mirror of
https://github.com/git/git
synced 2024-06-30 22:54:27 +00:00
revision: make pseudo-opt flags read via stdin behave consistently
When reading revisions from stdin via git-rev-list(1)'s `--stdin` option then these revisions never honor flags like `--not` which have been passed on the command line. Thus, an invocation like e.g. `git rev-list --all --not --stdin` will not treat all revisions read from stdin as uninteresting. While this behaviour may be surprising to a user, it's been this way ever since it has been introduced via42cabc341c
(Teach rev-list an option to read revs from the standard input., 2006-09-05). With that said, inc40f0b7877
(revision: handle pseudo-opts in `--stdin` mode, 2023-06-15) we have introduced a new mode to read pseudo opts from standard input where this behaviour is a lot more confusing. If you pass `--not` via stdin, it will: - Influence subsequent revisions or pseudo-options passed on the command line. - Influence pseudo-options passed via standard input. - _Not_ influence normal revisions passed via standard input. This behaviour is extremely inconsistent and bound to cause confusion. While it would be nice to retroactively change the behaviour for how `--not` and `--stdin` behave together, chances are quite high that this would break existing scripts that expect the current behaviour that has been around for many years by now. This is thus not really a viable option to explore to fix the inconsistency. Instead, we change the behaviour of how pseudo-opts read via standard input influence the flags such that the effect is fully localized. With this change, when reading `--not` via standard input, it will: - _Not_ influence subsequent revisions or pseudo-options passed on the command line, which is a change in behaviour. - Influence pseudo-options passed via standard input. - Influence normal revisions passed via standard input, which is a change in behaviour. Thus, all flags read via standard input are fully self-contained to that standard input, only. While this is a breaking change as well, the behaviour has only been recently introduced with Git v2.42.0. Furthermore, the current behaviour can be regarded as a simple bug. With that in mind it feels like the right thing to retroactively change it and make the behaviour sane. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Reported-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bcb6cae296
commit
f97c8b1e00
|
@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ endif::git-log[]
|
|||
--not::
|
||||
Reverses the meaning of the '{caret}' prefix (or lack thereof)
|
||||
for all following revision specifiers, up to the next `--not`.
|
||||
When used on the command line before --stdin, the revisions passed
|
||||
through stdin will not be affected by it. Conversely, when passed
|
||||
via standard input, the revisions passed on the command line will
|
||||
not be affected by it.
|
||||
|
||||
--all::
|
||||
Pretend as if all the refs in `refs/`, along with `HEAD`, are
|
||||
|
@ -240,7 +244,9 @@ endif::git-rev-list[]
|
|||
them from standard input as well. This accepts commits and
|
||||
pseudo-options like `--all` and `--glob=`. When a `--` separator
|
||||
is seen, the following input is treated as paths and used to
|
||||
limit the result.
|
||||
limit the result. Flags like `--not` which are read via standard input
|
||||
are only respected for arguments passed in the same way and will not
|
||||
influence any subsequent command line arguments.
|
||||
|
||||
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
||||
--quiet::
|
||||
|
|
10
revision.c
10
revision.c
|
@ -2788,13 +2788,13 @@ static int handle_revision_pseudo_opt(struct rev_info *revs,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void read_revisions_from_stdin(struct rev_info *revs,
|
||||
struct strvec *prune,
|
||||
int *flags)
|
||||
struct strvec *prune)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct strbuf sb;
|
||||
int seen_dashdash = 0;
|
||||
int seen_end_of_options = 0;
|
||||
int save_warning;
|
||||
int flags = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
save_warning = warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity;
|
||||
warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -2817,13 +2817,13 @@ static void read_revisions_from_stdin(struct rev_info *revs,
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (handle_revision_pseudo_opt(revs, argv, flags) > 0)
|
||||
if (handle_revision_pseudo_opt(revs, argv, &flags) > 0)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
die(_("invalid option '%s' in --stdin mode"), sb.buf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (handle_revision_arg(sb.buf, revs, 0,
|
||||
if (handle_revision_arg(sb.buf, revs, flags,
|
||||
REVARG_CANNOT_BE_FILENAME))
|
||||
die("bad revision '%s'", sb.buf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
|
|||
}
|
||||
if (revs->read_from_stdin++)
|
||||
die("--stdin given twice?");
|
||||
read_revisions_from_stdin(revs, &prune_data, &flags);
|
||||
read_revisions_from_stdin(revs, &prune_data);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ check --glob=refs/heads
|
|||
check --glob=refs/heads --
|
||||
check --glob=refs/heads -- file-1
|
||||
check --end-of-options -dashed-branch
|
||||
check --all --not refs/heads/main
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'not only --stdin' '
|
||||
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
|
||||
|
@ -127,4 +128,24 @@ test_expect_success 'unknown option without --end-of-options' '
|
|||
test_cmp expect error
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success '--not on command line does not influence revisions read via --stdin' '
|
||||
cat >input <<-EOF &&
|
||||
refs/heads/main
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
git rev-list refs/heads/main >expect &&
|
||||
|
||||
git rev-list refs/heads/main --not --stdin <input >actual &&
|
||||
test_cmp expect actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success '--not via stdin does not influence revisions from command line' '
|
||||
cat >input <<-EOF &&
|
||||
--not
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
git rev-list refs/heads/main >expect &&
|
||||
|
||||
git rev-list refs/heads/main --stdin refs/heads/main <input >actual &&
|
||||
test_cmp expect actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_done
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user