Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
6f54213718 Merge branch 'ab/avoid-losing-exit-codes-in-tests'
Test clean-up.

* ab/avoid-losing-exit-codes-in-tests:
  tests: don't lose misc "git" exit codes
  tests: don't lose exit status with "test <op> $(git ...)"
  tests: don't lose "git" exit codes in "! ( git ... | grep )"
  tests: don't lose exit status with "(cd ...; test <op> $(git ...))"
  t/lib-patch-mode.sh: fix ignored exit codes
  auto-crlf tests: don't lose exit code in loops and outside tests
2023-03-19 15:03:10 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
9ff2f06069 sequencer API users: fix get_replay_opts() leaks
Make the replay_opts_release() function added in the preceding commit
non-static, and use it for freeing the "struct replay_opts"
constructed for "rebase" and "revert".

To safely call our new replay_opts_release() we'll need to stop
calling it in sequencer_remove_state(), and instead call it where we
allocate the "struct replay_opts" itself.

This is because in e.g. do_interactive_rebase() we construct a "struct
replay_opts" with "get_replay_opts()", and then call
"complete_action()". If we get far enough in that function without
encountering errors we'll call "pick_commits()" which (indirectly)
calls sequencer_remove_state() at the end.

But if we encounter errors anywhere along the way we'd punt out early,
and not free() the memory we allocated. Remembering whether we
previously called sequencer_remove_state() would be a hassle.

Using a FREE_AND_NULL() pattern would also work, as it would be safe
to call replay_opts_release() repeatedly. But let's fix this properly
instead, by having the owner of the data free() it.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-06 16:03:52 -08:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
4bd0785dc2 tests: don't lose exit status with "test <op> $(git ...)"
As with the preceding commit, rewrite tests that ran "git" inside
command substitution and lost the exit status of "git" so that we
notice the failing "git". This time around we're converting cases that
didn't involve a containing sub-shell around the command substitution.

In the case of "t0060-path-utils.sh" and
"t2005-checkout-index-symlinks.sh" convert the relevant code to using
the modern style of indentation and newline wrapping while having to
change it.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-06 15:30:42 -08:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
0cd1a8818d tests: don't lose exit status with "(cd ...; test <op> $(git ...))"
Rewrite tests that ran "git" inside command substitution and lost the
exit status of "git" so that we notice the failing "git".

Have them use modern patterns such as a "test_cmp" of the expected
outputs instead.

We'll fix more of these these in the subsequent commit, for now we're
only converting the cases where this loss of exit code was combined
with spawning a sub-shell.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-06 15:30:41 -08:00
Calvin Wan
4057523a40 submodule merge: update conflict error message
When attempting to merge in a superproject with conflicting submodule
pointers that cannot be fast-forwarded or trivially resolved, the merge
fails and Git prints an error message that accurately describes the
failure, but does not provide steps for the user to resolve the error.

Git is left in a conflicted state, which requires the user to:
 1. merge submodules or update submodules to an already existing
	commit that reflects the merge
 2. add submodules changes to the superproject
 3. finish merging superproject
These steps are non-obvious for newer submodule users to figure out
based on the error message and neither `git submodule status` nor `git
status` provide any useful pointers.

Update error message to provide steps to resolve submodule merge
conflict. Future work could involve adding an advice flag to the
message. Although the message is long, it also has the id of the
submodule commit that needs to be merged, which could be useful
information for the user.

Additionally, 5 merge failures that resulted in an early return have
been updated to reflect the status of the merge.
1. Null merge base (null o): CONFLICT_SUBMODULE_NULL_MERGE_BASE added
   as a new conflict type and will print updated error message.
2. Null merge side a (null a): BUG(). See [1] for discussion
3. Null merge side b (null b): BUG(). See [1] for discussion
4. Submodule not checked out: added NEEDSWORK bit
5. Submodule commits not present: added NEEDSWORK bit
The errors with a NEEDSWORK bit deserve a more detailed explanation of
how to resolve them. See [2] for more context.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BE0qGwUy80dmVszkJQ+tcpfLRW0OZyErymzhZ9+HWY1mw@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqpmhjjwo9.fsf@gitster.g/

Signed-off-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-08-04 13:43:07 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
4ae6d4699f git-am: record full index line in the patch used while rebasing
Earlier, a230949 (am --rebasing: get patch body from commit, not
from mailbox, 2012-06-26) learned to regenerate patch body from the
commit object while rebasing, instead of reading from the rebase-am
front-end.  While doing so, it used "git diff-tree" but without
giving it the "--full-index" option.

This does not matter for in-repository objects; during rebasing, any
abbreviated object name should uniquely identify them.

But we may be rebasing a commit that contains a change to a gitlink,
in which case we usually should not have the object (it names a
commit in the submodule).  A full object name is necessary to later
reconstruct a fake ancestor index for them.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-31 20:30:55 -08:00
Stephan Beyer
d492b31caf t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".

This is useful to

 - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
   e.g. SIGSEGV, and

 - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13 13:21:26 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
6848d58c60 Ignore dirty submodule states during rebase and stash
When rebasing or stashing, chances are that you do not care about
dirty submodules, since they are not updated by those actions anyway.
So ignore the submodules' states.

Note: the submodule states -- as committed in the superproject --
will still be stashed and rebased, it is _just_ the state of the
submodule in the working tree which is ignored.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-15 16:12:43 -07:00