"git worktree list" annotates each worktree according to its state such
as "prunable" or "locked", however it is not immediately obvious why
these worktrees are being annotated. For prunable worktrees a reason
is available that is returned by should_prune_worktree() and for locked
worktrees a reason might be available provided by the user via `lock`
command.
Let's teach "git worktree list" a --verbose mode that outputs the reason
why the worktrees are being annotated. The reason is a text that can take
virtually any size and appending the text on the default columned format
will make it difficult to extend the command with other annotations and
not fit nicely on the screen. In order to address this shortcoming the
annotation is then moved to the next line indented followed by the reason
If the reason is not available the annotation stays on the same line as
the worktree itself.
The output of "git worktree list" with verbose becomes like so:
$ git worktree list --verbose
...
/path/to/locked-no-reason acb124 [branch-a] locked
/path/to/locked-with-reason acc125 [branch-b]
locked: worktree with a locked reason
/path/to/prunable-reason ace127 [branch-d]
prunable: gitdir file points to non-existent location
...
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git worktree list" command shows the absolute path to the worktree,
the commit that is checked out, the name of the branch, and a "locked"
annotation if the worktree is locked, however, it does not indicate
whether the worktree is prunable.
The "prune" command will remove a worktree if it is prunable unless
`--dry-run` option is specified. This could lead to a worktree being
removed without the user realizing before it is too late, in case the
user forgets to pass --dry-run for instance. If the "list" command shows
which worktree is prunable, the user could verify before running
"git worktree prune" and hopefully prevents the working tree to be
removed "accidentally" on the worse case scenario.
Let's teach "git worktree list" to show when a worktree is a prunable
candidate for both default and porcelain format.
In the default format a "prunable" text is appended:
$ git worktree list
/path/to/main aba123 [main]
/path/to/linked 123abc [branch-a]
/path/to/prunable ace127 (detached HEAD) prunable
In the --porcelain format a prunable label is added followed by
its reason:
$ git worktree list --porcelain
...
worktree /path/to/prunable
HEAD abc1234abc1234abc1234abc1234abc1234abc12
detached
prunable gitdir file points to non-existent location
...
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit c57b3367be (worktree: teach `list` to annotate locked worktree,
2020-10-11) taught "git worktree list" to annotate locked worktrees by
appending "locked" text to its output, however, this is not listed in
the --porcelain format.
Teach "list --porcelain" to do the same and add a "locked" attribute
followed by its reason, thus making both default and porcelain format
consistent. If the locked reason is not available then only "locked"
is shown.
The output of the "git worktree list --porcelain" becomes like so:
$ git worktree list --porcelain
...
worktree /path/to/locked
HEAD 123abcdea123abcd123acbd123acbda123abcd12
detached
locked
worktree /path/to/locked-with-reason
HEAD abc123abc123abc123abc123abc123abc123abc1
detached
locked reason why it is locked
...
In porcelain mode, if the lock reason contains special characters
such as newlines, they are escaped with backslashes and the entire
reason is enclosed in double quotes. For example:
$ git worktree list --porcelain
...
locked "worktree's path mounted in\nremovable device"
...
Furthermore, let's update the documentation to state that some
attributes in the porcelain format might be listed alone or together
with its value depending whether the value is available or not. Thus
documenting the case of the new "locked" attribute.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
worktree_lock_reason() aborts with an assertion failure when called on
the main worktree since locking the main worktree is nonsensical. Not
only is this behavior undocumented, thus callers might not even be aware
that the call could potentially crash the program, but it also forces
clients to be extra careful:
if (!is_main_worktree(wt) && worktree_locked_reason(...))
...
Since we know that locking makes no sense in the context of the main
worktree, we can simply return false for the main worktree, thus making
client code less complex by eliminating the need for the callers to have
inside knowledge about the implementation:
if (worktree_lock_reason(...))
...
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of teaching "git worktree list" to annotate worktree that is a
candidate for pruning, let's move should_prune_worktree() from
builtin/worktree.c to worktree.c in order to make part of the worktree
public API.
should_prune_worktree() knows how to select the given worktree for
pruning based on an expiration date, however the expiration value is
stored in a static file-scope variable and it is not local to the
function. In order to move the function, teach should_prune_worktree()
to take the expiration date as an argument and document the new
parameter that is not immediately obvious.
Also, change the function comment to clearly state that the worktree's
path is returned in `wtpath` argument.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git worktree repair` knows how to repair the two-way links between the
repository and a worktree as long as a link in one or the other
direction is sound. For instance, if a linked worktree is moved (without
using `git worktree move`), repair is possible because the worktree
still knows the location of the repository even though the repository no
longer knows where the worktree is. Similarly, if the repository is
moved, repair is possible since the repository still knows the locations
of the worktrees even though the worktrees no longer know where the
repository is.
However, if both the repository and the worktrees are moved, then links
are severed in both directions, and no repair is possible. This is the
case even when the new worktree locations are specified as arguments to
`git worktree repair`. The reason for this limitation is twofold. First,
when `repair` consults the worktree's gitfile (/path/to/worktree/.git)
to determine the corresponding <repo>/worktrees/<id>/gitdir file to fix,
<repo> is the old path to the repository, thus it is unable to fix the
`gitdir` file at its new location since it doesn't know where it is.
Second, when `repair` consults <repo>/worktrees/<id>/gitdir to find the
location of the worktree's gitfile (/path/to/worktree/.git), the path
recorded in `gitdir` is the old location of the worktree's gitfile, thus
it is unable to repair the gitfile since it doesn't know where it is.
Fix these shortcomings by teaching `repair` to attempt to infer the new
location of the <repo>/worktrees/<id>/gitdir file when the location
recorded in the worktree's gitfile has become stale but the file is
otherwise well-formed. The inference is intentionally simple-minded.
For each worktree path specified as an argument, `git worktree repair`
manually reads the ".git" gitfile at that location and, if it is
well-formed, extracts the <id>. It then searches for a corresponding
<id> in <repo>/worktrees/ and, if found, concludes that there is a
reasonable match and updates <repo>/worktrees/<id>/gitdir to point at
the specified worktree path. In order for <repo> to be known, `git
worktree repair` must be run in the main worktree or bare repository.
`git worktree repair` first attempts to repair each incoming
/path/to/worktree/.git gitfile to point at the repository, and then
attempts to repair outgoing <repo>/worktrees/<id>/gitdir files to point
at the worktrees. This sequence was chosen arbitrarily when originally
implemented since the order of fixes is immaterial as long as one side
of the two-way link between the repository and a worktree is sound.
However, for this new repair technique to work, the order must be
reversed. This is because the new inference mechanism, when it is
successful, allows the outgoing <repo>/worktrees/<id>/gitdir file to be
repaired, thus fixing one side of the two-way link. Once that side is
fixed, the other side can be fixed by the existing repair mechanism,
hence the order of repairs is now significant.
Two safeguards are employed to avoid hijacking a worktree from a
different repository if the user accidentally specifies a foreign
worktree as an argument. The first, as described above, is that it
requires an <id> match between the repository and the worktree. That
itself is not foolproof for preventing hijack, so the second safeguard
is that the inference will only kick in if the worktree's
/path/to/worktree/.git gitfile does not point at a repository.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix formulation of an error message with two placeholders in "git
worktree add" subcommand.
* mt/worktree-error-message-fix:
worktree: fix order of arguments in error message
`git worktree add` (without --force) errors out when given a path
that is already registered as a worktree and the path is missing on
disk. But the `cmd` and `path` strings are switched on the error
message. Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git worktree list" shows the absolute path to the working tree,
the commit that is checked out and the name of the branch. It is not
immediately obvious which of the worktrees, if any, are locked.
"git worktree remove" refuses to remove a locked worktree with
an error message. If "git worktree list" told which worktrees
are locked in its output, the user would not even attempt to
remove such a worktree, or would realize that
"git worktree remove -f -f <path>" is required.
Teach "git worktree list" to append "locked" to its output.
The output from the command becomes like so:
$ git worktree list
/path/to/main abc123 [master]
/path/to/worktree 456def (detached HEAD)
/path/to/locked-worktree 123abc (detached HEAD) locked
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add" learns that the "-d" is a synonym to "--detach"
option to create a new worktree without being on a branch.
* es/wt-add-detach:
git-worktree.txt: discuss branch-based vs. throwaway worktrees
worktree: teach `add` to recognize -d as shorthand for --detach
git-checkout.txt: document -d short option for --detach
"git worktree" gained a "repair" subcommand to help users recover
after moving the worktrees or repository manually without telling
Git. Also, "git init --separate-git-dir" no longer corrupts
administrative data related to linked worktrees.
* es/worktree-repair:
init: make --separate-git-dir work from within linked worktree
init: teach --separate-git-dir to repair linked worktrees
worktree: teach "repair" to fix outgoing links to worktrees
worktree: teach "repair" to fix worktree back-links to main worktree
worktree: add skeleton "repair" command
Like `git switch` and `git checkout`, `git worktree add` can check out a
branch or set up a detached HEAD. However, unlike those other commands,
`git worktree add` does not understand -d as shorthand for --detach,
which may confound users accustomed to using -d for this purpose.
Address this shortcoming by teaching `add` to recognize -d for --detach,
thus bringing it in line with the other commands.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The .git/worktrees/<id>/gitdir file points at the location of a linked
worktree's .git file. Its content must be of the form
/path/to/worktree/.git (from which the location of the worktree itself
can be derived by stripping the "/.git" suffix). If the gitdir file is
deleted or becomes corrupted or outdated, then Git will be unable to
find the linked worktree. An easy way for the gitdir file to become
outdated is for the user to move the worktree manually (without using
"git worktree move"). Although it is possible to manually update the
gitdir file to reflect the new linked worktree location, doing so
requires a level of knowledge about worktree internals beyond what a
user should be expected to know offhand.
Therefore, teach "git worktree repair" how to repair broken or outdated
.git/worktrees/<id>/gitdir files automatically. (For this to work, the
command must either be invoked from within the worktree whose gitdir
file requires repair, or from within the main or any linked worktree by
providing the path of the broken worktree as an argument to "git
worktree repair".)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The .git file in a linked worktree is a "gitfile" which points back to
the .git/worktrees/<id> entry in the main worktree or bare repository.
If a worktree's .git file is deleted or becomes corrupted or outdated,
then the linked worktree won't know how to find the repository or any of
its own administrative files (such as 'index', 'HEAD', etc.). An easy
way for the .git file to become outdated is for the user to move the
main worktree or bare repository. Although it is possible to manually
update each linked worktree's .git file to reflect the new repository
location, doing so requires a level of knowledge about worktree
internals beyond what a user should be expected to know offhand.
Therefore, teach "git worktree repair" how to repair broken or outdated
worktree .git files automatically. (For this to work, the command must
be invoked from within the main worktree or bare repository, or from
within a worktree which has not become disconnected from the repository
-- such as one which was created after the repository was moved.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Worktree administrative files can become corrupted or outdated due to
external factors. Although, it is often possible to recover from such
situations by hand-tweaking these files, doing so requires intimate
knowledge of worktree internals. While information necessary to make
such repairs manually can be obtained from git-worktree.txt and
gitrepository-layout.txt, we can assist users more directly by teaching
git-worktree how to repair its administrative files itself (at least to
some extent). Therefore, add a "git worktree repair" command which
attempts to correct common problems which may arise due to factors
beyond Git's control.
At this stage, the "repair" command is a mere skeleton; subsequent
commits will flesh out the functionality.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We allocate a child_env strvec but never free its memory. Instead, let's
just use the strvec that our child_process struct provides, which is
cleaned up automatically when we run the command.
And while we're moving the initialization of the child_process around,
let's switch it to use the official init function (zero-initializing it
works OK, since strvec is happy enough with that, but it sets a bad
example).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "argc" and "argv" names made sense when the struct was argv_array,
but now they're just confusing. Let's rename them to "nr" (which we use
for counts elsewhere) and "v" (which is rather terse, but reads well
when combined with typical variable names like "args.v").
Note that we have to update all of the callers immediately. Playing
tricks with the preprocessor is hard here, because we wouldn't want to
rewrite unrelated tokens.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Code which split an argv_array call across multiple lines, like:
argv_array_pushl(&args, "one argument",
"another argument", "and more",
NULL);
was recently mechanically renamed to use strvec, which results in
mis-matched indentation like:
strvec_pushl(&args, "one argument",
"another argument", "and more",
NULL);
Let's fix these up to align the arguments with the opening paren. I did
this manually by sifting through the results of:
git jump grep 'strvec_.*,$'
and liberally applying my editor's auto-format. Most of the changes are
of the form shown above, though I also normalized a few that had
originally used a single-tab indentation (rather than our usual style of
aligning with the open paren). I also rewrapped a couple of obvious
cases (e.g., where previously too-long lines became short enough to fit
on one), but I wasn't aggressive about it. In cases broken to three or
more lines, the grouping of arguments is sometimes meaningful, and it
wasn't worth my time or reviewer time to ponder each case individually.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We eventually want to drop the argv_array name and just use strvec
consistently. There's no particular reason we have to do it all at once,
or care about interactions between converted and unconverted bits.
Because of our preprocessor compat layer, the names are interchangeable
to the compiler (so even a definition and declaration using different
names is OK).
This patch converts all of the files in builtin/ to keep the diff to a
manageable size.
The conversion was done purely mechanically with:
git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' |
xargs perl -i -pe '
s/ARGV_ARRAY/STRVEC/g;
s/argv_array/strvec/g;
'
and then selectively staging files with "git add builtin/". We'll deal
with any indentation/style fallouts separately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This requires updating #include lines across the code-base, but that's
all fairly mechanical, and was done with:
git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' |
xargs perl -i -pe 's/argv-array.h/strvec.h/'
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
API cleanup for get_worktrees()
* es/get-worktrees-unsort:
worktree: drop get_worktrees() unused 'flags' argument
worktree: drop get_worktrees() special-purpose sorting option
The same worktree directory must be registered only once, but
"git worktree move" allowed this invariant to be violated, which
has been corrected.
* es/worktree-duplicate-paths:
worktree: make "move" refuse to move atop missing registered worktree
worktree: generalize candidate worktree path validation
worktree: prune linked worktree referencing main worktree path
worktree: prune duplicate entries referencing same worktree path
worktree: make high-level pruning re-usable
worktree: give "should be pruned?" function more meaningful name
worktree: factor out repeated string literal
get_worktrees() accepts a 'flags' argument, however, there are no
existing flags (the lone flag GWT_SORT_LINKED was recently retired) and
no behavior which can be tweaked. Therefore, drop the 'flags' argument.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Of all the clients of get_worktrees(), only "git worktree list" wants
the list sorted in a very specific way; other clients simply don't care
about the order. Rather than imbuing get_worktrees() with special
knowledge about how various clients -- now and in the future -- may want
the list sorted, drop the sorting capability altogether and make it the
client's responsibility to sort the list if needed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add" takes special care to avoid creating a new worktree
at a location already registered to an existing worktree even if that
worktree is missing (which can happen, for instance, if the worktree
resides on removable media). "git worktree move", however, is not so
careful when validating the destination location and will happily move
the source worktree atop the location of a missing worktree. This leads
to the anomalous situation of multiple worktrees being associated with
the same path, which is expressly forbidden by design. For example:
$ git clone foo.git
$ cd foo
$ git worktree add ../bar
$ git worktree add ../baz
$ rm -rf ../bar
$ git worktree move ../baz ../bar
$ git worktree list
.../foo beefd00f [master]
.../bar beefd00f [bar]
.../bar beefd00f [baz]
$ git worktree remove ../bar
fatal: validation failed, cannot remove working tree:
'.../bar' does not point back to '.git/worktrees/bar'
Fix this shortcoming by enhancing "git worktree move" to perform the
same additional validation of the destination directory as done by "git
worktree add".
While at it, add a test to verify that "git worktree move" won't move a
worktree atop an existing (non-worktree) path -- a restriction which has
always been in place but was never tested.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add" checks that the specified path is a valid location
for a new worktree by ensuring that the path does not already exist and
is not already registered to another worktree (a path can be registered
but missing, for instance, if it resides on removable media). Since "git
worktree add" is not the only command which should perform such
validation ("git worktree move" ought to also), generalize the the
validation function for use by other callers, as well.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree prune" detects when multiple entries are associated with
the same path and prunes the duplicates, however, it does not detect
when a linked worktree points at the path of the main worktree.
Although "git worktree add" disallows creating a new worktree with the
same path as the main worktree, such a case can arise outside the
control of Git even without the user mucking with .git/worktree/<id>/
administrative files. For instance:
$ git clone foo.git
$ git -C foo worktree add ../bar
$ rm -rf bar
$ mv foo bar
$ git -C bar worktree list
.../bar deadfeeb [master]
.../bar deadfeeb [bar]
Help the user recover from such corruption by extending "git worktree
prune" to also detect when a linked worktree is associated with the path
of the main worktree.
Reported-by: Jonathan Müller <jonathanmueller.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A fundamental restriction of linked working trees is that there must
only ever be a single worktree associated with a particular path, thus
"git worktree add" explicitly disallows creation of a new worktree at
the same location as an existing registered worktree. Nevertheless,
users can still "shoot themselves in the foot" by mucking with
administrative files in .git/worktree/<id>/. Worse, "git worktree move"
is careless[1] and allows a worktree to be moved atop a registered but
missing worktree (which can happen, for instance, if the worktree is on
removable media). For instance:
$ git clone foo.git
$ cd foo
$ git worktree add ../bar
$ git worktree add ../baz
$ rm -rf ../bar
$ git worktree move ../baz ../bar
$ git worktree list
.../foo beefd00f [master]
.../bar beefd00f [bar]
.../bar beefd00f [baz]
Help users recover from this form of corruption by teaching "git
worktree prune" to detect when multiple worktrees are associated with
the same path.
[1]: A subsequent commit will fix "git worktree move" validation to be
more strict.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The low-level logic for removing a worktree is well encapsulated in
delete_git_dir(). However, high-level details related to pruning a
worktree -- such as dealing with verbosity and dry-run mode -- are not
encapsulated. Factor out this high-level logic into its own function so
it can be re-used as new worktree corruption detectors are added.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Readers of the name prune_worktree() are likely to expect the function
to actually prune a worktree, however, it only answers the question
"should this worktree be pruned?". Give it a name more reflective of its
true purpose to avoid such confusion.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For each worktree removed by "git worktree prune", it reports the reason
for the removal. All reasons share the common prefix "Removing
worktrees/%s:". As new removal reasons are added, this prefix needs to
be duplicated, which is error-prone and potentially cumbersome.
Therefore, factor out the common prefix.
Although this change seems to increase the "sentence lego quotient", it
should be reasonably safe, as the reason for removal is a distinct
clause, not strictly related to the prefix. Moreover, the "worktrees" in
"Removing worktrees/%s:" is a path literal which ought not be localized,
so by factoring it out, we can more easily avoid exposing that path
fragment to translators.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Returning a shared buffer invites very subtle bugs due to reentrancy or
multi-threading, as demonstrated by the previous patch.
There was an unfinished effort to abolish this [1].
Let's finally rid of `real_path()`, using `strbuf_realpath()` instead.
This patch uses a local `strbuf` for most places where `real_path()` was
previously called.
However, two places return the value of `real_path()` to the caller. For
them, a `static` local `strbuf` was added, effectively pushing the
problem one level higher:
read_gitfile_gently()
get_superproject_working_tree()
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/1480964316-99305-1-git-send-email-bmwill@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add <path>" performs various checks before approving
<path> as a valid location for the new worktree. Aside from ensuring
that <path> does not already exist, one of the questions it asks is
whether <path> is already a registered worktree. To perform this check,
it queries find_worktree() and disallows the "add" operation if
find_worktree() finds a match for <path>. As a convenience, however,
find_worktree() casts an overly wide net to allow users to identify
worktrees by shorthand in order to keep typing to a minimum. For
instance, it performs suffix matching which, given subtrees "foo/bar"
and "foo/baz", can correctly select the latter when asked only for
"baz".
"add" validation knows the exact path it is interrogating, so this sort
of heuristic-based matching is, at best, questionable for this use-case
and, at worst, may may accidentally interpret <path> as matching an
existing worktree and incorrectly report it as already registered even
when it isn't. (In fact, validate_worktree_add() already contains a
special case to avoid accidentally matching against the main worktree,
precisely due to this problem.)
Avoid the problem of potential accidental matching against an existing
worktree by instead taking advantage of find_worktree_by_path() which
matches paths deterministically, without applying any sort of magic
shorthand matching performed by find_worktree().
Reported-by: Cameron Gunnin <cameron.gunnin@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add" internally calls "reset --hard" that should not
descend into submodules, even when submodule.recurse configuration
is set, but it was affected. This has been corrected.
* pb/no-recursive-reset-hard-in-worktree-add:
worktree: teach "add" to ignore submodule.recurse config
"worktree add" internally calls "reset --hard", but if
submodule.recurse is set, reset tries to recurse into
initialized submodules, which makes start_command try to
cd into non-existing submodule paths and die.
Fix that by making sure that the call to reset in "worktree add"
does not recurse.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Preparation for SHA-256 upgrade continues.
* bc/object-id-part17: (26 commits)
midx: switch to using the_hash_algo
builtin/show-index: replace sha1_to_hex
rerere: replace sha1_to_hex
builtin/receive-pack: replace sha1_to_hex
builtin/index-pack: replace sha1_to_hex
packfile: replace sha1_to_hex
wt-status: convert struct wt_status to object_id
cache: remove null_sha1
builtin/worktree: switch null_sha1 to null_oid
builtin/repack: write object IDs of the proper length
pack-write: use hash_to_hex when writing checksums
sequencer: convert to use the_hash_algo
bisect: switch to using the_hash_algo
sha1-lookup: switch hard-coded constants to the_hash_algo
config: use the_hash_algo in abbrev comparison
combine-diff: replace GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ with the_hash_algo
bundle: switch to use the_hash_algo
connected: switch GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ to the_hash_algo
show-index: switch hard-coded constants to the_hash_algo
blame: remove needless comparison with GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ
...
Found with "git grep '^#include ' '*.c' | sort | uniq -d".
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Switch the remaining use of null_sha1 to null_oid.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To avoid data loss, 'git worktree remove' refuses to delete a worktree
if it's dirty or contains untracked files. However, the error message
only mentions that the worktree "is dirty", even if the worktree in
question is in fact clean, but contains untracked files:
$ git worktree add test-worktree
Preparing worktree (new branch 'test-worktree')
HEAD is now at aa53e60 Initial
$ >test-worktree/untracked-file
$ git worktree remove test-worktree/
fatal: 'test-worktree/' is dirty, use --force to delete it
$ git -C test-worktree/ diff
$ git -C test-worktree/ diff --cached
$ # Huh? Where are those dirty files?!
Clarify this error message to say that the worktree "contains modified
or untracked files".
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In recent versions of Git, per-worktree refs are exposed in
refs/worktrees/<wtname>/ hierarchy, which means that worktree names
must be a valid refname component. The code now sanitizes the names
given to worktrees, to make sure these refs are well-formed.
* nd/worktree-name-sanitization:
worktree add: sanitize worktree names
Worktree names are based on $(basename $GIT_WORK_TREE). They aren't
significant until 3a3b9d8cde (refs: new ref types to make per-worktree
refs visible to all worktrees - 2018-10-21), where worktree name could
be part of a refname and must follow refname rules.
Update 'worktree add' code to remove special characters to follow
these rules. In the future the user will be able to specify the
worktree name by themselves if they're not happy with this dumb
character substitution.
Reported-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add" used to do a "find an available name with stat
and then mkdir", which is race-prone. This has been fixed by using
mkdir and reacting to EEXIST in a loop.
* ms/worktree-add-atomic-mkdir:
worktree: fix worktree add race
Git runs a stat loop to find a worktree name that's available and
then does mkdir on the found name. Turn it to mkdir loop to avoid
another invocation of worktree add finding the same free name and
creating the directory first.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
Acked-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Uninitialized submodules have nothing valueable for us to be worried
about. They are just SHA-1. Let "worktree remove" and "worktree move"
continue in this case so that people can still use multiple worktrees
on repos with optional submodules that are never populated, like
sha1collisiondetection in git.git when checked out by doc-diff script.
Note that for "worktree remove", it is possible that a user
initializes a submodule (*), makes some commits (but not push), then
deinitializes it. At that point, the submodule is unpopulated, but the
precious new commits are still in
$GIT_COMMON_DIR/worktrees/<worktree>/modules/<submodule>
directory and we should not allow removing the worktree or we lose
those commits forever. The new directory check is added to prevent
this.
(*) yes they are screwed anyway by doing this since "git submodule"
would add submodule.* in $GIT_COMMON_DIR/config, which is shared
across multiple worktrees. But it does not mean we let them be
screwed even more.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A function prefixed with 'is_' would be expected to return a boolean,
however this function returns a string.
Signed-off-by: Nickolai Belakovski <nbelakovski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For cleanliness, "git worktree prune" deletes the .git/worktrees
directory if it is empty after pruning is complete.
For consistency, make "git worktree remove <path>" likewise delete
.git/worktrees if it is empty after the removal.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For consistency with "add -f -f" and "move -f -f" which override
the lock on a worktree, allow "remove -f -f" to do so, as well, as a
convenience.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
