diff --git a/builtin/ls-remote.c b/builtin/ls-remote.c index 70f5622d9d..8ee91eb547 100644 --- a/builtin/ls-remote.c +++ b/builtin/ls-remote.c @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ #include "remote.h" static const char ls_remote_usage[] = -"git ls-remote [--heads] [--tags] [-u | --upload-pack ] ..."; +"git ls-remote [--heads] [--tags] [-u | --upload-pack ]\n" +" [ [...]]"; /* * Is there one among the list of patterns that match the tail part @@ -73,9 +74,6 @@ int cmd_ls_remote(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) break; } - if (!dest) - usage(ls_remote_usage); - if (argv[i]) { int j; pattern = xcalloc(sizeof(const char *), argc - i + 1); @@ -87,6 +85,11 @@ int cmd_ls_remote(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) } } remote = remote_get(dest); + if (!remote) { + if (dest) + die("bad repository '%s'", dest); + die("No remote configured to list refs from."); + } if (!remote->url_nr) die("remote %s has no configured URL", dest); transport = transport_get(remote, NULL); diff --git a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh index 1dd8eed5bb..3cf1b3da40 100755 --- a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh +++ b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh @@ -49,4 +49,62 @@ test_expect_success 'ls-remote self' ' ' +test_expect_success 'dies when no remote specified and no default remotes found' ' + + test_must_fail git ls-remote + +' + +test_expect_success 'use "origin" when no remote specified' ' + + git remote add origin "$(pwd)/.git" && + git ls-remote >actual && + test_cmp expected.all actual + +' + +test_expect_success 'use branch..remote if possible' ' + + # + # Test that we are indeed using branch..remote, not "origin", even + # though the "origin" remote has been set. + # + + # setup a new remote to differentiate from "origin" + git clone . other.git && + ( + cd other.git && + echo "$(git rev-parse HEAD) HEAD" + git show-ref | sed -e "s/ / /" + ) >exp && + + git remote add other other.git && + git config branch.master.remote other && + + git ls-remote >actual && + test_cmp exp actual + +' + +cat >exp <" to work; ls-remote, correctly, + # confuses for . Although ugly, this behaviour is akin + # to the confusion of refspecs for remotes by git-fetch and git-push, + # eg: + # + # $ git fetch branch + # + + # We could just as easily have used "master"; the "*" emphasizes its + # role as a pattern. + test_must_fail git ls-remote refs*master >actual 2>&1 && + test_cmp exp actual + +' + test_done