1
0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git synced 2024-06-30 22:54:27 +00:00
Commit Graph

101 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
1002f28a52 Merge branch 'eb/hash-transition'
Work to support a repository that work with both SHA-1 and SHA-256
hash algorithms has started.

* eb/hash-transition: (30 commits)
  t1016-compatObjectFormat: add tests to verify the conversion between objects
  t1006: test oid compatibility with cat-file
  t1006: rename sha1 to oid
  test-lib: compute the compatibility hash so tests may use it
  builtin/ls-tree: let the oid determine the output algorithm
  object-file: handle compat objects in check_object_signature
  tree-walk: init_tree_desc take an oid to get the hash algorithm
  builtin/cat-file: let the oid determine the output algorithm
  rev-parse: add an --output-object-format parameter
  repository: implement extensions.compatObjectFormat
  object-file: update object_info_extended to reencode objects
  object-file-convert: convert commits that embed signed tags
  object-file-convert: convert commit objects when writing
  object-file-convert: don't leak when converting tag objects
  object-file-convert: convert tag objects when writing
  object-file-convert: add a function to convert trees between algorithms
  object: factor out parse_mode out of fast-import and tree-walk into in object.h
  cache: add a function to read an OID of a specific algorithm
  tag: sign both hashes
  commit: export add_header_signature to support handling signatures on tags
  ...
2024-03-28 14:13:50 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
8ed4eb7538 Merge branch 'tb/rev-list-unpacked-fix'
"git rev-list --unpacked --objects" failed to exclude packed
non-commit objects, which has been corrected.

* tb/rev-list-unpacked-fix:
  pack-bitmap: drop --unpacked non-commit objects from results
  list-objects: drop --unpacked non-commit objects from results
2023-11-08 15:04:42 +09:00
Taylor Blau
4263f9279e list-objects: drop --unpacked non-commit objects from results
In git-rev-list(1), we describe the `--unpacked` option as:

    Only useful with `--objects`; print the object IDs that are not in
    packs.

This is true of commits, which we discard via get_commit_action(), but
not of the objects they reach. So if we ask for an --objects traversal
with --unpacked, we may get arbitrarily many objects which are indeed
packed.

I am nearly certain this behavior dates back to the introduction of
`--unpacked` via 12d2a18780 ("git rev-list --unpacked" shows only
unpacked commits, 2005-07-03), but I couldn't get that revision of Git
to compile for me. At least as early as v2.0.0 this has been subtly
broken:

    $ git.compile --version
    git version 2.0.0

    $ git.compile rev-list --objects --all --unpacked
    72791fe96c93f9ec5c311b8bc966ab349b3b5bbe
    05713d991c18bbeef7e154f99660005311b5004d v1.0
    153ed8b7719c6f5a68ce7ffc43133e95a6ac0fdb
    8e4020bb5a8d8c873b25de15933e75cc0fc275df one
    9200b628cf9dc883a85a7abc8d6e6730baee589c two
    3e6b46e1b7e3b91acce99f6a823104c28aae0b58 unpacked.t

There, only the first, third, and sixth entries are loose, with the
remaining set of objects belonging to at least one pack.

The implications for this are relatively benign: bare 'git repack'
invocations which invoke pack-objects with --unpacked are impacted, and
at worst we'll store a few extra objects that should have been excluded.

Arguably changing this behavior is a backwards-incompatible change,
since it alters the set of objects emitted from rev-list queries with
`--objects` and `--unpacked`. But I argue that this change is still
sensible, since the existing implementation deviates from
clearly-written documentation.

The fix here is straightforward: avoid showing any non-commit objects
which are contained in packs by discarding them within list-objects.c,
before they are shown to the user. Note that similar treatment for
`list-objects.c::show_commit()` is not needed, since that case is
already handled by `revision.c::get_commit_action()`.

Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-07 11:23:51 +09:00
Karthik Nayak
9830926c7d rev-list: add commit object support in --missing option
The `--missing` object option in rev-list currently works only with
missing blobs/trees. For missing commits the revision walker fails with
a fatal error.

Let's extend the functionality of `--missing` option to also support
commit objects. This is done by adding a `missing_objects` field to
`rev_info`. This field is an `oidset` to which we'll add the missing
commits as we encounter them. The revision walker will now continue the
traversal and call `show_commit()` even for missing commits. In rev-list
we can then check if the commit is a missing commit and call the
existing code for parsing `--missing` objects.

A scenario where this option would be used is to find the boundary
objects between different object directories. Consider a repository with
a main object directory (GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY) and one or more alternate
object directories (GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES). In such a
repository, using the `--missing=print` option while disabling the
alternate object directory allows us to find the boundary objects
between the main and alternate object directory.

Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-01 12:07:18 +09:00
Karthik Nayak
ca556f4707 revision: rename bit to do_not_die_on_missing_objects
The bit `do_not_die_on_missing_tree` is used in revision.h to ensure the
revision walker does not die when encountering a missing tree. This is
currently exclusively set within `builtin/rev-list.c` to ensure the
`--missing` option works with missing trees.

In the upcoming commits, we will extend `--missing` to also support
missing commits. So let's rename the bit to
`do_not_die_on_missing_objects`, which is object type agnostic and can
be used for both trees/commits.

Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-01 12:07:18 +09:00
Eric W. Biederman
efed687edc tree-walk: init_tree_desc take an oid to get the hash algorithm
To make it possible for git ls-tree to display the tree encoded
in the hash algorithm of the oid specified to git ls-tree, update
init_tree_desc to take as a parameter the oid of the tree object.

Update all callers of init_tree_desc and init_tree_desc_gently
to pass the oid of the tree object.

Use the oid of the tree object to discover the hash algorithm
of the oid and store that hash algorithm in struct tree_desc.

Use the hash algorithm in decode_tree_entry and
update_tree_entry_internal to handle reading a tree object encoded in
a hash algorithm that differs from the repositories hash algorithm.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-02 14:57:40 -07:00
Jeff King
670a1dadc7 list-objects: respect max_allowed_tree_depth
The tree traversal in list-objects.c, which is used by "rev-list
--objects", etc, uses recursion and may run out of stack space. Let's
teach it about the new core.maxTreeDepth config option.

We unfortunately can't return an error here, as this code doesn't
produce an error return at all. We'll die() instead, which matches the
behavior when we see an otherwise broken tree.

Note that this will also generally reject such deep trees from entering
the repository from a fetch or push, due to the use of rev-list in the
connectivity check. But it's not foolproof! We stop traversing when we
see an UNINTERESTING object, and the connectivity check marks existing
ref tips as UNINTERESTING. So imagine commit X has a tree
with maximum depth N. If you then create a new commit Y with a tree
entry "Y:subdir" that points to "X^{tree}", then the depth of Y will be
N+1. But a connectivity check running "git rev-list --objects Y --not X"
won't realize that; it will stop traversing at X^{tree}, since that was
already reachable.

So this will stop naive pushes of too-deep trees, but not carefully
crafted malicious ones. Doing it robustly and efficiently would require
caching the maximum depth of each tree (i.e., the longest path to any
leaf entry). That's much more complex and not strictly needed. If each
recursive algorithm limits itself already, then that's sufficient.
Blocking the objects from entering the repo would be a nice
belt-and-suspenders addition, but it's not worth the extra cost.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-08-31 15:51:08 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
fea92e4cac Merge branch 'jc/tree-walk-drop-base-offset'
Code simplification.

* jc/tree-walk-drop-base-offset:
  tree-walk: drop unused base_offset from do_match()
  tree-walk: lose base_offset that is never used in tree_entry_interesting
2023-08-02 09:37:23 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
0ad927e9e0 tree-walk: lose base_offset that is never used in tree_entry_interesting
The tree_entry_interesting() function takes base_offset, allowing
its callers to potentially pass a non-zero number to skip the early
part of the path string.

The feature is never exercised and we do not even know what bugs are
lurking there, as all callers pass 0 to the parameter.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-07-07 15:27:28 -07:00
Elijah Newren
a034e9106f object-store-ll.h: split this header out of object-store.h
The vast majority of files including object-store.h did not need dir.h
nor khash.h.  Split the header into two files, and let most just depend
upon object-store-ll.h, while letting the two callers that need it
depend on the full object-store.h.

After this patch:
    $ git grep -h include..object-store | sort | uniq -c
          2 #include "object-store.h"
        129 #include "object-store-ll.h"

Diff best viewed with `--color-moved`.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-06-21 13:39:54 -07:00
Elijah Newren
d812c3b6a0 treewide: remove cache.h inclusion due to object.h changes
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-11 08:52:10 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
e7dca80692 Merge branch 'ab/remove-implicit-use-of-the-repository' into en/header-split-cache-h
* ab/remove-implicit-use-of-the-repository:
  libs: use "struct repository *" argument, not "the_repository"
  post-cocci: adjust comments for recent repo_* migration
  cocci: apply the "revision.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "rerere.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "refs.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "promisor-remote.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "packfile.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "pretty.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "object-store.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "diff.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "commit.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "commit-reach.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: apply the "cache.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
  cocci: add missing "the_repository" macros to "pending"
  cocci: sort "the_repository" rules by header
  cocci: fix incorrect & verbose "the_repository" rules
  cocci: remove dead rule from "the_repository.pending.cocci"
2023-04-04 08:25:52 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
bc726bd075 cocci: apply the "object-store.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
Apply the part of "the_repository.pending.cocci" pertaining to
"object-store.h".

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-28 07:36:45 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ecb5091fd4 cocci: apply the "commit.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
Apply the part of "the_repository.pending.cocci" pertaining to
"commit.h".

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-28 07:36:45 -07:00
Elijah Newren
f394e093df treewide: be explicit about dependence on gettext.h
Dozens of files made use of gettext functions, without explicitly
including gettext.h.  This made it more difficult to find which files
could remove a dependence on cache.h.  Make C files explicitly include
gettext.h if they are using it.

However, while compat/fsmonitor/fsm-ipc-darwin.c should also gain an
include of gettext.h, it was left out to avoid conflicting with an
in-flight topic.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-21 10:56:51 -07:00
Elijah Newren
41771fa435 cache.h: remove dependence on hex.h; make other files include it explicitly
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-23 17:25:29 -08:00
Jeff King
00271485d4 list-objects: drop process_gitlink() function
Our object graph traversal code has a process_gitlink() function which
we call when we see a gitlink entry. The function does nothing; it was
added in the early days of gitlinks by 6e2f441bd4 (Teach git
list-objects logic to not follow gitlinks, 2007-04-13).

The comment above the function talks about some things we _could_ do.
But in the intervening 15 years, nobody has touched the function, and
the submodule code usually makes its own decisions about when and how to
examine the links. At the generic traversal layer, we can't assume that
the pointed-to commit is available.

Let's drop this placeholder that isn't really helping anything. This
silences some -Wunused-parameter warnings, and also gets rid of a crufty
use of "const unsigned char *" to pass a raw hash value.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-12-13 22:16:22 +09:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
4f33a6345f list-objects: handle NULL function pointers
If a caller to traverse_commit_list() specifies the options for the
--objects flag but does not specify a show_object function pointer, the
result is a segfault. This is currently visible by running 'git bundle
create --objects HEAD'.

We could fix this problem by supplying a no-op callback in
builtin/bundle.c, but that only solves the problem for one builtin,
leaving this segfault open for other callers.

Replace all callers of the show_commit and show_object function pointers
in list-objects.c to call helper functions show_commit() and
show_object() which check that the given context has non-NULL functions
before passing the necessary data. One extra benefit is that it reduces
duplication due to passing ctx->show_data to every caller.

Test that this segfault no longer occurs for 'git bundle'.

Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-03-09 10:25:27 -08:00
Derrick Stolee
3e0370a8d2 list-objects: consolidate traverse_commit_list[_filtered]
Now that all consumers of traverse_commit_list_filtered() populate the
'filter' member of 'struct rev_info', we can drop that parameter from
the method prototype to simplify things. In addition, the only thing
different now between traverse_commit_list_filtered() and
traverse_commit_list() is the presence of the 'omitted' parameter, which
is only non-NULL for one caller. We can consolidate these two methods by
having one call the other and use the simpler form everywhere the
'omitted' parameter would be NULL.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-03-09 10:25:27 -08:00
Teng Long
b3e36df0d4 list-objects.c: rename "traverse_trees_and_blobs" to "traverse_non_commits"
Function `traverse_trees_and_blobs` not only works on trees and blobs,
but also on tags, the function name is somewhat misleading. This commit
rename it to `traverse_non_commits`.

Signed-off-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-08-12 13:08:30 -07:00
Jeff King
aa9ad6fee5 bitmaps: don't recurse into trees already in the bitmap
If an object is already mentioned in a reachability bitmap we are
building, then by definition so are all of the objects it can reach. We
have an optimization to stop traversing commits when we see they are
already in the bitmap, but we don't do the same for trees.

It's generally unavoidable to recurse into trees for commits not yet
covered by bitmaps (since most commits generally do have unique
top-level trees). But they usually have subtrees that are shared with
other commits (i.e., all of the subtrees the commit _didn't_ touch). And
some of those commits (and their trees) may be covered by the bitmap.

Usually this isn't _too_ big a deal, because we'll visit those subtrees
only once in total for the whole walk. But if you have a large number of
unbitmapped commits, and if your tree is big, then you may end up
opening a lot of sub-trees for no good reason.

We can use the same optimization we do for commits here: when we are
about to open a tree, see if it's in the bitmap (either the one we are
building, or the "seen" bitmap which covers the UNINTERESTING side of
the bitmap when doing a set-difference).

This works especially well because we'll visit all commits before
hitting any trees. So even in a history like:

  A -- B

if "A" has a bitmap on disk but "B" doesn't, we'll already have OR-ed in
the results from A before looking at B's tree (so we really will only
look at trees touched by B).

For most repositories, the timings produced by p5310 are unspectacular.
Here's linux.git:

  Test                         HEAD^             HEAD
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.4: simulated clone      6.00(5.90+0.10)   5.98(5.90+0.08) -0.3%
  5310.5: simulated fetch      2.98(5.45+0.18)   2.85(5.31+0.18) -4.4%
  5310.7: rev-list (commits)   0.32(0.29+0.03)   0.33(0.30+0.03) +3.1%
  5310.8: rev-list (objects)   1.48(1.44+0.03)   1.49(1.44+0.05) +0.7%

Any improvement there is within the noise (the +3.1% on test 7 has to be
noise, since we are not recursing into trees, and thus the new code
isn't even run). The results for git.git are likewise uninteresting.

But here are numbers from some other real-world repositories (that are
not public). This one's tree is comparable in size to linux.git, but has
~16k refs (and so less complete bitmap coverage):

  Test                         HEAD^               HEAD
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.4: simulated clone      38.34(39.86+0.74)   33.95(35.53+0.76) -11.5%
  5310.5: simulated fetch      2.29(6.31+0.35)     2.20(5.97+0.41) -3.9%
  5310.7: rev-list (commits)   0.99(0.86+0.13)     0.96(0.85+0.11) -3.0%
  5310.8: rev-list (objects)   11.32(11.04+0.27)   6.59(6.37+0.21) -41.8%

And here's another with a very large tree (~340k entries), and a fairly
large number of refs (~10k):

  Test                         HEAD^               HEAD
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.3: simulated clone      53.83(54.71+1.54)   39.77(40.76+1.50) -26.1%
  5310.4: simulated fetch      19.91(20.11+0.56)   19.79(19.98+0.67) -0.6%
  5310.6: rev-list (commits)   0.54(0.44+0.11)     0.51(0.43+0.07) -5.6%
  5310.7: rev-list (objects)   24.32(23.59+0.73)   9.85(9.49+0.36) -59.5%

This patch provides substantial improvements in these larger cases, and
have any drawbacks for smaller ones (the cost of the bitmap check is
quite small compared to an actual tree traversal).

Note that we have to add a version of revision.c's include_check
callback which handles non-commits. We could possibly consolidate this
into a single callback for all objects types, as there's only one user
of the feature which would need converted (pack-bitmap.c:should_include).
That would in theory let us avoid duplicating any logic. But when I
tried it, the code ended up much worse to read, with lots of repeated
"if it's a commit do this, otherwise do that". Having two separate
callbacks splits that naturally, and matches the existing split of
show_commit/show_object callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-15 11:13:11 +09:00
Patrick Steinhardt
9a2a4f9544 list-objects: support filtering by tag and commit
Object filters currently only support filtering blobs or trees based on
some criteria. This commit lays the foundation to also allow filtering
of tags and commits.

No change in behaviour is expected from this commit given that there are
no filters yet for those object types.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-12 09:35:50 -07:00
Patrick Steinhardt
628d81be6c list-objects: move tag processing into its own function
Move processing of tags into its own function to make the logic easier
to extend when we're going to implement filtering for tags. No change in
behaviour is expected from this commit.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-10 23:03:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
bbfe5f2241 Merge branch 'jk/list-objects-optim-wo-trees'
The object traversal machinery has been optimized not to load tree
objects when we are only interested in commit history.

* jk/list-objects-optim-wo-trees:
  list-objects: don't queue root trees unless revs->tree_objects is set
2019-10-07 11:32:56 +09:00
Jeff King
72ed80c784 list-objects: don't queue root trees unless revs->tree_objects is set
When traverse_commit_list() processes each commit, it queues the
commit's root tree in the pending array. Then, after all commits are
processed, it calls traverse_trees_and_blobs() to walk over the pending
list, calling process_tree() on each. But if revs->tree_objects is not
set, process_tree() just exists immediately!

We can save ourselves some work by not even bothering to queue these
trees in the first place. There are a few subtle points to make:

  - we also detect commits with a NULL tree pointer here. But this isn't
    an interesting check for broken commits, since the lookup_tree()
    we'd have done during commit parsing doesn't actually check that we
    have the tree on disk. So we're not losing any robustness.

  - besides queueing, we also set the NOT_USER_GIVEN flag on the tree
    object. This is used by the traverse_commit_list_filtered() variant.
    But if we're not exploring trees, then we won't actually care about
    this flag, which is used only inside process_tree() code-paths.

  - queueing trees eventually leads to us queueing blobs, too. But we
    don't need to check revs->blob_objects here. Even in the current
    code, we still wouldn't find those blobs, because we'd never open up
    the tree objects to list their contents.

  - the user-visible impact to the caller is minimal. The pending trees
    are all cleared by the time the function returns anyway, by
    traverse_trees_and_blobs(). We do call a show_commit() callback,
    which technically could be looking at revs->pending during the
    callback. But it seems like a rather unlikely thing to do (if you
    want the tree of the current commit, then accessing the tree struct
    member is a lot simpler).

So this should be safe to do. Let's look at the benefits:

  [before]
  Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
    Time (mean ± σ):      7.651 s ±  0.021 s    [User: 7.399 s, System: 0.252 s]
    Range (min … max):    7.607 s …  7.683 s    10 runs

  [after]
  Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
    Time (mean ± σ):      7.593 s ±  0.023 s    [User: 7.329 s, System: 0.264 s]
    Range (min … max):    7.565 s …  7.634 s    10 runs

Not too impressive, but then we're really just avoiding sticking a
pointer into a growable array. But still, I'll take a free 0.75%
speedup.

Let's try it after running "git commit-graph write":

  [before]
  Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
    Time (mean ± σ):      1.458 s ±  0.011 s    [User: 1.199 s, System: 0.259 s]
    Range (min … max):    1.447 s …  1.481 s    10 runs

  [after]
  Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null
    Time (mean ± σ):      1.126 s ±  0.023 s    [User: 896.5 ms, System: 229.0 ms]
    Range (min … max):    1.106 s …  1.181 s    10 runs

Now that's more like it. We saved over 22% of the total time. Part of
that is because the runtime is shorter overall, but the absolute
improvement is also much larger. What's going on?

When we fill in a commit struct using the commit graph, we don't bother
to set the tree pointer, and instead lazy-load it when somebody calls
get_commit_tree(). So we're not only skipping the pointer write to the
pending queue, but we're skipping the lazy-load of the tree entirely.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-12 11:47:30 -07:00
Matthew DeVore
9430147ca0 list-objects-filter: encapsulate filter components
Encapsulate filter_fn, filter_free_fn, and filter_data into their own
opaque struct.

Due to opaqueness, filter_fn and filter_free_fn can no longer be
accessed directly by users. Currently, all usages of filter_fn are
guarded by a necessary check:

	(obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && filter_fn

Take the opportunity to include this check into the new function
list_objects_filter__filter_object(), so that we no longer need to write
this check at every caller of the filter function.

Also, the init functions in list-objects-filter.c no longer need to
confusingly return the filter constituents in various places (filter_fn
and filter_free_fn as out parameters, and filter_data as the function's
return value); they can just initialize the "struct filter" passed in.

Helped-by: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-28 08:41:53 -07:00
Jeff King
97dd512af7 rev-list: detect broken root trees
When the traversal machinery sees a commit without a root tree, it
assumes that the tree was part of a BOUNDARY commit, and quietly ignores
the tree. But it could also be caused by a commit whose root tree is
broken or missing.

Instead, let's die() when we see a NULL root tree. We can differentiate
it from the BOUNDARY case by seeing if the commit was actually parsed.
This covers that case, plus future-proofs us against any others where we
might try to show an unparsed commit.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-10 12:59:39 +09:00
Taylor Blau
b49e74eac4 list-objects.c: handle unexpected non-tree entries
Apply similar treatment as the previous commit for non-tree entries,
too.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-10 12:59:39 +09:00
Taylor Blau
23c204455b list-objects.c: handle unexpected non-blob entries
Fix one of the cases described in the previous commit where a tree-entry
that is promised to a blob is in fact a non-blob.

When 'lookup_blob()' returns NULL, it is because Git has cached the
requested object as a non-blob. In this case, prevent a SIGSEGV by
'die()'-ing immediately before attempting to dereference the result.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-10 12:59:39 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
5fda343321 Merge branch 'ds/push-sparse-tree-walk'
"git pack-objects" learned another algorithm to compute the set of
objects to send, that trades the resulting packfile off to save
traversal cost to favor small pushes.

* ds/push-sparse-tree-walk:
  pack-objects: create GIT_TEST_PACK_SPARSE
  pack-objects: create pack.useSparse setting
  revision: implement sparse algorithm
  list-objects: consume sparse tree walk
  revision: add mark_tree_uninteresting_sparse
2019-02-06 22:05:25 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
371820d5f1 Merge branch 'bc/tree-walk-oid'
The code to walk tree objects has been taught that we may be
working with object names that are not computed with SHA-1.

* bc/tree-walk-oid:
  cache: make oidcpy always copy GIT_MAX_RAWSZ bytes
  tree-walk: store object_id in a separate member
  match-trees: use hashcpy to splice trees
  match-trees: compute buffer offset correctly when splicing
  tree-walk: copy object ID before use
2019-01-29 12:47:56 -08:00
Derrick Stolee
4f6d26b167 list-objects: consume sparse tree walk
When creating a pack-file using 'git pack-objects --revs' we provide
a list of interesting and uninteresting commits. For example, a push
operation would make the local topic branch be interesting and the
known remote refs as uninteresting. We want to discover the set of
new objects to send to the server as a thin pack.

We walk these commits until we discover a frontier of commits such
that every commit walk starting at interesting commits ends in a root
commit or unintersting commit. We then need to discover which
non-commit objects are reachable from  uninteresting commits. This
commit walk is not changing during this series.

The mark_edges_uninteresting() method in list-objects.c iterates on
the commit list and does the following:

* If the commit is UNINTERSTING, then mark its root tree and every
  object it can reach as UNINTERESTING.

* If the commit is interesting, then mark the root tree of every
  UNINTERSTING parent (and all objects that tree can reach) as
  UNINTERSTING.

At the very end, we repeat the process on every commit directly
given to the revision walk from stdin. This helps ensure we properly
cover shallow commits that otherwise were not included in the
frontier.

The logic to recursively follow trees is in the
mark_tree_uninteresting() method in revision.c. The algorithm avoids
duplicate work by not recursing into trees that are already marked
UNINTERSTING.

Add a new 'sparse' option to the mark_edges_uninteresting() method
that performs this logic in a slightly different way. As we iterate
over the commits, we add all of the root trees to an oidset. Then,
call mark_trees_uninteresting_sparse() on that oidset. Note that we
include interesting trees in this process. The current implementation
of mark_trees_unintersting_sparse() will walk the same trees as
the old logic, but this will be replaced in a later change.

Add a '--sparse' flag in 'git pack-objects' to call this new logic.
Add a new test script t/t5322-pack-objects-sparse.sh that tests this
option. The tests currently demonstrate that the resulting object
list is the same as the old algorithm. This includes a case where
both algorithms pack an object that is not needed by a remote due to
limits on the explored set of trees. When the sparse algorithm is
changed in a later commit, we will add a test that demonstrates a
change of behavior in some cases.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-17 13:44:39 -08:00
brian m. carlson
ea82b2a085 tree-walk: store object_id in a separate member
When parsing a tree, we read the object ID directly out of the tree
buffer. This is normally fine, but such an object ID cannot be used with
oidcpy, which copies GIT_MAX_RAWSZ bytes, because if we are using SHA-1,
there may not be that many bytes to copy.

Instead, store the object ID in a separate struct member. Since we can
no longer efficiently compute the path length, store that information as
well in struct name_entry. Ensure we only copy the object ID into the
new buffer if the path length is nonzero, as some callers will pass us
an empty path with no object ID following it, and we will not want to
read past the end of the buffer.

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-15 09:57:41 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
d6f05a435f Merge branch 'nd/attr-pathspec-in-tree-walk'
The traversal over tree objects has learned to honor
":(attr:label)" pathspec match, which has been implemented only for
enumerating paths on the filesystem.

* nd/attr-pathspec-in-tree-walk:
  tree-walk: support :(attr) matching
  dir.c: move, rename and export match_attrs()
  pathspec.h: clean up "extern" in function declarations
  tree-walk.c: make tree_entry_interesting() take an index
  tree.c: make read_tree*() take 'struct repository *'
2019-01-14 15:29:28 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
67022e0214 tree-walk.c: make tree_entry_interesting() take an index
In order to support :(attr) when matching pathspec on a tree,
tree_entry_interesting() needs to take an index (because
git_check_attr() needs it). This is the preparation step for it. This
also makes it clearer what index we fall back to when looking up
attributes during an unpack-trees operation: the source index.

This also fixes revs->pruning.repo initialization that should have
been done in 2abf350385 (revision.c: remove implicit dependency on
the_index - 2018-09-21). Without it, skip_uninteresting() will
dereference a NULL pointer through this call chain

  get_revision(revs)
  get_revision_internal
  get_revision_1
  try_to_simplify_commit
  rev_compare_tree
  diff_tree_oid(..., &revs->pruning)
  ll_diff_tree_oid
  diff_tree_paths
  ll_diff_tree
  skip_uninteresting

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-19 10:50:33 +09:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
96ab6e0b30 list-objects.c: reduce the_repository references
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-12 14:50:05 +09:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
01d40c8487 list-objects-filter.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index
While at there, since we have access to struct repository now,
eliminate the only the_repository reference in this file.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-12 14:50:05 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
77d503757d Merge branch 'md/filter-trees'
The "rev-list --filter" feature learned to exclude all trees via
"tree:0" filter.

* md/filter-trees:
  list-objects: support for skipping tree traversal
  filter-trees: code clean-up of tests
  list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0
  list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init
  list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die
  revision: mark non-user-given objects instead
  rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly
  list-objects: always parse trees gently
  list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents
  list-objects: store common func args in struct
2018-10-30 15:43:39 +09:00
Matthew DeVore
8b10a206f0 list-objects: support for skipping tree traversal
The tree:0 filter does not need to traverse the trees that it has
filtered out, so optimize list-objects and list-objects-filter to skip
traversing the trees entirely. Before this patch, we iterated over all
children of the tree, and did nothing for all of them, which was
wasteful.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-18 12:49:18 +09:00
Matthew DeVore
99c9aa9579 revision: mark non-user-given objects instead
Currently, list-objects.c incorrectly treats all root trees of commits
as USER_GIVEN. Also, it would be easier to mark objects that are
non-user-given instead of user-given, since the places in the code
where we access an object through a reference are more obvious than
the places where we access an object that was given by the user.

Resolve these two problems by introducing a flag NOT_USER_GIVEN that
marks blobs and trees that are non-user-given, replacing USER_GIVEN.
(Only blobs and trees are marked because this mark is only used when
filtering objects, and filtering of other types of objects is not
supported yet.)

This fixes a bug in that git rev-list behaved differently from git
pack-objects. pack-objects would *not* filter objects given explicitly
on the command line and rev-list would filter. This was because the two
commands used a different function to add objects to the rev_info
struct. This seems to have been an oversight, and pack-objects has the
correct behavior, so I added a test to make sure that rev-list now
behaves properly.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07 08:55:00 +09:00
Matthew DeVore
7c0fe330d5 rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly
Previously, we assumed only blob objects could be missing. This patch
makes rev-list handle missing trees like missing blobs. The --missing=*
and --exclude-promisor-objects flags now work for trees as they already
do for blobs. This is demonstrated in t6112.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07 08:55:00 +09:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
b3c7eef9b0 revision.c: reduce implicit dependency the_repository
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-21 09:51:19 -07:00
Matthew DeVore
f1d02daacf list-objects: always parse trees gently
If parsing fails when revs->ignore_missing_links and
revs->exclude_promisor_objects are both false, we print the OID anyway
in the die("bad tree object...") call, so any message printed by
parse_tree_gently() is superfluous.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-15 09:26:21 -07:00
Matthew DeVore
9202489174 list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents
This will be used in a follow-up patch to reduce indentation needed when
invoking the logic conditionally. i.e. rather than:

if (foo) {
	while (...) {
		/* this is very indented */
	}
}

we will have:

if (foo)
	process_tree_contents(...);

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-13 15:17:32 -07:00
Matthew DeVore
f447a499db list-objects: store common func args in struct
This will make utility functions easier to create, as done by the next
patch.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-13 15:17:32 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
3a2a1dc170 Merge branch 'sb/object-store-lookup'
lookup_commit_reference() and friends have been updated to find
in-core object for a specific in-core repository instance.

* sb/object-store-lookup: (32 commits)
  commit.c: allow lookup_commit_reference to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit.c: allow lookup_commit_reference_gently to handle arbitrary repositories
  tag.c: allow deref_tag to handle arbitrary repositories
  object.c: allow parse_object to handle arbitrary repositories
  object.c: allow parse_object_buffer to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit.c: allow get_cached_commit_buffer to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit.c: allow set_commit_buffer to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit.c: migrate the commit buffer to the parsed object store
  commit-slabs: remove realloc counter outside of slab struct
  commit.c: allow parse_commit_buffer to handle arbitrary repositories
  tag: allow parse_tag_buffer to handle arbitrary repositories
  tag: allow lookup_tag to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit: allow lookup_commit to handle arbitrary repositories
  tree: allow lookup_tree to handle arbitrary repositories
  blob: allow lookup_blob to handle arbitrary repositories
  object: allow lookup_object to handle arbitrary repositories
  object: allow object_as_type to handle arbitrary repositories
  tag: add repository argument to deref_tag
  tag: add repository argument to parse_tag_buffer
  tag: add repository argument to lookup_tag
  ...
2018-08-02 15:30:42 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
8fa8a4f1ec Merge branch 'jt/partial-clone-fsck-connectivity'
Partial clone support of "git clone" has been updated to correctly
validate the objects it receives from the other side.  The server
side has been corrected to send objects that are directly
requested, even if they may match the filtering criteria (e.g. when
doing a "lazy blob" partial clone).

* jt/partial-clone-fsck-connectivity:
  clone: check connectivity even if clone is partial
  upload-pack: send refs' objects despite "filter"
2018-07-24 14:50:47 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
00624d608c Merge branch 'sb/object-store-grafts'
The conversion to pass "the_repository" and then "a_repository"
throughout the object access API continues.

* sb/object-store-grafts:
  commit: allow lookup_commit_graft to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit: allow prepare_commit_graft to handle arbitrary repositories
  shallow: migrate shallow information into the object parser
  path.c: migrate global git_path_* to take a repository argument
  cache: convert get_graft_file to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit: convert read_graft_file to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit: convert register_commit_graft to handle arbitrary repositories
  commit: convert commit_graft_pos() to handle arbitrary repositories
  shallow: add repository argument to is_repository_shallow
  shallow: add repository argument to check_shallow_file_for_update
  shallow: add repository argument to register_shallow
  shallow: add repository argument to set_alternate_shallow_file
  commit: add repository argument to lookup_commit_graft
  commit: add repository argument to prepare_commit_graft
  commit: add repository argument to read_graft_file
  commit: add repository argument to register_commit_graft
  commit: add repository argument to commit_graft_pos
  object: move grafts to object parser
  object-store: move object access functions to object-store.h
2018-07-18 12:20:28 -07:00
Jonathan Tan
a0c9016abd upload-pack: send refs' objects despite "filter"
A filter line in a request to upload-pack filters out objects regardless
of whether they are directly referenced by a "want" line or not. This
means that cloning with "--filter=blob:none" (or another filter that
excludes blobs) from a repository with at least one ref pointing to a
blob (for example, the Git repository itself) results in output like the
following:

    error: missing object referenced by 'refs/tags/junio-gpg-pub'

and if that particular blob is not referenced by a fetched tree, the
resulting clone fails fsck because there is no object from the remote to
vouch that the missing object is a promisor object.

Update both the protocol and the upload-pack implementation to include
all explicitly specified "want" objects in the packfile regardless of
the filter specification.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-09 12:37:38 -07:00
Stefan Beller
f86bcc7b2c tree: add repository argument to lookup_tree
Add a repository argument to allow the callers of lookup_tree
to be more specific about which repository to act on. This is a small
mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle
repositories other than the_repository yet.

As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a
repository other than the_repository at compile time.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-29 10:43:38 -07:00