filter-branch: subdirectory filter needs --full-history

When two branches are merged that modify a subdirectory (possibly in
different intermediate steps) such that both end up identical, then
rev-list chooses only one branch. But when we filter history, we want to
keep both branches. Therefore, we must use --full-history.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Sixt 2007-06-08 23:28:50 +02:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 813b4734fc
commit cfabd6eee1
2 changed files with 22 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ case "$filter_subdir" in
;;
*)
git-rev-list --reverse --topo-order --default HEAD \
--parents "$@" -- "$filter_subdir"
--parents --full-history "$@" -- "$filter_subdir"
esac > ../revs
commits=$(cat ../revs | wc -l | tr -d " ")

View file

@ -78,4 +78,25 @@ test_expect_success 'subdirectory filter result looks okay' '
! git show sub:subdir
'
test_expect_success 'setup and filter history that requires --full-history' '
git checkout master &&
mkdir subdir &&
echo A > subdir/new &&
git add subdir/new &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "subdir on master" subdir/new &&
git rm a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "again subdir on master" &&
git merge branch &&
git-filter-branch --subdirectory-filter subdir sub-master
'
test_expect_success 'subdirectory filter result looks okay' '
test 3 = $(git-rev-list -1 --parents sub-master | wc -w) &&
git show sub-master^:new &&
git show sub-master^2:new &&
! git show sub:subdir
'
test_done