The previous change introduced the get_branch_base_for_tip() method in
commit-reach.c. The motivation of that change was about using a heuristic to
deteremine the base branch for a source commit from a list of candidate
commit tips. This change makes that algorithm visible to users via a new
atom in the 'git for-each-ref' format. This change is very similar to the
chang in 49abcd21da (for-each-ref: add ahead-behind format atom,
2023-03-20).
Introduce the 'is-base:<source>' atom, which will indicate that the
algorithm should be computed and the result of the algorithm is reported
using an indicator of the form '(<source>)'. For example, using
'%(is-base:HEAD)' would result in one line having the token '(HEAD)'.
Use the sorted order of refs included in the ref filter to break ties in the
algorithm's heuristic. In the previous change, the motivating examples
include using an L0 trunk, long-lived L1 branches, and temporary release
branches. A caller could communicate the ordered preference among these
categories using the input refpecs and avoiding a different sort mechanism.
This sorting behavior is tested in the test scripts.
It is important to include this atom as a special case to
can_do_iterative_format() to match the expectations created in bd98f9774e
(ref-filter.c: filter & format refs in the same callback, 2023-11-14). The
ahead-behind atom was one of the special cases, and this similarly requires
using an algorithm across all input refs before starting the format of any
single ref.
In the test script, the format tokens use colons or lack whitespace to avoid
Git complaining about trailing whitespace errors.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new reachability algorithm that intends to discover (from a heuristic)
which branch was used as the starting point for a given commit. Add focused
tests using the 'test-tool reach' command.
In repositories that use pull requests (or merge requests) to advance one or
more "protected" branches, the history of that reference can be recovered by
following the first-parent history in most cases. Most are completed using
no-fast-forward merges, though squash merges are quite common. Less common
is rebase-and-merge, which still validates this assumption. Finally, the
case that breaks this assumption is the fast-forward update (with potential
rebasing). Even in this case, the previous commit commonly appears in the
first-parent history of the branch.
Similar assumptions can be made for a topic branch created by a single user
with the intention to merge back into another branch. Using 'git commit',
'git merge', and 'git cherry-pick' from HEAD will default to having the
first-parent commit be the previous commit at HEAD. This history changes
only with commands such as 'git reset' or 'git rebase', where the command
names also imply that the branch is starting from a new location.
With this movement of branches in mind, the following heuristic is proposed
as a way to determine the base branch for a given source branch:
Among a list of candidate base branches, select the candidate that
minimizes the number of commits in the first-parent history of the source
that are not in the first-parent history of the candidate.
Prior third-party solutions to this problem have used this optimization
criteria, but have relied upon extracting the first-parent history and
comparing those lists as tables instead of using commit-graph walks.
Given current command-line interface options, this optimization criteria is
not easy to detect directly. Even using the command
git rev-list --count --first-parent <base>..<source>
does not measure this count, as it uses full reachability from <base> to
determine which commits to remove from the range '<base>..<source>'. This
may lead to one asking if we should instead be using the full reachability
of the candidate and only the first-parent history of the source. This,
unfortunately, does not work for repositories that use long-lived branches
and automation to merge across those branches.
In extremely large repositories, merging into a single trunk may not be
feasible. This is usually due to the desired frequency of updates
(thousands of engineers doing daily work) combined with the time required to
perform a validation build. These factors combine to create significant
risk of semantic merge conflicts, leading to build breaks on the trunk. In
response, repository maintainers can create a single Level Zero (L0) trunk
and multiple Level One (L1) branches. By partitioning the engineers by
organization, these engineers may see lower risk of semantic merge conflicts
as well as be protected against build breaks in other L1 branches. The key
to making this system work is a semi-automated process of merging L1
branches into the L0 trunk and vice-versa. In a large enough organization,
these L1 branches may further split into L2 or L3 branches, but the same
principles apply for merging across deeper levels.
If these automated merges use a typical merge with the second parent
bringing in the "new" content, then each L0 and L1 branch can track its
previous positions by following first-parent history, which appear as
parallel paths (until reaching the first place where the branches diverged).
If we also walk to second parents, then the histories overlap significantly
and cannot be distinguished except for very-recent changes.
For this reason, the first-parent condition should be symmetrical across the
base and source branches.
Another common case for desiring the result of this optimization method is
the use of release branches. When releasing a version of a repository, a
branch can be used to track that release. Any updates that are worth fixing
in that release can be merged to the release branch and shipped with only
the necessary fixes without any new features introduced in the trunk branch.
The 'maint-2.<X>' branches represent this pattern in the Git project. The
microsoft/git fork uses 'vfs-2.<X>.<Y>' branches to track the changes that
are custom to that fork on top of each upstream Git release 2.<X>.<Y>. This
application doesn't need the symmetrical first-parent condition, but the use
of first-parent histories does not change the results for these branches.
To determine the base branch from a list of candidates, create a new method
in commit-reach.c that performs a single* commit-graph walk. The core
concept is to walk first-parents starting at the candidate bases and the
source, tracking the "best" base to reach a given commit. Use generation
numbers to ensure that a commit is walked at most once and all children have
been explored before visiting it. When reaching a commit that is reachable
from both a base and the source, we will then have a guarantee that this is
the closest intersection of first-parent histories. Track the best base to
reach that commit and return it as a result. In rare cases involving
multiple root commits, the first-parent history of the source may never
intersect any of the candidates and thus a null result is returned.
* There are up to two walks, since we require all commits to have a computed
generation number in order to avoid incorrect results. This is similar to
the need for computed generation numbers in ahead_behind() as implemented
in fd67d149bd (commit-reach: implement ahead_behind() logic, 2023-03-20).
In order to track the "best" base, use a new commit slab that stores an
integer. This value defaults to zero upon initialization, so use -1 to
track that the source commit can reach this commit and use 'i + 1' to track
that the ith base can reach this commit. When multiple bases can reach a
commit, minimize the index to break ties. This allows the caller to specify
an order to the bases that determines some amount of preference when the
heuristic does not result in a unique result.
The trickiest part of the integer slab is what happens when reaching a
collision among the histories of the bases and the history of the source.
This is noticed when viewing the first parent and seeing that it has a slab
value that differs in sign (negative or positive). In this case, the
collision commit is stored in the method variable 'branch_point' and its
slab value is set to -1. The index of the best base (so far) is stored in
the method variable 'best_index'. It is possible that there are multiple
commits that have the branch_point as its first parent, leading to multiple
updates of best_index. The result is determined when 'branch_point' is
visited in the commit walk, giving the guarantee that all commits that could
reach 'branch_point' were visited.
Several interesting cases of collisions and different results are tested in
the t6600-test-reach.sh script. Recall that this script also tests the
algorithm in three possible states involving the commit-graph file and how
many commits are written in the file. This provides some coverage of the
need (and lack of need) for the ensure_generations_valid() method.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both 'git for-each-ref --merged=<X>' and 'git branch --merged=<X>' use
the ref-filter machinery to select references or branches (respectively)
that are reachable from a set of commits presented by one or more
--merged arguments. This happens within reach_filter(), which uses the
revision-walk machinery to walk history in a standard way.
However, the commit-reach.c file is full of custom searches that are
more efficient, especially for reachability queries that can terminate
early when reachability is discovered. Add a new
tips_reachable_from_bases() method to commit-reach.c and call it from
within reach_filter() in ref-filter.c. This affects both 'git branch'
and 'git for-each-ref' as tested in p1500-graph-walks.sh.
For the Linux kernel repository, we take an already-fast algorithm and
make it even faster:
Test HEAD~1 HEAD
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1500.5: contains: git for-each-ref --merged 0.13 0.02 -84.6%
1500.6: contains: git branch --merged 0.14 0.02 -85.7%
1500.7: contains: git tag --merged 0.15 0.03 -80.0%
(Note that we remove the iterative 'git rev-list' test from p1500
because it no longer makes sense as a comparison to 'git for-each-ref'
and would just waste time running it for these comparisons.)
The algorithm is implemented in commit-reach.c in the method
tips_reachable_from_base(). This method takes a string_list of tips and
assigns the 'util' for each item with the value 1 if the base commit can
reach those tips.
Like other reachability queries in commit-reach.c, the fastest way to
search for "can A reach B?" is to do a depth-first search up to the
generation number of B, preferring to explore first parents before later
parents. While we must walk all reachable commits up to that generation
number when the answer is "no", the depth-first search can answer "yes"
much faster than other approaches in most cases.
This search becomes trickier when there are multiple targets for the
depth-first search. The commits with lower generation number are more
likely to be within the history of the start commit, but we don't want
to waste time searching commits of low generation number if the commit
target with lowest generation number has already been found.
The trick here is to take the input commits and sort them by generation
number in ascending order. Track the index within this order as
min_generation_index. When we find a commit, if its index in the list is
equal to min_generation_index, then we can increase the generation
number boundary of our search to the next-lowest value in the list.
With this mechanism, the number of commits to search is minimized with
respect to the depth-first search heuristic. We will walk all commits up
to the minimum generation number of a commit that is _not_ reachable
from the start, but we will walk only the necessary portion of the
depth-first search for the reachable commits of lower generation.
Add extra tests for this behavior in t6600-test-reach.sh as the
interesting data shape of that repository can sometimes demonstrate
corner case bugs.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous change implemented the ahead_behind() method, including an
algorithm to compute the ahead/behind values for a number of commit tips
relative to a number of commit bases. Now, integrate that algorithm as
part of 'git for-each-ref' hidden behind a new format atom,
ahead-behind. This naturally extends to 'git branch' and 'git tag'
builtins, as well.
This format allows specifying multiple bases, if so desired, and all
matching references are compared against all of those bases. For this
reason, failing to read a reference provided from these atoms results in
an error.
In order to translate the ahead_behind() method information to the
format output code in ref-filter.c, we must populate arrays of
ahead_behind_count structs. In struct ref_array, we store the full array
that will be passed to ahead_behind(). In struct ref_array_item, we
store an array of pointers that point to the relvant items within the
full array. In this way, we can pull all relevant ahead/behind values
directly when formatting output for a specific item. It also ensures the
lifetime of the ahead_behind_count structs matches the time that the
array is being used.
Add specific tests of the ahead/behind counts in t6600-test-reach.sh, as
it has an interesting repository shape. In particular, its merging
strategy and its use of different commit-graphs would demonstrate over-
counting if the ahead_behind() method did not already account for that
possibility.
Also add tests for the specific for-each-ref, branch, and tag builtins.
In the case of 'git tag', there are intersting cases that happen when
some of the selected tips are not commits. This requires careful logic
around commits_nr in the second loop of filter_ahead_behind(). Also, the
test in t7004 is carefully located to avoid being dependent on the GPG
prereq. It also avoids using the test_commit helper, as that will add
ticks to the time and disrupt the expected timestamps in later tag
tests.
Also add performance tests in a new p1300-graph-walks.sh script. This
will be useful for more uses in the future, but for now compare the
ahead-behind counting algorithm in 'git for-each-ref' to the naive
implementation by running 'git rev-list --count' processes for each
input.
For the Git source code repository, the improvement is already obvious:
Test this tree
---------------------------------------------------------------
1500.2: ahead-behind counts: git for-each-ref 0.07(0.07+0.00)
1500.3: ahead-behind counts: git branch 0.07(0.06+0.00)
1500.4: ahead-behind counts: git tag 0.07(0.06+0.00)
1500.5: ahead-behind counts: git rev-list 1.32(1.04+0.27)
But the standard performance benchmark is the Linux kernel repository,
which demosntrates a significant improvement:
Test this tree
---------------------------------------------------------------
1500.2: ahead-behind counts: git for-each-ref 0.27(0.24+0.02)
1500.3: ahead-behind counts: git branch 0.27(0.24+0.03)
1500.4: ahead-behind counts: git tag 0.28(0.27+0.01)
1500.5: ahead-behind counts: git rev-list 4.57(4.03+0.54)
The 'git rev-list' test exists in this change as a demonstration, but it
will be removed in the next change to avoid wasting time on this
comparison.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have two established generation number versions:
1: topological levels
2: corrected commit dates
The corrected commit dates are enabled by default, but they also write
extra data in the GDAT and GDOV chunks. Services that host Git data
might want to have more control over when this feature rolls out than
just updating the Git binaries.
Add a new "commitGraph.generationVersion" config option that specifies
the intended generation number version. If this value is less than 2,
then the GDAT chunk is never written _or read_ from an existing file.
This can replace our use of the GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT
environment variable in the test suite. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As discovered by Ævar, we cannot increment graph version to
distinguish between generation numbers v1 and v2 [1]. Thus, one of
pre-requistes before implementing generation number v2 was to
distinguish between graph versions in a backwards compatible manner.
We are going to introduce a new chunk called Generation DATa chunk (or
GDAT). GDAT will store corrected committer date offsets whereas CDAT
will still store topological level.
Old Git does not understand GDAT chunk and would ignore it, reading
topological levels from CDAT. New Git can parse GDAT and take advantage
of newer generation numbers, falling back to topological levels when
GDAT chunk is missing (as it would happen with a commit-graph written
by old Git).
We introduce a test environment variable 'GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT'
which forces commit-graph file to be written without generation data
chunk to emulate a commit-graph file written by old Git.
To minimize the space required to store corrrected commit date, Git
stores corrected commit date offsets into the commit-graph file, instea
of corrected commit dates. This saves us 4 bytes per commit, decreasing
the GDAT chunk size by half, but it's possible for the offset to
overflow the 4-bytes allocated for storage. As such overflows are and
should be exceedingly rare, we use the following overflow management
scheme:
We introduce a new commit-graph chunk, Generation Data OVerflow ('GDOV')
to store corrected commit dates for commits with offsets greater than
GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX.
If the offset is greater than GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX, we set
the MSB of the offset and the other bits store the position of corrected
commit date in GDOV chunk, similar to how Extra Edge List is maintained.
We test the overflow-related code with the following repo history:
F - N - U
/ \
U - N - U N
\ /
N - F - N
Where the commits denoted by U have committer date of zero seconds
since Unix epoch, the commits denoted by N have committer date of
1112354055 (default committer date for the test suite) seconds since
Unix epoch and the commits denoted by F have committer date of
(2 ^ 31 - 2) seconds since Unix epoch.
The largest offset observed is 2 ^ 31, just large enough to overflow.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a7gdspo4.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a preparatory step to implement generation number v2, we add tests to
ensure Git can read and parse commit-graph files without Generation Data
chunk. These files represent commit-graph files written by Old Git and
are neccesary for backward compatability.
We extend run_three_modes() and test_three_modes() to *_all_modes() with
the fourth mode being "commit-graph without generation data chunk".
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Way back in f9b8908b (commit.c: use generation numbers for
in_merge_bases(), 2018-05-01), a heuristic was used to short-circuit
the in_merge_bases() walk. This works just fine as long as the
caller is checking only two commits, but when there are multiple,
there is a possibility that this heuristic is _very wrong_.
Some code moves since then has changed this method to
repo_in_merge_bases_many() inside commit-reach.c. The heuristic
computes the minimum generation number of the "reference" list, then
compares this number to the generation number of the "commit".
In a recent topic, a test was added that used in_merge_bases_many()
to test if a commit was reachable from a number of commits pulled
from a reflog. However, this highlighted the problem: if any of the
reference commits have a smaller generation number than the given
commit, then the walk is skipped _even if there exist some with
higher generation number_.
This heuristic is wrong! It must check the MAXIMUM generation number
of the reference commits, not the MINIMUM.
This highlights a testing gap. t6600-test-reach.sh covers many
methods in commit-reach.c, including in_merge_bases() and
get_merge_bases_many(), but since these methods either restrict to
two input commits or actually look for the full list of merge bases,
they don't check this heuristic!
Add a possible input to "test-tool reach" that tests
in_merge_bases_many() and add tests to t6600-test-reach.sh that
cover this heuristic. This includes cases for the reference commits
having generation above and below the generation of the input commit,
but also having maximum generation below the generation of the input
commit.
The fix itself is to swap min_generation with a max_generation in
repo_in_merge_bases_many().
Reported-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the previous commit, Git learned 'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode' to
allow the caller to specify the permission bits (prior to further
adjustment by the umask and shared repository permissions) used when
acquiring a temporary file.
Use this in the commit-graph machinery for writing a non-split graph to
acquire an opened temporary file with permissions read-only permissions
to match the split behavior. (In the split case, Git uses
git_mkstemp_mode' for each of the commit-graph layers with permission
bits '0444').
One can notice this discrepancy when moving a non-split graph to be part
of a new chain. This causes a commit-graph chain where all layers have
read-only permission bits, except for the base layer, which is writable
for the current user.
Resolve this discrepancy by using the new
'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode' and passing the desired permission
bits.
Doing so causes some test fallout in t5318 and t6600. In t5318, this
occurs in tests that corrupt a commit-graph file by writing into it. For
these, 'chmod u+w'-ing the file beforehand resolves the issue. The
additional spot in 'corrupt_graph_verify' is necessary because of the
extra 'git commit-graph write' beforehand (which *does* rewrite the
commit-graph file). In t6600, this is caused by copying a read-only
commit-graph file into place and then trying to replace it. For these,
make these files writable.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The revision walker machinery learned to take advantage of the
commit generation numbers stored in the commit-graph file.
* ds/reachable-topo-order:
t6012: make rev-list tests more interesting
revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithm
commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoring
revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logic
test-reach: add rev-list tests
test-reach: add run_three_modes method
prio-queue: add 'peek' operation
The get_reachable_subset() method returns the list of commits in
the 'to' array that are reachable from at least one commit in the
'from' array. Add tests that check this method works in a few
cases:
1. All commits in the 'to' list are reachable. This exercises the
early-termination condition.
2. Some commits in the 'to' list are reachable. This exercises the
loop-termination condition.
3. No commits in the 'to' list are reachable. This exercises the
NULL return condition.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The rev-list command is critical to Git's functionality. Ensure it
works in the three commit-graph environments constructed in
t6600-test-reach.sh. Here are a few important types of rev-list
operations:
* Basic: git rev-list --topo-order HEAD
* Range: git rev-list --topo-order compare..HEAD
* Ancestry: git rev-list --topo-order --ancestry-path compare..HEAD
* Symmetric Difference: git rev-list --topo-order compare...HEAD
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'test_three_modes' method assumes we are using the 'test-tool
reach' command for our test. However, we may want to use the data
shape of our commit graph and the three modes (no commit-graph,
full commit-graph, partial commit-graph) for other git commands.
Split test_three_modes to be a simple translation on a more general
run_three_modes method that executes the given command and tests
the actual output to the expected output.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The can_all_from_reach_with_flag() algorithm was refactored in 4fbcca4e
"commit-reach: make can_all_from_reach... linear" but incorrectly
assumed that all objects provided were commits. During a fetch
negotiation, ok_to_give_up() in upload-pack.c may provide unpeeled tags
to the 'from' array. The current code creates a segfault.
Add a direct call to can_all_from_reach_with_flag() in 'test-tool reach'
and add a test in t6600-test-reach.sh that demonstrates this segfault.
Correct the issue by peeling tags when investigating the initial list
of objects in the 'from' array.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit_contains method has two modes which depend on the given
ref_filter struct. We have the "normal" algorithm (which is also the
typically-slow operation) and the "tag" algorithm. This difference is
essentially what changes performance for 'git branch --contains' versus
'git tag --contains'. There are thoughts that the data shapes used by
these two applications justify the different implementations.
Create tests using 'test-tool reach commit_contains [--tag]' to cover
both methods.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The can_all_from_reach_with_flags method is used by ok_to_give_up in
upload-pack.c to see if we have done enough negotiation during a fetch.
This method is intentionally created to preserve state between calls to
assist with stateful negotiation, such as over SSH.
To make this method testable, add a new can_all_from_reach method that
does the initial setup and final tear-down. We will later use this
method in production code. Call the method from 'test-tool reach' for
now.
Since this is a many-to-many reachability query, add a new type of input
to the 'test-tool reach' input format. Lines "Y:<committish>" create a
list of commits to be the reachability targets from the commits in the
'X' list. In the context of fetch negotiation, the 'X' commits are the
'want' commits and the 'Y' commits are the 'have' commits.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The get_merge_bases_many method returns a list of merge bases for a
single commit (A) against a list of commits (X). Some care is needed in
constructing the expected behavior because the result is not the
expected merge-base for an octopus merge with those parents but instead
the set of maximal commits that are reachable from A and at least one of
the commits in X.
Add get_merge_bases_many to 'test-tool reach' and create a test that
demonstrates that this output returns multiple results. Specifically, we
select a list of three commits such that we output two commits that are
reachable from one of the first two, respectively, and none are
reachable from the third.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The is_descendant_of method takes a single commit as its first parameter
and a list of commits as its second parameter. Extend the input of the
'test-tool reach' command to take multiple lines of the form
"X:<committish>" to construct a list of commits. Pass these to
is_descendant_of and create tests that check each result.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we prepare to change the behavior of the algorithms in
commit-reach.c, create a new test-tool subcommand 'reach' to test these
methods on interesting commit-graph shapes.
To use the new test-tool, use 'test-tool reach <method>' and provide
input to stdin that describes the inputs to the method. Currently, we
only implement the ref_newer method, which requires two commits. Use
lines "A:<committish>" and "B:<committish>" for the two inputs. We will
expand this input later to accommodate methods that take lists of
commits.
The test t6600-test-reach.sh creates a repo whose commits form a
two-dimensional grid. This grid makes it easy for us to determine
reachability because commit-A-B can reach commit-X-Y if and only if A is
at least X and B is at least Y. This helps create interesting test cases
for each result of the methods in commit-reach.c.
We test all methods in three different states of the commit-graph file:
Non-existent (no generation numbers), fully computed, and mixed (some
commits have generation numbers and others do not).
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
