1309\*)

Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`)
that we rename here, too.

This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.

Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:18 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
334afbc76f tests: mark tests relying on the current default for init.defaultBranch
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.

To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in

- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,

- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
  initialize the default branch,

- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,

- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
  uses `master`)

This trick was performed by this command:

	$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
	GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
	export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
	' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
	t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh

After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:

	$ git checkout HEAD -- \
		t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
		t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
		t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
		t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
		t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
		t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
		t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
		t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
		t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
		t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
		t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
		t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
		t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
		t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
		t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
		t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
		t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
		t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
		t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh

We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:

	$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
	GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
	export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
	' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:17 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
74195c69ad t1408: add a test of stale packed refs covered by loose refs
It is OK for the packed-refs file to contain old reference definitions
that might even refer to objects that have since been
garbage-collected, as long as there is a corresponding loose reference
definition that overrides it. Add a test that such references don't
cause problems.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-23 13:27:32 -07:00