documentation: merge-base: explain "git merge-base" with more than 2 args

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2008-07-30 07:04:43 +02:00
parent 53eda89b2f
commit 99f1c04be0

View file

@ -8,26 +8,81 @@ git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge
SYNOPSIS SYNOPSIS
-------- --------
'git merge-base' [--all] <commit> <commit> 'git merge-base' [--all] <commit> <commit>...
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
----------- -----------
'git-merge-base' finds as good a common ancestor as possible between 'git-merge-base' finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use
the two commits. That is, given two commits A and B, `git merge-base A in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is 'better' than another common
B` will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor
the parent relationship. that does not have any better common ancestor than it is a 'best common
ancestor', i.e. a 'merge base'. Note that there can be more than one
merge bases between two commits.
Given a selection of equally good common ancestors it should not be Among the two commits to compute their merge bases, one is specified by
relied on to decide in any particular way. the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a
(possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining
The 'git-merge-base' algorithm is still in flux - use the source... commits on the command line. As the most common special case, giving only
two commits from the command line means computing the merge base between
the given two commits.
OPTIONS OPTIONS
------- -------
--all:: --all::
Output all common ancestors for the two commits instead of Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one.
just one.
DISCUSSION
----------
Given two commits 'A' and 'B', `git merge-base A B` will output a commit
which is reachable from both 'A' and 'B' through the parent relationship.
For example, with this topology:
o---o---o---B
/
---o---1---o---o---o---A
the merge base between 'A' and 'B' is '1'.
Given three commits 'A', 'B' and 'C', `git merge-base A B C` will compute the
merge base between 'A' and an hypothetical commit 'M', which is a merge
between 'B' and 'C'. For example, with this topology:
o---o---o---o---C
/
/ o---o---o---B
/ /
---2---1---o---o---o---A
the result of `git merge-base A B C` is '1'. This is because the
equivalent topology with a merge commit 'M' between 'B' and 'C' is:
o---o---o---o---o
/ \
/ o---o---o---o---M
/ /
---2---1---o---o---o---A
and the result of `git merge-base A M` is '1'. Commit '2' is also a
common ancestor between 'A' and 'M', but '1' is a better common ancestor,
because '2' is an ancestor of '1'. Hence, '2' is not a merge base.
When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one
'best' common ancestors between two commits. For example, with this
topology:
---1---o---A
\ /
X
/ \
---2---o---o---B
both '1' and '2' are merge-base of A and B. Neither one is better than
the other (both are 'best' merge base). When `--all` option is not given,
it is unspecified which best one is output.
Author Author
------ ------