1
0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git synced 2024-06-30 22:54:27 +00:00

t3060: fix mention of function prune_index

Commit [1] added tests which trigger function prune_cache.  The comments
in these tests, however, incorrectly call it "prune_path".  Since then,
function "prune_cache" has been renamed to "prune_index" in commit [2].
Later still in commit [3], the_index singleton, which is also mentioned
in a comment, stopped being used directly with function "prune_index".

Fix mentions of function "prune_index" and the struct it changes in
comments in file "t3060-ls-files-with-tree.sh".

[1] 54e1abce90 (Add test case for ls-files --with-tree, 2007-10-03)
[2] 6510ae173a (ls-files: convert prune_cache to take an index,
    2017-06-12)
[3] 188dce131f (ls-files: use repository object, 2017-06-22)

Signed-off-by: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andrei Rybak 2023-03-31 16:36:03 +02:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 6369acd968
commit 993d7085be

View File

@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
git commit -a -m "remove them all" &&
# The bug also requires some entry before our directory so that
# prune_path will modify the_index.cache
# prune_index will modify the_repository->index.cache
mkdir a_directory_that_sorts_before_sub &&
>a_directory_that_sorts_before_sub/file &&
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ test_expect_success 'usage' '
'
test_expect_success 'git ls-files --with-tree should succeed from subdir' '
# We have to run from a sub-directory to trigger prune_path
# We have to run from a sub-directory to trigger prune_index
# Then we finally get to run our --with-tree test
(
cd sub &&