mirror of
https://github.com/git/git
synced 2024-11-05 01:58:18 +00:00
t1406: move reffiles specific tests to t0600
Move this test to t0600 with the rest of the tests that are specific to reffiles. This test reaches into reflog directories manually, and so are specific to reffiles. Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0453030709
commit
e74d9f5716
2 changed files with 48 additions and 37 deletions
|
@ -260,4 +260,52 @@ test_expect_success 'delete fails cleanly if packed-refs.new write fails' '
|
|||
test_cmp unchanged actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
RWT="test-tool ref-store worktree:wt"
|
||||
RMAIN="test-tool ref-store worktree:main"
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'setup worktree' '
|
||||
test_commit first &&
|
||||
git worktree add -b wt-main wt &&
|
||||
(
|
||||
cd wt &&
|
||||
test_commit second
|
||||
)
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
# Some refs (refs/bisect/*, pseudorefs) are kept per worktree, so they should
|
||||
# only appear in the for-each-reflog output if it is called from the correct
|
||||
# worktree, which is exercised in this test. This test is poorly written for
|
||||
# mulitple reasons: 1) it creates invalidly formatted log entres. 2) it uses
|
||||
# direct FS access for creating the reflogs. 3) PSEUDO-WT and refs/bisect/random
|
||||
# do not create reflogs by default, so it is not testing a realistic scenario.
|
||||
test_expect_success 'for_each_reflog()' '
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/logs/PSEUDO-MAIN &&
|
||||
mkdir -p .git/logs/refs/bisect &&
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/logs/refs/bisect/random &&
|
||||
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/worktrees/wt/logs/PSEUDO-WT &&
|
||||
mkdir -p .git/worktrees/wt/logs/refs/bisect &&
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/worktrees/wt/logs/refs/bisect/wt-random &&
|
||||
|
||||
$RWT for-each-reflog | cut -d" " -f 2- | sort >actual &&
|
||||
cat >expected <<-\EOF &&
|
||||
HEAD 0x1
|
||||
PSEUDO-WT 0x0
|
||||
refs/bisect/wt-random 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/main 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/wt-main 0x0
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
test_cmp expected actual &&
|
||||
|
||||
$RMAIN for-each-reflog | cut -d" " -f 2- | sort >actual &&
|
||||
cat >expected <<-\EOF &&
|
||||
HEAD 0x1
|
||||
PSEUDO-MAIN 0x0
|
||||
refs/bisect/random 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/main 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/wt-main 0x0
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
test_cmp expected actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_done
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -53,41 +53,4 @@ test_expect_success 'create_symref(FOO, refs/heads/main)' '
|
|||
test_cmp expected actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
# Some refs (refs/bisect/*, pseudorefs) are kept per worktree, so they should
|
||||
# only appear in the for-each-reflog output if it is called from the correct
|
||||
# worktree, which is exercised in this test. This test is poorly written (and
|
||||
# therefore marked REFFILES) for mulitple reasons: 1) it creates invalidly
|
||||
# formatted log entres. 2) it uses direct FS access for creating the reflogs. 3)
|
||||
# PSEUDO-WT and refs/bisect/random do not create reflogs by default, so it is
|
||||
# not testing a realistic scenario.
|
||||
test_expect_success REFFILES 'for_each_reflog()' '
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/logs/PSEUDO-MAIN &&
|
||||
mkdir -p .git/logs/refs/bisect &&
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/logs/refs/bisect/random &&
|
||||
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/worktrees/wt/logs/PSEUDO-WT &&
|
||||
mkdir -p .git/worktrees/wt/logs/refs/bisect &&
|
||||
echo $ZERO_OID > .git/worktrees/wt/logs/refs/bisect/wt-random &&
|
||||
|
||||
$RWT for-each-reflog | cut -d" " -f 2- | sort >actual &&
|
||||
cat >expected <<-\EOF &&
|
||||
HEAD 0x1
|
||||
PSEUDO-WT 0x0
|
||||
refs/bisect/wt-random 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/main 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/wt-main 0x0
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
test_cmp expected actual &&
|
||||
|
||||
$RMAIN for-each-reflog | cut -d" " -f 2- | sort >actual &&
|
||||
cat >expected <<-\EOF &&
|
||||
HEAD 0x1
|
||||
PSEUDO-MAIN 0x0
|
||||
refs/bisect/random 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/main 0x0
|
||||
refs/heads/wt-main 0x0
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
test_cmp expected actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_done
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue