Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stephen Boyd c4f3f551a6 tests: consolidate CR removal/addition functions
append_cr(), remove_cr(), q_to_nul() and q_to_cr() are defined in multiple
tests. Consolidate them into test-lib.sh so we can stop redefining them.
The use of remove_cr() in t0020 to test for a CR is replaced with a new
function has_cr() to accurately reflect what is intended (the output of
remove_cr() was being thrown away).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-25 16:42:23 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin 249c61a62d merge-recursive: respect core.autocrlf when writing out the result
The code forgot to convert the blob contents into work tree
representation before writing it out.  Also fixes leaks -- earlier
the updated blobs were never freed.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-09 16:11:08 -07:00
Marius Storm-Olsen eea982843e Add testcase for merging in a CRLF repo
If you work on a repo with core.autocrlf == true, you would expect
every text file to have CRLF EOLs. However, if you by some operation,
get a conflict, then the conflicted file has LF EOLs.

Now, of course you'd go about resolving the files conflict, and then 'git
add <file>'. When you do that, you'll get the warning saying that LF will
be replaced by CRLF. Then you commit. The end result is that you have a
workingdir with a mix of LF and CRLF files, which after some more
operations may trigger a "whole file changed" diff, due to the workingdir
file now having LF EOLs.

An LF only conflict file results in the resolved file being in LF,
the commit is in LF and a warning saying that LF will be replaced
by CRLF, and the working dir ends up with a mix of CRLF and LF files.

Signed-off-by: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-09 15:37:44 -07:00