The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace 'committish' in documentation and comments with 'commit-ish'
to match gitglossary(7) and to be consistent with 'tree-ish'.
The only remaining instances of 'committish' are:
* variable, function, and macro names
* "(also committish)" in the definition of commit-ish in
gitglossary[7]
Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Port v1.7.0-rc0~83^2 (Teach --[no-]rerere-autoupdate option to
merge, revert and friends, 2009-12-04) to the example merge script.
After this change, all tests pass for me with the scripted
merge.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Port v1.6.2-rc1~10^2 (Teach @{-1} to git merge, 2009-02-13) to
the old merge script.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a --no-ff merge with conflicts, "git commit" used to forget the
--no-ff when used to complete the merge. That was fixed by
v1.6.1-rc1~134^2 (builtin-commit: use reduce_heads() only when
appropriate, 2008-10-03) for the builtin merge. Port the change to
the merge script in contrib/examples.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Port v1.6.6-rc0~62^2 (Teach 'git merge' and 'git pull' the option
--ff-only, 2009-10-29) to the old merge script.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Based on v1.6.0-rc0~51^2~5 (Build in merge, 2008-07-07).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Based on v1.7.1.1~23^2 (merge: --log appends shortlog to message if
specified, 2010-05-11). Without this change, the scripted
(non-builtin) merge does not pass t7604.
Cc: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some git-merge-* commands are not merge strategies. This is based on
v1.6.1-rc1~294^2~7 (builtin-merge: allow using a custom strategy,
2008-07-30) but it is less smart: we just use a hard-coded list of
forbidden strategy names. It is okay if this falls out of date, since
the code is just an example.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The idea comes from v1.6.1-rc1~294^2~7 (builtin-merge: allow using a
custom strategy, 2008-07-30).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this support, the scripted merge cannot pass t6037.
Based on v1.7.0-rc0~55^2~5 (git merge -X<option>, 2009-11-25).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- point out remote-tracking branches as "remote branch
'upstream/master'";
- avoid misleading log messages when a tag and branch
share a name.
This approximates the builtin merge command's behavior well
enough to pass the relevant tests.
Based roughly on v1.6.4.2~10^2 (merge: indicate remote tracking
branches in merge message, 2009-08-09) and v1.6.4.2~10^2~1 (merge: fix
incorrect merge message for ambiguous tag/branch, 2009-08-09).
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Check MERGE_HEAD and bail out if it exists. Based on v1.6.3.3~3^2
(refuse to merge during a merge, 2009-06-01). Without this change,
the scripted merge does not pass t3030.
Cc: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before:
You are in the middle of a conflicted merge.
After:
Merge is not possible because you have unmerged files.
I prefer the old message, but the new one is more consistent with
other commands and tests expect it. In particular, without this
change the scripted merge does not pass t3030.
Based on v1.7.0-rc0~66^2 (Be more user-friendly when refusing to do
something because of conflict., 2010-01-12).
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Port v1.6.1-rc1~319 (provide more errors for the "merge into empty
head" case, 2008-08-21) to the example merge script.
Noticed by comparison with builtin merge.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach "-X <option>" command line argument to "git merge" that is passed to
strategy implementations. "ours" and "theirs" autoresolution introduced
by the previous commit can be asked to the recursive strategy.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sb/dashless:
Make usage strings dash-less
t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"
t/test-lib.sh: exit with small negagive int is ok with test_must_fail
Conflicts:
builtin-blame.c
builtin-mailinfo.c
builtin-mailsplit.c
builtin-shortlog.c
git-am.sh
t/t4150-am.sh
t/t4200-rerere.sh
Mentored-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
