sparse-index.c: expand_to_path() can assume non-NULL "istate"

This function added in [1] was subsequently used in [2]. All of the
calls to it are in name-hash.c, and come after calls to
lazy_init_name_hash(istate). The first thing that function does is:

	if (istate->name_hash_initialized)
		return;

So we can already assume that we have a non-NULL "istate" here, or
we'd be segfaulting. Let's not confuse matters by making it appear
that's not the case.

1. 71f82d032f (sparse-index: expand_to_path(), 2021-04-12)
2. 4589bca829 (name-hash: use expand_to_path(), 2021-04-12)

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2023-01-12 13:55:24 +01:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 0dda3ac925
commit d2cdf2c285

View file

@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ void expand_to_path(struct index_state *istate,
if (in_expand_to_path)
return;
if (!istate || !istate->sparse_index)
if (!istate->sparse_index)
return;
if (!istate->repo)