On a case-insensitive filesystem, we should realize that
"a/objects" and "A/objects" are the same path. We already
use fspathcmp() to check against the main object directory,
but until recently we couldn't use it for comparing against
other alternates (because their paths were not
NUL-terminated strings). But now we can, so let's do so.
Note that we also need to adjust count-objects to load the
config, so that it can see the setting of core.ignorecase
(this is required by the test, but is also a general bugfix
for users of count-objects).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We recursively expand alternates repositories, so that if A
borrows from B which borrows from C, A can see all objects.
For the root object database, we allow relative paths, so A
can point to B as "../B/objects". However, we currently do
not allow relative paths when recursing, so B must use an
absolute path to reach C.
That is an ancient protection from c2f493a (Transitively
read alternatives, 2006-05-07) that tries to avoid adding
the same alternate through two different paths. Since
5bdf0a8 (sha1_file: normalize alt_odb path before comparing
and storing, 2011-09-07), we use a normalized absolute path
for each alt_odb entry.
This means that in most cases the protection is no longer
necessary; we will detect the duplicate no matter how we got
there (but see below). And it's a good idea to get rid of
it, as it creates an unnecessary complication when setting
up recursive alternates (B has to know that A is going to
borrow from it and make sure to use an absolute path).
Note that our normalization doesn't actually look at the
filesystem, so it can still be fooled by crossing symbolic
links. But that's also true of absolute paths, so it's not a
good reason to disallow only relative paths (it's
potentially a reason to switch to real_path(), but that's a
separate and non-trivial change).
We adjust the test script here to demonstrate that this now
works, and add new tests to show that the normalization does
indeed suppress duplicates.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's no way to get the list of alternates that git
computes internally; our tests only infer it based on which
objects are available. In addition to testing, knowing this
list may be helpful for somebody debugging their alternates
setup.
Let's add it to the "count-objects -v" output. We could give
it a separate flag, but there's not really any need.
"count-objects -v" is already a debugging catch-all for the
object database, its output is easily extensible to new data
items, and printing the alternates is not expensive (we
already had to find them to count the objects).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These tests are just trying to show that we allow recursion
up to a certain depth, but not past it. But the counting is
a bit non-intuitive, and rather than test at the edge of the
breakage, we test "OK" cases in the middle of the chain.
Let's explain what's going on, and explicitly test the
switch between "OK" and "too deep".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our usual style when working with subdirectories is to chdir
inside a subshell or to use "git -C", which means we do not
have to constantly return to the main test directory. Let's
convert this old test, which does not follow that style.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our normal test style these days puts the opening quote of
the body on the description line, and indents the body with
a single tab. This ancient test did not follow this.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Besides being our normal style, this correctly checks for an
error exit() versus signal death.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function makes sure that "git fsck" does not report any
errors. But "--full" has been the default since f29cd39
(fsck: default to "git fsck --full", 2009-10-20), and we can
use the exit code (instead of counting the lines) since
e2b4f63 (fsck: exit with non-zero status upon errors,
2007-03-05).
So we can just use "git fsck", which is shorter and more
flexible (e.g., we can use "git -C").
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function was never used since its inception in dd05ea1
(test case for transitive info/alternates, 2006-05-07).
Which is just as well, since it mutates the repo state in a
way that would invalidate further tests, without cleaning up
after itself. Let's get rid of it so that nobody is tempted
to use it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When trying to find a good spot for testing clone with submodules, I
got confused where to add a new test file. There are both tests in t560*
as well as t57* both testing the clone command. t/README claims the
second digit is to indicate the command, which is inconsistent to the
current naming structure.
Rename all t57* tests to be in t56* to follow the pattern of the digits
as laid out in t/README.
It would have been less work to rename t56* => t57* because there are less
files, but the tests in t56* look more basic and I assumed the higher the
last digits the more complicated niche details are tested, so with the patch
now it looks more in order to me.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
