Commit graph

22 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Derrick Stolee
5a6072f631 fsck: validate .rev file header
While parsing a .rev file, we check the header information to be sure it
makes sense. This happens before doing any additional validation such as
a checksum or value check. In order to differentiate between a bad
header and a non-existent file, we need to update the API for loading a
reverse index.

Make load_pack_revindex_from_disk() non-static and specify that a
positive value means "the file does not exist" while other errors during
parsing are negative values. Since an invalid header prevents setting up
the structures we would use for further validations, we can stop at that
point.

The place where we can distinguish between a missing file and a corrupt
file is inside load_revindex_from_disk(), which is used both by pack
rev-indexes and multi-pack-index rev-indexes. Some tests in t5326
demonstrate that it is critical to take some conditions to allow
positive error signals.

Add tests that check the three header values.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-17 14:39:05 -07:00
Derrick Stolee
0d30feef3c fsck: create scaffolding for rev-index checks
The 'fsck' builtin checks many of Git's on-disk data structures, but
does not currently validate the pack rev-index files (a .rev file to
pair with a .pack and .idx file).

Before doing a more-involved check process, create the scaffolding
within builtin/fsck.c to have a new error type and add that error type
when the API method verify_pack_revindex() returns an error. That method
does nothing currently, but we will add checks to it in later changes.

For now, check that 'git fsck' succeeds without any errors in the normal
case. Future checks will be paired with tests that corrupt the .rev file
appropriately.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-17 14:39:04 -07:00
Taylor Blau
9f7f10a282 t: invert GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEX
Back in e8c58f894b (t: support GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEX, 2021-01-25), we
added a test knob to conditionally enable writing a ".rev" file when
indexing a pack. At the time, this was used to ensure that the test
suite worked even when ".rev" files were written, which served as a
stress-test for the on-disk reverse index implementation.

Now that reading from on-disk ".rev" files is enabled by default, the
test knob `GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEX` no longer has any meaning.

We could get rid of the option entirely, but there would be no
convenient way to test Git when ".rev" files *aren't* in place.

Instead of getting rid of the option, invert its meaning to instead
disable writing ".rev" files, thereby running the test suite in a mode
where the reverse index is generated from scratch.

This ensures that, when GIT_TEST_NO_WRITE_REV_INDEX is set to some
spelling of "true", we are still running and exercising Git's behavior
when forced to generate reverse indexes from scratch. Do so by setting
it in the linux-TEST-vars CI run to ensure that we are maintaining good
coverage of this now-legacy code.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-13 07:55:46 -07:00
Taylor Blau
2a250d6165 pack-revindex: introduce GIT_TEST_REV_INDEX_DIE_ON_DISK
In ec8e7760ac (pack-revindex: ensure that on-disk reverse indexes are
given precedence, 2021-01-25), we introduced
GIT_TEST_REV_INDEX_DIE_IN_MEMORY to abort the process when Git generated
a reverse index from scratch.

ec8e7760ac was about ensuring that Git prefers a .rev file when
available over generating the same information in memory from scratch.

In a subsequent patch, we'll introduce `pack.readReverseIndex`, which
may be used to disable reading ".rev" files when available. In order to
ensure that those files are indeed being ignored, introduce an analogous
option to abort the process when Git reads a ".rev" file from disk.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-13 07:55:46 -07:00
Taylor Blau
65308ad8f7 pack-revindex: make load_pack_revindex take a repository
In a future commit, we will introduce a `pack.readReverseIndex`
configuration, which forces Git to generate the reverse index from
scratch instead of loading it from disk.

In order to avoid reading this configuration value more than once, we'll
use the `repo_settings` struct to lazily load this value.

In order to access the `struct repo_settings`, add a repository argument
to `load_pack_revindex`, and update all callers to pass the correct
instance (in all cases, `the_repository`).

In certain instances, a new function-local variable is introduced to
take the place of a `struct repository *` argument to the function
itself to avoid propagating the new parameter even further throughout
the tree.

Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-13 07:55:45 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
977c47b46d docs: move pack format docs to man section 5
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space by moving
the various documentation pertaining to the *.pack format and related
files, and updating things that refer to it to link to the new
location.

By moving these we can properly link from the newly created
gitformat-commit-graph to a gitformat-chunk-format page.

Integrating "Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt" and
"Documentation/technical/cruft-packs.txt" might logically be part of
this change, but as those cover parts of the wider "pack
format" (including associated files) that's documented outside of
"Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt" let's leave those for now,
subsequent commit(s) will address those.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-08-04 14:12:24 -07:00
Kyle Zhao
afb32e8101 pack-revindex.h: correct the time complexity descriptions
Time complexities for pack_pos_to_midx and midx_to_pack_pos are swapped,
correct it.

Signed-off-by: Kyle Zhao <kylezhao@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-15 22:16:25 -07:00
Taylor Blau
f894081dea pack-revindex: read multi-pack reverse indexes
Implement reading for multi-pack reverse indexes, as described in the
previous patch.

Note that these functions don't yet have any callers, and won't until
multi-pack reachability bitmaps are introduced in a later patch series.
In the meantime, this patch implements some of the infrastructure
necessary to support multi-pack bitmaps.

There are three new functions exposed by the revindex API:

  - load_midx_revindex(): loads the reverse index corresponding to the
    given multi-pack index.

  - midx_to_pack_pos() and pack_pos_to_midx(): these convert between the
    multi-pack index and pseudo-pack order.

load_midx_revindex() and pack_pos_to_midx() are both relatively
straightforward.

load_midx_revindex() needs a few functions to be exposed from the midx
API. One to get the checksum of a midx, and another to get the .rev's
filename. Similar to recent changes in the packed_git struct, three new
fields are added to the multi_pack_index struct: one to keep track of
the size, one to keep track of the mmap'd pointer, and another to point
past the header and at the reverse index's data.

pack_pos_to_midx() simply reads the corresponding entry out of the
table.

midx_to_pack_pos() is the trickiest, since it needs to find an object's
position in the psuedo-pack order, but that order can only be recovered
in the .rev file itself. This mapping can be implemented with a binary
search, but note that the thing we're binary searching over isn't an
array of values, but rather a permuted order of those values.

So, when comparing two items, it's helpful to keep in mind the
difference. Instead of a traditional binary search, where you are
comparing two things directly, here we're comparing a (pack, offset)
tuple with an index into the multi-pack index. That index describes
another (pack, offset) tuple, and it is _those_ two tuples that are
compared.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-01 13:07:37 -07:00
Taylor Blau
ec8e7760ac pack-revindex: ensure that on-disk reverse indexes are given precedence
When an on-disk reverse index exists, there is no need to generate one
in memory. In fact, doing so can be slow, and require large amounts of
the heap.

Let's make sure that we treat the on-disk reverse index with precedence
(i.e., that when it exists, we don't bother trying to generate an
equivalent one in memory) by teaching Git how to conditionally die()
when generating a reverse index in memory.

Then, add a test to ensure that when (a) an on-disk reverse index
exists, and (b) when setting GIT_TEST_REV_INDEX_DIE_IN_MEMORY, that we
do not die, implying that we read from the on-disk one.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25 18:32:44 -08:00
Taylor Blau
e8c58f894b t: support GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEX
Add a new option that unconditionally enables the pack.writeReverseIndex
setting in order to run the whole test suite in a mode that generates
on-disk reverse indexes. Additionally, enable this mode in the second
run of tests under linux-gcc in 'ci/run-build-and-tests.sh'.

Once on-disk reverse indexes are proven out over several releases, we
can change the default value of that configuration to 'true', and drop
this patch.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25 18:32:44 -08:00
Taylor Blau
2f4ba2a867 packfile: prepare for the existence of '*.rev' files
Specify the format of the on-disk reverse index 'pack-*.rev' file, as
well as prepare the code for the existence of such files.

The reverse index maps from pack relative positions (i.e., an index into
the array of object which is sorted by their offsets within the
packfile) to their position within the 'pack-*.idx' file. Today, this is
done by building up a list of (off_t, uint32_t) tuples for each object
(the off_t corresponding to that object's offset, and the uint32_t
corresponding to its position in the index). To convert between pack and
index position quickly, this array of tuples is radix sorted based on
its offset.

This has two major drawbacks:

First, the in-memory cost scales linearly with the number of objects in
a pack.  Each 'struct revindex_entry' is sizeof(off_t) +
sizeof(uint32_t) + padding bytes for a total of 16.

To observe this, force Git to load the reverse index by, for e.g.,
running 'git cat-file --batch-check="%(objectsize:disk)"'. When asking
for a single object in a fresh clone of the kernel, Git needs to
allocate 120+ MB of memory in order to hold the reverse index in memory.

Second, the cost to sort also scales with the size of the pack.
Luckily, this is a linear function since 'load_pack_revindex()' uses a
radix sort, but this cost still must be paid once per pack per process.

As an example, it takes ~60x longer to print the _size_ of an object as
it does to print that entire object's _contents_:

  Benchmark #1: git.compile cat-file --batch <obj
    Time (mean ± σ):       3.4 ms ±   0.1 ms    [User: 3.3 ms, System: 2.1 ms]
    Range (min … max):     3.2 ms …   3.7 ms    726 runs

  Benchmark #2: git.compile cat-file --batch-check="%(objectsize:disk)" <obj
    Time (mean ± σ):     210.3 ms ±   8.9 ms    [User: 188.2 ms, System: 23.2 ms]
    Range (min … max):   193.7 ms … 224.4 ms    13 runs

Instead, avoid computing and sorting the revindex once per process by
writing it to a file when the pack itself is generated.

The format is relatively straightforward. It contains an array of
uint32_t's, the length of which is equal to the number of objects in the
pack.  The ith entry in this table contains the index position of the
ith object in the pack, where "ith object in the pack" is determined by
pack offset.

One thing that the on-disk format does _not_ contain is the full (up to)
eight-byte offset corresponding to each object. This is something that
the in-memory revindex contains (it stores an off_t in 'struct
revindex_entry' along with the same uint32_t that the on-disk format
has). Omit it in the on-disk format, since knowing the index position
for some object is sufficient to get a constant-time lookup in the
pack-*.idx file to ask for an object's offset within the pack.

This trades off between the on-disk size of the 'pack-*.rev' file for
runtime to chase down the offset for some object. Even though the lookup
is constant time, the constant is heavier, since it can potentially
involve two pointer walks in v2 indexes (one to access the 4-byte offset
table, and potentially a second to access the double wide offset table).

Consider trying to map an object's pack offset to a relative position
within that pack. In a cold-cache scenario, more page faults occur while
switching between binary searching through the reverse index and
searching through the *.idx file for an object's offset. Sure enough,
with a cold cache (writing '3' into '/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' after
'sync'ing), printing out the entire object's contents is still
marginally faster than printing its size:

  Benchmark #1: git.compile cat-file --batch-check="%(objectsize:disk)" <obj >/dev/null
    Time (mean ± σ):      22.6 ms ±   0.5 ms    [User: 2.4 ms, System: 7.9 ms]
    Range (min … max):    21.4 ms …  23.5 ms    41 runs

  Benchmark #2: git.compile cat-file --batch <obj >/dev/null
    Time (mean ± σ):      17.2 ms ±   0.7 ms    [User: 2.8 ms, System: 5.5 ms]
    Range (min … max):    15.6 ms …  18.2 ms    45 runs

(Numbers taken in the kernel after cheating and using the next patch to
generate a reverse index). There are a couple of approaches to improve
cold cache performance not pursued here:

  - We could include the object offsets in the reverse index format.
    Predictably, this does result in fewer page faults, but it triples
    the size of the file, while simultaneously duplicating a ton of data
    already available in the .idx file. (This was the original way I
    implemented the format, and it did show
    `--batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)'` winning out against `--batch`.)

    On the other hand, this increase in size also results in a large
    block-cache footprint, which could potentially hurt other workloads.

  - We could store the mapping from pack to index position in more
    cache-friendly way, like constructing a binary search tree from the
    table and writing the values in breadth-first order. This would
    result in much better locality, but the price you pay is trading
    O(1) lookup in 'pack_pos_to_index()' for an O(log n) one (since you
    can no longer directly index the table).

So, neither of these approaches are taken here. (Thankfully, the format
is versioned, so we are free to pursue these in the future.) But, cold
cache performance likely isn't interesting outside of one-off cases like
asking for the size of an object directly. In real-world usage, Git is
often performing many operations in the revindex (i.e., asking about
many objects rather than a single one).

The trade-off is worth it, since we will avoid the vast majority of the
cost of generating the revindex that the extra pointer chase will look
like noise in the following patch's benchmarks.

This patch describes the format and prepares callers (like in
pack-revindex.c) to be able to read *.rev files once they exist. An
implementation of the writer will appear in the next patch, and callers
will gradually begin to start using the writer in the patches that
follow after that.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25 18:32:43 -08:00
Taylor Blau
d5bc7c60c7 pack-revindex: hide the definition of 'revindex_entry'
Now that all spots outside of pack-revindex.c that reference 'struct
revindex_entry' directly have been removed, it is safe to hide the
implementation by moving it from pack-revindex.h to pack-revindex.c.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:48 -08:00
Taylor Blau
8389855a9b pack-revindex: remove unused 'find_revindex_position()'
Now that all 'find_revindex_position()' callers have been removed (and
converted to the more descriptive 'offset_to_pack_pos()'), it is almost
safe to get rid of 'find_revindex_position()' entirely. Almost, except
for the fact that 'offset_to_pack_pos()' calls
'find_revindex_position()'.

Inline 'find_revindex_position()' into 'offset_to_pack_pos()', and
then remove 'find_revindex_position()' entirely.

This is a straightforward refactoring with one minor snag.
'offset_to_pack_pos()' used to load the index before calling
'find_revindex_position()'. That means that by the time
'find_revindex_position()' starts executing, 'p->num_objects' can be
safely read. After inlining, be careful to not read 'p->num_objects'
until _after_ 'load_pack_revindex()' (which loads the index as a
side-effect) has been called.

Another small fix that is included is converting the upper- and
lower-bounds to be unsigned's instead of ints. This dates back to
92e5c77c37 (revindex: export new APIs, 2013-10-24)--ironically, the last
time we introduced new APIs here--but this unifies the types.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:48 -08:00
Taylor Blau
1c3855f33b pack-revindex: remove unused 'find_pack_revindex()'
Now that no callers of 'find_pack_revindex()' remain, remove the
function's declaration and implementation entirely.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:47 -08:00
Taylor Blau
f33fb6e419 pack-revindex: introduce a new API
In the next several patches, we will prepare for loading a reverse index
either in memory (mapping the inverse of the .idx's contents in-core),
or directly from a yet-to-be-introduced on-disk format. To prepare for
that, we'll introduce an API that avoids the caller explicitly indexing
the revindex pointer in the packed_git structure.

There are four ways to interact with the reverse index. Accordingly,
four functions will be exported from 'pack-revindex.h' by the time that
the existing API is removed. A caller may:

 1. Load the pack's reverse index. This involves opening up the index,
    generating an array, and then sorting it. Since opening the index
    can fail, this function ('load_pack_revindex()') returns an int.
    Accordingly, it takes only a single argument: the 'struct
    packed_git' the caller wants to build a reverse index for.

    This function is well-suited for both the current and new API.
    Callers will have to continue to open the reverse index explicitly,
    but this function will eventually learn how to detect and load a
    reverse index from the on-disk format, if one exists. Otherwise, it
    will fallback to generating one in memory from scratch.

 2. Convert a pack position into an offset. This operation is now
    called `pack_pos_to_offset()`. It takes a pack and a position, and
    returns the corresponding off_t.

    Any error simply calls BUG(), since the callers are not well-suited
    to handle a failure and keep going.

 3. Convert a pack position into an index position. Same as above; this
    takes a pack and a position, and returns a uint32_t. This operation
    is known as `pack_pos_to_index()`. The same thinking about error
    conditions applies here as well.

 4. Find the pack position for a given offset. This operation is now
    known as `offset_to_pack_pos()`. It takes a pack, an offset, and a
    pointer to a uint32_t where the position is written, if an object
    exists at that offset. Otherwise, -1 is returned to indicate
    failure.

    Unlike some of the callers that used to access '->offset' and '->nr'
    directly, the error checking around this call is somewhat more
    robust. This is important since callers should always pass an offset
    which points at the boundary of two objects. The API, unlike direct
    access, enforces that that is the case.

    This will become important in a subsequent patch where a caller
    which does not but could check the return value treats the signed
    `-1` from `find_revindex_position()` as an index into the 'revindex'
    array.

Two design warts are carried over into the new API:

  - Asking for the index position of an out-of-bounds object will result
    in a BUG() (since no such object exists), but asking for the offset
    of the non-existent object at the end of the pack returns the total
    size of the pack.

    This makes it convenient for callers who always want to take the
    difference of two adjacent object's offsets (to compute the on-disk
    size) but don't want to worry about boundaries at the end of the
    pack.

  - offset_to_pack_pos() lazily loads the reverse index, but
    pack_pos_to_index() doesn't (callers of the former are well-suited
    to handle errors, but callers of the latter are not).

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:44 -08:00
Jeff King
4828ce9871 pack-revindex: open index if necessary
We can't create a pack revindex if we haven't actually looked at the
index. Normally we would never get as far as creating a revindex without
having already been looking in the pack, so this code never bothered to
double-check that pack->index_data had been loaded.

But with the new multi-pack-index feature, many code paths might not
load the individual pack .idx at all (they'd find objects via the midx
and then open the .pack, but not its index).

This can't yet be triggered in practice, because a bug in the midx code
means we accidentally open up the individual .idx files anyway. But in
preparation for fixing that, let's have the revindex code check that
everything it needs has been loaded.

In most cases this will just be a quick noop. But note that this does
introduce a possibility of error (if we have to open the index and it's
corrupt), so load_pack_revindex() now returns a result code, and callers
need to handle the error.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-16 16:58:21 +09:00
Jeff King
9d98bbf578 pack-revindex: store entries directly in packed_git
A pack_revindex struct has two elements: the revindex
entries themselves, and a pointer to the packed_git. We need
both to do lookups, because only the latter knows things
like the number of objects in the pack.

Now that packed_git contains the pack_revindex struct it's
just as easy to pass around the packed_git itself, and we do
not need the extra back-pointer.

We can instead just store the entries directly in the pack.
All functions which took a pack_revindex now just take a
packed_git. We still lazy-load in find_pack_revindex, so
most callers are unaffected.

The exception is the bitmap code, which computes the
revindex and caches the pointer when we load the bitmaps. We
can continue to load, drop the extra cache pointer, and just
access bitmap_git.pack.revindex directly.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-21 14:36:28 -08:00
Jeff King
1a6d8b9148 do not discard revindex when re-preparing packfiles
When an object lookup fails, we re-read the objects/pack
directory to pick up any new packfiles that may have been
created since our last read. We also discard any pack
revindex structs we've allocated.

The discarding is a problem for the pack-bitmap code, which keeps
a pointer to the revindex for the bitmapped pack. After the
discard, the pointer is invalid, and we may read free()d
memory.

Other revindex users do not keep a bare pointer to the
revindex; instead, they always access it through
revindex_for_pack(), which lazily builds the revindex. So
one solution is to teach the pack-bitmap code a similar
trick. It would be slightly less efficient, but probably not
all that noticeable.

However, it turns out this discarding is not actually
necessary. When we call reprepare_packed_git, we do not
throw away our old pack list. We keep the existing entries,
and only add in new ones. So there is no safety problem; we
will still have the pack struct that matches each revindex.
The packfile itself may go away, of course, but we are
already prepared to handle that, and it may happen outside
of reprepare_packed_git anyway.

Throwing away the revindex may save some RAM if the pack
never gets reused (about 12 bytes per object). But it also
wastes some CPU time (to regenerate the index) if the pack
does get reused. It's hard to say which is more valuable,
but in either case, it happens very rarely (only when we
race with a simultaneous repack). Just leaving the revindex
in place is simple and safe both for current and future
code.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-16 14:33:46 -08:00
Vicent Marti
92e5c77c37 revindex: export new APIs
Allow users to efficiently lookup consecutive entries that are expected
to be found on the same revindex by exporting `find_revindex_position`:
this function takes a pointer to revindex itself, instead of looking up
the proper revindex for a given packfile on each call.

Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <tanoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-24 15:44:45 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre
4b480c6716 discard revindex data when pack list changes
This is needed to fix verify-pack -v with multiple pack arguments.

Also, in theory, revindex data (if any) must be discarded whenever
reprepare_packed_git() is called. In practice this is hard to trigger
though.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-22 22:00:22 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre
1f5c74f6cf call init_pack_revindex() lazily
This makes life much easier for next patch, as well as being more efficient
when the revindex is actually not used.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-23 21:25:20 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre
3449f8c4cb factorize revindex code out of builtin-pack-objects.c
No functional change. This is needed to fix verify-pack in a later patch.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-01 01:44:45 -08:00