Error messages given when working on an unborn branch that is
checked out in another worktree have been improved.
* rj/branch-unborn-in-other-worktrees:
branch: avoid unnecessary worktrees traversals
branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree
branch: description for orphan branch errors
branch: use get_worktrees() in copy_or_rename_branch()
branch: test for failures while renaming branches
Header clean-up.
* en/header-split-cache-h: (24 commits)
protocol.h: move definition of DEFAULT_GIT_PORT from cache.h
mailmap, quote: move declarations of global vars to correct unit
treewide: reduce includes of cache.h in other headers
treewide: remove double forward declaration of read_in_full
cache.h: remove unnecessary includes
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to pager.h changes
pager.h: move declarations for pager.c functions from cache.h
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to editor.h changes
editor: move editor-related functions and declarations into common file
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to object.h changes
object.h: move some inline functions and defines from cache.h
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to object-file.h changes
object-file.h: move declarations for object-file.c functions from cache.h
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to git-zlib changes
git-zlib: move declarations for git-zlib functions from cache.h
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to object-name.h changes
object-name.h: move declarations for object-name.c functions from cache.h
treewide: remove unnecessary cache.h inclusion
treewide: be explicit about dependence on mem-pool.h
treewide: be explicit about dependence on oid-array.h
...
"git branch --format=..." and "git format-patch --format=..."
learns "--omit-empty" to hide refs that whose formatting result
becomes an empty string from the output.
* ow/ref-filter-omit-empty:
branch, for-each-ref, tag: add option to omit empty lines
"git branch -d origin/master" would say "no such branch", but it is
likely a missed "-r" if refs/remotes/origin/master exists. The
command has been taught to give such a hint in its error message.
* cm/branch-delete-error-message-update:
branch: improve error log on branch not found by checking remotes refs
If the given format string expands to the empty string, a newline is
still printed. This makes using the output linewise more tedious. For
example, git update-ref --stdin does not accept empty lines.
Add options to "git branch", "git for-each-ref", and "git tag" to
not print these empty lines. The default behavior remains the same.
Signed-off-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cache.h and strbuf.[ch] had editor-related functions. Move these into
editor.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Split key function and data structure definitions out of cache.h to
new header files and adjust the users.
* en/header-split-cleanup:
csum-file.h: remove unnecessary inclusion of cache.h
write-or-die.h: move declarations for write-or-die.c functions from cache.h
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to setup.h changes
setup.h: move declarations for setup.c functions from cache.h
treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to environment.h changes
environment.h: move declarations for environment.c functions from cache.h
treewide: remove unnecessary includes of cache.h
wrapper.h: move declarations for wrapper.c functions from cache.h
path.h: move function declarations for path.c functions from cache.h
cache.h: remove expand_user_path()
abspath.h: move absolute path functions from cache.h
environment: move comment_line_char from cache.h
treewide: remove unnecessary cache.h inclusion from several sources
treewide: remove unnecessary inclusion of gettext.h
treewide: be explicit about dependence on gettext.h
treewide: remove unnecessary cache.h inclusion from a few headers
Code clean-up around the use of the_repository.
* ab/remove-implicit-use-of-the-repository:
libs: use "struct repository *" argument, not "the_repository"
post-cocci: adjust comments for recent repo_* migration
cocci: apply the "revision.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "rerere.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "refs.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "promisor-remote.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "packfile.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "pretty.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "object-store.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "diff.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "commit.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "commit-reach.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "cache.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: add missing "the_repository" macros to "pending"
cocci: sort "the_repository" rules by header
cocci: fix incorrect & verbose "the_repository" rules
cocci: remove dead rule from "the_repository.pending.cocci"
New git users may want to locally delete remote-tracking branches but
don't really understand how they are distinguished from branches by git.
Then one may naively try:
`git branch -d foo/bar` and get a correct error `branch foo/bar not
found` but hard to understand for a newbie, this patch aims to guide one
in such case.
when failing to delete a branch with `git branch -d <branch>` because
of branch not found, try to find a **remote refs** matching `<branch>`
and if so, add an hint:
`Did you forget --remote?` to the error message
Signed-off-by: Clement Mabileau <mabileau.clement@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ab/remove-implicit-use-of-the-repository:
libs: use "struct repository *" argument, not "the_repository"
post-cocci: adjust comments for recent repo_* migration
cocci: apply the "revision.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "rerere.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "refs.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "promisor-remote.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "packfile.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "pretty.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "object-store.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "diff.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "commit.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "commit-reach.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "cache.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: add missing "the_repository" macros to "pending"
cocci: sort "the_repository" rules by header
cocci: fix incorrect & verbose "the_repository" rules
cocci: remove dead rule from "the_repository.pending.cocci"
In preceding commits we changed many calls to macros that were
providing a "the_repository" argument to invoke corresponding repo_*()
function instead. Let's follow-up and adjust references to those in
comments, which coccinelle didn't (and inherently can't) catch.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apply the part of "the_repository.pending.cocci" pertaining to
"commit-reach.h".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apply the part of "the_repository.pending.cocci" pertaining to
"cache.h".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we rename a branch ref, we need to update any worktree that have
its HEAD pointing to the branch ref being renamed, so to make it use the
new ref name.
If we know in advance that we're renaming a branch that is not currently
checked out in any worktree, we can skip this step entirely. Let's do
it so.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In cfaff3aac (branch -m: allow renaming a yet-unborn branch, 2020-12-13)
we added support for renaming an orphan branch when that branch is
checked out in the current worktree.
Let's also allow renaming an orphan branch checked out in a worktree
different than the current one.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In bcfc82bd48 (branch: description for non-existent branch errors,
2022-10-08) we checked the HEAD in the current worktree to detect if the
branch to operate with is an orphan branch, so as to avoid the confusing
error: "No branch named...".
If we are asked to operate with an orphan branch in a different working
tree than the current one, we need to check the HEAD in that different
working tree.
Let's extend the check we did in bcfc82bd48, to check the HEADs in all
worktrees linked to the current repository, using the helper introduced
in 31ad6b61bd (branch: add branch_checked_out() helper, 2022-06-15).
The helper, branch_checked_out(), does its work obtaining internally a
list of worktrees linked to the current repository. Obtaining that list
is not a lightweight work because it implies disk access.
In copy_or_rename_branch() we already have a list of worktrees. Let's
use that already obtained list, and avoid using here the helper.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Obtaining the list of worktrees, using get_worktrees(), is not a
lightweight operation, because it involves reading from disk.
Let's stop calling get_worktrees() in reject_rebase_or_bisect_branch()
and in replace_each_worktree_head_symref(). Make them receive the list
of worktrees from their only caller, copy_or_rename_branch().
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we introduced replace_each_worktree_head_symref() in 70999e9cec
(branch -m: update all per-worktree HEADs, 2016-03-27), we implemented a
best effort approach.
If we are asked to rename a branch that is simultaneously checked out in
multiple worktrees, we try to update all of those worktrees. If we fail
updating any of them, we die() as a signal that something has gone
wrong. However, at this point, the branch ref has already been renamed
and also updated the HEADs of the successfully updated worktrees.
Despite returning an error, we do not try to rollback those changes.
Let's add a test to notice if we change this behavior in the future.
In next commits we will change replace_each_worktree_head_symref() to
work more closely with its only caller, copy_or_rename_branch(). Let's
move the former closer to its caller, to facilitate those changes.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is one step towards making strbuf.c not depend upon cache.h.
Additional steps will follow in subsequent commits.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Dozens of files made use of gettext functions, without explicitly
including gettext.h. This made it more difficult to find which files
could remove a dependence on cache.h. Make C files explicitly include
gettext.h if they are using it.
However, while compat/fsmonitor/fsm-ipc-darwin.c should also gain an
include of gettext.h, it was left out to avoid conflicting with an
in-flight topic.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous change implemented the ahead_behind() method, including an
algorithm to compute the ahead/behind values for a number of commit tips
relative to a number of commit bases. Now, integrate that algorithm as
part of 'git for-each-ref' hidden behind a new format atom,
ahead-behind. This naturally extends to 'git branch' and 'git tag'
builtins, as well.
This format allows specifying multiple bases, if so desired, and all
matching references are compared against all of those bases. For this
reason, failing to read a reference provided from these atoms results in
an error.
In order to translate the ahead_behind() method information to the
format output code in ref-filter.c, we must populate arrays of
ahead_behind_count structs. In struct ref_array, we store the full array
that will be passed to ahead_behind(). In struct ref_array_item, we
store an array of pointers that point to the relvant items within the
full array. In this way, we can pull all relevant ahead/behind values
directly when formatting output for a specific item. It also ensures the
lifetime of the ahead_behind_count structs matches the time that the
array is being used.
Add specific tests of the ahead/behind counts in t6600-test-reach.sh, as
it has an interesting repository shape. In particular, its merging
strategy and its use of different commit-graphs would demonstrate over-
counting if the ahead_behind() method did not already account for that
possibility.
Also add tests for the specific for-each-ref, branch, and tag builtins.
In the case of 'git tag', there are intersting cases that happen when
some of the selected tips are not commits. This requires careful logic
around commits_nr in the second loop of filter_ahead_behind(). Also, the
test in t7004 is carefully located to avoid being dependent on the GPG
prereq. It also avoids using the test_commit helper, as that will add
ticks to the time and disrupt the expected timestamps in later tag
tests.
Also add performance tests in a new p1300-graph-walks.sh script. This
will be useful for more uses in the future, but for now compare the
ahead-behind counting algorithm in 'git for-each-ref' to the naive
implementation by running 'git rev-list --count' processes for each
input.
For the Git source code repository, the improvement is already obvious:
Test this tree
---------------------------------------------------------------
1500.2: ahead-behind counts: git for-each-ref 0.07(0.07+0.00)
1500.3: ahead-behind counts: git branch 0.07(0.06+0.00)
1500.4: ahead-behind counts: git tag 0.07(0.06+0.00)
1500.5: ahead-behind counts: git rev-list 1.32(1.04+0.27)
But the standard performance benchmark is the Linux kernel repository,
which demosntrates a significant improvement:
Test this tree
---------------------------------------------------------------
1500.2: ahead-behind counts: git for-each-ref 0.27(0.24+0.02)
1500.3: ahead-behind counts: git branch 0.27(0.24+0.03)
1500.4: ahead-behind counts: git tag 0.28(0.27+0.01)
1500.5: ahead-behind counts: git rev-list 4.57(4.03+0.54)
The 'git rev-list' test exists in this change as a demonstration, but it
will be removed in the next change to avoid wasting time on this
comparison.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 52d59cc645 (branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move
(-m), 2017-06-18) we can copy a branch to make a new branch with the
'-c' (copy) option or to overwrite an existing branch using the '-C'
(force copy) option. A no-op possibility is considered when we are
asked to copy a branch to itself, to follow the same no-op introduced
for the rename (-M) operation in 3f59481e33 (branch: allow a no-op
"branch -M <current-branch> HEAD", 2011-11-25). To check for this, in
52d59cc645 we compared the branch names provided by the user, source
(HEAD if omitted) and destination, and a match is considered as this
no-op.
Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout: implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th
last branch, 2009-01-17) a branch can be specified using shortcuts like
@{-1}. This allows this usage:
$ git checkout -b test
$ git checkout -
$ git branch -C test test # no-op
$ git branch -C test @{-1} # oops
$ git branch -C @{-1} test # oops
As we are using the branch name provided by the user to do the
comparison, if one of the branches is provided using a shortcut we are
not going to have a match and a call to git_config_copy_section() will
happen. This will make a duplicate of the configuration for that
branch, and with this progression the second call will produce four
copies of the configuration, and so on.
Let's use the interpreted branch name instead for this comparison.
The rename operation is not affected.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
When deleting a branch, "git branch -d" has a safety check that ensures
the branch is merged to its upstream (if any), or to HEAD. To do that,
naturally we try to resolve HEAD to a commit object. If we're on an
orphan branch (i.e., HEAD points to a branch that does not yet exist),
that will fail, and we'll bail with an error:
$ git branch -d to-delete
fatal: Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD
This usually isn't that big of a deal. The deletion would fail anyway,
since the branch isn't merged to HEAD, and you'd need to use "-D" (or
"-f"). And doing so skips the HEAD resolution, courtesy of 67affd5173
(git-branch -D: make it work even when on a yet-to-be-born branch,
2006-11-24).
But there are still two problems:
1. The error message isn't very helpful. We should give the usual "not
fully merged" message, which points the user at "branch -D". That
was a problem even back in 67affd5173.
2. Even without a HEAD, these days it's still possible for the
deletion to succeed. After 67affd5173, commit 99c419c915 (branch
-d: base the "already-merged" safety on the branch it merges with,
2009-12-29) made it OK to delete a branch if it is merged to its
upstream.
We can fix both by removing the die() in delete_branches() completely,
leaving head_rev NULL in this case. It's tempting to stop there, as it
appears at first glance that the rest of the code does the right thing
with a NULL. But sadly, it's not quite true.
We end up feeding the NULL to repo_is_descendant_of(). In the
traditional code path there, we call repo_in_merge_bases_many(). It
feeds the NULL to repo_parse_commit(), which is smart enough to return
an error, and we immediately return "no, it's not a descendant".
But there's an alternate code path: if we have a commit graph with
generation numbers, we end up in can_all_from_reach(), which does
eventually try to set a flag on the NULL commit and segfaults.
So instead, we'll teach the local branch_merged() helper to treat a NULL
as "not merged". This would be a little more elegant in in_merge_bases()
itself, but that function is called in a lot of places, and it's not
clear that quietly returning "not merged" is the right thing everywhere
(I'd expect in many cases, feeding a NULL is a sign of a bug).
There are four tests here:
a. The first one confirms that deletion succeeds with an orphaned HEAD
when the branch is merged to its upstream. This is case (2) above.
b. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Even if it is merged to
upstream, we still check head_rev so that we can say "deleting
because it's merged to upstream, even though it's not merged to
HEAD". Without the second hunk in branch_merged(), this test would
segfault in can_all_from_reach().
c. The third one confirms that we correctly say "not merged to HEAD"
when we can't resolve HEAD, and reject the deletion.
d. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Without the first hunk in
branch_merged(), this one would segfault.
Reported-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
"git branch --edit-description" can exit with status -1 which is
not a good practice; it learned to use 1 as everybody else instead.
* rj/branch-do-not-exit-with-minus-one-status:
branch: error code with --edit-description
Since c2d17ba3db (branch --edit-description: protect against mistyped
branch name, 2012-02-05) we return -1 on error editing the branch
description.
Let's change to 1, which follows the established convention and it is
better for portability reasons.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In c847f53712 (Detached HEAD (experimental), 2007-01-01) an error
condition was introduced in rename_branch() to prevent renaming, later
also copying, a detached HEAD.
The condition used was checking for NULL in oldname, the source branch
to rename/copy. That condition cannot be satisfied because if no source
branch is specified, HEAD is going to be used in the call.
The error issued instead is:
fatal: Invalid branch name: 'HEAD'
Let's remove the condition in copy_or_rename_branch() (the current
function name) and check for HEAD before calling it, dying with the
original intended error if we're in a detached HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --edit-description @{-1}" is now a way to edit branch
description of the branch you were on before switching to the
current branch.
* rj/branch-edit-description-with-nth-checkout:
branch: support for shortcuts like @{-1}, completed
"git branch --edit-description" on an unborh branch misleadingly
said that no such branch exists, which has been corrected.
* rj/branch-edit-desc-unborn:
branch: description for non-existent branch errors
"GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description" resulted in failure,
which has been corrected.
* jc/branch-description-unset:
branch: do not fail a no-op --edit-desc
branch command with options "edit-description", "set-upstream-to" and
"unset-upstream" expects a branch name. Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout:
implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th last branch, 2009-01-17) a
branch can be specified using shortcuts like @{-1}. Those shortcuts
need to be resolved when considering the arguments.
We can modify the description of the previously checked out branch with:
$ git branch --edit--description @{-1}
We can modify the upstream of the previously checked out branch with:
$ git branch --set-upstream-to upstream @{-1}
$ git branch --unset-upstream @{-1}
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the repository does not yet have commits, some errors describe that
there is no branch:
$ git init -b first
$ git branch --edit-description first
error: No branch named 'first'.
$ git branch --set-upstream-to=upstream
fatal: branch 'first' does not exist
$ git branch -c second
error: refname refs/heads/first not found
fatal: Branch copy failed
That "first" branch is unborn but to say it doesn't exists is confusing.
Options "-c" (copy) and "-m" (rename) show the same error when the
origin branch doesn't exists:
$ git branch -c non-existent-branch second
error: refname refs/heads/non-existent-branch not found
fatal: Branch copy failed
$ git branch -m non-existent-branch second
error: refname refs/heads/non-existent-branch not found
fatal: Branch rename failed
Note that "--edit-description" without an explicit argument is already
considering the _empty repository_ circumstance in its error. Also note
that "-m" on the initial branch it is an allowed operation.
Make the error descriptions for those branch operations with unborn or
non-existent branches, more informative.
This is the result of the change:
$ git init -b first
$ git branch --edit-description first
error: No commit on branch 'first' yet.
$ git branch --set-upstream-to=upstream
fatal: No commit on branch 'first' yet.
$ git branch -c second
fatal: No commit on branch 'first' yet.
$ git branch [-c/-m] non-existent-branch second
fatal: No branch named 'non-existent-branch'.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Imagine running "git branch --edit-description" while on a branch
without the branch description, and then exit the editor after
emptying the edit buffer, which is the way to tell the command that
you changed your mind and you do not want the description after all.
The command should just happily oblige, adding no branch description
for the current branch, and exit successfully. But it fails to do
so:
$ git init -b main
$ git commit --allow-empty -m commit
$ GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description
fatal: could not unset 'branch.main.description'
The end result is OK in that the configuration variable does not
exist in the resulting repository, but we should do better. If we
know we didn't have a description, and if we are asked not to have a
description by the editor, we can just return doing nothing.
This of course introduces TOCTOU. If you add a branch description
to the same branch from another window, while you had the editor
open to edit the description, and then exit the editor without
writing anything there, we'd end up not removing the description you
added in the other window. But you are fooling yourself in your own
repository at that point, and if it hurts, you'd be better off not
doing so ;-).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After b489b9d9aa (branch: use branch_checked_out() when deleting refs,
2022-06-14), we no longer look at our local "worktrees" variable, since
branch_checked_out() handles it under the hood. The compiler didn't
notice the unused variable because we call functions to initialize and
free it (so it's not totally unused, it just doesn't do anything
useful).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is the last current use of find_shared_symref() that can easily be
replaced by branch_checked_out(). The benefit of this switch is that the
code is a bit simpler, but also it is faster on repeated calls.
The remaining uses of find_shared_symref() are non-trivial to remove, so
we probably should not continue in that direction:
* builtin/notes.c uses find_shared_symref() with "NOTES_MERGE_REF"
instead of "HEAD", so it doesn't have an immediate analogue with
branch_checked_out(). Perhaps we should consider extending it to
include that symref in addition to HEAD, BISECT_HEAD, and
REBASE_HEAD.
* receive-pack.c checks to see if a worktree has a checkout for the ref
that is being updated. The tricky part is that it can actually decide
to update the worktree directly instead of just skipping the update.
This all depends on the receive.denyCurrentBranch config option. The
implementation currenty cares about receiving the worktree in the
result, so the current branch_checked_out() prototype is insufficient
currently. This is something to investigate later, though, since a
large number of refs could be updated at the same time and using the
strmap implementation of branch_checked_out() could be beneficial.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch" learned the "--recurse-submodules" option.
* gc/branch-recurse-submodules:
branch.c: use 'goto cleanup' in setup_tracking() to fix memory leaks
branch: add --recurse-submodules option for branch creation
builtin/branch: consolidate action-picking logic in cmd_branch()
branch: add a dry_run parameter to create_branch()
branch: make create_branch() always create a branch
branch: move --set-upstream-to behavior to dwim_and_setup_tracking()
To improve the submodules UX, we would like to teach Git to handle
branches in submodules. Start this process by teaching "git branch" the
--recurse-submodules option so that "git branch --recurse-submodules
topic" will create the `topic` branch in the superproject and its
submodules.
Although this commit does not introduce breaking changes, it does not
work well with existing --recurse-submodules commands because "git
branch --recurse-submodules" writes to the submodule ref store, but most
commands only consider the superproject gitlink and ignore the submodule
ref store. For example, "git checkout --recurse-submodules" will check
out the commits in the superproject gitlinks (and put the submodules in
detached HEAD) instead of checking out the submodule branches.
Because of this, this commit introduces a new configuration value,
`submodule.propagateBranches`. The plan is for Git commands to
prioritize submodule ref store information over superproject gitlinks if
this value is true. Because "git branch --recurse-submodules" writes to
submodule ref stores, for the sake of clarity, it will not function
unless this configuration value is set.
This commit also includes changes that support working with submodules
from a superproject commit because "branch --recurse-submodules" (and
future commands) need to read .gitmodules and gitlinks from the
superproject commit, but submodules are typically read from the
filesystem's .gitmodules and the index's gitlinks. These changes are:
* add a submodules_of_tree() helper that gives the relevant
information of an in-tree submodule (e.g. path and oid) and
initializes the repository
* add is_tree_submodule_active() by adding a treeish_name parameter to
is_submodule_active()
* add the "submoduleNotUpdated" advice to advise users to update the
submodules in their trees
Incidentally, fix an incorrect usage string that combined the 'list'
usage of git branch (-l) with the 'create' usage; this string has been
incorrect since its inception, a8dfd5eac4 (Make builtin-branch.c use
parse_options., 2007-10-07).
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Consolidate the logic for deciding when to create a new branch in
cmd_branch(), and save the result for reuse. Besides making the function
more explicit, this allows us to validate options that can only be used
when creating a branch. Such an option does not exist yet, but one will
be introduced in a subsequent commit.
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a dry_run parameter to create_branch() such that dry_run = 1 will
validate a new branch without trying to create it. This will be used in
`git branch --recurse-submodules` to ensure that the new branch can be
created in all submodules.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is preparation for a future commit that will simplify
create_branch() so that it always creates a branch. This will allow
create_branch() to accept a dry_run parameter (which is needed for "git
branch --recurse-submodules").
create_branch() used to always create a branch, but 4fc5006676 (Add
branch --set-upstream, 2010-01-18) changed it to also be able to set
tracking information without creating a branch.
Refactor the code that sets tracking information into its own functions
dwim_branch_start() and dwim_and_setup_tracking(). Also change an
invocation of create_branch() in cmd_branch() in builtin/branch.c to use
dwim_and_setup_tracking(), since that invocation is only for setting
tracking information (in "git branch --set-upstream-to").
As of this commit, create_branch() is no longer invoked in a way that
does not create branches.
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch -h" incorrectly said "--track[=direct|inherit]",
implying that "--trackinherit" is a valid option, which has been
corrected.
source: <3de40324bea6a1dd9bca2654721471e3809e87d8.1642538935.git.steadmon@google.com>
source: <c3c26192-aee9-185a-e559-b8735139e49c@web.de>
* js/branch-track-inherit:
branch,checkout: fix --track documentation
Document that the accepted variants of the --track option are --track,
--track=direct, and --track=inherit. The equal sign in the latter two
cannot be replaced with whitespace; in general optional arguments need
to be attached firmly to their option.
Put "direct" consistently before "inherit", if only for the reasons
that the former is the default, explained first in the documentation,
and comes before the latter alphabetically.
Mention both modes in the short help so that readers don't have to look
them up in the full documentation. They are literal strings and thus
untranslatable. PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP is inferred due to the pipe
and parenthesis characters, so we don't have to provide that flag
explicitly.
Mention that -t has the same effect as --track and --track=direct.
There is no way to specify inherit mode using the short option, because
short options generally don't accept optional arguments.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch -h" incorrectly said "--track[=direct|inherit]",
implying that "--trackinherit" is a valid option, which has been
corrected.
* js/branch-track-inherit:
branch,checkout: fix --track usage strings
As Ævar pointed out in [1], the use of PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP with a
list of allowed parameters is not recommended. Both git-branch and
git-checkout were changed in d311566 (branch: add flags and config to
inherit tracking, 2021-12-20) to use this discouraged combination for
their --track flags.
Fix this by removing PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP, and changing the arghelp
to simply be "mode". Users may discover allowed values in the manual
pages.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/220111.86a6g3yqf9.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar message templates have been consolidated so that
translators need to work on fewer number of messages.
* ja/i18n-similar-messages:
i18n: turn even more messages into "cannot be used together" ones
i18n: ref-filter: factorize "%(foo) atom used without %(bar) atom"
i18n: factorize "--foo outside a repository"
i18n: refactor "unrecognized %(foo) argument" strings
i18n: factorize "no directory given for --foo"
i18n: factorize "--foo requires --bar" and the like
i18n: tag.c factorize i18n strings
i18n: standardize "cannot open" and "cannot read"
i18n: turn "options are incompatible" into "cannot be used together"
i18n: refactor "%s, %s and %s are mutually exclusive"
i18n: refactor "foo and bar are mutually exclusive"
"git -c branch.autosetupmerge=inherit branch new old" makes "new"
to have the same upstream as the "old" branch, instead of marking
"old" itself as its upstream.
* js/branch-track-inherit:
config: require lowercase for branch.*.autosetupmerge
branch: add flags and config to inherit tracking
branch: accept multiple upstream branches for tracking
