[PATCH] read-tree: update documentation for 3-way merge.

This explains the new merge world order that formally assigns
specific meaning to each of three tree-ish command line
arguments.  It also mentions -u option

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2005-06-07 14:35:43 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent d4f8b390a4
commit ccef66b55a

View file

@ -9,16 +9,19 @@ git-read-tree - Reads tree information into the directory cache
SYNOPSIS
--------
'git-read-tree' (<tree-ish> | -m <tree-ish1> [<tree-ish2> <tree-ish3>])"
'git-read-tree' (<tree-ish> | [-m [-u]] <tree-ish1> [<tree-ish2> [<tree-ish3>]])
DESCRIPTION
-----------
Reads the tree information given by <tree> into the directory cache,
Reads the tree information given by <tree-ish> into the directory cache,
but does not actually *update* any of the files it "caches". (see:
git-checkout-cache)
Optionally, it can merge a tree into the cache or perform a 3-way
merge.
Optionally, it can merge a tree into the cache, perform a
fast-forward (i.e. 2-way) merge, or a 3-way merge, with the -m
flag. When used with -m, the -u flag causes it to also update
the files in the work tree with the result of the merge.
Trivial merges are done by "git-read-tree" itself. Only conflicting paths
will be in unmerged state when "git-read-tree" returns.
@ -26,7 +29,11 @@ will be in unmerged state when "git-read-tree" returns.
OPTIONS
-------
-m::
Perform a merge, not just a read
Perform a merge, not just a read.
-u::
After a successful merge, update the files in the work
tree with the result of the merge.
<tree-ish#>::
The id of the tree object(s) to be read/merged.
@ -34,10 +41,12 @@ OPTIONS
Merging
-------
If '-m' is specified, "git-read-tree" performs 2 kinds of merge, a single tree
merge if only 1 tree is given or a 3-way merge if 3 trees are
If '-m' is specified, "git-read-tree" can performs 3 kinds of
merge, a single tree merge if only 1 tree is given, a
fast-forward merge with 2 trees, or a 3-way merge if 3 trees are
provided.
Single Tree Merge
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If only 1 tree is specified, git-read-tree operates as if the user did not
@ -47,7 +56,7 @@ being read, the stat info from the cache is used. (In other words, the
cache's stat()s take precedence over the merged tree's)
That means that if you do a "git-read-tree -m <newtree>" followed by a
"git-checkout-cache -f -a", the "git-checkout-cache" only checks out
"git-checkout-cache -f -u -a", the "git-checkout-cache" only checks out
the stuff that really changed.
This is used to avoid unnecessary false hits when "git-diff-files" is
@ -166,23 +175,18 @@ merge. The different stages represent the "result tree" (stage 0, aka
"merged"), the original tree (stage 1, aka "orig"), and the two trees
you are trying to merge (stage 2 and 3 respectively).
In fact, the way "git-read-tree" works, it's entirely agnostic about how
you assign the stages, and you could really assign them any which way,
and the above is just a suggested way to do it (except since
"git-write-tree" refuses to write anything but stage0 entries, it makes
sense to always consider stage 0 to be the "full merge" state).
So what happens? Try it out. Select the original tree, and two trees
to merge, and look how it works:
The order of stages 1, 2 and 3 (hence the order of three
<tree-ish> command line arguments) are significant when you
start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already
populated. Here is an outline of how the algorithm works:
- if a file exists in identical format in all three trees, it will
automatically collapse to "merged" state by the new git-read-tree.
automatically collapse to "merged" state by git-read-tree.
- a file that has _any_ difference what-so-ever in the three trees
will stay as separate entries in the index. It's up to "script
policy" to determine how to remove the non-0 stages, and insert a
merged version. But since the index is always sorted, they're easy
to find: they'll be clustered together.
merged version.
- the index file saves and restores with all this information, so you
can merge things incrementally, but as long as it has entries in
@ -201,11 +205,49 @@ to merge, and look how it works:
matching "stage1" entry if it exists too. .. all the normal
trivial rules ..
Incidentally - it also means that you don't even have to have a
separate subdirectory for this. All the information literally is in
the index file, which is a temporary thing anyway. There is no need to
worry about what is in the working directory, since it is never shown
and never used.
You would normally use "git-merge-cache" with supplied
"git-merge-one-file-script" to do this last step. The script
does not touch the files in the work tree, and the entire merge
happens in the index file. In other words, there is no need to
worry about what is in the working directory, since it is never
shown and never used.
When you start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already
populated, it is assumed that it represents the state of the
files in your work tree, and you can even have files with
changes unrecorded in the index file. It is further assumed
that this state is "derived" from the stage 2 tree. The 3-way
merge refuses to run if it finds an entry in the original index
file that does not match stage 2.
This is done to prevent you from losing your work-in-progress
changes. To illustrate, suppose you start from what has been
commited last to your repository:
$ JC=`cat .git/HEAD`
$ git-checkout-cache -f -u -a $JC
You do random edits, without running git-update-cache. And then
you notice that the tip of your "upstream" tree has advanced
since you pulled from him:
$ git-fetch-script rsync://.... linus
$ LT=`cat .git/MERGE_HEAD`
Your work tree is still based on your HEAD ($JC), but you have
some edits since. Three-way merge makes sure that you have not
added or modified cache entries since $JC, and if you haven't,
then does the right thing. So with the following sequence:
$ git-read-tree -m -u `git-merge-base $JC $LT` $JC $LT
$ git-merge-cache git-merge-one-file-script -a
$ echo "Merge with Linus" | \
git-commit-tree `git-write-tree` -p $JC -p $LT
what you would commit is a pure merge between $JC and LT without
your work-in-progress changes, and your work tree would be
updated to the result of the merge.
See Also
--------