Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason e75d2f7f73 revisions API: have release_revisions() release "filter"
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"filter" in the "struct rev_info". This in combination with a
preceding change to free "cmdline" means that we can mark another set
of tests as passing under "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".

The "filter" member was added recently in ffaa137f64 (revision: put
object filter into struct rev_info, 2022-03-09), and this fixes leaks
intruded in the subsequent leak 7940941de1 (pack-objects: use
rev.filter when possible, 2022-03-09) and 105c6f14ad (bundle: parse
filter capability, 2022-03-09).

The "builtin/pack-objects.c" leak in 7940941de1 was effectively with
us already, but the variable was referred to by a "static" file-scoped
variable. The "bundle.c " leak in 105c6f14ad was newly introduced
with the new "filter" feature for bundles.

The "t5600-clone-fail-cleanup.sh" change here to add
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" is one of the cases where
run-command.c in not carrying the abort() exit code upwards would have
had that test passing before, but now it *actually* passes[1]. We
should fix the lack of 1=1 mapping of SANITIZE=leak testing to actual
leaks some other time, but it's an existing edge case, let's just mark
the really-passing test as passing for now.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220303.86fsnz5o9w.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-04-13 23:56:09 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin 8f37854b18 t4*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
Carefully excluding t4013 and t4015, which see independent development
elsewhere at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch
name in t4*. This trick was performed via

	$ (cd t &&
	   sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
		-e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t4*.sh t4211/*.export &&
	   git checkout HEAD -- t4013\*)

This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:18 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin 334afbc76f tests: mark tests relying on the current default for init.defaultBranch
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.

To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in

- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,

- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
  initialize the default branch,

- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,

- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
  uses `master`)

This trick was performed by this command:

	$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
	GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
	export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
	' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
	t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh

After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:

	$ git checkout HEAD -- \
		t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
		t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
		t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
		t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
		t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
		t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
		t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
		t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
		t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
		t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
		t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
		t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
		t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
		t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
		t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
		t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
		t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
		t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
		t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh

We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:

	$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
	GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
	export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
	' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 15:44:17 -08:00
Jeff King 097b681baa t: use test_decode_color rather than literal ANSI codes
When we put literal ANSI terminal codes into our test
scripts, it makes diffs on those scripts hard to read (the
colors may be indistinguishable from diff coloring, or in
the case of a reset, may not be visible at all).

Some scripts get around this by including human-readable
names and converting to literal codes with a git-config
hack. This makes the actual code diffs look OK, but test_cmp
output suffers from the same problem.

Let's use test_decode_color instead, which turns the codes
into obvious text tags.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-07-13 12:42:50 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy a903e233f6 log: decorate HEAD -> branch with the same color for arrow and HEAD
Commit 76c61fb (log: decorate HEAD with branch name under
--decorate=full, too - 2015-05-13) adds "HEAD -> branch" decoration to
show current branch vs detached HEAD. The sign of whether HEAD is
detached or not is "->" (vs ",") because the branch is always colored
by type. Color the arrow the same as HEAD to visually emphasize that
the following branch is HEAD, without paying too much attention to the
actual separators "->" or ","

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-12 15:08:26 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 51ff0f27bc log: decorate HEAD with branch name
Currently, log decorations do not indicate which branch is checked out
and whether HEAD is detached.

When branch foo is checked out, change the "HEAD, foo" part of the
decorations to "HEAD -> foo". This serves to indicate both ref
decorations (helped by the spacing) as well as their relationshsip.
As a consequence, "HEAD" without any " -> " denotes a detached HEAD now.

Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-10 15:17:48 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 5ee875852e log --decorate: do not leak "commit" color into the next item
In "git log --decorate", you would see the commit header like this:

    commit ... (HEAD, jc/decorate-leaky-separator-color)

where "commit ... (" is painted in color.diff.commit, "HEAD" in
color.decorate.head, ", " in color.diff.commit, the branch name in
color.decorate.branch and then closing ")" in color.diff.commit.

If you wanted to paint the HEAD and local branch name in the same
color as the body text (perhaps because cyan and green are too faint
on a black-on-white terminal to be readable), you would not want to
have to say

    [color "decorate"]
        head = black
        branch = black

because that you would not be able to reuse same configuration on a
white-on-black terminal.  You would naively expect

    [color "decorate"]
        head = normal
	branch = normal

to work, but unfortunately it does not.  It paints the string "HEAD"
and the branch name in the same color as the opening parenthesis or
comma between the decoration elements.  This is because the code
forgets to reset the color after printing the "prefix" in its own
color.

It theoretically is possible that some people were expecting and
relying on that the attribute set as the "diff.commit" color, which
is used to draw these opening parenthesis and inter-item comma, is
inherited by the drawing of branch names, but it is not how the
coloring works everywhere else.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-04 11:42:35 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 9d3f002f21 pretty: share code between format_decoration and show_decorations
This also adds color support to format_decorations()

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-18 16:28:27 -07:00
Nazri Ramliy 567102819a Add test for correct coloring of git log --decoration
Signed-off-by: Nazri Ramliy <ayiehere@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-30 11:14:44 -07:00