The TODO comment suggested to heed core.bare from template config file
if no command line override given. And the prev_bare_repository
variable seems to have been placed for this sole purpose as it is not
used anywhere else.
However, it was clarified by Junio [1] that such values (including
core.bare) are ignored intentionally and does not make sense to
propagate them from template config to repository config. Also, the
directories for the worktree and repository are already created, and
therefore the bare/non-bare decision has already been made, by the
point we reach the codepath where the TODO comment is placed.
Therefore, prev_bare_repository does not have a usecase with/without
supporting core.bare from template. And the removal of
prev_bare_repository is safe as proved by the later part of the
comment:
"Unfortunately, the line above is equivalent to
is_bare_repository_cfg = !work_tree;
which ignores the config entirely even if no `--[no-]bare`
command line option was present.
To see why, note that before this function, there was this call:
prev_bare_repository = is_bare_repository()
expanding the right hand side:
= is_bare_repository_cfg && !get_git_work_tree()
= is_bare_repository_cfg && !work_tree
note that the last simplification above is valid because nothing
calls repo_init() or set_git_work_tree() between any of the
relevant calls in the code, and thus the !get_git_work_tree()
calls will return the same result each time. So, what we are
interested in computing is the right hand side of the line of
code just above this comment:
prev_bare_repository || !work_tree
= is_bare_repository_cfg && !work_tree || !work_tree
= !work_tree
because "A && !B || !B == !B" for all boolean values of A & B."
Therefore, remove the TODO comment and remove prev_bare_repository
variable. Also, update relevant testcases and remove one redundant
testcase.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqjzonpy9l.fsf@gitster.g/
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We still have a bunch of tests scattered across our test suites that
exercise on-disk files of the "files" backend directly:
- t1301 exercises permissions of reflog files when the config
"core.sharedRepository" is set.
- t1400 exercises whether empty directories in the ref store are
handled correctly.
- t3200 exercises what happens when there are symlinks in the ref
store.
- t3400 also exercises what happens when ".git/logs" is a symlink.
All of these are inherently low-level tests specific to the "files"
backend. Move them into "t0600-reffiles-backend.sh" to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In t1301 we verify whether reflog files written by the "files" ref
backend correctly honor permissions when "core.sharedRepository" is set.
The test logic is thus specific to the reffiles backend and will not
work with any other backends.
Mark the test accordingly with the REFFILES prereq.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comments in create_default_files() talks about reading config from
the config file in the specified `--templates` directory, which leads to
the question of whether core.bare could be set in such a config file and
thus whether the code is doing the right thing. It turns out, that it
doesn't; it unconditionally ignores core.bare in the config file in any
--templates directory. It is not clear to me that fixing it can be done
within this function; it seems to occur too late:
* create_default_files() is called by init_db()
* init_db() is called by both builtin/{clone.c,init-db.c}
* both callers of init_db() call set_git_work_tree() before init_db()
and in order to actual affect whether a repository is bear, we'd need to
somewhere reset these values, not just the is_bare_repository_cfg
setting.
I do not want to open this can of worms at this time; I'm trying to
clean up some headers, for which I need to move some functions, for
which I need to clean up some globals, and that's far enough down the
rabbit hole. So, simply document the issue with a careful TODO comment
and a few testcases.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have a small helper function called "verbose", with the idea that you
can write:
verbose foo
to get a message to stderr when the "foo" command fails, even if it does
not produce any output itself. This goes back to 8ad1652418 (t5304: use
helper to report failure of "test foo = bar", 2014-10-10). It does work,
but overall it has not been a big success for two reasons:
1. Test writers have to remember to put it there (and the resulting
test code is longer as a result).
2. It doesn't handle the opposite case (we expect "foo" to fail, but
it succeeds), leading to inconsistencies in tests (which you can
see in many hunks of this patch, e.g. ones involving "has_cr").
Most importantly, we added a136f6d8ff (test-lib.sh: support -x option
for shell-tracing, 2014-10-10) at the same time, and it does roughly the
same thing. The output is not quite as succinct as "verbose", and you
have to watch out for stray shell-traces ending up in stderr. But it
solves both of the problems above, and has clearly become the preferred
tool.
Let's consider the "verbose" function a failed experiment and remove the
last few callers (which are all many years old, and have been dwindling
as we remove them from scripts we touch for other reasons). It will be
one less thing for new test writers to see and wonder if they should be
using themselves.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the "ab/various-leak-fixes" topic was merged in [1] only t6021
would fail if the tests were run in the
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=check" mode, i.e. to check whether we
marked all leak-free tests with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Since then we've had various tests starting to pass under
SANITIZE=leak. Let's mark those as passing, this is when they started
to pass, narrowed down with "git bisect":
- t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh: In
faebba436e (list-objects-filter: plug pattern_list leak, 2022-12-01).
- t3210-pack-refs.sh, t5613-info-alternate.sh,
t7403-submodule-sync.sh: In 189e97bc4b (diff: remove parseopts member
from struct diff_options, 2022-12-01).
- t1408-packed-refs.sh: In ab91f6b7c4 (Merge branch
'rs/diff-parseopts', 2022-12-19).
- t0023-crlf-am.sh, t4152-am-subjects.sh, t4254-am-corrupt.sh,
t4256-am-format-flowed.sh, t4257-am-interactive.sh,
t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh: In a658e881c1 (am: don't pass strvec to
apply_parse_options(), 2022-12-13)
- t1301-shared-repo.sh, t1302-repo-version.sh: In b07a819c05 (reflog:
clear leftovers in reflog_expiry_cleanup(), 2022-12-13).
- t1304-default-acl.sh, t1410-reflog.sh,
t5330-no-lazy-fetch-with-commit-graph.sh, t5502-quickfetch.sh,
t5604-clone-reference.sh, t6014-rev-list-all.sh,
t7701-repack-unpack-unreachable.sh: In b0c61be320 (Merge branch
'rs/reflog-expiry-cleanup', 2022-12-26)
- t3800-mktag.sh, t5302-pack-index.sh, t5306-pack-nobase.sh,
t5573-pull-verify-signatures.sh, t7612-merge-verify-signatures.sh: In
69bbbe484b (hash-object: use fsck for object checks, 2023-01-18).
- t1451-fsck-buffer.sh: In 8e4309038f (fsck: do not assume
NUL-termination of buffers, 2023-01-19).
- t6501-freshen-objects.sh: In abf2bb895b (Merge branch
'jk/hash-object-fsck', 2023-01-30)
1. 9ea1378d04 (Merge branch 'ab/various-leak-fixes', 2022-12-14)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In test case "shared=all", the working directory is permanently changed
to the "sub" directory. This leads to a strange behavior that the
temporary repositories created by subsequent test cases are all in this
"sub" directory, such as "sub/new", "sub/child.git". If we bypass this
test case, all subsequent test cases will have different working
directory.
Besides, all subsequent test cases assuming they are in the "sub"
directory do not run any destructive operations in their parent
directory (".."), and will not make damage out side of $TRASH_DIRECTORY.
So it is a safe change for us to run the test case "shared=all" in
current repository instead of creating and changing to "sub".
For the next test case, the path ".git/info" is assumed to be missing,
but we no longer run the test case in the "sub" repository which is
initialized from an empty template. In order for the test case to run
properly, we can set "TEST_CREATE_REPO_NO_TEMPLATE=1" to initialize the
default repository without a template.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refactor several test cases to use "test_when_finished" for cleanup.
1. For first of these, we used to clean-up outside the test, but instead
let's use test_when_finished for that.
2. For the second, we used to leave "new" after we are done, but not use
it at all later. Now we do clean up.
3. For the rest, these child.git test repositories used to follow
"initialize what we are going to use to a known state before we use"
pattern, which is not wrong per-se, but now we use "clean up the
cruft we made after we are done" pattern, which may arguably be
better simply because the test that makes cruft should know what
cruft it created better than whatever comes later that may not know.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The template dir prepared in test case "forced modes" is not used as
expected because a wrong template dir is provided to "git init". This is
because the $CWD for "git-init" command is a sibling directory alongside
the template directory. Change it to the right template directory and
add a protection test using "test_path_is_file".
The wrong template directory was introduced by mistake in commit
e1df7fe43f (init: make --template path relative to $CWD, 2019-05-10).
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change those tests that assumed that a .git/info directory would be
created for them when writing .git/info/refs to explicitly create the
directory by using the "--template=" argument to "git init".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Carefully excluding t1309, which sees independent development elsewhere
at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the
default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via
$ (cd t &&
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
-e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- t[01]*.sh &&
git checkout HEAD -- t1309\*)
Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`)
that we rename here, too.
This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.
To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in
- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,
- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
initialize the default branch,
- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,
- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
uses `master`)
This trick was performed by this command:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh
After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:
$ git checkout HEAD -- \
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh
We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During git-init we chdir() to the target directory, but --template is
not adjusted. So it's relative to the target directory instead of
current directory.
It would be ok if it's documented, but --template in git-init.txt
mentions nothing about this behavior. Change it to be relative to $CWD,
which is much more intuitive.
The changes in the test suite show that this relative-to-target behavior
is actually used. I just hope that it's only used in the test suite and
it's safe to change. Otherwise, the other option is just document
it (i.e. relative to target dir) and move on.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As the modebits() function can be useful outside t1301,
let's move it into test-lib-functions.sh, and while at
it let's rename it test_modebits().
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After we copy the templates into place, we re-read the
config in case we copied in a default config file. But since
git_config() is backed by a cache these days, it's possible
that the call will not actually touch the filesystem at all;
we need to tell it that something has changed behind the
scenes.
Note that we also need to reset the shared_repository
config. At first glance, it seems like this should probably
just be folded into git_config_clear(). But unfortunately
that is not quite right. The shared repository value may
come from config, _or_ it may have been set manually. So
only the caller who knows whether or not they set it is the
one who can clear it (and indeed, if you _do_ put it into
git_config_clear(), then many tests fail, as we have to
clear the config cache any time we set a new config
variable).
There are three tests here. The first two actually pass
already, though it's largely luck: they just don't happen to
actually read any config before we enter the new repo.
But the third one does fail without this patch; we look at
core.sharedrepository while creating the directory, but need
to make sure the value from the template config overrides
it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git_config() runs, it looks in the system, user-wide,
and repo-level config files. It gets the latter by calling
git_pathdup(), which in turn calls get_git_dir(). If we
haven't set up the git repository yet, this may simply
return ".git", and we will look at ".git/config". This
seems like it would be helpful (presumably we haven't set up
the repository yet, so it tries to find it), but it turns
out to be a bad idea for a few reasons:
- it's not sufficient, and therefore hides bugs in a
confusing way. Config will be respected if commands are
run from the top-level of the working tree, but not from
a subdirectory.
- it's not always true that we haven't set up the
repository _yet_; we may not want to do it at all. For
instance, if you run "git init /some/path" from inside
another repository, it should not load config from the
existing repository.
- there might be a path ".git/config", but it is not the
actual repository we would find via setup_git_directory().
This may happen, e.g., if you are storing a git
repository inside another git repository, but have
munged one of the files in such a way that the
inner repository is not valid (e.g., by removing HEAD).
We have at least two bugs of the second type in git-init,
introduced by ae5f677 (lazily load core.sharedrepository,
2016-03-11). It causes init to use git_configset(), which
loads all of the config, including values from the current
repo (if any). This shows up in two ways:
1. If we happen to be in an existing repository directory,
we'll read and respect core.sharedrepository from it,
even though it should have no bearing on the new
repository. A new test in t1301 covers this.
2. Similarly, if we're in an existing repo that sets
core.logallrefupdates, that will cause init to fail to
set it in a newly created repository (because it thinks
that the user's templates already did so). A new test
in t0001 covers this.
We also need to adjust an existing test in t1302, which
gives another example of why this patch is an improvement.
That test creates an embedded repository with a bogus
core.repositoryformatversion of "99". It wants to make sure
that we actually stop at the bogus repo rather than
continuing upward to find the outer repo. So it checks that
"git config core.repositoryformatversion" returns 99. But
that only works because we blindly read ".git/config", even
though we _know_ we're in a repository whose vintage we do
not understand.
After this patch, we avoid reading config from the unknown
vintage repository at all, which is a safer choice. But we
need to tweak the test, since core.repositoryformatversion
will not return 99; it will claim that it could not find the
variable at all.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Prior to d38379e (make update-server-info more robust, 2014-09-13),
we used a straight "fopen" to create the info/refs and
objects/info/packs files, which creates the file using mode 0666
(less the default umask).
In d38379e, we switched to creating the file with mkstemp to get a
unique filename. But mkstemp also uses the more restrictive 0600
mode to create the file. This was an unintended side effect that we
did not want, and causes problems when the repository is served by a
different user than the one running update-server-info (it is not
readable by a dumb http server running as `www`, for example).
We can fix this by using git_mkstemp_mode and specifying 0666 to
make sure that the umask is honored.
Note that we could also say "just use core.sharedrepository", as we
do call adjust_shared_perm on the result before renaming it into
place. But that should not be necessary as long as everybody
involved is using permissive umask to allow HTTP server to read
necessary files.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The t1301 script sets the umask globally before many of the
tests. Most of the tests that care about the umask then set
it explicitly at the start of the test. However, one test
does not, and relies on the 077 umask setting from earlier
tests. This is fragile and can break if another test is
added in between. Let's be more explicit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test was added recently (5a688fe, "core.sharedrepository = 0mode"
should set, not loosen; 2009-03-28). It checked the result of a sed
invocation for emptyness, but in some cases it forgot to print anything
at all, so that those checks would never be false.
Due to this mistake, it went unnoticed that the files in objects/info are
not necessarily 0440, but can also be 0660. Because the 0mode setting
tries to guarantee that the files are accessible only to the people they
are meant to be used by, we should only make sure that they are readable
by the user and the group when the configuration is set to 0660. It is a
separate matter from the core.shredrepository settings that w-bit from
immutable object files under objects/[0-9a-f][0-9a-f] directories should
be dropped.
COMMIT_EDITMSG is still world-readable, but it (and any transient files
that are meant for repositories with a work tree) does not matter. If you
are working on a shared machine and on a sekrit stuff, the root of the
work tree would be with mode 0700 (or 0750 to allow peeking by other
people in the group), and that would mean that .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG in such
a repository would not be readable by the strangers anyway.
Also, in the real-world use case, .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG will be given to an
arbitrary editor the user happens to use, and we have no guarantee what it
does (e.g. it may create a new file with umask and replace, it may rewrite
in place, it may leave an editor backup file but use umask to create it,
etc.), and the protection of the file lies majorly on the protection of
the root of the work tree.
This test cannot be run on Windows; it requires POSIXPERM when merged to
'master'.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/shared-literally:
t1301: loosen test for forced modes
set_shared_perm(): sometimes we know what the final mode bits should look like
move_temp_to_file(): do not forget to chmod() in "Coda hack" codepath
Move chmod(foo, 0444) into move_temp_to_file()
"core.sharedrepository = 0mode" should set, not loosen
One of the aspects of the test checked explicitly for the
g+s bit to be set on created directories. However, this is
only the means to an end (the "end" being having the correct
group set). And in fact, on systems where
DIR_HAS_BSD_GROUP_SEMANTICS is set, we do not even need to
use this "means" at all, causing the test to fail.
This patch removes that part of the test. In an ideal world
it would be replaced by a test to check that the group was
properly assigned, but that is difficult to automate because
it requires the user running the test suite be a member of
multiple groups.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes the behaviour of octal notation to how it is defined in the
documentation, while keeping the traditional "loosen only" semantics
intact for "group" and "everybody".
Three main points of this patch are:
- For an explicit octal notation, the internal shared_repository variable
is set to a negative value, so that we can tell "group" (which is to
"OR" in 0660) and 0660 (which is to "SET" to 0660);
- git-init did not set shared_repository variable early enough to affect
the initial creation of many files, notably copied templates and the
configuration. We set it very early when a command-line option
specifies a custom value.
- Many codepaths create files inside $GIT_DIR by various ways that all
involve mkstemp(), and then call move_temp_to_file() to rename it to
its final destination. We can add adjust_shared_perm() call here; for
the traditional "loosen-only", this would be a no-op for many codepaths
because the mode is already loose enough, but with the new behaviour it
makes a difference.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
06cbe855 (Make core.sharedRepository more generic, 2008-04-16) made
several testcases in t1301-shared-repo.sh which fail if on a system
which creates files with extended attributes (e.g. SELinux), since ls
appends a '+' sign to the permission set in such cases. In fact,
POSIX.1 allows ls to add a single printable character after the usual
3x3 permission bits to show that an optional alternate/additional access
method is associated with the path.
This fixes the testcase to strip any such sign prior to verifying the
permission set.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>
This test creates files with several different umasks and expects their
permissions to be initialized according to the umask, so a default ACL on the
trash directory (which overrides the umask for files created in that directory)
causes the test to fail. To avoid that, remove the default ACL if possible with
setfacl(1).
Signed-off-by: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
06cbe85 (Make core.sharedRepository more generic, 2008-04-16) broke the
traditional setting of core.sharedRepository to true, which was to make
the repository group writable: with umask 022, it would clear the
permission bits for 'other'. (umask 002 did not exhibit this behaviour
since pre-chmod() check in adjust_shared_perm() fails in that case.)
The call to adjust_shared_perm() should only loosen the permission.
If the user has umask like 022 or 002 that allow others to read, the
resulting files should be made readable and writable by group, without
restricting the readability by others.
This patch fixes the adjust_shared_perm() mode tweak based on Junio's
suggestion and adds the appropriate tests to t/t1301-shared-repo.sh.
Cc: Heikki Orsila <heikki.orsila@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git init --shared=0xxx, where '0xxx' is an octal number, will create
a repository with file modes set to '0xxx'. Users with a safe umask
value (0077) can use this option to force file modes. For example,
'0640' is a group-readable but not group-writable regardless of
user's umask value. Values compatible with old Git versions are written
as they were before, for compatibility reasons. That is, "1" for
"group" and "2" for "everybody".
"git config core.sharedRepository 0xxx" is also handled.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Orsila <heikki.orsila@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The t1301-shared-repo.sh testscript uses /usr/bin/stat to get the file
mode, which isn't portable. Implement the test in shell using 'ls' as
shown by Junio.
Signed-off-by: Arjen Laarhoven <arjen@yaph.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For compatibility reasons, "git init --shared=all" does not write
"all" into the config, but a number. In the shared setup, you
really have to support even older clients on the _same_ repository.
But git_config_perm() did not pick up on it.
Also, "git update-server-info" failed to pick up on the shared
permissions.
This patch fixes both issues, and adds a test to prove it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Tested-by: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
