blame: improve diagnosis for "--reverse NEW"

"git blame --reverse OLD..NEW -- PATH" tells us to start from the
contents in PATH at OLD and observe how each line is changed while
the history develops up to NEW, and report for each line the latest
commit up to which the line survives in the original form.

If you say "git blame --reverse NEW -- PATH" by mistake, we complain
about the missing OLD, but we phrased it as "No commit to dig down
to?"  In this case, however, we are digging up from OLD, so say so.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2016-06-14 10:46:06 -07:00
parent 0b65a8dbdb
commit d993ce1ed2
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
[verse]
'git blame' [-c] [-b] [-l] [--root] [-t] [-f] [-n] [-s] [-e] [-p] [-w] [--incremental]
[-L <range>] [-S <revs-file>] [-M] [-C] [-C] [-C] [--since=<date>]
[--progress] [--abbrev=<n>] [<rev> | --contents <file> | --reverse <rev>]
[--progress] [--abbrev=<n>] [<rev> | --contents <file> | --reverse <rev>..<rev>]
[--] <file>
DESCRIPTION

View file

@ -2466,14 +2466,14 @@ static char *prepare_initial(struct scoreboard *sb)
if (obj->type != OBJ_COMMIT)
die("Non commit %s?", revs->pending.objects[i].name);
if (sb->final)
die("More than one commit to dig down to %s and %s?",
die("More than one commit to dig up from, %s and %s?",
revs->pending.objects[i].name,
final_commit_name);
sb->final = (struct commit *) obj;
final_commit_name = revs->pending.objects[i].name;
}
if (!final_commit_name)
die("No commit to dig down to?");
die("No commit to dig up from?");
return xstrdup(final_commit_name);
}